Return to Video

Carbon

  • 0:01 - 0:06
    [ominous music]
    (Leonardo DiCaprio) Ancient life on earth.
  • 0:06 - 0:11
    Over millions of years plants and animals lived and died.
  • 0:11 - 0:16
    That decomposed life sunk deep into the ground, and as a result,
  • 0:16 - 0:22
    an ancient menace was created...fossil fuels.
  • 0:22 - 0:28
    Black oil, coal, and gas, have created modern society as we know it.
  • 0:28 - 0:33
    This ancient sunlight unleashed global industrial power on a scale
  • 0:33 - 0:37
    never before witnessed in the history of the planet.
  • 0:37 - 0:41
    But when burnt into the atmosphere, carbon causes climate change.
  • 0:41 - 0:46
    Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate change
  • 0:46 - 0:50
    is happening now and is caused by human activity.
  • 0:50 - 0:54
    However, the fossil fuel industry continues to pull that carbon out of the ground.
  • 0:54 - 0:59
    They drill, they extract, making trillions of dollars.
  • 0:59 - 1:05
    They frack, they mine, earning astronomical profits.
  • 1:05 - 1:09
    We need to keep this carbon in the ground.
  • Not Synced
    In order to prevent a catastrophic warming of the planet by 2 degrees Celsius,
  • Not Synced
    we cannot burn more than 500 gigatons of carbon into the atmosphere.
  • Not Synced
    But the fossil fuel industry has access to five times more than that.
  • Not Synced
    Almost twenty-eight-hundred gigatons of carbon pollution is ready to be pulled out of the ground, sold, and burned.
  • Not Synced
    We must fight to keep this carbon in the ground., and it is possible.
  • Not Synced
    - People are ready for conversation. They're ready to understand that carbon pollution is causing this challenge,
  • Not Synced
    And that there is a simple solution. Put a price on carbon pollution.
  • Not Synced
    In the United States we spend $110 billion federal dollars on climate change events.
  • Not Synced
    That's about $300 a person in tax dollars.
  • Not Synced
    - But which certainly need a price on carbon pollution.
  • Not Synced
    Right now it's a free good and we're using the atmosphere as a sewer and that has a real cost.
  • Not Synced
    And that cost should be reflected in the cost of carbon pollution.
  • Not Synced
    - In the '50s in London, based on the industrial revolution,
  • Not Synced
    there was so much pollution, as you see in Beijing and around China today,
  • Not Synced
    that you actually couldn't see six straight feet in front of you.
  • Not Synced
    They put a price on pollution, and it changed.
  • Not Synced
    - You have to put a price on carbon,
  • Not Synced
    and that can either happen by carbon trading or through a carbon tax.
  • Not Synced
    There's a moral imperative there, but there's also a business imperative.
  • Not Synced
    - Senator Boxer and I have introduced legislation to do just that. We are going
  • Not Synced
    to do it in a way that impacts fewer than 3,000 of the most significant
  • Not Synced
    fossil fuel polluters in the country. And the reason you do it , is people should not have
  • Not Synced
    the " freedom" to destroy the planet.
  • Not Synced
    They cannot continue to be able to do that with impunity.
  • Not Synced
    - The government has been subsidizing energy for decades
  • Not Synced
    to the tune now of a trillion dollars a year. We need to redirect these subsidies
  • Not Synced
    that encourage innovation. That's what we need in the world.
  • Not Synced
    But the biggest barrier is money from fossil industries that want to defend
  • Not Synced
    their market share, and which I consider the industries' walking butt. They've got
  • Not Synced
    tremendous assets underground that they want to be able to mine.
  • Not Synced
    Those are trillions of dollars of assets that the fossil energy companies used
  • Not Synced
    to evaluate their worth in the stock market. And the fact that we want to strand them,
  • Not Synced
    to leave them underground is not going over real well In those industries.
  • Not Synced
    But in fact, if we wanted to head off the worst uncontrollable damages
  • Not Synced
    from climate change, that's what we have to do.
  • Not Synced
    - Finland and the Netherlands implemented a carbon tax back in 1990.
  • Not Synced
    Both, putting a price tag on each ton of CO2 poison.
  • Not Synced
    - In the beginning of the '90s there was a deep understanding that we should do something.
  • Not Synced
    We think that the Finnish economy should be based on sustainable energy in order
  • Not Synced
    to make our society competitive and in order to save our planet, which is, of course, the main target
  • Not Synced
    which is, of course, the main target.
  • Not Synced
    - Since then several other nations have created their own versions, including
  • Not Synced
    Norway, Costa Rica, and the United Kingdom.
  • Not Synced
    Ireland passed a carbon tax in 2010.
  • Not Synced
    - It was very simple to introduce. When they see a carbon tax if place,
  • Not Synced
    people know that they can invest in alternatives that actually
  • Not Synced
    cut out the use of fossil fuel.
  • Not Synced
    It starts to have that effect improving energy efficiency in your homes and improving industries' energy efficiency.
  • Not Synced
    And what we've seen in the last 5 years is we have doubled amount
  • Not Synced
    of renewable energy supplies, so the benefit for the consumer
  • Not Synced
    is if through those signals you can cut out the wasteful use of energy, then everyone
  • Not Synced
    is saving money and it more than covers the cost of the carbon tax in the first place.
  • Not Synced
    Thom Hartmann: Iin Australia renewables like wind are now cheaper than fossil fuels
  • Not Synced
    like coal. Recently China put a price on carbon in over 7 regions and will add more.
  • Not Synced
    Now it's up to the United States, where there's good news another a local level.
Title:
Carbon
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Team:
Captions Requested
Duration:
08:33
E B edited English subtitles for Carbon
E B edited English subtitles for Carbon
Robert_CSR1970 edited English subtitles for Carbon
Robert_CSR1970 edited English subtitles for Carbon
Robert_CSR1970 edited English subtitles for Carbon
Robert_CSR1970 edited English subtitles for Carbon
Robert_CSR1970 edited English subtitles for Carbon
Robert_CSR1970 edited English subtitles for Carbon
Show all
  • Hi Robert,

    I'm so glad you undertook the captioning of this video, and the way you are splitting captions.

    Thank you!

  • Claude:

    Thank you for the encouragement. Very much appreciated. I hope to try and do the entire video.

  • That's great, Roberto! However, don't hesitate to ask if you want some help: e.g. the other voices than DiCaprio are identified in on-video texts: you could re-use that, or simply mar changes of speakers with ">>".

    Best

    Claude

  • Hey there, Claude:

    Thanks mucho for the input and tips. I did actually finish the whole thing!!! Yaaaaay! Whew!! ... but just haven't done the sync yet, and still not sure I like all the groupings yet.

    As far as speaker ID, DiCaprio and Hartmann I know of and identified. The rest of them, I used the "-" indication as per the "Rev" company guidelines I trained and tested for and the Amara guidlines. However, I started out using what you suggested, ">>", which I like a lot better, and may go back and change it to that. However, I was looking into Amara's offer of doing paid work for them, and so was trying to stick more to their style since they want to see what one's subtitling work looks like. Anyway, next stop, "sync."

    Again, thanks for the support and suggestions. I hope to have this project finished early this week.

    Appreciatively,

    Robert

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions