Price Ceilings: Rent Controls

Rent controls are a type of price ceiling. We’ll use our diagram to show how rent controls create shortages by reducing the supply of apartments available on the market. Rent controls also result in reduced product quality, since they reduce the returns to landlords from renting apartments. Landlords respond by cutting costs or performing less maintenance, leading to lower quality. There are search costs associated with rent controls, and they also lead to a misallocation of resources since apartments are not allocated to renters who value them the most.

Microeconomics Course: http://mruniversity.com/courses/principles-economics-microeconomics

Ask a question about the video: http://mruniversity.com/courses/principles-economics-microeconomics/rent-controls-economics#QandA

Next video: http://mruniversity.com/courses/principles-economics-microeconomics/price-floor-example-minimum-wage

[Alex] Today, we'll be looking
at rent controls,

an application
of what we've done already,

because rent controls
are simply a type of price ceiling.

Let's get going.

Here's the list of the effect
of price ceilings,

which you've now seen many times.

I'm going to talk about each one of these
in the context of rent controls,

except for a loss in gains from trade.

That doesn't really introduce
any new issues,

so I won't talk about that.

Let's talk about the other items, however.

Okay. Rent controls create shortages.

Let's do our usual diagram,
except this time on the horizontal axis

we have the quantity
of rental apartments.

On the vertical axis, we have price.

Here's our demand
and here's our supply.

The main thing we want to add here

is that the supply of apartments
in the short-run

is going to be very inelastic.

Why? Well, in the short-run,
the apartments are simply there.

They're already built, there's not
much you can do

to change the supply of apartments.

Now, this is not quite true.

You can take an apartment
which is about to come on to the market

and turn it instead into a condo.

You might switch some uses.

You might tear down an apartment early,
things like that.

But, basically, the supply
is going to be fairly inelastic

in the short-run.

So, we have a controlled rent.

This means that they'll be a shortage
in the short-run

and it's given by this amount
on the diagram.

Note that most of the shortage
comes from an increase

from the quantity demanded
when you push the rent below

the market equilibrium right,
when you lower therent.

Only a little bit of the shortage
comes from a decrease

in the quantity supplied.

In the long-run, however,

the long-run supply is going to be
much more elastic

than the short-run supply.

So, in the long-run, the shortage
will get much worse.

In the long-run, what will happen
is that fewer apartments will be built,

more apartments
will be allowed to run down

to become dilapidated,
to slowly go off the market.

Apartments will be turned
into condominiums.

Instead of building apartments,
people will build car garages,

people will build other types of housing,
and so forth.

So in the long-run, the shortage
from a rent-control gets much worse

than in the short-run.

Here's an interesting graph
from Ontario, Canada,

showing how rent controls can reduce
the number of new units being built.

So, prior to rent control
even being debated,

there are about 30
to 40 thousand new units

being built every year in Ontario, Canada.

After rent control was put into place
in 1975,

there were fewer than 10,000 new units
being built every year.

Also note, that the number
of new apartments being built,

which might be rent-controlled,

declined even before rent control
was put into place,

and that makes perfect sense.

An apartment has got to pay
for itself over 30 or 40 years.

They are very durable, long-lived assets.

So if you hear today that in the next year
or two, rents may be controlled,

you're going to say,

"Well, I don't want to build
this apartment unit.

You know, it's not going to be profitable
anymore. I was expecting so many rents

for the next 30 or 40 years -

that's now being cut. This unit is not
going to be profitable, I don't want to

build it anymore." And that's exactly
what we saw. A discussion in rent controls

reduced the number of apartments being
constructed. We've also put, by the way,

the number in red, the number of
non-rental-controlled housing that was

being built at the time. And you can see
it didn't change very much. So this

illustrates that it was the rent control
itself and not other factors in the market,

such as the state of the economy, which
reduce the number of rent-controlled

apartments being built every year. So this
illustrates how rent controls can create a

shortage by reducing the supply. As with
other types of price controls, rent

controls create reductions in product
quality. So the rent controls reduce the

return to landlords from renting
apartments, and owners are going to

respond to that price control by trying to
cut costs. So, they're going to reduce

Maintenance, they're going to slow down
the repairs to elevators, they're not

going to mow the lawns as often. After
all, you can still sell just as many units

as they did before. They can keep all of
their units rented at the rent-controlled

price, even when they cut maintenance and
repair costs and amenities, and they don't

put in the new pool or they don't put in
the playground and so forth. They're no

longer in a competitive market. They have
lots and lots of people who want to rent

their apartments at the below-market
price, so they don't need to spend so much

on maintenance and repairs, and other
benefits. And, since their profits are

falling, they want to try and cut costs as
much as possible. Indeed, when rent

controls are very strong, serviceable
apartment buildings quickly turn into

slums, and slums turn into abandoned and
hollowed-out buildings. This happened in

New York City, this happened in Paris,
this happened in many cities around the

world, which instituted strong rent
controls. Rent controls create wasteful

lines and other search costs. So, finding
an apartment in New York City often takes

a long time and you have to spend a lot of
money to get a rent-controlled apartment.

In one famous example, episode of
Seinfeld, George looks for apartments by

consulting the obituaries and rushing to
the landlord anytime he sees someone who

died who had a nice apartment. And that's
in fact one of the techniques which New

Yorkers use to try and get a
rent-controlled apartment. Another effect

of rent controls is to increase
discrimination because rent controls

reduce the price of discrimination. In a
free market, landlords might discriminate.

But then, they pay a price because it's
going to take them longer to rent out the

apartment. But, precisely because the rent
control makes the quantity demanded exceed

the quantity supplied. There are more
people lining up to get apartments than

there are apartments. So, landlords can
more easily, or at lower cost, pick and

choose whom they rent to. Therefore, for
minorities or for people with children, or

for people whom landlords are perhaps
slightly don't want in their apartment,

the cost to them of obtaining apartment is
going to be even higher than for the

average person. Another effect of rent
controls, which is very common, is paying

bribes to get a rent-controlled apartment.
Bribes, of course, are illegal. This is

illegal, but there are ways of disguising
the bribe. One way, for example, would be

to charge extra for a furnished apartment.
What does a furnished apartment look like in

New York City for rent-controlled
apartment? It looks like this. That's a

furnished apartment. You get the idea -
it's a way of paying a bribe under the

table. As with other types of price
ceilings, rent controls create a

misallocation of resources. That is the
apartments are not allocated to the

renters who value them the most. If you
ever get control of a rent-controlled

apartment in New York City, for example,
you never, ever, ever give it up. So, I've

known some people who keep an apartment in
New York City just as a vacation home,

just for the summer, they go there
occasionally. It doesn't have a lot of

value to them, but the price is so low
that it makes sense to keep the apartment.

If they had to pay the market price, then
the high-value bidders, the ones who

really valued the apartment, would bid the
price up and the goods would be allocated

to them. Instead, what we have is people
who only use the apartment occasionally,

keeping the apartment, while other people
with large families are scrunched into

apartments which are much too small for
them. Another classic example: the older

couple who stay in their large
rent-controlled apartment even when their

kids have moved out. It doesn't make sense
for them to move out because they're not

paying the full price, they're not paying
the actual value. So you get apartments

who are allocated to older couples who
actually have a low value for the

apartment, even when there are people who
have a much higher value for that same

apartment and they cannot find an apartment.
One study of this found, for example, that

21% of renters in New York City live in an
apartment that has more or fewer rooms

than they would choose if they lived in a
city without rent controls. So the

apartments become misallocated. Okay.
That's it for price ceilings. Next time,

we're going to be looking at price floors,
a price below which it is illegal to go.

- [Announcer] If you want to test yourself,
click Practice Questions. Or, if you're

ready to move on, just click Next Video.