Return to Video

Norway - Stina

  • 0:02 - 0:04
    Who are you and who are you in the movement?
  • 0:06 - 0:09
    My name is Stina Jakobsen.
  • 0:09 - 0:13
    I am coordinator for the Zeitgeist Movement here in Norway.
  • 0:17 - 0:22
    Concerning what I like to do;
  • 0:22 - 0:26
    I am taken with sustainability.
  • 0:26 - 0:29
    In my spare time I like to go out in the nature, I am very fond of skis.
  • 0:31 - 0:35
    I also enjoy very much to seek new knowledge.
  • 0:35 - 0:39
    Like to work on my habits, developing.
  • 0:39 - 0:42
    Search all the time for something that's better,
  • 0:42 - 0:44
    both in regards to myself and others.
  • 0:47 - 0:49
    Like to help others to,
  • 0:49 - 0:52
    to get a better life as well.
  • 0:53 - 0:56
    Yes, I think we'll stop there.
  • 1:00 - 1:04
    How did you join the movement?
  • 1:07 - 1:13
    For several years, I have seen various documentaries together with my beloved.
  • 1:16 - 1:22
    We have tried finding out a little concerning the different problems around in the world.
  • 1:22 - 1:26
    Before I met him, I wasn't overly occupied with that for a long time,
  • 1:26 - 1:30
    but when I was little, I was quite taken with...
  • 1:30 - 1:33
    Well, I saw that the world around me was not sustainable.
  • 1:34 - 1:36
    And thought that we can't be living in this way,
  • 1:37 - 1:42
    because that will only lead us off the cliff, but I saw noone around me do something about it, so,
  • 1:42 - 1:49
    eventually, I guess I just became one of the gang.
  • 1:49 - 1:53
    Deep down, though, I felt all along that there was something out of place
  • 1:53 - 1:57
    - with a fair share of the system we are living in, the society we are living in, so...
  • 2:00 - 2:05
    I began after a while to seek more information on my own too,
  • 2:06 - 2:10
    because in the beginning, I hadn't the time to hear too much about the problems around in the world,
  • 2:10 - 2:14
    because I like to focus on positive things and not listen to so much negative,
  • 2:15 - 2:22
    but in time I began to search a little myself and was, among other things,
  • 2:22 - 2:25
    on a debate forum on Dagbladet.no and there
  • 2:25 - 2:30
    there was someone who had posted a link toZeitgeist the Movie.
  • 2:31 - 2:35
    I saw that and found out that, wow: "This was a very nice",
  • 2:36 - 2:42
    what should I say? "compilation", of many videos I've seen before,
  • 2:46 - 2:52
    in addition to some new information which was very nicely put together and I thought that
  • 2:53 - 2:57
    it gave a fine summation of other information that I've seen but; again:
  • 2:58 - 3:02
    focus on the problems and no solutions.
  • 3:03 - 3:10
    Was very positively surprised when Zeitgeist Addendum came and presented Resource Based Economy.
  • 3:11 - 3:15
    Then it was as if a light had been turned on for me and my beloved both
  • 3:15 - 3:25
    and we were very positively surprised, because what they presented there was...
  • 3:25 - 3:28
    You could say the light had been turned on for us too.
  • 3:29 - 3:35
    We saw that what was explained about RBE was very logical.
  • 3:35 - 3:37
    We just saw how everything clicked, you could say.
  • 3:39 - 3:42
    Everything... Everything turned out true.
  • 3:42 - 3:47
    We saw the logic in the system.
  • 3:48 - 3:53
    Why did you join the movement?
  • 3:55 - 3:58
    When I found out that there was established a movement,
  • 3:58 - 4:03
    it must have been after Addendum..
  • 4:04 - 4:10
    There, the movie ended with saying "Join the movement" and, of course,
  • 4:10 - 4:13
    then we looked up the movement both I and my beloved and we registered there
  • 4:16 - 4:22
    on the international site and in a bit we found out there was a Norwegian domain established too.
  • 4:22 - 4:25
    So then we registered... Or... I registered there and, yeah,
  • 4:25 - 4:28
    well, there was not so much that
  • 4:28 - 4:31
    happened there but I had registered and
  • 4:31 - 4:32
    we didn't really do much more with it,
  • 4:32 - 4:36
    but we continued to seek information
  • 4:36 - 4:38
    and learn about new things
  • 4:38 - 4:42
    and eventually, we found out there had happened
  • 4:42 - 4:44
    a bit more in the movement and then
  • 4:44 - 4:49
    I started engaging a bit more again.
