-
I'm here today to talk about
the two ideas that,
-
at least based on
my observations at Khan Academy,
-
are kind of the core,
or the key leverage points for learning.
-
And it's the idea of mastery
-
and the idea of mindset.
-
I saw this in the early days
working with my cousins.
-
A lot of them were having trouble
with math at first,
-
because they had all of these gaps
accumulated in their learning.
-
And because of that, at some point
they got to an algebra class
-
and they might have been a little bit
shaky on some of the pre-algebra,
-
and because of that, they thought
they didn't have the math gene.
-
Or they'd get to a calculus class,
-
and they'd be a little bit
shaky on the algebra.
-
I saw it in the early days
-
when I was uploading
some of those videos on YouTube,
-
and I realized that people
who were not my cousins were watching.
-
(Laughter)
-
And at first, those comments
were just simple thank-yous.
-
I thought that was a pretty big deal.
-
I don't know how much time
you all spend on YouTube.
-
Most of the comments are not "Thank you."
-
(Laughter)
-
They're a little edgier than that.
-
But then the comments
got a little more intense,
-
student after student saying
that they had grown up not liking math.
-
It was getting difficult as they got
into more advanced math topics.
-
By the time they got to algebra,
-
they had so many gaps in their knowledge
they couldn't engage with it.
-
They thought they didn't
have the math gene.
-
But when they were a bit older,
-
they took a little agency
and decided to engage.
-
They found resources like Khan Academy
-
and they were able to fill in those gaps
and master those concepts,
-
and that reinforced their mindset
that it wasn't fixed;
-
that they actually were capable
of learning mathematics.
-
And in a lot of ways, this is how
you would master a lot of things in life.
-
It's the way you would
learn a martial art.
-
In a martial art, you would
practice the white belt skills
-
as long as necessary,
-
and only when you've mastered it
-
you would move on to become a yellow belt.
-
It's the way you learn
a musical instrument:
-
you practice the basic piece
over and over again,
-
and only when you've mastered it,
-
you go on to the more advanced one.
-
But what we point out --
-
this is not the way a traditional
academic model is structured,
-
the type of academic model
that most of us grew up in.
-
In a traditional academic model,
-
we group students together,
usually by age,
-
and around middle school,
-
by age and perceived ability,
-
and we shepherd them all
together at the same pace.
-
And what typically happens,
-
let's say we're in a middle school
pre-algebra class,
-
and the current unit is on exponents,
-
the teacher will give
a lecture on exponents,
-
then we'll go home, do some homework.
-
The next morning,
we'll review the homework,
-
then another lecture, homework,
lecture, homework.
-
That will continue for about
two or three weeks,
-
and then we get a test.
-
On that test, maybe I get a 75 percent,
-
maybe you get a 90 percent,
-
maybe you get a 95 percent.
-
And even though the test identified
gaps in our knowledge,
-
I didn't know 25 percent of the material.
-
Even the A student, what was
the five percent they didn't know?
-
Even though we've identified the gaps,
-
the whole class will then
move on to the next subject,
-
probably a more advanced subject
that's going to build on those gaps.
-
It might be logarithms
or negative exponents.
-
And that process continues,
and you immediately start to realize
-
how strange this is.
-
I didn't know 25 percent
of the more foundational thing,
-
and now I'm being pushed
to the more advanced thing.
-
And this will continue for months, years,
all the way until at some point,
-
I might be in an algebra class
or trigonometry class
-
and I hit a wall.
-
And it's not because algebra
is fundamentally difficult
-
or because the student isn't bright.
-
It's because I'm seeing an equation
and they're dealing with exponents
-
and that 30 percent
that I didn't know is showing up.
-
And then I start to disengage.
-
To appreciate how absurd that is,
-
imagine if we did other things
in our life that way.
-
Say, home-building.
-
(Laughter)
-
So we bring in the contractor and say,
-
"We were told we have
two weeks to build a foundation.
-
Do what you can."
-
(Laughter)
-
So they do what they can.
-
Maybe it rains.
-
Maybe some of the supplies don't show up.
-
And two weeks later,
the inspector comes, looks around,
-
says, "OK, the concrete
is still wet right over there,
-
that part's not quite up to code ...
-
I'll give it an 80 percent."
-
(Laughter)
-
You say, "Great! That's a C.
Let's build the first floor."
-
(Laughter)
-
Same thing.
-
We have two weeks, do what you can,
inspector shows up, it's a 75 percent.
-
Great, that's a D-plus.
-
Second floor, third floor,
-
and all of a sudden,
while you're building the third floor,
-
the whole structure collapses.
-
And if your reaction is the reaction
you typically have in education,
-
or that a lot of folks have,
-
you might say, maybe
we had a bad contractor,
-
or maybe we needed better inspection
or more frequent inspection.
-
But what was really broken
was the process.
-
We were artificially constraining
how long we had to something,
-
pretty much ensuring a variable outcome,
-
and we took the trouble of inspecting
and identifying those gaps,
-
but then we built right on top of it.
-
So the idea of mastery learning
is to do the exact opposite.
-
Instead of artificially
constraining, fixing
-
when and how long you work on something,
-
pretty much ensuring
that variable outcome,
-
the A, B, C, D, F --
-
do it the other way around.
-
What's variable is when and how long
-
a student actually has
to work on something,
-
and what's fixed is that
they actually master the material.
-
And it's important to realize
-
that not only will this make the student
learn their exponents better,
-
but it'll reinforce
the right mindset muscles.
-
It makes them realize that if you got
20 percent wrong on something,
-
it doesn't mean that you have
a C branded in your DNA somehow.
-
It means that you should just
keep working on it.
-
You should have grit;
you should have perseverance;
-
you should take agency over your learning.
-
Now, a lot of skeptics might say,
well, hey, this is all great,
-
philosophically, this whole idea
of mastery-based learning
-
and its connection to mindset,
-
students taking agency
over their learning.
-
It makes a lot of sense,
but it seems impractical.
-
To actually do it, every student
would be on their own track.
-
It would have to be personalized,
-
you'd have to have private tutors
and worksheets for every student.
-
And these aren't new ideas --
-
there were experiments
in Winnetka, Illinois, 100 years ago,
-
where they did mastery-based learning
and saw great results,
-
but they said it wouldn't scale
because it was logistically difficult.
-
The teacher had to give different
worksheets to every student,
-
give on-demand assessments.
-
But now today, it's no longer impractical.
-
We have the tools to do it.
-
Students see an explanation
at their own time and pace?
-
There's on-demand video for that.
-
They need practice? They need feedback?
-
There's adaptive exercises
readily available for students.
-
And when that happens,
all sorts of neat things happen.
-
One, the students can actually
master the concepts,
-
but they're also building
their growth mindset,
-
they're building grit, perseverance,
-
they're taking agency over their learning.
-
And all sorts of beautiful things
can start to happen
-
in the actual classroom.
-
Instead of it being focused
on the lecture,
-
students can interact with each other.
-
They can get deeper mastery
over the material.
-
They can go into simulations,
Socratic dialogue.
-
To appreciate what we're talking about
-
and the tragedy of lost potential here,
-
I'd like to give a little bit
of a thought experiment.
-
If we were to go 400 years
into the past to Western Europe,
-
which even then, was one of the more
literate parts of the planet,
-
you would see that about 15 percent
of the population knew how to read.
-
And I suspect that if you asked someone
who did know how to read,
-
say a member of the clergy,
-
"What percentage of the population
do you think is even capable of reading?"
-
They might say, "Well,
with a great education system,
-
maybe 20 or 30 percent."
-
But if you fast forward to today,
-
we know that that prediction
would have been wildly pessimistic,
-
that pretty close to 100 percent
of the population is capable of reading.
-
But if I were to ask you
a similar question:
-
"What percentage of the population
do you think is capable
-
of truly mastering calculus,
-
or understanding organic chemistry,
-
or being able to contribute
to cancer research?"
-
A lot of you might say, "Well,
with a great education system,
-
maybe 20, 30 percent."
-
But what if that estimate
-
is just based on your own experience
in a non-mastery framework,
-
your own experience with yourself
or observing your peers,
-
where you're being pushed
at this set pace through classes,
-
accumulating all these gaps?
-
Even when you got that 95 percent,
-
what was that five percent you missed?
-
And it keeps accumulating --
you get to an advanced class,
-
all of a sudden you hit a wall and say,
-
"I'm not meant to be a cancer researcher;
-
not meant to be a physicist;
not meant to be a mathematician."
-
I suspect that that actually is the case,
-
but if you were allowed to be operating
in a mastery framework,
-
if you were allowed to really
take agency over your learning,
-
and when you get something wrong,
-
embrace it -- view that failure
as a moment of learning --
-
that number, the percent
that could really master calculus
-
or understand organic chemistry,
-
is actually a lot closer to 100 percent.
-
And this isn't even just a "nice to have."
-
I think it's a social imperative.
-
We're exiting what you could call
the industrial age
-
and we're going into
this information revolution.
-
And it's clear that some
things are happening.
-
In the industrial age,
society was a pyramid.
-
At the base of the pyramid,
you needed human labor.
-
In the middle of the pyramid,
you had an information processing,
-
a bureaucracy class,
-
and at the top of the pyramid,
you had your owners of capital
-
and your entrepreneurs
-
and your creative class.
-
But we know what's happening already,
-
as we go into this information revolution.
-
The bottom of that pyramid,
automation, is going to take over.
-
Even that middle tier,
information processing,
-
that's what computers are good at.
-
So as a society, we have a question:
-
All this new productivity is happening
because of this technology,
-
but who participates in it?
-
Is it just going to be that very top
of the pyramid, in which case,
-
what does everyone else do?
-
How do they operate?
-
Or do we do something
that's more aspirational?
-
Do we actually attempt
to invert the pyramid,
-
where you have a large creative class,
-
where almost everyone
can participate as an entrepreneur,
-
an artist, as a researcher?
-
And I don't think that this is utopian.
-
I really think that this
is all based on the idea
-
that if we let people
tap into their potential
-
by mastering concepts,
-
by being able to exercise agency
over their learning,
-
that they can get there.
-
And when you think of it
as just a citizen of the world,
-
it's pretty exciting.
-
I mean, think about
the type of equity we can we have,
-
and the rate at which civilization
could even progress.
-
And so, I'm pretty optimistic about it.
-
I think it's going to be
a pretty exciting time to be alive.
-
Thank you.
-
(Applause)
Yasushi Aoki
the type of equity we can we have,
->
the type of equity we can have,