-
You probably don't know me,
-
but I am one of those .01 percenters
-
that you hear about and read about,
-
and I am by any reasonable definition a plutocrat.
-
And tonight, what I would like to do is speak directly
-
to other plutocrats, to my people,
-
because it feels like it's time for us all
-
to have a chat.
-
Like most plutocrats, I too am a proud
-
and unapologetic capitalist.
-
I have founded, cofounded, or funded
-
over 30 companies across a range of industries.
-
I was the first non-family investor in Amazon.com.
-
I co-founded a company called Aquantive
-
that we sold to Microsoft for 6.4 billion dollars.
-
My friends and I, we own a bank.
-
I tell you this — (Laughter) —
-
unbelievable, right?
-
I tell you this to show
-
that my life is like most plutocrats.
-
I have a broad perspective on capitalism
-
and business,
-
and I have been rewarded obscenely for that
-
with a life that most of you all
-
can't even imagine:
-
multiple homes, a yacht, my own plane,
-
etc. etc. etc.
-
But let's be honest: I am not the
smartest person you've ever met.
-
I am certainly not the hardest working.
-
I was a mediocre student.
-
I'm not technical at all.
-
I can't write a word of code.
-
Truly, my success is the consequence
-
of spectacular luck,
-
of birth, of circumstance, and of timing.
-
But I am actually pretty good at a couple of things.
-
One, I have an unusually high tolerance for risk,
-
and the other is I have a good sense,
-
a good intuition about what will happen in the future,
-
and I think that that intuition about the future
-
is the essence of good entrepreneurship.
-
So what do I see in our future today,
-
you ask?
-
I see pitchforks,
-
as in angry mobs with pitchforks,
-
because while people like us plutocrats
-
are living beyond the dreams of avarice,
-
the other 99 percent of our fellow citizens
-
are falling farther and farther behind.
-
In 1980, the top one percent of Americans
-
shared about eight percent of national wealth,
-
while the bottom 50 percent of Americans
-
shared 18 percent.
-
Thirty years later, today, the top one percent
-
shares over 20 percent of national wealth,
-
while the bottom 50 percent of Americans
-
share 12 or 13.
-
If the trend continues,
-
the top one percent will share
-
over 30 percent of national wealth
-
in another 30 years,
-
while the bottom 50 percent of Americans
-
will share just six.
-
You see, the problem isn't that we have
-
some inequality.
-
Some inequality is necessary
-
for a high-functioning capitalist democracy.
-
The problem is that inequality
-
is at historic highs today
-
and it's getting worse every day,
-
and if wealth, power, and income
-
continue to concentrate
-
at the very tippy top,
-
our society will change
-
from a capitalist democracy
-
to a neo-feudalist rentier society
-
like 18th century France.
-
That was, you know, France
-
before the revolution
-
and the mobs with the pitchforks.
-
So I have a message for my fellow plutocrats
-
and zillionaires
-
and for anyone who lives
-
in a gated bubble world:
-
wake up.
-
Wake up. It cannot last.
-
Because if we do not do something
-
to fix the glaring economic inequities in our society,
-
the pitchforks will come for us,
-
for no free and open society can long sustain
-
this kind of rising economic inequality.
-
It has never happened. There are no examples.
-
You show me a highly unequal society,
-
and I will show you a police state
-
or an uprising.
-
The pitchforks will come for us
-
if we do not address this.
-
It's not a matter of if, it's when.
-
And it will be terrible when they come
-
for everyone,
-
but particularly for people like us plutocrats.
-
I know I must sound like some liberal do-gooder.
-
I'm not. I'm not making a moral argument
-
that economic inequality is wrong.
-
What I am arguing is that rising economic inequality
-
is stupid and ultimately self-defeating.
-
Rising inequality doesn't just increase our risks
-
from pitchforks,
-
but it's also terrible for business too.
-
So the model for us rich guys should be Henry Ford.
-
When Ford famously introduced the five dollar day,
-
which was twice the prevailing wage at the time,
-
he didn't just increase the productivity
-
of his factories,
-
he converted exploited autoworkers who were poor
-
into a thriving middle class who could now afford
-
to buy the products that they made.
-
Ford intuited what we now know is true,
-
that an economy is best understood as an ecosystem
-
and characterized by the same kinds
-
of feedback loops you find
-
in a natural ecosystem,
-
a feedback between customers and businesses.
-
Raising wages increases demand,
-
which increases hiring,
-
which in turn increases wages
-
and demand and profits,
-
and that virtuous cycle of increasing prosperity
-
is precisely what is missing
-
from today's economic recovery.
-
And this is why we need to put behind us
-
the trickle-down policies that so dominate
-
both political parties
-
and embrace something I call middle-out economics.
-
Middle-out economics rejects
-
the neoclassical economic idea
-
that economies are efficient, linear, mechanistic,
-
that they tend towards equilibrium and fairness,
-
and instead embraces the 21st century idea
-
that economies are complex, adaptive,
-
ecosystemic,
-
that they tend away from
equilibrium and toward inequality,
-
that they're not efficient at all
-
but are effective if well-managed.
