-
I'd like to have you look at this pencil.
-
It's a thing. It's a legal thing.
-
And so are books you might have
or the cars that you own.
-
They're all legal things.
-
The great apes that you'll see behind me,
-
they too are legal things.
-
Now, I can do that to a legal thing.
-
I can do whatever I want
to my book or my car.
-
These great apes, you'll see.
-
The photographs are taken by a man
named James Mollison
-
who wrote a book called
"James & Other Apes."
-
And he tells in his book
how every single one them,
-
almost every one of them, is an orphan
-
who saw his mother and father
die before his eyes.
-
They're legal things.
-
So for centuries, there's been
a great legal wall
-
that separates legal things
from legal persons.
-
On one hand, legal things
are invisible to judges.
-
They don't count in law.
-
They don't have any legal rights.
-
They don't have
the capacity for legal rights.
-
They are the slaves.
-
On the other side of that legal wall
are the legal persons.
-
Legal persons are very visible to judges.
-
They count in law.
-
They may have many rights.
-
They have the capacity
for an infinite number of rights.
-
And they're the masters.
-
Right now, all non-human animals
-
are legal things.
-
All human beings are legal persons.
-
But being human and being a legal person
-
has never been, and is not today,
synonymous with a legal person.
-
Humans and legal persons
are not synonymous.
-
On the one side,
-
there have been many human beings
over the centuries
-
who have been legal things.
-
Slaves were legal things.
-
Women, children
-
were sometimes legal things.
-
Indeed, a great deal of civil rights
struggle over the last centuries
-
has been to punch a hole
through that wall
-
and begin to feed
-
these human things through the wall
and have them become legal persons.
-
Alas, that hole has closed up.
-
Now, on the other side are legal persons,
-
but they've never only been
limited to human beings.
-
There are, for example, there are many
legal persons who are not even alive.
-
In the United States, we're aware
of the fact that corporations
-
are legal persons.
-
In pre-independence India,
-
a court held that a Hindu idol
was a legal person,
-
that a mosque was a legal person.
-
In 2000, the Indian Supreme Court
-
held that the holy books
of the Sikh religion was a legal person,
-
and in 2012, just recently,
-
there was a treaty between
the indigenous peoples of New Zealand
-
and the crown, in which it was agreed
that a river was a legal person
-
who owned its own riverbed.
-
Now, I read Peter Singer's book in 1980,
-
when I had a full head
of lush, brown hair,
-
and indeed I was moved by it,
-
because I had become a lawyer because
I wanted to speak for the voiceless,
-
defend the defenseless,
-
and I'd never realized how voiceless
and defenseless the trillions,
-
billions of non-human animals are.
-
And I began to work
as an animal protection lawyer.
-
And by 1985, I realized that I
was trying to accomplish something
-
that was literally impossible,
-
the reason being that all of my clients,
-
all the animals whose interests
I was trying to defend,
-
were legal things. They were invisible.
-
It was not going to work, so I decided
-
that the only thing that was going to work
-
was they had, at least some of them,
-
had to also be moved through a hole
that we could open up again in that wall
-
and begin feeding the appropriate
non-human animals through that hole
-
onto the other side
of being legal persons.
-
Now, at that time, there was
very little known about or spoken about
-
about truly animal rights,
-
about the idea of having a legal person
or a legal rights for a non-human animal,
-
and I knew it was going to take a long time.
-
And so, in 1985, I figured that it
would take about 30 years
-
before we'd be able to even begin
a strategic litigation,
-
long-term campaign, in order to be able
to punch another hole through that wall.
-
It turned out that I was pessimistic,
-
that it only took 28.
-
So what we had to do in order
to begin was not only
-
to write law review articles
and teach classes, write books,
-
but we had to then begin
to get down to the nuts and bolts
-
of how you litigate that kind of case.
-
So one of the first things we needed to do
was figure out what a cause of action was,
-
a legal cause of action.
-
And a legal cause of action
is a vehicle that lawyers use
-
to put their arguments in front of courts.
-
It turns out there's
a very interesting case
-
that had been heard
almost 250 years ago in London
-
called Somerset v Stewart,
-
whereby a black slave
had used the legal system
-
and had moved from a legal thing
to a legal person.
-
I was so interested in it that I
eventually wrote an entire book about it.
-
James Somerset was an eight-year old boy
when he was kidnapped from West Africa.
-
He survived the Middle Passage,
-
and he was sold to a Scottish businessman
-
named Charles Stewart in Virginia.
-
Now, 20 years later, Stewart
brought James Somerset to London,
-
and after he got there, James decided
he was going to escape.
-
And so one of the first things he did
was to get himself baptized,
-
because he wanted to get
a set of godparents,
-
because to an 18th-century slave,
-
they knew that one of the major
responsibilities of godfathers
-
was to help you escape.
-
And so in the fall of 1771,
-
James Somerset had a confrontation
with Charles Stewart.
-
We don't know exactly what happened,
but then James dropped out of sight.
-
An enraged Charles Stewart
then hired slave catchers
-
to canvas the city of London,
-
find him, bring him
not back to Charles Stewart,
-
but to a ship, the Anna Marie,
-
that was floating in London Harbor,
-
and he was chained to the deck,
-
and the ship was to set sail for Jamaica
-
where James was to be sold
in the slave markets
-
and be doomed to the three-to-five years
of life that a slave had
-
harvesting sugar cane in Jamaica.
-
Well now, James's godparents
swung into action.
-
They approached the most powerful judge,
-
Lord Mansfield, who was Chief Judge
of the Court of King's Bench,
-
and they demanded that he issue
a common law write of habeus corpus
-
on behalf of James Somerset.
-
Now, the common law is the kind of law
that English-speaking judges can make
-
when they're not cabinned in
by statues or constitutions,
-
and a writ of habeus corpus
is called the Great Writ,
-
capital G, capital W,
-
and it's meant to protect any of us
who are detained against our will.
-
A writ of habeus corpus is issued.
-
The detainer is required
to bring the detainee in
-
and give a legally sufficient reason
for depriving him of his bodily liberty.
-
Well, Lord Mansfield has to make
a decision right off the bat,
-
because if James Somerset
was a legal thing,
-
he was not eligible
for a writ of habeus corpus,
-
only if he could be a legal person.
-
So Lord Mansfield decided
that he would assume,
-
without deciding, that James Somerset
was indeed a legal person,
-
and he issued the writ of habeus corpus,
and James's body was broad in
-
by the captain of the ship.
-
There were a series of hearings
over the next six months.
-
On June 22, 1772, Lord Mansfield
-
said that slavery was so odious,
and he used the word "odious,"
-
that the common law would not support it,
and he ordered James free.
-
At that moment, James Somerset
underwent a legal transubstantiation.
-
The free man who walked
out of the courtroom
-
looked exactly like the salve
who had walked in,
-
but as far as the law was concerned,
-
they had nothing whatsoever in common.
-
The next thing we did is that
the Nonhuman Rights Project,
-
which we founded, then began to look at
what kind of values and principles
-
do we want to put before the judges?
-
What values and principles
did they imbibe with their mother's milk,
-
were they taught in law school,
do they use every day,
-
do they believe with all their hearts?
And we chose liberty and equality.
-
Now, liberty right is the kind of right
to which you're entitled
-
because of how you're put together,
-
and a fundamental liberty right
protects the fundamental interest.
-
And the supreme interest in the common law
are the rights to autonomy
-
and self-determination.
-
So they are so powerful that
in a common law country,
-
if you go to a hospital and you refuse
life-saving medical treatment,
-
a judge will not order it forced upon you,
because they will respect
-
your self-determination and your autonomy.
-
Now, an equality right is the kind
of right to which you're entitled
-
because you resemble someone else
in a relevant way,
-
and there's the rub, relevant way.
-
So if you are that, then because
they have the right, you're like them,
-
you're entitled to the right.
-
Now, courts and legislatures
draw lines all the time.
-
Some are included, some are excluded.
-
But you have to, at the bare minimum,
-
that line has to be a reasonable means
to a legitimate end.
-
The Nonhuman Rights Project argues
that drawing a line in order
-
to enslave an autonomous
and self-determining being
-
like you're seeing behind me,
-
that that's a violation of equality.