  • 4:50 - 4:57
    Why do you support the movement and a RBE?
  • 4:57 - 5:00
    I support the Zeitgeist movement
  • 5:00 - 5:06
    because the movement presents things,
  • 5:06 - 5:08
    you could say, a solution, that is
  • 5:08 - 5:12
    logical, to the worlds problems.
  • 5:12 - 5:16
    It's solution that can seem utopic to many,
  • 5:16 - 5:19
    that sounds very difficult, but at the same time,
  • 5:19 - 5:21
    I can't see another
  • 5:21 - 5:25
    solution that is better than that and
  • 5:25 - 5:29
    therefore, I just have to support that.
  • 5:29 - 5:33
    Can't really see any other possibility
  • 5:33 - 5:36
    except for that. I have previously
  • 5:36 - 5:41
    looked at various milieu organizations
  • 5:41 - 5:44
    and the things that they have
  • 5:44 - 5:48
    suggested or...
  • 5:48 - 5:49
    What they work with, and
  • 5:49 - 5:51
    when I check what they're doing.. they
  • 5:51 - 5:52
    don't seize on the foundational issues
  • 5:52 - 5:56
    in society, but that I think RBE does.
  • 5:56 - 5:58
    They suggest a transformation of the
  • 5:58 - 6:00
    society that will address the root
  • 6:00 - 6:04
    causes and that's, naturally, incredibly
  • 6:04 - 6:06
    difficult to achieve, but, I mean,
  • 6:06 - 6:08
    there's no arguing we have to try.
  • 6:08 - 6:10
    If it won't work, it won't work,
  • 6:10 - 6:12
    but then atleast... It's better to
  • 6:12 - 6:14
    come with something that is very extreme
  • 6:14 - 6:17
    and come a good stretch along the way,
  • 6:17 - 6:19
    than trying just a little and ending
  • 6:19 - 6:22
    up with a much poorer result.
  • 6:22 - 6:24
    Another thing, in regards to..
  • 6:24 - 6:27
    Well, if you're going to engage in politics... I
  • 6:27 - 6:32
    have never seen quite where I belong in
  • 6:32 - 6:33
    the politics and never found out about
  • 6:33 - 6:39
    it, because... The left has many good
  • 6:39 - 6:44
    principles; want more equality and
  • 6:44 - 6:46
    care more for the people, which I like,
  • 6:46 - 6:49
    but at the same time I think they're
  • 6:49 - 6:52
    very backwards when it comes to
  • 6:52 - 6:57
    innovation, development and that train of
  • 6:57 - 7:01
    thought, as concerning research and such.
  • 7:01 - 7:03
    I think it seems like the right has
  • 7:03 - 7:05
    got more of a grasp on that, so then
  • 7:05 - 7:07
    it's like: I like one thing here and
  • 7:07 - 7:09
    one thing there, but there's nothing that
  • 7:09 - 7:14
    represents what I want to accomplish
  • 7:14 - 7:17
    and further in society, but that the
  • 7:17 - 7:26
    Zeitgeist movement and RBE do.
  • 7:26 - 7:30
    Tell me a little about the history of the
  • 7:30 - 7:34
    movement in Norway, about the biggest
  • 7:34 - 7:37
    successes and the biggest problems, and
  • 7:37 - 7:40
    say a little, about the plans for the
  • 7:40 - 7:43
    future of it, in Norway.
  • 7:43 - 7:51
    The Norwegian web site, www.Zeitgeist.no,
  • 7:51 - 7:56
    was put up in 2009
  • 7:56 - 8:00
    and after a while people, started registering there, but
  • 8:00 - 8:02
    grabbing attention was a waiting game,
  • 8:02 - 8:07
    but lately there's been some more registered there.
  • 8:08 - 8:10
    When it comes to what has
  • 8:10 - 8:11
    happened in Norway..
  • 8:11 - 8:17
    There's been a few film screenings,
  • 8:17 - 8:18
    among others, one in Bergen
  • 8:18 - 8:20
    that was very successful, with a
  • 8:20 - 8:24
    theatre filled to the brim, but in Oslo,
  • 8:24 - 8:28
    we haven't seen the same response.
  • 8:28 - 8:30
    I don't live in Oslo myself,
  • 8:30 - 8:32
    so I can't really say.
  • 8:32 - 8:35
    Then there's been Z-day, which
  • 8:35 - 8:37
    I went to once, in Oslo.
  • 8:38 - 8:40
    Was last year, unless I'm mistaken.
  • 8:40 - 8:45
    There were some who showed, but not that many.
  • 8:46 - 8:49
    I traveled by plane from a different place in
  • 8:50 - 8:51
    the country and not really that much
  • 8:51 - 8:54
    happened to write home about. There was
  • 8:54 - 8:56
    a movie presentation and a little
  • 8:56 - 8:58
    discussion afterwards and that was all she
  • 8:58 - 9:00
    wrote, so I didn't really feel it made
  • 9:00 - 9:02
    the trip, but, uhm, I got to meet
  • 9:02 - 9:04
    some of the others, at any rate. The
  • 9:04 - 9:08
    success story in Norway? In regards to...
  • 9:08 - 9:13
    Zeitgeist: Moving Forward - that was
  • 9:13 - 9:14
    translated in just three weeks, by
  • 9:14 - 9:17
    a team of four-five people. which was a
  • 9:17 - 9:20
    rather big success, when you consider
  • 9:20 - 9:22
    it was done in no time at all, a lot
  • 9:22 - 9:25
    of work, quite a long film, and we
  • 9:25 - 9:29
    achieved good translations,
  • 9:29 - 9:31
    well I wasn't a part of that,
  • 9:31 - 9:36
    but those that did that did a very fine job.
  • 9:36 - 9:45
    Apart from that, we.. Let me think.
  • 9:49 - 9:53
    Yes, in regards to.. Something we managed
  • 9:53 - 9:56
    for the first time: a national meeting!
  • 9:56 - 9:59
    That's actually going on as we speak.
  • 9:59 - 10:02
    A three day national meeting that
  • 10:02 - 10:06
    started on friday evening and lasts all
  • 10:06 - 10:10
    the way to sunday afternoon.
  • 10:10 - 10:13
    It consist of, well, Friday we had planning and
  • 10:13 - 10:17
    meetings regarding Saturday, when
  • 10:17 - 10:19
    we would work promoting the movement,
  • 10:19 - 10:23
    so today we have been walking
  • 10:23 - 10:25
    in the streets, we put a stand, we
  • 10:25 - 10:30
    talked to people, gave out fliers and
  • 10:30 - 10:36
    we have given a try on a.. Flash mob.
  • 10:36 - 10:39
    Still in the start phase on such things for the moment,
  • 10:39 - 10:42
    but we'll surely improve eventually.
  • 10:43 - 10:46
    Then there's a presentation
  • 10:46 - 10:49
    we had of the movement today,
  • 10:49 - 10:55
    where we invited some people from the streets and put up posters,
  • 10:55 - 10:56
    introduced it a little in advance.
  • 10:56 - 10:57
    A little, but not enough.
  • 10:57 - 10:59
    We recruited some new
  • 10:59 - 11:03
    there, and met, among others, several
  • 11:03 - 11:07
    people from an environmental party
  • 11:07 - 11:10
    who were interested in coming into
  • 11:10 - 11:12
    contact with us, perhaps begin a joint
  • 11:12 - 11:16
    conference, so we appreciate that.
  • 11:16 - 11:19
    And there were people from another group
  • 11:19 - 11:24
    that wanted us to do presentations for them.
  • 11:24 - 11:27
    And we love establishing new contacts.
  • 11:29 - 11:38
    Tomorrow, we will have a presentation in the University for Environment and Bio Science,
  • 11:38 - 11:52
    in Ås, outside of Oslo, where we've been invited by Studentsamskipnaden.
  • 11:52 - 11:54
    We'll see what comes of it,
  • 11:54 - 11:57
    but it's definitely exciting being invited by a university.
  • 11:57 - 11:59
    That's the kind of people we wish
  • 11:59 - 12:01
    to get into contact with and they invited
  • 12:01 - 12:06
    us, which we think is excellent.
  • 12:06 - 12:08
    Another thing that's been good in Norway,
  • 12:08 - 12:13
    or a success story, you could say,
  • 12:13 - 12:15
    is that we, lately, have written some
  • 12:15 - 12:24
    commentaries in a news weekly.
  • 12:24 - 12:27
    There was a person who wrote a critical article
  • 12:27 - 12:31
    about the Zeitgeist Movement.
  • 12:31 - 12:35
    That we have answered.
  • 12:35 - 12:38
    Then he replied, so we had three and we had three.
  • 12:38 - 12:44
    So there we got to represent the movement, in a national magazine.
  • 12:44 - 12:45
    We're well pleased with that and,
  • 12:45 - 12:50
    possibly, that's why people took contact with us.
  • 12:50 - 12:55
    I can't say for sure, but, at any rate, it allowed us to present ourselves outwardly,
  • 12:55 - 12:58
    in a bit more serious way, because it's
  • 12:58 - 13:01
    in a leaflet that's not just for the
  • 13:01 - 13:04
    hoi polloi in the streets, but is read
  • 13:04 - 13:10
    by people engaged in... The society.
  • 13:10 - 13:12
    What is challenging in Norway, is that
  • 13:12 - 13:16
    we live in a nation that is long and diverse.
  • 13:19 - 13:23
    We are only..
  • 13:23 - 13:30
    How many are we now? 4,7-8 million people?
  • 13:34 - 13:38
    Those people are spread all across the land.
  • 13:38 - 13:40
    Those who are members of the movement are
  • 13:40 - 13:42
    spread across; perhaps one valley has
  • 13:42 - 13:46
    only one person who is committed to the
  • 13:46 - 13:48
    movement, then there's a
  • 13:48 - 13:52
    few in each city, so...
  • 13:53 - 13:56
    Organizing becomes a challenge.
  • 13:56 - 13:59
    Because of that we are trying to pull together a national meeting now,
  • 13:59 - 14:01
    to get the movement to take off a bit more -
  • 14:01 - 14:04
    we need to increase the numbers of ...
  • 14:04 - 14:08
    members and the activity, on a local level.
  • 14:09 - 14:12
    Now it's mostly on the Internet
  • 14:15 - 14:18
    as well as a few other things.
  • 14:24 - 14:25
    Future plans?
  • 14:25 - 14:27
    Future plans.
  • 14:32 - 14:35
    The future plans for the movement
  • 14:35 - 14:39
    in Norway, well, I have some
  • 14:39 - 14:42
    ideas, but we will talk
  • 14:42 - 14:44
    about that tomorrow.
  • 14:44 - 14:47
    We have a naitonal meet right now
  • 14:47 - 14:49
    and we'll have internal meetings
  • 14:49 - 14:51
    where we discuss what to do internally
  • 14:51 - 14:53
    in the movement, tomorrow.
  • 14:53 - 14:55
    It's good that we are quite a few who are gathered now,
  • 14:55 - 15:00
    so we can lay some plans.
  • 15:00 - 15:05
    What is necessary, is to get more people
  • 15:05 - 15:09
    to get more active, find their roles.
  • 15:09 - 15:13
    People are good at different things.
  • 15:13 - 15:17
    We have to dig out the potential in each and
  • 15:17 - 15:19
    everyone, find out what they master,
  • 15:19 - 15:25
    so that we may contribute with each
  • 15:25 - 15:27
    our thing - together that'll be quite
  • 15:27 - 15:31
    a lot of things. We'll achieve breadth,
  • 15:31 - 15:37
    so that we can work more aimed.
  • 15:37 - 15:39
    And make it so that not a few individuals
  • 15:39 - 15:40
    do it all on their own.
  • 15:40 - 15:44
    That has been the tendency lately, there are a
  • 15:44 - 15:47
    few who are putting things up on the
  • 15:47 - 15:51
    forum and discussing on the Internet,
  • 15:51 - 15:54
    but when it comes to practical work,
  • 15:54 - 15:56
    we are pretty few who actually make the
  • 15:56 - 15:59
    effort and that we wish to change.
  • 15:59 - 16:03
    We wish that people take
  • 16:03 - 16:06
    a more active role.
  • 16:06 - 16:08
    They'll get to decide themselves
  • 16:08 - 16:12
    what they wish to contribute with, so
  • 16:12 - 16:15
    the impetus comes from them and not a
  • 16:15 - 16:20
    simple command from us, that, that are
  • 16:20 - 16:24
    the most active now.
  • 16:24 - 16:32
    Other things we must achieve, of practical things..
  • 16:32 - 16:37
    It's smart, I think, to get more contacts with other groups.
  • 16:38 - 16:42
    Maybe the Milieu party and other organisations.
  • 16:43 - 16:52
    Can join in on conferences where we present RBE and
  • 16:52 - 16:56
    we can also listen what others have to
  • 16:56 - 16:59
    say about the environment because the
  • 16:59 - 17:00
    Zeitgeist movement is
  • 17:00 - 17:02
    quite new and the org.
  • 17:02 - 17:06
    that have been.. That have been
  • 17:06 - 17:08
    present longer than us.. Perhaps
  • 17:08 - 17:11
    we can learn quite a bit from them too.
  • 17:11 - 17:14
    I think that, if we get more in touch
  • 17:14 - 17:17
    with that kind of people, these sorts
  • 17:17 - 17:22
    of org., then we can achieve more
  • 17:22 - 17:29
    breadth, more strength, we can
  • 17:29 - 17:32
    reach out to a wider audience, I believe.
  • 17:35 - 17:38
    We hope to get more on wavelength with
  • 17:38 - 17:40
    universities here and there, I believe it
  • 17:40 - 17:42
    very important to have on our side, people
  • 17:42 - 17:51
    who have a certain background enabling them to
  • 17:51 - 17:54
    contribute a little extra.
  • 17:54 - 18:04
    RBE is based on scientific methods and technology.
  • 18:04 - 18:08
    It's also very advantageous for communication, not least, to have
  • 18:08 - 18:21
    people with you who are experts on these areas, so that the movement will be strengthened on these areas,
  • 18:24 - 18:30
    because then we'll be able to strike the table a bit harder, as it were, when we say things.
  • 18:34 - 18:39
    It'll be easier to establish cooperation with universities and others.
  • 18:40 - 18:43
    Uhm, let's see now...
  • 18:43 - 18:45
    Was there something else?
  • 18:51 - 18:52
    We'll stop there.
  • 18:52 - 18:56
    I'm just thinking about how one should translate this "striking the table", ("knock on wood").
  • 19:20 - 19:21
    Tell a little something about
  • 19:21 - 19:26
    the most important concerns
  • 19:27 - 19:31
    regarding the economical and political situation
  • 19:31 - 19:33
    in Norway.
  • 19:39 - 19:45
    Economically, Norway is one of the countries that
  • 19:46 - 19:49
    stands quite firm, you could say, because
  • 19:49 - 19:54
    Norway is an oil nation that
  • 19:54 - 19:55
    get quite a bit income
  • 19:55 - 20:00
    from that, which allows us to have a..
  • 20:00 - 20:03
    Well, we can have.. We have a lot
  • 20:03 - 20:06
    of money that can give wealth to
  • 20:06 - 20:10
    people and Norway as a land, has
  • 20:10 - 20:13
    been nominated the best nation to live in by the
  • 20:13 - 20:19
    UN, for eight years in a row
  • 20:19 - 20:21
    and then there's, of course, been evaluated
  • 20:21 - 20:26
    a lot of factors concerning the welfare system,
  • 20:26 - 20:28
    e.g.: How well we take care
  • 20:28 - 20:30
    of our inhabitants,
  • 20:30 - 20:32
    how good people have it.
  • 20:33 - 20:35
    Norway scores high there.
  • 20:35 - 20:40
    Also score high on the list by «Equality Trust»,
  • 20:40 - 20:45
    if you look at their home page,
  • 20:45 - 20:47
    you'll see that Norway comes very well across,
  • 20:48 - 20:52
    because the differences in wages are smaller
  • 20:52 - 20:56
    than in very many other countries,
  • 20:56 - 21:01
    even though they have increased somewhat in the latter years.
  • 21:02 - 21:05
    In regards to Equality Trust..
  • 21:05 - 21:08
    They say that when wage differences are smaller,
  • 21:10 - 21:14
    the inhabitants will be more content,
  • 21:14 - 21:16
    in a great number of ways.
  • 21:17 - 21:22
    Less crime, less...
  • 21:23 - 21:26
    Teenage pregnancy..
  • 21:26 - 21:31
    What was that in Norwegian?
  • 22:04 - 22:08
    Can you help set me back on track? We were talking about crime... And..?
  • 22:09 - 22:14
    Well, criminality.. And.. And then you went
  • 22:14 - 22:17
    straight from crime to teenage pregnancy.
  • 22:17 - 22:20
    Well, you can take the...
  • 22:20 - 22:25
    What was it again?
  • 22:27 - 22:29
    You said something about
  • 22:29 - 22:35
    Norway scoring well on...
  • 22:35 - 22:37
    No, I don't quite remember. You could begin on the Equality Trust..
  • 22:37 - 22:42
    People in prison, crime.. What were the the other things then..?
  • 22:43 - 22:45
    Everything; life expectancy and so on..
  • 22:45 - 22:49
    Life expentancy, right. OK. So..
  • 22:51 - 22:59
    According to Equality Trust, Norway scores well,
  • 22:59 - 23:04
    as opposed to other countries, especially
  • 23:04 - 23:07
    when it comes to the difference
  • 23:07 - 23:11
    between poor and rich, then you're
  • 23:11 - 23:15
    talking about the differences in wages.
  • 23:15 - 23:18
    The differences in wages are not so great
  • 23:18 - 23:22
    as in other countries and we score...
  • 23:25 - 23:28
    Ai.. I'm simply too tired now.
  • 23:43 - 23:45
    How do you envision the transition
  • 23:45 - 23:47
    from the current system to
  • 23:47 - 23:50
    a resource based economy?
  • 23:51 - 23:59
    Ah, yes, I'll say a little about the transition from the current system to a Resource Based Economy.
  • 23:59 - 24:03
    I think it's really important
  • 24:03 - 24:11
    to get in touch with others...
  • 24:12 - 24:21
    No, I'm losing my focus now..
  • 24:21 - 24:26
    It revolves around different open source systems, you know, that..
  • 24:29 - 24:35
    I slept two hours last night.
  • 25:04 - 25:05
    Transition.
  • 25:05 - 25:07
    Transition.
  • 25:15 - 25:17
    OK, now it's on.
  • 25:18 - 25:21
    When it comes to the transtition from the current
  • 25:21 - 25:25
    system to an RBE;
  • 25:25 - 25:34
    Firstly, I believe that what we see of economic troubles today,
  • 25:34 - 25:37
    is most likely peanuts compared to
  • 25:37 - 25:38
    what we could see in the future
  • 25:38 - 25:49
    and of the reasons for that, is due to automation and technology is developing
  • 25:49 - 25:54
    at an exponential pace and continually
  • 25:54 - 25:56
    take over increasingly more jobs,
  • 25:56 - 26:00
    in Norway, we see, e.g., the postal system, Posten..
  • 26:00 - 26:01
    The offices have been closed
  • 26:01 - 26:05
    down a whole lot of places,
  • 26:05 - 26:09
    after we got EU-mail, got the possibility of
  • 26:09 - 26:14
    using the Internet, so.. Posten became,
  • 26:14 - 26:16
    well, not as useful and necessary
  • 26:16 - 26:24
    as before for sending letters, in any case.
  • 26:24 - 26:26
    Now we have mail-venues
  • 26:26 - 26:30
    in supermarkets.
  • 26:30 - 26:35
    What you see in large stores, places I've been in Italy,
  • 26:35 - 26:39
    they have self service cash registers
  • 26:39 - 26:40
    that are fully automated, no need
  • 26:40 - 26:42
    for a person to be occupied at all.
  • 26:42 - 26:48
    You pay with a debit card and there's no need for a person to be there.
  • 26:48 - 26:56
    There's a machine there that gives notice if you leave without paying.
  • 26:56 - 26:59
    We see all the time, in several
  • 26:59 - 27:03
    industries, that this takes place.
  • 27:03 - 27:05
    If you look at the techonologies that
  • 27:05 - 27:10
    have come lately, for instance Google Cars,
  • 27:10 - 27:13
    which is cars that drive without
  • 27:13 - 27:17
    a person steering, all is run
  • 27:17 - 27:19
    fully automatic..
  • 27:19 - 27:24
    Consider if all cars drive like that eventually.
  • 27:24 - 27:26
    That we don't need to drive ourselves ?
  • 27:26 - 27:30
    Do we then need cab drivers?
  • 27:30 - 27:33
    Do we need employees in the transport business?
  • 27:33 - 27:35
    Do we need to have our own car?
  • 27:35 - 27:46
    There's already some car sharing services, in London,
  • 27:46 - 27:50
    England, where instead of owning a car,
  • 27:50 - 27:54
    you can have access, which you
  • 27:54 - 27:57
    then loan upon need and if you combine
  • 27:57 - 28:02
    that with Google Cars, you can just
  • 28:02 - 28:03
    order a car that shows up at your door
  • 28:04 - 28:06
    when you need it. Do you then need cars
  • 28:06 - 28:10
    parked all over the place, that aren't
  • 28:10 - 28:13
    used for the greater parts of the day.
  • 28:13 - 28:15
    With this kind of system, you will
  • 28:15 - 28:18
    need a much smaller amount of cars.
  • 28:18 - 28:25
    As the technology gains traction, start combining modules,
  • 28:26 - 28:28
    suddenly we'll have solutions that... Oops!
  • 28:28 - 28:35
    There went a bunch of professions..
  • 28:35 - 28:41
    We have many other examples of this type of technology,
  • 28:41 - 28:48
    e.g.: Watson, from IBM, that is a, you could say,
  • 28:51 - 28:53
    an "Artificial Intelligence Machine",
  • 28:53 - 28:58
    that responds to questions
  • 28:58 - 29:01
    like in Jeopardy. Jeopardy, of course,
  • 29:01 - 29:06
    is a quiz contest where you get the
  • 29:06 - 29:07
    answer and you have to find out the
  • 29:07 - 29:12
    question and in the beginning, when this
  • 29:12 - 29:14
    machine was competing
  • 29:14 - 29:16
    with humans, it didn't
  • 29:16 - 29:17
    do so well, but when it
  • 29:17 - 29:21
    got experience, well..
  • 29:21 - 29:26
    Used this intelligent system to
  • 29:26 - 29:28
    improve itself, I'm not rightly
  • 29:28 - 29:33
    sure how this works, but now this
  • 29:33 - 29:36
    mahchine, Watson, has beaten the worlds
  • 29:36 - 29:38
    best in Jeopardy, absolutely crushed the
  • 29:38 - 29:41
    worlds best in Jeopardy. How can you
  • 29:41 - 29:46
    use this technology..?
  • 29:46 - 29:49
    Like with call centers; do you really need a person
  • 29:49 - 29:51
    sitting there or can you use similar
  • 29:51 - 29:54
    systems to answer questions? You can
  • 29:54 - 30:01
    find out of various questions..
  • 30:01 - 30:04
    If I call and have a problem with my cell phone and call
  • 30:04 - 30:09
    technical support, then..
  • 30:09 - 30:12
    If we use a system like this, we don't need a person.
  • 30:12 - 30:21
    The machine can cope just fine on its own.
  • 30:21 - 30:24
    We have already developed systems
  • 30:24 - 30:27
    that can be used for things like
  • 30:27 - 30:31
    this and that way all calls in the
  • 30:31 - 30:36
    call center industry can be automated.
  • 30:36 - 30:39
    Perhaps we can use it in medicine, to
  • 30:39 - 30:43
    give diagnosises. I think it had been..
  • 30:43 - 30:47
    If we could have a computer system
  • 30:47 - 30:49
    where all available knowledge was
  • 30:49 - 30:53
    inputted about sickesses, symptoms, these
  • 30:53 - 30:57
    sorts of things, and I plot in my
  • 30:57 - 31:02
    problems then this machin can find the
  • 31:02 - 31:13
    apt solution.. Say I plot in that my knees
  • 31:13 - 31:16
    hurt and suffer a cough, that could
  • 31:16 - 31:20
    be a hundred things and then it could
  • 31:20 - 31:23
    ask a number of questions to eliminate
  • 31:23 - 31:27
    possibilities. OK, so "In addition, do
  • 31:27 - 31:29
    you have a head ache?" Then perhaps
  • 31:29 - 31:32
    some diagnosises are excluded and,
  • 31:32 - 31:36
    succeedingly, the machine can evaluate,
  • 31:37 - 31:41
    so I may get a more precise diagnosis.
  • 31:41 - 31:42
    If I go to doctor, the possibility
  • 31:42 - 31:44
    exists that the doctor forgets to ask
  • 31:44 - 31:47
    certain questions. So, I would rather go
  • 31:47 - 31:50
    to the doctor after getting the diagnosis
  • 31:50 - 31:54
    and perhaps the machine could also
  • 31:54 - 31:58
    take a blood sample, analyze it and
  • 31:58 - 32:03
    give clues to anomalies there.
  • 32:03 - 32:05
    Already, we have apparatuses for measuring blood
  • 32:05 - 32:08
    sugar, so there should be possible
  • 32:08 - 32:10
    to take a blood sample at home and get
  • 32:10 - 32:15
    diagnosises for lot's of things, so
  • 32:15 - 32:17
    there you have a lot of things that can
  • 32:17 - 32:21
    be automated in the medicinal industry,
  • 32:21 - 32:24
    among others. If you continue to
  • 32:24 - 32:28
    consider what technology can do, of
  • 32:28 - 32:32
    changes, if you just amalgamate different
  • 32:32 - 32:35
    sorts of technology, we have an
  • 32:35 - 32:36
    incredible number of solutions that will
  • 32:36 - 32:38
    take from us an inordinate amount of
  • 32:38 - 32:42
    jobs, if we wish it and that is not
  • 32:42 - 32:49
    desirable for many, because then we'll
  • 32:49 - 32:52
    lose the jobs and if we lose the jobs,
  • 32:52 - 32:54
    we won't have money to buy things and
  • 32:54 - 32:56
    then companies, of course, will go
  • 32:56 - 33:03
    bankrupt, because noone buys the things.
  • 33:03 - 33:06
    So I imagine, this will
  • 33:06 - 33:08
    happen in the future.
  • 33:08 - 33:15
    We lose more and more jobs and
  • 33:15 - 33:17
    at the same time, many systems are
  • 33:17 - 33:24
    broached that make things easier for us,
  • 33:24 - 33:27
    so we don't need to work. What need
  • 33:27 - 33:30
    fills economy any more? I think it will
  • 33:30 - 33:39
    collapse and if we look at the fact
  • 33:39 - 33:45
    that we actually have the resources we
  • 33:45 - 33:48
    need; we need to work on informing people
  • 33:48 - 33:51
    that we have the resources we need
  • 33:51 - 33:53
    but we don't have money to buy them,
  • 33:53 - 33:57
    so I think we are well on our way to
  • 33:57 - 34:02
    an RB-system, but we have to help it
  • 34:02 - 34:06
    along to avoid that we end up with a
  • 34:06 - 34:10
    large amount of human suffering.
  • 34:10 - 34:12
    That I think
  • 34:12 - 34:15
    can happen if we don't stop to..
  • 34:15 - 34:19
    Think money.
  • 34:19 - 34:24
    Well.. Yeah.
  • 34:26 - 34:27
    What was it I was going to say?
  • 34:27 - 34:28
    There was something
  • 34:28 - 34:32
    about "What do you do today"?
  • 34:32 - 34:36
    Create the day of tomorrow. Something.
  • 34:36 - 34:38
    You didn't mention that to me.
  • 34:38 - 34:49
    No, I said someething to myself about that. How goes it again?
  • 35:08 - 35:13
    I want you to think about what you do today.
  • 35:13 - 35:20
    Because it has so much to say for the day of tomorrow. If you do nothing...
  • 35:21 - 35:26
    The day of tomorrow can be quite...
  • 35:26 - 35:30
    Similar, but with all the things
  • 35:30 - 35:31
    going on around the world, it
  • 35:31 - 35:34
    quite possibly may be worse.
  • 35:34 - 35:37
    Perhaps you can contribute with something here
  • 35:37 - 35:40
    and now, that allows the future to be
  • 35:40 - 35:44
    better, for you, for me and for all.
Title:
Norway - Stina
Description:

Help us caption & translate this video!

http://amara.org/v/CPTz/

more » « less
Video Language:
Norwegian Bokmal
Duration:
35:45

English, British subtitles

Revisions