-
Five years ago, I was a Ph.D student
-
living two lives.
-
In one, I used NASA supercomputers
-
to design next generation spacecraft,
-
and in the other I was a data scientist
-
looking for potential smugglers
-
of sensitive nuclear technologies.
-
As a data scientist, I did a lot of analyses,
-
mostly of facilities,
-
industrial facilities around the world.
-
And I was always looking for a better canvas
-
to tie these all together.
-
And one day, I was thinking about how
-
all data has a location,
-
and I realized that the answer
-
had been staring me in the face.
-
Although I was a satellite engineer,
-
I hadn't thought about using satellite imagery
-
in my work.
-
Now like most of us, I'd been online,
-
I'd see my house, so I thought,
-
I'll hop in there and I'll start looking up
-
some of these facilities.
-
And what I found really surprised me.
-
The pictures that I was finding
-
were years out of date,
-
and because of that,
-
it had relatively little relevance
-
to the work that I was doing today.
-
But I was intrigued.
-
I mean, satellite imagery is pretty amazing stuff.
-
There are millions and millions of sensors
-
surrounding us today,
-
but there's still so much we
don't know on a daily basis.
-
How much oil is stored in all of China?
-
How much corn is being produced?
-
How many ships are in all of our world's ports?
-
Now, in theory, all of these questions
-
could be answered by imagery,
-
but not if it's old.
-
And if this data was so valuable,
-
then how come I couldn't get my hands
-
on more recent pictures?
-
So the story begins over 50 years ago
-
with the launch of the first generation
-
of U.S. government photo reconnaissance satellites.
-
And today, there's a handful
-
of the great, great grandchildren
-
of these early cold war machines
-
which are now operated by private companies
-
and from which the vast majority of satellite imagery
-
that you and I see on a daily basis comes.
-
During this period, launching things into space,
-
just the rocket to get the satellite up there,
-
has cost hundreds of millions of dollars each,
-
and that's created tremendous pressure
-
to launch things infrequently
-
and to make sure that when you do,
-
you cram as much functionality in there as possible.
-
All of this has only made satellites
-
bigger and bigger and bigger
-
and more expensive,
-
now nearly a billion, with a b, dollars per copy.
-
Because they are so expensive,
-
there aren't very many of them.
-
Because there aren't very many of them,
-
the pictures that we see on a daily basis
-
tend to be old.
-
I think a lot of people actually
understand this anecdotally,
-
but in order to visualize just how sparsely
-
our planet is collected,
-
some friends and I put together a data set
-
of the 30 million pictures that have been gathered
-
by these satellites between 2000 and 2010.
-
As you can see in blue, huge areas of our world
-
are barely seen, less than once a year,
-
and even the areas that are seen most frequently,
-
those in red, are seen at best once a quarter.
-
Now as aerospace engineering grad students,
-
this chart cried out to us as a challenge.
-
Why do these things have to be so expensive?
-
Does a single satellite really have to cost
-
the equivalent of three 747 jumbo jets?
-
Wasn't there a way to build a smaller,
-
simpler, new satellite design that could enable
-
more timely imaging?
-
Now I realize that it does sound a little bit crazy
-
that we were going to go out and just
-
begin designing satellites,
-
but fortunately we had help.
-
In the late 1990s, a couple of professors
-
proposed a concept for radically reducing the price
-
of putting things in space.
-
This was hitchhiking small satellites
-
alongside much larger satellite.
-
This dropped the cost of putting objects up there
-
by over a factor of 100,
-
and suddenly we could afford to experiment,
-
to take a little bit of risk,
-
and to realize a lot of innovation.
-
And a new generation of engineers and scientists,
-
mostly out of universities,
-
began launching these very small,
-
breadbox-sized satellites called CubeSats.
-
And these were built with electronics obtained
-
from RadioShack instead of Lockheed Martin.
-
Now it was using the lessons
learned from these early missions
-
that my friends and I began a series of sketches
-
of our own satellite design.
-
And, you know, I can't remember a specific day
-
where we made, like, a conscious decision
-
that we were actually going to
go out and build these things,
-
but it was just, once we got that idea in our minds
-
of the world as a data set,
-
of being able to capture millions of data points
-
on a daily basis, describing the global economy,
-
of being able to unearth billions of connections
-
between them that had never before been found,
-
it just seemed boring
-
to go work on anything else.
-
And so we moved into a cramped,
-
windowless office in Palo Alto,
-
and began working to take our design
-
from the drawing board into the lab.
-
Now the first major question we had to tackle
-
was just how big to build this thing.
-
In space, size drives cost,
-
and we had worked with these very small,
-
breadbox-sized satellites in school,
-
but as we began to better
understand the laws of physics,
-
we found that the quality of pictures
-
those satellites could take was very limited,
-
because the laws of physics dictate
-
that the best picture you
can take through a telescope
-
is a function of the diameter of that telescope,
-
and these satellites had a very small,
-
very constrained volume.
-
And we found that the best picture we would
-
have been able to get looked something like this.
-
And although this was the low-cost option,
-
quite frankly it was just too blurry
-
to see the things that make
satellite imagery valuable.
-
So about three or four weeks later,
-
we met a group of engineers randomly
-
who had worked on the first
-
private imaging satellite ever developed,
-
and they told us that back in the 1970s,
-
the U.S. government had found a powerful
-
optimal tradeoff,
-
that in taking pictures at right
about one meter resolution,
-
being able to see objects one meter in size,
-
they found that they could not
just get very high quality images,
-
but get a lot of them at an affordable price.
-
From our own computer simulations,
-
we quickly found that one meter really was
-
the minimum viable product
-
to be able to see the drivers of our global economy,
-
for the first time, being able to count
-
the ships and cars and shipping
containers and trucks
-
that move around our world on a daily basis,
-
while conveniently still not
being able to see individuals.
-
We had found our compromise.
-
We would have to build something larger
-
than the original breadbox,
-
now more like a mini-fridge,
-
but we still wouldn't have to build a pickup truck.
-
So now we had our constraint.
-
The laws of physics dictated
-
the absolute minimum-sized
telescope that we could build.
-
What came next was making the rest of the satellite
-
as small and as simple as possible,
-
basically a flying telescope with four walls
-
and a set of electronics smaller than a phone book
-
that used less power than a 100 watt light bulb.
-
The big challenge became actually taking
-
the pictures through that telescope.
-
Traditional imaging satellites use a line scanner,
-
similar to a Xerox machine,
-
and as they traverse the earth, they take pictures,
-
scanning row by row by row
-
to build the complete image.
-
Now people use these because they get a lot of light,
-
which means less of the noise you see
-
in a low-cost cell phone image.
-
The problem with them is they require
-
very sophisticated pointing.
-
You have to stay focused on a 50-centimeter target
-
from over 600 miles away
-
while moving at more than
seven kilometers a second,
-
which requires an awesome degree of complexity.
-
So instead, we turned to a new
generation of video sensors,
-
originally created for use in night vision goggles.
-
Instead of taking a single, high quality image,
-
we could take a videostream
-
of individually noisier frames,
-
but then we could recombine
-
all of those frames together
-
into very high quality images
-
using sophisticated pixel processing techniques
-
here on the ground,
-
at a cost of one one-hundredth a traditional system.
-
And we applied this technique
-
to many of the other systems on the satellite as well,
-
and day by day, our design evolved
-
from cad to prototypes
-
to production units.
-
A few short weeks ago,
-
we packed up SkySat 1,
-
put our signatures on it,
-
and waved goodbye for the last time on earth.
-
Today, it's sitting in its final launch configuration
-
ready to blast off in a few short weeks.
-
And soon, we'll turn our attention to launching
-
a constellation of 24 or more of these satellites
-
and beginning to build the scalable analytics
-
that will allow us to unearth the insights
-
in the pedabytes of data we will collect.
-
So why do all of this? Why build these satellites?
-
Well, it turns out imaging satellites
-
have a unique ability to provide global transparency,
-
and providing that transparency on a timely basis
-
is simply an idea whose time has come.
-
We see ourselves as pioneers of a new frontier,
-
and beyond economic data,
-
unlocking the human story, moment by moment.
-
For a data scientist
-
that just happened to go to space camp as a kid,
-
it just doesn't get much better than that.
-
Thank you.
-
(Applause)