-
(Music)
-
(Applause)
-
Trevor Copp: When Dancing With the Stars
first hit the airwaves,
-
that is not what it looked like.
-
(Laughter)
-
Jeff and I were full-time
ballroom dance instructors
-
when the big TV ballroom revival hit,
-
and this was incredible.
-
I mean, one day we would say "fox-trot,"
-
and people were like "Foxes trotting."
-
(Laughter)
-
And the next day they were telling us
-
the finer points of a good feather step.
-
And this blew our minds.
-
I mean, all of the ballroom dance
geeking out that we had always done
-
on why salsa worked differently
than the competitive rumba
-
and why tango traveled unlike the waltz,
-
all of that just hit
the public consciousness,
-
and it changed everything.
-
But running parallel to this excitement,
-
the excitement that suddenly,
somehow, we were cool --
-
(Laughter)
-
there was also this reservation.
-
Why this and why now?
-
Jeff Fox: When Trevor and I
would get together for training seminars
-
or just for fun,
-
we'd toss each other around, mix it up,
-
take a break from having
to lead all the time.
-
We even came up with a system
for switching lead and follow
-
while we were dancing,
-
as a way of taking turns and playing fair.
-
It wasn't until we used that system
as part of a performance
-
in a small festival
-
that we got an important tap
on the shoulder.
-
Lisa O'Connell, a dramaturge
and director of a playwright center,
-
pulled us aside after the show and said,
-
"Do you have any idea
how political that was?"
-
(Laughter)
-
So that began an eight-year
collaboration to create a play
-
which not only further developed
our system for switching,
-
but also explored the impact
of being locked into a single role,
-
and what's worse,
-
being defined by that single role.
-
TC: Because, of course,
-
classic Latin and ballroom dancing
isn't just a system of dancing;
-
it's a way of thinking, of being,
-
of relating to each other
-
that captured a whole period's values.
-
There's one thing that stayed
consistent, though:
-
the man leads
-
and the woman follows.
-
So street salsa, championship tango,
it's all the same --
-
he leads, she follows.
-
So this was gender training.
-
You weren't just learning to dance --
-
you were learning to "man" and to "woman."
-
It's a relic.
-
And in the way of relics,
you don't throw it out,
-
but you need to know
that this is the past.
-
This isn't the present.
-
It's like Shakespeare:
respect it, revive it -- great!
-
But know that this is history.
-
This doesn't represent how we think today.
-
So we asked ourselves:
-
If you strip it all down,
-
what is at the core of partner dancing?
-
JF: Well, the core principle
of partner dancing
-
is that one person leads,
the other one follows.
-
The machine works the same,
regardless of who's playing which role.
-
The physics of movement doesn't really
give a crap about your gender.
-
(Laughter)
-
So if we were to update the existing form,
-
we would need to make it
more representative
-
of how we interact here, now, in 2015.
-
When you watch ballroom,
don't just watch what's there.
-
Watch what's not.
-
The couple is always
only a man or a woman.
-
Together.
-
Only.
-
Ever.
-
So, same-sex and gender nonconformist
couples just disappear.
-
In most mainstream international
ballroom competitions,
-
same-sex couples are rarely
recognized on the floor,
-
and in many cases,
-
the rules prohibit them completely.
-
TC: Try this: Google-image,
"professional Latin dancer,"
-
and then look for an actual Latino person.
-
(Laughter)
-
You'll be there for days.
-
What you will get is page after page
of white, straight Russian couples
-
spray-tanned the point of mahogany.
-
(Laughter)
-
There are no black people,
there are no Asians,
-
no mixed-race couples,
-
so basically, non-white people
just disappeared.
-
Even within the white straight
couple only paradigm --
-
she can't be taller,
-
he can't be shorter,
-
she can't be bolder,
-
he can't be gentler --
-
if you were to take a ballroom dance
-
and translate that into a conversation
-
and drop that into a movie,
-
we, as a culture,
would never stand for this.
-
He dictates, she reacts.
-
No relationship -- gay,
straight or anything --
-
that we would regard as remotely healthy
or functional looks like that,
-
and yet somehow,
-
you put it on prime time,
you slap some makeup on it,
-
throw the glitter on, put it out there
as movement, not as text,
-
and we, as a culture,
-
tune in and clap.
-
We are applauding our own absence.
-
Too many people have disappeared
from partner dancing.
-
(Music)
-
(Applause)
-
JF: Now, you just saw
two man dancing together.
-
(Laughter)
-
And you thought it looked ...
-
a little strange.
-
Interesting -- appealing, even --
-
but a little bit odd.
-
Even avid followers of the same-sex
ballroom circuit can attest
-
that while same-sex partner dancing
can be dynamic and strong and exciting,
-
it just doesn't quite seem to fit.
-
Aesthetically speaking,
-
if Alida and I take the classic
closed ballroom hold ...
-
this is considered beautiful.
-
(Laughter)
-
But why not this?
-
(Laughter)
-
See, the standard image that the leader
must be larger and masculine
-
and the follower smaller and feminine --
-
this is a stumbling point.
-
TC: So we wanted to look at this
from a totally different angle.
-
So, what if we could keep
the idea of lead and follow
-
but toss the idea that this
was connected to gender?
-
Further, what if a couple
could lead and follow each other
-
and then switch?
-
And then switch back?
-
What if it could be like a conversation,
-
taking turns listening and speaking,
just like we do in life?
-
What if we could dance like that?
-
We call it "Liquid Lead Dancing."
-
JF: Let's try this with a Latin dance,
-
salsa.
-
In salsa, there's a key transitional step,
called the cross-body lead.
-
We use it as punctuation
to break up the improvisation.
-
It can be a little tricky to spot
if you're not used to looking for it,
-
so here it is.
-
One more time for the cheap seats.
-
(Laughter)
-
And here's the action one more time,
-
nice and slow.
-
Now, if we apply liquid-lead thinking
to this transitional step,
-
the cross-body lead becomes a point
-
where the lead and the follow can switch.
-
The person following can elect
to take over the lead,
-
or the person leading can choose
to surrender it,
-
essentially making it
a counter-cross-body lead.
-
Here's how that looks in slow motion.
-
And here's how it looked
when we danced it in the opening dance.
-
With this simple tweak,
the dance moves from being a dictation
-
to a negotiation.
-
Anyone can lead. Anyone can follow.
-
And more importantly,
you can change your mind.
-
Now, this is only one example
of how this applies,
-
but once the blinkers come off,
anything can happen.
-
TC: Let's look at how liquid-lead thinking
could apply to a classic waltz.
-
Because, of course,
-
it isn't just a system of switching leads;
-
it's a way of thinking
-
that can actually make
the dance itself more efficient.
-
So: the waltz.
-
The waltz is a turning dance.
-
This means that for the lead,
-
you spend half of the dance
traveling backwards,
-
completely blind.
-
And because of the follower's position,
-
basically, no one can see
where they're going.
-
(Laughter)
-
So you're out here on the floor,
-
and then imagine that coming right at you.
-
JF: Raaaaaah!
-
(Laughter)
-
TC: There are actually a lot
of accidents out there
-
that happen as a result
of this blind spot.
-
But what if the partners
were to just allow for
-
a switch of posture for a moment?
-
A lot of accidents could be avoided.
-
Even if one person led the whole dance
but allowed this switch to happen,
-
it would be a lot safer,
-
while at the same time,
offering new aesthetics into the waltz.
-
Because physics doesn't give a damn
about your gender.
-
(Laughter)
-
JF: Now, we've danced liquid lead
in clubs, convention centers
-
and as part of First Dance,
the play we created with Lisa,
-
on stages in North America and in Europe.
-
And it never fails to engage.
-
I mean, beyond the unusual sight
of seeing two men dancing together,
-
it always evokes and engages.
-
But why?
-
The secret lies in what made
Lisa see our initial demonstration
-
as "political."
-
It wasn't just that we were
switching lead and follow;
-
it's that we stayed consistent
in our presence, our personality
-
and our power, regardless
of which role we were playing.
-
We were still us.
-
And that's where the true freedom lies --
-
not just the freedom to switch roles,
-
but the freedom from being defined
by whichever role you're playing,
-
the freedom to always remain
true to yourself.
-
Forget what a lead is supposed
to look like, or a follow.
-
Be a masculine follow
-
or a feminine lead.
-
Just be yourself.
-
Obviously, this applies
off the dance floor as well,
-
but on the floor, it gives us
the perfect opportunity
-
to update an old paradigm,
reinvigorate an old relic
-
and make it more representative
of our era and our current way of being.
-
TC: Jeff and I dance partner dancing
all the time with women and men
-
and we love it.
-
But we dance with a consciousness
that this is a historic form
-
that can produce silence
and produce invisibility
-
across the spectrum of identity
that we enjoy today.
-
We invented Liquid Lead
-
as a way of stripping out
all the ideas that don't belong to us,
-
and taking partner dancing back
to what it really always was:
-
the fine art of taking care of each other.
-
(Music)
-
(Applause)
Brian Greene
The subtitle beginning at 5:31 was corrected on 12/6/16.
5:31
spray-tanned the point of mahogany.
was changed to:
spray-tanned to the point of mahogany.