Return to Video

What I learned from 2,000 obituaries

  • 0:01 - 0:05
    Joseph Keller used to jog
    around the Stanford campus,
  • 0:05 - 0:10
    and he was struck by all the women
    jogging there as well.
  • 0:10 - 0:13
    Why did their ponytails swing
    from side to side like that?
  • 0:14 - 0:17
    Being a mathematician,
    he set out to understand why.
  • 0:17 - 0:18
    (Laughter)
  • 0:18 - 0:21
    Professor Keller was curious
    about many things:
  • 0:21 - 0:23
    why teapots dribble
  • 0:23 - 0:24
    or how earthworms wriggle.
  • 0:25 - 0:28
    Until a few months ago,
    I hadn't heard of Joseph Keller.
  • 0:29 - 0:31
    I read about him in the New York Times,
  • 0:31 - 0:33
    in the obituaries.
  • 0:33 - 0:37
    The Times had half a page
    of editorial dedicated to him,
  • 0:37 - 0:41
    which you can imagine is premium space
    for a newspaper of their stature.
  • 0:41 - 0:44
    I read the obituaries almost every day.
  • 0:45 - 0:48
    My wife understandably thinks
    I'm rather morbid
  • 0:48 - 0:52
    to begin my day with scrambled eggs
    and a "Let's see who died today."
  • 0:52 - 0:53
    (Laughter)
  • 0:54 - 0:55
    But if you think about it,
  • 0:55 - 0:59
    the front page of the newspaper
    is usually bad news,
  • 0:59 - 1:01
    and cues man's failures.
  • 1:01 - 1:03
    An instance where bad news
    cues accomplishment
  • 1:03 - 1:07
    is at the end of the paper,
    in the obituaries.
  • 1:07 - 1:09
    In my day job,
  • 1:09 - 1:11
    I run a company that focuses
    on future insights
  • 1:11 - 1:14
    that marketers can derive
    from past data --
  • 1:14 - 1:17
    a kind of rearview-mirror analysis.
  • 1:17 - 1:18
    And we began to think:
  • 1:18 - 1:23
    What if we held a rearview mirror
    to obituaries from the New York Times?
  • 1:25 - 1:28
    Were there lessons on how you could get
    your obituary featured --
  • 1:28 - 1:30
    even if you aren't around to enjoy it?
  • 1:30 - 1:31
    (Laughter)
  • 1:32 - 1:34
    Would this go better with scrambled eggs?
  • 1:34 - 1:35
    (Laughter)
  • 1:36 - 1:39
    And so, we looked at the data.
  • 1:40 - 1:44
    2,000 editorial, non-paid obituaries
  • 1:44 - 1:48
    over a 20-month period
    between 2015 and 2016.
  • 1:48 - 1:53
    What did these 2,000 deaths --
    rather, lives -- teach us?
  • 1:53 - 1:55
    Well, first we looked at words.
  • 1:55 - 1:57
    This here is an obituary headline.
  • 1:57 - 1:59
    This one is of the amazing Lee Kuan Yew.
  • 1:59 - 2:02
    If you remove the beginning and the end,
  • 2:02 - 2:05
    you're left with a beautifully
    worded descriptor
  • 2:05 - 2:10
    that tries to, in just a few words,
    capture an achievement or a lifetime.
  • 2:10 - 2:12
    Just looking at these is fascinating.
  • 2:12 - 2:16
    Here are a few famous ones,
    people who died in the last two years.
  • 2:16 - 2:17
    Try and guess who they are.
  • 2:17 - 2:18
    [An Artist who Defied Genre]
  • 2:18 - 2:20
    That's Prince.
  • 2:20 - 2:22
    [Titan of Boxing and the 20th Century]
  • 2:22 - 2:24
    Oh, yes.
  • 2:24 - 2:25
    [Muhammad Ali]
  • 2:25 - 2:26
    [Groundbreaking Architect]
  • 2:26 - 2:28
    Zaha Hadid.
  • 2:29 - 2:31
    So we took these descriptors
  • 2:31 - 2:33
    and did what's called
    natural language processing,
  • 2:33 - 2:35
    where you feed these into a program,
  • 2:35 - 2:37
    it throws out the superfluous words --
  • 2:37 - 2:41
    "the," "and," -- the kind of words
    you can mime easily in "Charades," --
  • 2:41 - 2:43
    and leaves you with the most
    significant words.
  • 2:43 - 2:45
    And we did it not just for these four,
  • 2:45 - 2:48
    but for all 2,000 descriptors.
  • 2:48 - 2:49
    And this is what it looks like.
  • 2:51 - 2:56
    Film, theatre, music, dance
    and of course, art, are huge.
  • 2:56 - 2:58
    Over 40 percent.
  • 2:58 - 3:01
    You have to wonder
    why in so many societies
  • 3:01 - 3:05
    we insist that our kids pursue
    engineering or medicine or business or law
  • 3:05 - 3:07
    to be construed as successful.
  • 3:08 - 3:10
    And while we're talking profession,
  • 3:10 - 3:11
    let's look at age --
  • 3:11 - 3:13
    the average age at which
    they achieved things.
