-
Scientific breakthrough,
-
the kind that can potentially save lives,
-
can sometimes be lying right out in the open
-
for us to discover,
-
in the evolved, accumulated body
-
of human anecdote, for example,
-
or in the time-tested adaptations
-
that we observe in the natural world around us.
-
Science starts with observation,
-
but the trick is to identify the patterns and signatures
-
that we might otherwise dismiss
-
as myth or coincidence,
-
isolate them, and test them with scientific rigor.
-
And when we do, the results will often surprise.
-
Western Australia has had a particular problem
-
with shark attacks over the last three years,
-
unfortunately and tragically culminating
-
in five fatal shark attacks in a 10-month period
-
during that time.
-
But Western Australia is not alone in this.
-
The incident of shark engagements on humans
-
is escalating worldwide.
-
And so it's not surprising, perhaps,
-
that in July of this year,
-
Shark Attack Mitigation Systems in collaboration
-
with the University of Western
Australia Oceans Institute
-
made an announcement which captured the attention
-
of the worldwide media and of ocean users
-
worldwide,
-
and that was around the development of technology
-
to mitigate or reduce the risk of shark attack
-
based on the science of what sharks can see.
-
And I have for you today
-
the story of that journey,
-
but also the notion that science can be
-
as powerful as a translator
-
as it can be for invention.
-
When we began this process,
-
we were looking, it was about three years ago,
-
and we'd just had the first two fatal shark attacks
-
in Western Australia,
-
and by chance, in a previous role,
-
I happened to be having dinner with Harry Butler.
-
Now Harry Butler, who most Australians
would know is a famous naturalist,
-
had spent a lot of time in the marine environment.
-
Harry Butler is a precursor, if you like,
-
to the late Steve Irwin.
-
When I asked him about
-
what the solution to the problem might be,
-
the answer was quite surprising.
-
He said, "Take a black wetsuit,
-
band it in yellow stripes like a bumblebee,
-
and you'll be mimicking the warning systems
-
of most marine species."
-
I didn't think about that much at the time,
-
and it wasn't until the next three
fatal shark attacks happened,
-
and it caused me to think,
-
maybe there's some merit to this idea.
-
And I turned to the web
-
to see if there might be some clues.
-
And it turns out the web is awash
-
with this sort of evidence that supports
-
this sort of thinking.
-
So biologically, there are plenty of species
-
that display banding or patterns, warning patterns,
-
to either be cryptical in the water
-
or warn against being attacked,
-
not the least of which is the pilot fish
-
which spends a big slab of its life
-
around the business end of a shark.
-
On the human side, Walter Starck, an oceanographer,
-
has been painting his wetsuit since the 1970s,
-
and anthropologically,
-
Pacific island tribes painted themselves in bands
-
in a sea snake ceremony
-
to ward off the shark god.
-
So what's going on here?
-
Is this an idea lying wide out in the open
-
for us to consider and define?
-
We know that sharks use a range of sensors
-
when they engage, particularly for attack,
-
but the sight sensor is the one that they use
-
to identify the target, and particularly
-
in the last number of meters before the attack.
-
It makes sense to pay attention
to the biological anecdote
-
because that's time-tested evolution
-
over many millennia.
-
But isn't human anecdote also an evolution of sorts,
-
the idea that there's a kernel of truth
-
thought to be important,
-
passed down from generation to generation,
-
so that it actually ends up shaping human behavior?
-
I wanted to test this idea.
-
I wanted to put some science
-
to this anecdotal evidence,
-
because if science could support this concept,
-
then we might have at least part of the solution
-
to shark attack right under our very nose.
-
To do that, I needed some experts
-
in shark vision and shark neurology,
-
and a worldwide search, again,
-
led to the University of W.A.
-
on the doorstep here, with the Oceans Institute.
-
And professor Nathan Hart and his team
-
had just written a paper which tells us,
-
confirms that predatory sharks see
-
in black and white, or grayscale.
-
So I called up Nathan,
-
a little bit sheepishly, actually, about this idea
-
that maybe we could use these patterns and shapes
-
to produce a wetsuit to try and
mitigate the risk of shark attack,
-
and fortunately, he thought that was a good idea.
-
So what ensued is a collaborative bit of research
-
supported by the West Australian State Government.
-
And we did three key things.
-
The first is that we mapped the characteristics,
-
the physical characteristics of the eyes
-
of the three main predatory sharks,
-
so the great white, tiger and bull shark.
-
We did that genetically
-
and we did that anatomically.
-
The next thing we did was to understand,
-
using complex computer modeling,
-
what that eye can see
-
at different depths, distances,
-
light conditions, and water clarity in the ocean.
-
And from there, we were able to pinpoint
-
two key characteristics:
-
what patterns and shapes would present the wearer
-
as hidden or hard to make out in the water, cryptic,
-
and what patterns and shapes might provide
-
the greatest contrast but provide the greatest
-
breakup of profile
-
so that that person wasn't confused for shark prey
-
or shark food.
-
The next thing we needed to do was to convert this
-
into wetsuits that people might actually wear,
-
and to that end, I invited Ray Smith,
-
a surfer, industrial designer, wetsuit designer,
-
and in fact the guy that designed
the original Quiksilver logo,
-
to come over and sit with the science team
-
and interpret that science
-
into aesthetic wetsuits that
people might actually wear.
-
And here's an example of one of the first drawings.
-
So this is what I call a "don't eat me" wetsuit.
-
So this takes that banding idea,
-
takes that banding idea, it's highly visible,
-
provides a highly disruptive profile,
-
and is intended to prevent the shark
-
from considering that you would be ordinary food,
-
and potentially even create confusion for the shark.
-
And this one's configured to go with a surfboard.
-
You can see that dark, opaque panel on the front,
-
and it's particularly better for the surface,
-
where being backlit and providing a silhouette
-
is problematic.
-
Second iteration is the cryptic wetsuit,
-
or the one which attempts to hide the wearer
-
in the water column.
-
There are three panels on this suit,
-
and in any given conditions,
-
one or more of those panels
-
will match the reflective spectra of the water
-
so as to disappear fully or partially,
-
leaving the last panel or panels
-
to create a disruptive profile in the water column.
-
And this one's particularly well-suited
-
to the dive configuration,
-
so when you're deeper under the water.
-
So we knew that we had
-
some really solid science here.
-
We knew, if you wanted to stand out,
-
you needed to look stripy,
-
and we knew if you wanted to be cryptic,
-
you needed to look like this.
-
But the acid test is always going to be,
-
how would sharks really behave
-
in the context of these patterns and shapes.
-
And testing to simulate a person in a wetsuit
-
in the water with a predatory shark
-
in a natural environment
-
is actually a lot harder than you might think.
-
(Laughter)
-
So we have to bait the rig,
-
because we need to get the statistical number
-
of samples through to get the scientific evidence,
-
and by baiting the rig,
-
we're obviously changing shark behavior.
-
We can't put humans in the water.
-
We're ethically precluded from even using
-
humanoid shapes and baiting them up in the water.
-
But nevertheless, we started the testing process
-
in January of this year,
-
initially with tiger sharks
-
and subsequently with great white sharks.
-
The way we did that
-
was to get a perforated drum which is full of bait,
-
wrap it in a neoprene skin,
-
and then run two stereo underwater cameras
-
to watch how the shark
actually engages with that rig.
-
And because we use stereo,
-
we can capture all the statistics
on how big the shark is,
-
what angle it comes in at, how quickly it leaves,
-
and what its behavior is
-
in an empirical rather than a subjective way.
-
Because we needed to
preserve the scientific method,
-
we ran a control rig
-
which was a black neoprene rig
-
just like a normal black wetsuit
-
against the, what we call,
-
SAMS technology rig.
-
And the results were not just exciting,
-
but very encouraging,
-
and today I would like to just give you a snapshot
-
of two of those engagements.
-
So here we've got a four-meter tiger shark
-
engaging the black control rig,
-
which it had encountered about
-
a minute and a half before.
-
Now that exact same shark had engaged,
-
or encountered this SAMS rig,
-
which is the Elude SAMS rig,
-
about eight minutes before,
-
and spent six minutes circling it, hunting for it,
-
looking for what it could
smell and sense but not see,
-
and this was the final engagement.
-
Great white sharks are more
confident than the tigers,
-
and here you see great white shark
-
engaging a control rig,
-
so a black neoprene wetsuit,
-
and going straight to the bottom,
-
coming up
-
and engaging.
-
In contrast to the SAMS technology rig,
-
this is the banded one,
-
where it's more tactile,
-
it's more investigative,
-
it's more apprehensive,
-
and shows a reluctance to come straight in and go.
-
(Applause)
-
So, it's important for us that all
the testing is done independently,
-
and the University of W.A. is doing the testing.
-
It'll be an ongoing process.
-
It's subject to peer review and subject to publication.
-
It's so important that this concept
-
is led with the science.
-
From the perspective of Shark
Attack Mitigation Systems,
-
we're a biotechnology licensing company,
-
so we don't make wetsuits ourselves.
-
We'll license others to do that.
-
But I thought you might be interested
-
in seeing what SAMS technology looks like
-
embedded in a wetsuit, and to that end,
-
for the first time, live, worldwide --
-
(Laughter) —
-
I can show you what biological adaptation,
-
science and design looks like in real life.
-
So I can welcome Sam, the surfer,
-
from this side. Where are you, Sam?
-
(Applause)
-
And Eduardo.
-
(Applause)
-
Cheers, mate.
-
Cheers.
-
Thanks, gentlemen. (Applause)
-
So what have we done here?
-
Well, to my mind, rather than take a blank sheet
-
and use science as a tool for invention,
-
we've paid attention to the biological evidence,
-
we've put importance to the
-
human anecdotal evidence,
-
and we've used science as a tool
-
for translation,
-
translation of something that was already there
-
into something that we can
use for the benefit of mankind.
-
And it strikes me that this idea of science
-
as a tool for translation rather than invention
-
is one that we can apply much more widely than this
-
in the pursuit of innovation.
-
After all, did the Wright brothers
-
discover manned flight,
-
or did they observe the biological fact of flight
-
and translate that mechanically, replicate it
-
in a way that humans could use?
-
As for the humble wetsuit,
-
who knows what oceanwear will look like
-
in two years' time, in five years' time
-
or in 50 years' time, but with this new thinking,
-
I'm guessing there's a fair chance
-
it won't be pure black.
-
Thank you.
-
(Applause)