-
This 21st-century perspective
-
allows you to clearly see that capitalism
-
does not work by effectively allocating
-
existing resources.
-
It works by effectively creating new solutions
-
to human problems.
-
The genius of capitalism
-
is that it is an evolutionary solution-finding system.
-
It rewards people for solving
other people's problems.
-
The difference between a poor society
-
and a rich society, obviously,
-
is the degree to which that society
-
has generated solutions in the form
-
of products for its citizens.
-
The sum of the solutions
-
that we have in our society
-
really is our prosperity, and this explains
-
why companies like Google and Amazon
-
and Microsoft and Apple
-
and the entrepreneurs who created those companies
-
have contributed so much
-
to our nation's prosperity.
-
This 21st century perspective
-
also makes clear
-
that what we think of as economic growth
-
is best understood as
-
the rate at which we solve problems.
-
But that rate is totally dependent upon
-
how many problem-solvers,
-
diverse, able problem-solvers we have,
-
and thus how many of our fellow citizens
-
actively participate,
-
both as entrepreneurs who can offer solutions,
-
and as customers who consume them.
-
But this maximizing participation thing
-
doesn't happen by accident.
-
It doesn't happen by itself.
-
It requires effort and investment,
-
which is why all
-
highly prosperous capitalist democracies
-
are characterized by massive investments
-
in the middle class and the infrastructure
-
that they depend on.
-
We plutocrats need to get this
-
trickle-down economics thing behind us,
-
this idea that the better we do,
-
the better everyone else will do.
-
It's not true. How could it be?
-
I earn a thousand times the median wage,
-
but I do not buy a thousand times as much stuff,
-
do I?
-
I actually bought two pairs of these pants,
-
what my partner Mike calls
-
my manager pants.
-
I could have bought 2,000 pairs,
-
but what would I do with them?
-
How many haircuts can I get?
-
How often can I go out to dinner?
-
No matter how wealthy a few plutocrats get,
-
we can never drive a great national economy.
-
Only a thriving middle class can do that.
-
"There's nothing to be done,"
-
my plutocrat friends might say.
-
"Henry Ford was in a different time."
-
Maybe we can't do some things.
-
Maybe we can do some things.
-
In June 19th, 2013,
-
Bloomberg published an article I wrote called
-
"The Capitalist’s Case for a $15 Minimum Wage."
-
The good people at Forbes Magazine,
-
among my biggest admirers,
-
called it "Nick Hanauer's near-insane proposal."
-
And yet, just 350 days
-
after that article was published,
-
Seattle's Mayor Ed Murray signed into law
-
an ordnance raising the minimum wage in Seattle
-
to 15 dollars an hour,
-
more than double
-
what the prevailing federal $7.25 rate is.
-
"How did this happen?"
-
reasonable people might ask.
-
It happened because a group of us
-
reminded the middle class
-
that they are the source
-
of growth an prosperity in capitalist economies.
-
We reminded them that when
workers have more money,
-
businesses have more customers,
-
and need more employees.
-
We reminded them that when businesses
-
pay workers a living wage,
-
taxpayers are relieved of the burden
-
of funding the poverty programs
-
like food stamps and medical assistance
-
and rent assistance
-
that those workers need.
-
We reminded them that low-wage workers
-
make terrible taxpayers,
-
and that when you raise the minimum wage
-
for all businesses,
-
all businesses benefit
-
yet all can compete.
-
Now the orthodox reaction, of course,
-
is raising the minimum wage costs jobs. Right?
-
Your politician's always echoing
-
that trickle down idea by saying things like,
-
"Well if you raise the price of employment,
-
guess what happens? You get less of it."
-
Are you sure?
-
Because there's some contravening evidence.
-
Since 1980, the wages of CEOs in our country
-
have gone from about 30 time the median wage
-
to 500 times.
-
That's raising the price of employment.
-
And yet, to my knowledge,
-
I have never seen a company
-
outsource its CEO's job, automate their job,
-
export the job to China.
-
In fact, we appear to be employing
-
more CEOs and senior managers than ever before.
-
So too for technology workers
-
and financial services workers,
-
who earn multiples of the median wage
-
and yet we employ more and more of them,
-
so clearly you can raise the price of employment
-
and get more of it.
-
I know that most people
-
think that the 15 dollar minimum wage
-
is this insane, risky economic experiment.
-
We disagree.
-
We believe that the 15 dollar minimum wage
-
in Seattle
-
is actually the continuation
-
of a logical economic policy.
-
It is allowing our city
-
to kick your city's ass.
-
Because, you see,
-
Washington State already has
-
the highest minimum wage
-
of any state in the nation.
-
We pay all workers $9.32,
-
which is almost 30 percent more
-
than the federal minimum of 7.25,
-
but crucially, 427 percent more
-
than the federal tipped minimum of 2.13.
-
If trickle down thinkers were right,
-
then Washington State should
have massive unemployment.
-
Seattle should be sliding into the ocean.
-
And yet, Seattle
-
is the fastest-growing big city in the country.
-
Washington State is generating small business jobs
-
at a higher rate than any other major state
-
in the nation.
-
The restaurant business in Seattle? Booming.
-
Why? Because the fundamental law of capitalism is,
-
when workers have more money,
-
businesses have more customers
-
and need more workers.
-
When restaurants pay restaurant workers enough
-
so that even they can afford to eat in restaurants,
-
that's not bad for the restaurant business.
-
That's good for it,
-
despite what some restauranteurs may tell you.
-
Is it more complicated than I'm making out?
-
Of course it is.
-
There are a lot of dynamics at play.
-
But can we please stop insisting
-
that if low-wage workers earn a little bit more,
-
unemployment will skyrocket
-
and the economy will collapse?
-
There is no evidence for it.
-
The most insidious thing
-
about trickle-down economics
-
is not the claim that if the rich get richer,
-
everyone is better off.
-
It is the claim made by those who oppose
-
any increase in the minimum wage
-
that if the poor get richer,
-
that will be bad for the economy.
-
This is nonsense.
-
So can we please dispense with this rhetoric
-
that says that rich guys like me
-
and my plutocrat friends
-
made our country?
-
We plutocrats know,
-
even if we don't like to admit it in public,
-
that if we had been born somewhere else,
-
not here in the United States,
-
we might well be just some dude standing barefoot
-
by the side of a dirt road selling fruit.
-
It's not that they don't have good
entrepreneurs in other places,
-
even very, very poor places.
-
It's just that that's all
-
that those entrepreneurs' customers can afford.
-
So here's an idea for a new kind of economics,
-
a new kind of politics
-
that I call new capitalism.
-
Let's acknowledge that capitalism
-
beats the alternatives,
-
but also that the more people we include,
-
both as entrepreneurs and as customers,
-
the better it works.
-
Let's by all means shrink the size of government,
-
but not by slashing the poverty programs,
-
but by ensuring that workers are paid enough
-
so that they actually don't need those programs.
-
Let's invest enough in the middle class
-
to make our economy fairer and more inclusive,
-
and by fairer, more truly competitive,
-
and by more truly competitive,
-
more able to generate the solutions
-
to human problems
-
that are the true drivers of growth and prosperity.
-
Capitalism is the greatest social technology
-
ever invented
-
for creating prosperity in human societies,
-
if it is well-managed,
-
but capitalism, because of the fundamental
-
multiplicative dynamics of complex systems,
-
tends towards, inexorably, inequality,
-
concentration, and collapse.
-
The work of democracies
-
is to maximize the inclusion of the many
-
in order to create prosperity,
-
not to enable the few to accumulate money.
-
Government does create prosperity and growth,
-
by creating the conditions that allow
-
both entrepreneurs and their customers
-
to thrive.
-
Balancing the power of capitalists like me
-
and workers isn't bad for capitalism.
-
It's essential to it.
-
Programs like a reasonable minimum wage,
-
affordable health care,
-
paid sick leave,
-
and the progressive taxation necessary
-
to pay for the important infrastructure
-
necessary for the middle class like education, R&D,
-
these are indispensable tools
-
shrewd capitalists should embrace
-
to drive growth, because no one benefits from it
-
like us.
-
Many economists would have you believe
-
that their field is an objective science.
-
I disagree, and I think that it is equally
-
a tool that humans use
-
to enforce and encode
-
our social and moral preferences and prejudices
-
about status and power,
-
which is why plutocrats like me
-
have always needed to find persuasive stories
-
to tell everyone else
-
about why our relative positions
-
are morally righteous and good for everyone:
-
like, we are indispensable, the job creators,
-
and you are not;
-
like, tax cuts for us create growth,
-
but investments in you
-
will balloon our debt
-
and bankrupt our great country;
-
that we matter;
-
that you don't.
-
For thousands of years, these stories were called
-
divine right.
-
Today, we have trickle-down economics.
-
How obviously, transparently self-serving
-
all of this is.
-
We plutocrats need to see
-
that the United States of America made us,
-
not the other way around;
-
that a thriving middle class is the source
-
of prosperity in capitalist economies,
-
not a consequence of it.
-
And we should never forget
-
that even the best of us in
the worst of circumstances
-
are barefoot by the side of a dirt road selling fruit.
-
Fellow plutocrats, I think it may be time for us
-
to recommit to our country,
-
to commit to a new kind of capitalism
-
which is both more inclusive and more effective,
-
a capitalism that will ensure
-
that America's economy remains
-
the most dynamic and prosperous in the world.
-
Let's secure the future for ourselves,
-
our children, and their children.
-
Or alternatively, we could do nothing,
-
hide in our gated communities
-
and private schools,
-
enjoy our planes and yachts
-
— they're fun —
-
and wait for the pitchforks.
-
Thank you.
-
(Applause)