-
In this video, I want to give you a quick
introduction to the history of MOOCs.
-
How they came to be, and especially
focusing
-
on the mainstream evolution that led to
them.
-
For a long while now, many universities
have taped their
-
lectures and offered them on private or
public TV channels.
-
Some universities were even built around
distance learning.
-
For instance, I remember as a kid in the
'80's watching
-
on Sunday morning on the BBC Lectures of
the British Open University.
-
These lectures were great, and they are
still great fun to watch, if only
-
because you could see university
professors wearing
-
elephant pants straight out of the '70's.
-
Now, in a residential university, the
advantage to taped lectures would be
-
that these students can watch a class they
have missed or misunderstood.
-
At some point in the 2000s, this
transitioned to the Web.
-
Students could know watch classes on
demand with extra convenience.
-
But with the transition to the web,
professors
-
had now more flexibility and could do
something new.
-
They could post handouts on the website,
for instance.
-
This is a form of blended learning.
-
Or, if they had recorded the lecture one
year,
-
say in 2005, in 2006 for the new lecture.
-
They could put the old one, the 2005
lecture, online.
-
And decide to manage the class time
-
differently, in their new, live lecture in
2006.
-
Instead of covering that material like
they're always done, they
-
could start assuming that the students had
already watched the material.
-
And hold more interactive discussions and
challenge the students in class.
-
This is called flip teaching where the
goal of the instructor
-
is to make face time, with the students
most useful to them.
-
To try to engage them in active learning.
-
At the same time, if the lectures were
already recorded, it also
-
opened up the possibility of sharing all
their material with the world.
-
Why not do it?
-
This was done by MIT with Open Courseware,
where
-
they started to offer freely their regular
lectures online.
-
Starting in 2011, it became easier to
-
date things, because development vocalized
around Stanford.
-
Some professors there realized that their
lectures that were
-
available online, for the world, actually
attracted a huge audience.
-
In the tens of thousands of students, a
massive scale.
-
They decided to create their own startups.
-
Daphne Koller and Andrew Ng started
Coursera.
-
While Sebastian Thrun started Udacity.
-
However, unlike Open Coursework.
-
This company started offering certificates
and
-
raising large levels of venture capital
funding.
-
$85 million for Coursera.
-
American Universities sense a real threat
there, mostly in a certificate.
-
Suddenly, you can buy for hundreds of
dollars and
-
hard work, what usually required $40,000
and hard work.
-
As a response, Standford started Class to
Go and MIT started EDX.
-
EDX was set up as a non profit startup and
quickly Harvard, Berkeley,
-
and a bunch of other major schools joined
them on the portal, EDX.org.
-
Stanford even decided to drop Class2Go and
work with EDX, because
-
their software was open source and
available for anyone to use.
-
You can see them at Stanford Online.
-
These are Universities that compete on
everything else but there they
-
collaborated and injected money at levels
that matched adventure capital fund.
-
So, the situation at this stage is that
Coursera is
-
the major MOOC portal that has agreement
with around 100 universities.
-
Basing them, there is an unusual alliance
of the
-
world's most famous universities trying to
contract Coursera's dominance.
-
In addition, a bunch of other initiatives
have been
-
started in 2013, mostly divided among geo
political borders.
-
Future learning the UK Iversity in Germany
[FOREIGN_LANGUAGE] in France, Miranda
-
X in Spain, and Portugal, and Latin
America, and EDRAAK in the middle east.
-
Now is that the whole picture for MOOCs.
-
No, this is only for so called xMOOCs, the
large scale classes.
-
In parallel, and even starting in 2008, a
-
whole different kind of MOOCs called
cMOOCs was developed.
-
The emphasis there was not on the scale,
but
-
rather on the c, which stands here for
connectivism.
-
I'm utterly unqualified to exactly define
what connectivism is.
-
But let me try to pass on my understanding
of it.
-
In some ways, C moocs, X moocs, sorry push
-
contents to the student, generally in the
form of video.
-
I intentionally put the video site above
to emphasize that it flows from
-
instructor to students, and that the
students are left on the forum to discuss.
-
Connectivism as I understand it highlights
the other direction.
-
In a cMooc the instructor should also
actively pool the best content
-
and ideas from the students and integrate
it in the course content.
-
In fact, this process should be as
decentralized as possible.
-
This means that the content aggregation,
production, and integration should also be
-
done by the students, that they should get
assistance to help their learning.
-
For instance, they should be helped to
-
make the important personal connections
with each other.
-
So they can build the content
collaboratively.
-
They should also be helped to connect with
external sources.
-
And, as it's unlikely, that all
-
the necessary information resides within
the class.
-
So I've now presented to you both cMOOCs
and
-
xMOOCs and tried to clarify the
distinction between them.
-
Many people try to blend the two models,
taking the best out of both types.
-
I find myself that the distinction between
pushing content in
-
an xMOOC and pulling ideas in a cMOOC
helps me.
-
So that distinction helps me a lot to
-
think of MOOCs and where they should be
going.
-
[BLANK_AUDIO]