  • 3:13 - 3:15
    That number is 37.
  • 3:16 - 3:20
    What that means is,
    you've got to wait 37 years ...
  • 3:20 - 3:23
    before your first significant achievement
    that you're remembered for --
  • 3:23 - 3:25
    on average --
  • 3:25 - 3:27
    44 years later, when you
    die at the age of 81 --
  • 3:27 - 3:28
    on average.
  • 3:28 - 3:29
    (Laughter)
  • 3:29 - 3:31
    Talk about having to be patient.
  • 3:31 - 3:32
    (Laughter)
  • 3:32 - 3:34
    Of course, it varies by profession.
  • 3:35 - 3:36
    If you're a sports star,
  • 3:36 - 3:38
    you'll probably hit
    your stride in your 20s.
  • 3:38 - 3:41
    And if you're in your 40s like me,
  • 3:41 - 3:43
    you can join the fun world of politics.
  • 3:43 - 3:44
    (Laughter)
  • 3:44 - 3:48
    Politicians do their first and sometimes
    only commendable act in their mid-40s.
  • 3:48 - 3:49
    (Laughter)
  • 3:49 - 3:51
    If you're wondering what "others" are,
  • 3:51 - 3:52
    here are some examples.
  • 3:53 - 3:55
    Isn't it fascinating, the things people do
  • 3:55 - 3:57
    and the things they're remembered for?
  • 3:57 - 3:59
    (Laughter)
  • 4:00 - 4:02
    Our curiosity was in overdrive,
  • 4:02 - 4:06
    and we desired to analyze
    more than just a descriptor.
  • 4:07 - 4:12
    So, we ingested the entire
    first paragraph of all 2,000 obituaries,
  • 4:12 - 4:15
    but we did this separately
    for two groups of people:
  • 4:15 - 4:18
    people that are famous
    and people that are not famous.
  • 4:18 - 4:20
    Famous people -- Prince,
    Ali, Zaha Hadid --
  • 4:20 - 4:25
    people who are not famous
    are people like Jocelyn Cooper,
  • 4:25 - 4:26
    Reverend Curry
  • 4:26 - 4:27
    or Lorna Kelly.
  • 4:27 - 4:30
    I'm willing to bet you haven't heard
    of most of their names.
  • 4:30 - 4:34
    Amazing people, fantastic achievements,
    but they're not famous.
  • 4:35 - 4:38
    So what if we analyze
    these two groups separately --
  • 4:38 - 4:39
    the famous and the non-famous?
  • 4:39 - 4:40
    What might that tell us?
  • 4:41 - 4:42
    Take a look.
  • 4:45 - 4:46
    Two things leap out at me.
  • 4:47 - 4:48
    First:
  • 4:48 - 4:49
    "John."
  • 4:49 - 4:51
    (Laughter)
  • 4:52 - 4:55
    Anyone here named John
    should thank your parents --
  • 4:55 - 4:57
    (Laughter)
  • 4:57 - 5:00
    and remind your kids to cut out
    your obituary when you're gone.
  • 5:01 - 5:02
    And second:
  • 5:04 - 5:05
    "help."
  • 5:07 - 5:10
    We uncovered, many lessons
    from lives well-led,
  • 5:10 - 5:13
    and what those people immortalized
    in print could teach us.
  • 5:13 - 5:18
    The exercise was a fascinating testament
    to the kaleidoscope that is life,
  • 5:18 - 5:20
    and even more fascinating
  • 5:20 - 5:23
    was the fact that the overwhelming
    majority of obituaries
  • 5:23 - 5:26
    featured people famous and non-famous,
  • 5:26 - 5:29
    who did seemingly extraordinary things.
  • 5:30 - 5:33
    They made a positive dent
    in the fabric of life.
  • 5:33 - 5:34
    They helped.
  • 5:35 - 5:37
    So ask yourselves as you go
    back to your daily lives:
  • 5:37 - 5:40
    How am I using my talents to help society?
  • 5:40 - 5:43
    Because the most powerful lesson here is,
  • 5:43 - 5:48
    if more people lived their lives
    trying to be famous in death,
  • 5:48 - 5:50
    the world would be a much better place.
  • 5:51 - 5:52
    Thank you.
  • 5:52 - 5:55
    (Applause)
Title:
What I learned from 2,000 obituaries
Speaker:
Lux Narayan
Description:

Lux Narayan starts his day with scrambled eggs and the question: "Who died today?" Why? By analyzing 2,000 New York Times obituaries over a 20-month period, Narayan gleaned, in just a few words, what achievement looks like over a lifetime. Here he shares what those immortalized in print can teach us about a life well lived.

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Team:
closed TED
Project:
TEDTalks
Duration:
06:08
  • 2:05 that tries to, in just a few words, capture an achievement or a lifetime.

    It seems to me, the speaker says "capture an achievement over a lifetime", or "of a lifetime", could you please double check?

    Thank you.

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions