Return to Video

What if 3D printing was 100x faster?

  • 0:01 - 0:03
    I'm thrilled to be here tonight
  • 0:03 - 0:05
    to share with you something
    we've been working on
  • 0:05 - 0:07
    for over two years,
  • 0:07 - 0:10
    and it's in the area
    of additive manufacturing,
  • 0:10 - 0:13
    also known as 3D printing.
  • 0:13 - 0:14
    You see this object here.
  • 0:14 - 0:18
    It looks fairly simple,
    but it's quite complex at the same time.
  • 0:19 - 0:22
    It's a set of concentric
    geodesic structures
  • 0:22 - 0:25
    with linkages between each one.
  • 0:25 - 0:31
    In its context, it is not manufacturable
    by traditional manufacturing techniques.
  • 0:31 - 0:35
    It has a symmetry such
    that you can't injection mold it.
  • 0:35 - 0:39
    You can't even manufacture it
    through milling.
  • 0:39 - 0:42
    This is a job for a 3D printer,
  • 0:42 - 0:47
    but most 3D printers would take between
    three and 10 hours to fabricate it,
  • 0:47 - 0:51
    and we're going to take the risk tonight
    to try to fabricate it onstage
  • 0:51 - 0:53
    during this 10-minute talk.
  • 0:53 - 0:55
    Wish us luck.
  • 0:56 - 1:00
    Now, 3D printing is actually a misnomer.
  • 1:00 - 1:03
    It's actually 2D printing
    over and over again,
  • 1:04 - 1:08
    and it in fact uses the technologies
    associated with 2D printing.
  • 1:08 - 1:13
    Think about inkjet printing where you
    lay down ink on a page to make letters,
  • 1:13 - 1:18
    and then do that over and over again
    to build up a three-dimensional object.
  • 1:18 - 1:20
    In microelectronics, they use something
  • 1:20 - 1:23
    called lithography to do
    the same sort of thing,
  • 1:23 - 1:25
    to make the transistors
    and integrated circuits
  • 1:25 - 1:27
    and build up a structure several times.
  • 1:27 - 1:29
    These are all 2D printing technologies.
  • 1:30 - 1:34
    Now, I'm a chemist,
    a material scientist too,
  • 1:34 - 1:37
    and my co-inventors
    are also material scientists,
  • 1:37 - 1:39
    one a chemist, one a physicist,
  • 1:39 - 1:42
    and we began to be
    interested in 3D printing.
  • 1:42 - 1:48
    And very often, as you know,
    new ideas are often simple connections
  • 1:48 - 1:51
    between people with different experiences
    in different communities,
  • 1:51 - 1:53
    and that's our story.
  • 1:54 - 1:56
    Now, we were inspired
  • 1:56 - 2:01
    by the "Terminator 2" scene for T-1000,
  • 2:01 - 2:06
    and we thought, why couldn't a 3D printer
    operate in this fashion,
  • 2:06 - 2:10
    where you have an object
    arise out of a puddle
  • 2:11 - 2:14
    in essentially real time
  • 2:14 - 2:16
    with essentially no waste
  • 2:16 - 2:18
    to make a great object?
  • 2:18 - 2:19
    Okay, just like the movies.
  • 2:19 - 2:23
    And could we be inspired by Hollywood
  • 2:23 - 2:26
    and come up with ways
    to actually try to get this to work?
  • 2:26 - 2:28
    And that was our challenge.
  • 2:28 - 2:32
    And our approach would be,
    if we could do this,
  • 2:32 - 2:36
    then we could fundamentally address
    the three issues holding back 3D printing
  • 2:36 - 2:38
    from being a manufacturing process.
  • 2:38 - 2:41
    One, 3D printing takes forever.
  • 2:41 - 2:46
    There are mushrooms that grow faster
    than 3D printed parts. (Laughter)
  • 2:47 - 2:49
    The layer by layer process
  • 2:49 - 2:52
    leads to defects
    in mechanical properties,
  • 2:52 - 2:56
    and if we could grow continuously,
    we could eliminate those defects.
  • 2:56 - 3:01
    And in fact, if we could grow really fast,
    we could also start using materials
  • 3:01 - 3:06
    that are self-curing,
    and we could have amazing properties.
  • 3:06 - 3:10
    So if we could pull this off,
    imitate Hollywood,
  • 3:10 - 3:13
    we could in fact address 3D manufacturing.
  • 3:15 - 3:18
    Our approach is to use
    some standard knowledge
  • 3:18 - 3:21
    in polymer chemistry
  • 3:21 - 3:27
    to harness light and oxygen
    to grow parts continuously.
  • 3:27 - 3:30
    Light and oxygen work in different ways.
  • 3:30 - 3:33
    Light can take a resin
    and convert it to a solid,
  • 3:33 - 3:35
    can convert a liquid to a solid.
  • 3:35 - 3:39
    Oxygen inhibits that process.
  • 3:39 - 3:42
    So light and oxygen
    are polar opposites from one another
  • 3:42 - 3:45
    from a chemical point of view,
  • 3:45 - 3:48
    and if we can control spatially
    the light and oxygen,
  • 3:48 - 3:50
    we could control this process.
  • 3:50 - 3:54
    And we refer to this as CLIP.
    [Continuous Liquid Interface Production.]
  • 3:54 - 3:56
    It has three functional components.
  • 3:56 - 4:00
    One, it has a reservoir
    that holds the puddle,
  • 4:00 - 4:02
    just like the T-1000.
  • 4:02 - 4:05
    At the bottom of the reservoir
    is a special window.
  • 4:05 - 4:06
    I'll come back to that.
  • 4:06 - 4:10
    In addition, it has a stage
    that will lower into the puddle
  • 4:10 - 4:12
    and pull the object out of the liquid.
  • 4:12 - 4:16
    The third component
    is a digital light projection system
  • 4:16 - 4:18
    underneath the reservoir,
  • 4:18 - 4:22
    illuminating with light
    in the ultraviolet region.
  • 4:22 - 4:25
    Now, the key is that this window
    in the bottom of this reservoir,
  • 4:25 - 4:28
    it's a composite,
    it's a very special window.
  • 4:28 - 4:32
    It's not only transparent to light
    but it's permeable to oxygen.
  • 4:32 - 4:34
    It's got characteristics
    like a contact lens.
  • 4:35 - 4:38
    So we can see how the process works.
  • 4:38 - 4:41
    You can start to see that
    as you lower a stage in there,
  • 4:41 - 4:45
    in a traditional process,
    with an oxygen-impermeable window,
  • 4:45 - 4:47
    you make a two-dimensional pattern
  • 4:48 - 4:51
    and you end up gluing that onto the window
    with a traditional window,
  • 4:51 - 4:55
    and so in order to introduce
    the next layer, you have to separate it,
  • 4:55 - 4:58
    introduce new resin, reposition it,
  • 4:58 - 5:01
    and do this process over and over again.
  • 5:01 - 5:03
    But with our very special window,
  • 5:03 - 5:07
    what we're able to do is,
    with oxygen coming through the bottom
  • 5:07 - 5:08
    as light hits it,
  • 5:09 - 5:12
    that oxygen inhibits the reaction,
  • 5:12 - 5:15
    and we form a dead zone.
  • 5:15 - 5:19
    This dead zone is on the order
    of tens of microns thick,
  • 5:19 - 5:22
    so that's two or three diameters
    of a red blood cell,
  • 5:22 - 5:25
    right at the window interface
    that remains a liquid,
  • 5:25 - 5:27
    and we pull this object up,
  • 5:27 - 5:29
    and as we talked about in a Science paper,
  • 5:29 - 5:34
    as we change the oxygen content,
    we can change the dead zone thickness.
  • 5:34 - 5:37
    And so we have a number of key variables
    that we control: oxygen content,
  • 5:37 - 5:40
    the light, the light intensity,
    the dose to cure,
  • 5:40 - 5:42
    the viscosity, the geometry,
  • 5:42 - 5:46
    and we use very sophisticated software
    to control this process.
  • 5:47 - 5:49
    The result is pretty staggering.
  • 5:49 - 5:53
    It's 25 to 100 times faster
    than traditional 3D printers,
  • 5:54 - 5:56
    which is game-changing.
  • 5:56 - 6:01
    In addition, as our ability
    to deliver liquid to that interface,
  • 6:01 - 6:04
    we can go 1,000 times faster I believe,
  • 6:04 - 6:08
    and that in fact opens up the opportunity
    for generating a lot of heat,
  • 6:08 - 6:12
    and as a chemical engineer,
    I get very excited at heat transfer
  • 6:12 - 6:16
    and the idea that we might one day
    have water-cooled 3D printers,
  • 6:16 - 6:18
    because they're going so fast.
  • 6:18 - 6:22
    In addition, because we're growing things,
    we eliminate the layers,
  • 6:22 - 6:24
    and the parts are monolithic.
  • 6:24 - 6:27
    You don't see the surface structure.
  • 6:27 - 6:29
    You have molecularly smooth surfaces.
  • 6:29 - 6:33
    And the mechanical properties
    of most parts made in a 3D printer
  • 6:33 - 6:38
    are notorious for having properties
    that depend on the orientation
  • 6:38 - 6:41
    with which how you printed it,
    because of the layer-like structure.
  • 6:41 - 6:44
    But when you grow objects like this,
  • 6:44 - 6:47
    the properties are invariant
    with the print direction.
  • 6:47 - 6:50
    These look like injection-molded parts,
  • 6:50 - 6:54
    which is very different
    than traditional 3D manufacturing.
  • 6:54 - 6:57
    In addition, we're able to throw
  • 6:57 - 7:01
    the entire polymer
    chemistry textbook at this,
  • 7:01 - 7:05
    and we're able to design chemistries
    that can give rise to the properties
  • 7:05 - 7:08
    you really want in a 3D-printed object.
  • 7:08 - 7:09
    (Applause)
  • 7:09 - 7:12
    There it is. That's great.
  • 7:14 - 7:18
    You always take the risk that something
    like this won't work onstage, right?
  • 7:18 - 7:21
    But we can have materials
    with great mechanical properties.
  • 7:21 - 7:23
    For the first time, we can have elastomers
  • 7:23 - 7:26
    that are high elasticity
    or high dampening.
  • 7:26 - 7:29
    Think about vibration control
    or great sneakers, for example.
  • 7:29 - 7:32
    We can make materials
    that have incredible strength,
  • 7:33 - 7:36
    high strength-to-weight ratio,
    really strong materials,
  • 7:36 - 7:39
    really great elastomers,
  • 7:39 - 7:41
    so throw that in the audience there.
  • 7:41 - 7:44
    So great material properties.
  • 7:44 - 7:47
    And so the opportunity now,
    if you actually make a part
  • 7:47 - 7:51
    that has the properties
    to be a final part,
  • 7:51 - 7:54
    and you do it in game-changing speeds,
  • 7:54 - 7:57
    you can actually transform manufacturing.
  • 7:57 - 8:00
    Right now, in manufacturing,
    what happens is,
  • 8:00 - 8:03
    the so-called digital thread
    in digital manufacturing.
  • 8:03 - 8:08
    We go from a CAD drawing, a design,
    to a prototype to manufacturing.
  • 8:08 - 8:10
    Often, the digital thread is broken
    right at prototype,
  • 8:10 - 8:13
    because you can't go
    all the way to manufacturing
  • 8:13 - 8:17
    because most parts don't have
    the properties to be a final part.
  • 8:17 - 8:19
    We now can connect the digital thread
  • 8:19 - 8:23
    all the way from design
    to prototyping to manufacturing,
  • 8:23 - 8:26
    and that opportunity
    really opens up all sorts of things,
  • 8:26 - 8:31
    from better fuel-efficient cars
    dealing with great lattice properties
  • 8:31 - 8:33
    with high strength-to-weight ratio,
  • 8:33 - 8:37
    new turbine blades,
    all sorts of wonderful things.
  • 8:37 - 8:43
    Think about if you need a stent
    in an emergency situation,
  • 8:43 - 8:47
    instead of the doctor pulling off
    a stent out of the shelf
  • 8:47 - 8:49
    that was just standard sizes,
  • 8:49 - 8:53
    having a stent that's designed
    for you, for your own anatomy
  • 8:53 - 8:55
    with your own tributaries,
  • 8:55 - 8:58
    printed in an emergency situation
    in real time out of the properties
  • 8:58 - 9:01
    such that the stent could go away
    after 18 months: really-game changing.
  • 9:01 - 9:06
    Or digital dentistry, and making
    these kinds of structures
  • 9:06 - 9:09
    even while you're in the dentist chair.
  • 9:09 - 9:12
    And look at the structures
    that my students are making
  • 9:12 - 9:14
    at the University of North Carolina.
  • 9:14 - 9:16
    These are amazing microscale structures.
  • 9:16 - 9:19
    You know, the world is really good
    at nano-fabrication.
  • 9:19 - 9:24
    Moore's Law has driven things
    from 10 microns and below.
  • 9:24 - 9:25
    We're really good at that,
  • 9:25 - 9:29
    but it's actually very hard to make things
    from 10 microns to 1,000 microns,
  • 9:29 - 9:31
    the mesoscale.
  • 9:31 - 9:34
    And subtractive techniques
    from the silicon industry
  • 9:34 - 9:36
    can't do that very well.
  • 9:36 - 9:37
    They can't etch wafers that well.
  • 9:37 - 9:39
    But this process is so gentle,
  • 9:39 - 9:42
    we can grow these objects
    up from the bottom
  • 9:42 - 9:44
    using additive manufacturing
  • 9:44 - 9:46
    and make amazing things
    in tens of seconds,
  • 9:46 - 9:48
    opening up new sensor technologies,
  • 9:48 - 9:50
    new drug delivery techniques,
  • 9:50 - 9:54
    new lab-on-a-chip applications,
    really game-changing stuff.
  • 9:55 - 10:00
    So the opportunity of making
    a part in real time
  • 10:00 - 10:03
    that has the properties to be a final part
  • 10:03 - 10:06
    really opens up 3D manufacturing,
  • 10:06 - 10:09
    and for us, this is very exciting,
    because this really is owning
  • 10:09 - 10:16
    the intersection between hardware,
    software and molecular science,
  • 10:16 - 10:20
    and I can't wait to see what designers
    and engineers around the world
  • 10:20 - 10:22
    are going to be able to do
    with this great tool.
  • 10:22 - 10:25
    Thanks for listening.
  • 10:25 - 10:30
    (Applause)
Title:
What if 3D printing was 100x faster?
Speaker:
Joe DeSimone
Description:

What we think of as 3D printing, says Joseph DeSimone, is really just 2D printing over and over ... slowly. Onstage at TED2015, he unveils a bold new technique — inspired, yes, by Terminator 2 — that's 25 to 100 times faster, and creates smooth, strong parts. Could it finally help to fulfill the tremendous promise of 3D printing?

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Team:
closed TED
Project:
TEDTalks
Duration:
10:45

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions