Return to Video

Office Hours: The Solow Model

  • 0:00 - 0:01
    ♪ (音乐) ♪
  • 0:01 - 0:03
    MRUniversity:
    认识经济,了解世界
  • 0:03 - 0:06
    看了我们网站上的资料,也跟很多学生谈过
  • 0:06 - 0:09
    发现这问题大家都不会
  • 0:09 - 0:11
    所以觉得该是做个视频解说的时候了
  • 0:11 - 0:12
    ♪ (music) ♪
  • 0:12 - 0:15
    Office Hours:
    新古典经济增长模型
  • 0:16 - 0:18
    新古典经济增长模型的稳定状态
    我们之前已有教学视频
  • 0:18 - 0:21
    现在来解其中一道题目
  • 0:21 - 0:28
    A国的GDP产出是以下列方程式表示:
    GDP=5√K
  • 0:28 - 0:30
    资本存量为1万
  • 0:31 - 0:35
    若该国25%的GDP用于生产投资财
  • 0:35 - 0:37
    则该国总投资额为多少?
  • 0:38 - 0:42
    另外,若每年所有资本消耗1%
  • 0:42 - 0:47
    那经济模型达到稳定状态时
    该国GDP是增加、减少还是持平?
  • 0:48 - 0:53
    一如既往,最好先看过视频
    然后试着自己做做看
  • 0:53 - 0:56
    若还有问题,可以再回来
  • 0:56 - 0:58
    大家一起解决
  • 0:58 - 1:01
    准备好了没?
    此问题其实有两部分
  • 1:02 - 1:04
    首先得算出该国的投资总额
  • 1:04 - 1:08
    然后判断GDP是否成长?
  • 1:08 - 1:13
    幸运的是,首题是解开次题的必要步骤
  • 1:14 - 1:15
    按部就班
  • 1:15 - 1:20
    题目中的相关信息已写在白板左上角供大家参考
  • 1:21 - 1:25
    同样地,最好先理出解题步骤
  • 1:26 - 1:29
    第一个问题相当明确
  • 1:29 - 1:33
    只要从GDP等式中拆解出投资要素
  • 1:33 - 1:37
    然后以资本存量1万的条件,解出投资额(I)
  • 1:38 - 1:42
    至于次题则需首题答案
  • 1:42 - 1:46
    也就是投资过程中所累积的资本
  • 1:46 - 1:50
    即能算出资本消耗量
  • 1:50 - 1:54
    最后比较投资额与资本消耗
  • 1:54 - 2:02
    藉此判断该国的资本存量以及GDP
    于稳定状态下是增减或持平
  • 2:03 - 2:06
    我们来详解这个问题
  • 2:06 - 2:09
    As you can see,
    GDP is measured on the y-axis.
  • 2:09 - 2:11
    In previous Solow questions,
  • 2:11 - 2:15
    you may have seen this label does
    total output or Y instead of GDP.
  • 2:15 - 2:19
    And K, physical capital,
    is measured on the x-axis
  • 2:19 - 2:23
    We know that this country's GDP is 5√K
  • 2:23 - 2:26
    and we've actually already graphed it.
  • 2:26 - 2:29
    This equation shows that GDP
    is a function of K.
  • 2:29 - 2:32
    As K increases, GDP also increases.
  • 2:32 - 2:36
    Albeit by a smaller amount because
    of the law of diminishing returns.
  • 2:36 - 2:38
    It's also worth noting
    that we're actually holding
  • 2:38 - 2:41
    other variables that could affect
    GDP constant.
  • 2:41 - 2:44
    Things like education,
    or population, and ideas.
  • 2:44 - 2:49
    So increasing capital is the only way
    this country's GDP grows.
  • 2:49 - 2:53
    In our example, this country
    has $10,000 dollars worth of capital.
  • 2:53 - 2:57
    If we plug that into equation,
    GDP is 500.
  • 2:59 - 3:02
    Now we know that GDP is 5√K
  • 3:02 - 3:06
    and we also know that Investment
    is 25% of GDP,
  • 3:07 - 3:13
    therefore, we can substitute
    5√K in for GDP.
  • 3:18 - 3:20
    And that's it, for step one.
  • 3:20 - 3:21
    To take a short cut,
  • 3:21 - 3:28
    since we know GDP in this instance is 500,
    25% of 500 is 125.
  • 3:28 - 3:32
    This country is investing $125 dollars
    into capital accumulation.
  • 3:32 - 3:36
    And that's the answer to step two.
  • 3:36 - 3:38
    A few quick things to note here,
  • 3:38 - 3:41
    several variables are actually
    measured along the y-axis.
  • 3:41 - 3:44
    Not just GDP,
    but we're also measuring investment,
  • 3:44 - 3:46
    and eventually
    we're going to add depreciation.
  • 3:46 - 3:48
    In general, it looks pretty cluttered,
  • 3:48 - 3:51
    if we were to add all of those labels
    up to the top.
  • 3:51 - 3:53
    So we'll just leave it at GDP.
  • 3:53 - 3:57
    And one other thing to know,
    if we're investing 125,
  • 3:57 - 4:02
    and total GDP is 500,
    what's happened to that remaining GDP?
  • 4:02 - 4:05
    It's being used for consumption.
    You know, buying stuff.
  • 4:05 - 4:07
    One of the follow-up questions
    at the end of this video
  • 4:07 - 4:10
    actually tests your understanding of this.
  • 4:10 - 4:14
    So while this country is accumulating
    125 worth of capital,
  • 4:14 - 4:17
    we don't yet know
    if the country's capital stock overall
  • 4:17 - 4:20
    is increasing, decreasing,
    or remaining constant
  • 4:20 - 4:24
    because we don't know how much
    of the capital stock is wearing down,
  • 4:24 - 4:26
    or depreciating.
  • 4:26 - 4:30
    In the real world,
    machines break, laptops die.
  • 4:30 - 4:32
    Think of physical capital
    in your own life.
  • 4:32 - 4:35
    How many times have you dropped
    your iPhone and had to get a new one?
  • 4:35 - 4:39
    Or how often have you replaced
    an old phone, even though it still worked.
  • 4:39 - 4:44
    So even though capital is being added
    to the stock of 10,000 through investment,
  • 4:44 - 4:48
    some of this 10,000
    is also being lost to depreciation,
  • 4:48 - 4:49
    to those iPhones dropping.
  • 4:49 - 4:52
    It helps to graph depreciation.
  • 4:52 - 4:54
    We know from the initial problem,
  • 4:54 - 4:57
    that 1% of all capital stock
    is depreciating.
  • 4:57 - 5:03
    Graphically, 1% times K
    can be represented roughly like this:
  • 5:03 - 5:07
    If capital stock is 10,000,
    1% of 10,000 is 100.
  • 5:07 - 5:10
    So, 100 dollars worth of capital stock
    is wearing down,
  • 5:10 - 5:11
    or depreciating, each year.
  • 5:11 - 5:15
    We've now solved for step 3.
  • 5:15 - 5:19
    We now have investment and depreciation,
    and can compare the two.
  • 5:19 - 5:22
    If the country invests
    125 worth of capital,
  • 5:22 - 5:25
    and loses 100 to depreciation,
  • 5:25 - 5:30
    then investment
    is greater than depreciation,
  • 5:31 - 5:34
    and therefore, the capital stock
    will grow by 25 this year,
  • 5:34 - 5:37
    as represented by the difference
    between these two curves.
  • 5:38 - 5:41
    We can now answer that final question.
  • 5:41 - 5:43
    The country's capital stock is increasing,
  • 5:43 - 5:48
    and therefore, so too is GDP.
  • 5:49 - 5:52
    And that's our answer.
  • 5:53 - 5:55
    Because remember,
    according to the equation
  • 5:55 - 5:58
    increases in K, increase GDP.
  • 5:58 - 6:01
    As long as investment
    is greater than depreciation
  • 6:01 - 6:04
    K and GDP will continue to increase
  • 6:04 - 6:09
    until the country's capital investment
    equals depreciation.
  • 6:09 - 6:13
    At this point, it reaches steady state
    because capital gain through investment
  • 6:13 - 6:18
    is perfectly offset
    to capital lost from depreciation.
  • 6:18 - 6:22
    And therefore, neither the capital stock
    nor GDP changes at this point.
  • 6:23 - 6:25
    As always, please let us know
    what you think.
  • 6:25 - 6:27
    And if you'd like to have
    some additional practice,
  • 6:27 - 6:30
    we've included some extra questions
    on Solow and steady state
  • 6:30 - 6:32
    at the end of this video.
  • 6:32 - 6:34
    ♪ (music) ♪
Title:
Office Hours: The Solow Model
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Team:
Marginal Revolution University
Project:
Office Hours
Duration:
06:39
  • Ms. He:

    Thanks for your feedback on my subtitle of the video clip, for which I have to tell you on which reference I based my translation.

    The original text:
    00:02:14,987 --> 00:02:19,016
    And K, "physical capital",
    is measured on the x-axis

    First, to be exactly, in economics, “physical capital” or just capital is a factor of production (or input into the process of production), consisting of machinery, buildings, computers, and the like. The production function takes the general form Y=f(K, L), where Y is the amount of output produced, K is the amount of capital stock used and L is the “amount of labor” used.

    "Physical" is used to distinguish physical capital from “human capital” (a result of investment in the human agent), circulating capital, and financial capital "Physical capital" is fixed capital, any kind of “real” physical asset that is not used up in the production of a product. (https://goo.gl/9KkygV)

    Hence, I am afraid we should make a point to differentiate these various capitals when translating them, and that’s why you can easily find the translation “物質資本” by googling it. (https://goo.gl/gsjEAx)

    According to the definition by National Academy of Educational Research,
    物質資本指傳統的「人造的生產工具」,如建築物、機器設備等,都是物質設施。 教育經濟學的研究中,特別著重物質資本與人力資本獲利性的比較。根據沙查波羅(G. Psacharopoulos)研究顯示:在開發中國家,物質資本的投資收益率不及人力資本;但是在已開發國家,物質資本的投資卻優於人力資本。
    (https://goo.gl/q0FdZ6)

    Hope these points are solid enough to prove that “物質資本” is not mistranslation, let alone “physical capital” is a term, not an adjective.

    00:02:14,987 --> 00:02:19,016
    And K, physical capital,
    is measured on the x-axis

    (My translation)
    00:02:14,909 --> 00:02:18,644
    而X轴则表示「物质资本」
    而非现在看到的K

    (Your suggestion)
    02;15 original translation has a misunderstanding
    "而X轴则表示「实际的」资本
    而非现在看到的K"

    00:02:14,987 --> 00:02:19,016
    And K, physical capital,
    is measured on the x-axis

    (My translation)
    00:02:14,909 --> 00:02:18,644
    而X轴则表示「物质资本」
    而非现在看到的K

    (Your suggestion)
    02;15 original translation has a misunderstanding
    "而X轴则表示「实际的」资本
    而非现在看到的K"

  • Sam,

    As I said in my message, translation of "physical capital" is not the problem.

    The original text:
    00:02:14,987 --> 00:02:19,016
    And K, "physical capital",
    is measured on the x-axis

    Your translation basically means
    "x-axis measures physical capital,
    not the K you are seeing here"

    Hope it helps.

  • Sorry I misspelled your name, Samson! I'm terribly sorry。抱歉!

  • 1. The Title “Office Hour” is capitalized, which implies it can be a proper noun instead of the generic nouns as a period of time in which students can bring their questions to the teachers. And the way MRUniversity makes a reference to it corroborates this:
    “’New Office Hours’ on Solow model and steady state”
    (a new installment of this series of videos is available now)
    https://goo.gl/tgsgO4

  • (My translation)
    00:02:14,909 --> 00:02:18,644
    而X轴则表示「物质资本」
    而非现在看到的K

    (Your suggestion in the message box)
    02;15 original translation has a misunderstanding
    "而X轴则表示「实际的」资本
    而非现在看到的K"

    1. The only diofference is 实际的 and 物质资本
    2. 而X轴则表示「物质资本」does not necessarily mean x-axis measures physical capital. Let's lookn at the simplest model Supply and Demand. In Chinese, when we say X-axis X軸代表需求, people would know that it mean all the changes developed regarding this factor is "marked" on x-axis. Actually, "measure" here means"to find the exact corresponding number or amount and because it is not a fixed one, so we say "X轴则表示「物质资本」. If you use Google Translation, there is no correlation between 表示 and Measure.

  • Ms. He:
    I am afraid you did not put my translation in context, the speaker compared the typical chart students might h. ve seen and the present one she is going to use.

    00:02:08,752 --> 00:02:10,561
    以往新古典经济增长模型的问题
    In previous Solow questions,

    38
    00:02:10,641 --> 00:02:14,315
    各位看过的标记或许并非GDP
    而是「总产出」或「Y」
    you may have seen this label does
    total output or Y instead of GDP.

    39
    00:02:14,909 --> 00:02:18,644
    而X轴则表示物质资本
    而非现在看到的K
    And K, physical capital,
    is measured on the x-axis

  • 2. Isn’t this video a SDH Master track, if so, Amara Ondemand Handbook dictates subtitles “Must include all relevant on-screen texts.”
    Hence, should we omit the opening headline “MRUniversity: Learn Economics, Understand Your World”?

  • Samson, I think I'm correct on this one. If you don't agree, you can run it by our other teammates or third-party translators.

    Original sentence:
    “And K, "physical capital",
    is measured on the x-axis”

    This is your translation
    "而X轴则表示「实际的」资本
    而非现在看到的K"

    So basically your translation means
    "x-axis represents physical capital,
    not the K you are seeing now."

    Thanks

  • 3. 0:31~0:35 (Did you look this up?)
    If the country devotes 25% of its GDP
    to making investment “goods”,

     投資財是一種提供生產增加資本的財貨。在經濟上,財貨的支出,不是投資,就是消費。就投資而言,其財貨的支出有下列三種特性:(1)可以累積資本,擴大資本的存量;(2)具有耐久性或長久性,在於未來獲得利益;(3)由於用於生產或投資,有時不能滿足其消費慾望。   視教育為一種投資財,是基於:(1)是對於未來消費能力的增進;(2)是將來賺錢能力的加強;(3)是社會聲望、社會地位及發展潛能的增進。其中特別是第二點,布勞格(M.Blaug,1972)研究英、美、墨西哥、印度等國,其人民教育程度與收入的關係,發現三種事實:   1.如果不考慮教育程度,則個人一生收入,隨年齡而增加,至四十五歲而達到高峰,以後就有逐年下降的趨勢。   2.個人所受教育愈長,起薪就愈高,並且薪資上升幅度較為陡峭。   3.個人所受教育愈長,到達最高收入額愈遲,且其退休時的收入亦愈高。   因此,僅就經濟利益的觀點言,顯見個人投資於教育,對未來的收入的確是有利的。至於國家與社會,在人力素質提高後,產業結構的改變與生產力的增加,導致整個社會的富裕,亦可視為是一種投資。
    https://goo.gl/Pa2hwe
    投資財Investment Goods
    https://goo.gl/85jHF7

  • "x-axis represents physical capital,
    not the K you are seeing now."
    "而X轴则表示「实际的」资本
    而非现在看到的K"
    1. You put it in similar way
    2. Could you please tell me the difference between "X轴则表示「物质资本」" and "而X轴则表示「实际的」资本" ?

  • Ms. He:
    I think we should figure out what the verb "measured" means in "And K, "physical capital",
    is measured on the x-axis.
    1. Could you help me define the word "measured" in the context? Then we can work together to find the Chinese word that is closest to it.

  • 4. 0:42~0:47
    is the country's GDP increasing, decreasing, or remaining constant “in ‘that’ steady state”?

    If we refer back to the same term “steady state” at 0:16~0:19
    , I see no reason to not translate it here as稳定状态

  • 00:02:14,987 --> 00:02:19,016
    And K, physical capital,
    “is measured” on the x-axis
    而x轴衡量的是实物资本(K)

    00:02:05,687 --> 00:02:08,903
    As you can see,
    GDP “is measured” on the y-axis.
    这里y轴代表GDP
    In Chinese:
    衡量: ①比较;评定:衡量得失|衡量利弊|衡量是非。 ②估量,考虑:这件事该不该做,你要好好衡量一下。(https://goo.gl/ESVsNU)

    1. Why could the same phrase “is measured” be translated into two different Chinese words衡量 and 代表 ?
    2. In Chinese, 衡量 is an active verb, and thus requires an actor. But in economics, we have to figure(算出) the equation and then draw the graph using the corresponding amounts we get from the equation. Therefore, it may be strange to say x轴衡量的是实物资本(We use the X-axis to figure out K). Actually, we “put” the amounts of K “on “ the x-axis. These numbers just reflect what we get from the equation.

  • 5. 2:53~ 2:57
    I guess 帶入 and 代入 are interchangeable
    https://goo.gl/aCjVi2

  • 3:28~3:32
    因此该国投入资本累积的/额度就是125美元
    累积的(adj) 额度(noun)
    Common Guidelines – “Avoid breaking grammatical units”
    “Your line breaks shouldn’t divide proper nouns, auxiliary verbs from the word they modify, nor prepositions and adjectives from their nouns”


  • There are many Chinese translations for the term "The Solow Model, " I suggest we should keep the English along with the Chinese translation. https://goo.gl/F06hzo

    梭羅-史旺模型(Solow–Swan model),又稱索洛增长模型(Solow growth model)、新古典经济增长模型、外生经济增长模型(exogenous growth model)

Chinese, Simplified subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions