What I learned from 2,000 obituaries

Joseph Keller used to jog
around the Stamford campus.

And he was struck by all the women
jogging there as well.

Why did their ponytails swing
from side to side like that?

Being a mathematician,

he set out to understand why.

(Laughter)

Professor Keller was curious
about many things.

Why teapots dribble,

or how earthworms wriggle.

Until a few months ago,

I hadn't heard of Joseph Keller.

I read about him in the New York Times

in the obituaries.

The Times had half a page
of editorial dedicated to him,

which you can imagine is premium space
for a newspaper of their stature.

I read the obituaries almost every day.

My wife understandably thinks
I'm rather morbid

to begin my day with scrambled eggs
and "Let's see who died today."

(Laughter)

But if you think about,

the front page of the newspaper
is usually bad news.

And [....] man's failures.

An instance where bad news
[...] accomplishment

is that the end of the paper,

in the obituaries.

In my day job,

I run a company that focuses
on future insights

that marketers can derive from past data.

A kind of rearview mirror analysis.

And we began to think,

what if we held a rearview mirror
to obituaries from The New York Times?

Were there lessons on how
you could get your obituary featured?

Even if you aren't around to enjoy it?

(Laughter)

What does go better with scrambled eggs?

(Laughter)

And so we looked at the data.

2,000 editorial nonpaid obituaries
over 20-month period

between 2015 and 2016.

What did these 2,000 deaths,

rather, lives,

teach us?

Well, first we looked at words.

This here is an obituary headline.

This one is the amazing Lee Kuan Yew.

If you remove the beginning and the end,

you're left with the beautifully
worded descriptor,

that tries to,

in just a few words,

capture an achievement of a lifetime.

Just looking at these is fascinating.

Here are a few famous ones --

people who died in the last two years.

Try and guess who they are.

[An Artist who Defied Genre]

That's Prince.

[Titan of Boxing and the 20th Century]

Oh, yes.

[Muhammed Ali]

[Groundbreaking Architect]

Zaha Haddid.

So we took these descriptors

and did what's called natural
language processing,

where you feed these into a program,

it throws out the superfluous words --

"the" and "and,"

the kind of words you can mime
easily in "Charades," --

and leaves you with the most
significant words.

And we did it not just for these four,

but for all 2,000 descriptors.

And this is what it looks like.

Film, theatre, music,
dance and of course art

are huge.

Over 40 percent.

You have to wonder why
in so many societies

we insist that art gets [....] engineering
or medicine or law

to be construed as successful.

And while we're talking profession,

let's look at age:

the average age at which
they achieved things.

That number is 37.

All that means is you've
got to wait 37 years ...

before your first significant achievement

that you're remembered for,

on average,

44 years later,

when you die at the age of 81 ...

on an average.

(Laughter)

Talk about having to be patient.

Of course it varies by profession.

If you're a sports star,

you'll probably hit
your stride in your 20s,

and if you're in your 40s like me,

you can join the fun world of politics.

Politicians do their first and sometimes
only commendable act in their mid-40s.

(Laughter)

If you're wondering what others are,

here are some examples.

Isn't it fascinating the things people do
and the things they're remembered for?

(Laughter)

Our curiosity was an [...],

and we desire it to analyze
more than just a descriptor.

So, we [ingested] the entire
first paragraph of all 2,000 obituaries,

but we did this separately
for two groups of people:

people that are famous
and people that are not famous.

Famous people --

Prince, Ali, Zaha Hadid --

people who are not famous
are people like Jocelyn Cooper,

Reverend Curry,

or people like Lorna Kelly.

I'm willing to bet you haven't
heard of most of their names.

Amazing people --

fantastic achievements --

but they're not famous.

So what if we analyze
these two groups separately --

the famous and the non-famous?

What might that tell us?

Take a look.

Two things leap out at me.

First:

John.

(Laughter)

Anyone here named John should
thank your parents --

(Laughter)

And remind your kids to cut out
your obituary when you're gone.

And second ...

help.

The uncovered many lessons
from lives well-led.

And what those people immortalized
in print could teach us.

The exercise was a fascinating testament
to the kaleidoscope that is life,

and even more fascinating was the fact

that the overwhelming
majority of obituaries

featured people famous and nonfamous
who did seemingly extraordinary things.

They made a positive dent
in the fabric of life.

They helped.

So ask yourselves after you go
back to your daily life:

how am I using my talents
to help society?

Because the most powerful
lesson here is ...

if more people lived their lives
trying to be famous in death,

the world would be a much better place.

Thank you.

(Applause)