-
We then searched through 80 jurisdictions,
-
it took us seven years,
to find a jurisdiction
-
that we wanted to begin
filing our first suit.
-
We chose the State of New York.
-
Then we decided upon
who our plaintiffs are going to be.
-
We decided upon chimpanzees,
-
not just because Jane Goodall
was on our board of directors,
-
but because they, Jane and others,
have studied chimpanzees
-
intensively for decades.
-
We know the extraordinary
cognitive capabilities that they have,
-
and they also resemble the kind
that human beings have.
-
And so we chose chimpanzees,
and we began to then canvas the world
-
to find the experts
in chimpanzee cognition.
-
We found them in Japan, Sweden, Germany,
Scotland, England, and the United States,
-
and amongst them, they wrote
100 pages of affidavits
-
in which they set out more than 40 ways
-
in which their complex
cognitive capability,
-
either individually or together,
-
all added up to autonomy
and self-determination.
-
Now, these included, for example,
that they were conscious.
-
But they're also conscious
that they're conscious.
-
They know they have a mind.
They know that others have a mind.
-
They know they're individuals,
and that they can live.
-
They understand that they lived yesterday
and they will live tomorrow.
-
They engage in mental time travel.
They remember what happened yesterday.
-
They can anticipate tomorrow,
-
which is why it's so terrible
to imprison a chimpanzee,
-
especially alone: it's the things
that we do to our worst criminals,
-
and we do that to chimpanzees
without even thinking about it.
-
They have some kind of moral capacity.
-
When they play economic games
with human beings,
-
they'll spontaneously make fair offers,
even when they're not required to do so.
-
They are numerate.
They understand numbers.
-
They can do some simple math.
-
They can engage in language or,
to stay out of the language wars,
-
they're involved in intentional
and referential communication
-
in which they pay attention
to the attitudes of those
-
with whom they are speaking.
-
They have culture.
-
They have a material culture,
a social culture.
-
They have a symbolic culture.
-
Scientists in the Taï Forests
in the Ivory Coast
-
found chimpanzees who were using
these rocks to smash open
-
the incredibly hard hulls of nuts.
-
It takes a long time
to learn how to do that,
-
and they excavated the area
and they found
-
that this material culture,
this way of doing it,
-
these rocks, had passed down
for at least 4,300 years
-
through 225 chimpanzee generations.
-
So now we needed to find our chimpanzee.
-
Our chimpanzee,
-
first we found two of them
in the State of New York.
-
Both of them would die before
we could even get our suits filed.
-
Then we found Tommy.
-
Tommy is a chimpanzee.
You see him behind me.
-
Tommy was a chimpanzee.
We found him in that cage.
-
We found him in a small room
that was filled with cages
-
in a larger warehouse structure
on a used trailer lot
-
in central New York.
-
We found Kiko, who is partially deaf.
-
Kiko was in the back of a cement
storefront in western Massachusetts.
-
And we found Hercules and Leo.
-
They're two young male chimpanzees
being used for biomedical,
-
anatomical research at Stonybrook.
-
we found them.
-
And so on the last week of December, 2013,
-
the Nonhuman Rights Project
filed three suits
-
all across the State of New York
-
using the same common law
writ of habeus corpus argument
-
that had been used with James Somerset,
-
and we demanded that the judges issue
-
these common law writs of habeus corpus.
-
We wanted the chimpanzees out,
-
and we wanted them brought
to Save the Chimps,
-
a tremendous chimpanzee
sanctuary in South Florida
-
which involves an artificial lake
with 12 or 13 islands.
-
There are two or three acres where
two dozen chimpanzees live on each of them.
-
And these chimpanzees would then live
the life of a chimpanzee,
-
with other chimpanzees in an environment
that was as close to Africa as possible.
-
Now, all these cases are still going on.
-
We have not yet run into
our Lord Mansfield.
-
We shall. We shall.
-
This is a long-term strategic
litigation campaign. We shall.
-
And to quote Winston Churchill,
the way we view our cases is that
-
they're not the end,
-
they're not even the beginning of the end,
-
but they are perhaps
-
the end of the beginning.
-
Thank you.
-
(Applause)