-
Here's a question that matters.
-
[Is it ethical to evolve the human body?]
-
Because we're beginning to get all
the tools together to evolve ourselves.
-
And we can evolve bacteria
and we can evolve plants
-
and we can evolve animals,
-
and we're now reaching a point
where we really have to ask,
-
is it really ethical
and do we want to evolve human beings?
-
And as you're thinking about that,
-
let me talk about that
in the context of prosthetics,
-
prosthetics past, present, future.
-
So this is the iron hand
-
that belonged to one of the German counts.
-
Loved to fight, lost his arm
in one of these battles.
-
No problem, he just made a suit of armor,
-
put it on,
-
perfect prosthetic.
-
That's where the concept
of ruling with an iron fist comes from.
-
And of course these prosthetics
have been getting more and more useful,
-
more and more modern.
-
You can hold soft-boiled eggs.
-
You can have all types of controls,
and as you're thinking about that,
-
there are wonderful people like Hugh Herr
-
who have been building
absolutely extraordinary prosthetics.
-
So the wonderful Aimee Mullins
will go out and say,
-
how tall do I want to be tonight?
-
Or he will say what type of cliff
do I want to climb?
-
Or does somebody want to run a marathon,
or does somebody want to ballroom dance?
-
And as you adapt these things,
-
the interesting thing about prosthetics
is they've been coming inside the body.
-
So these external prosthetics
have now become artificial knees.
-
They've become artificial hips.
-
And then they've evolved further
-
to become not just nice to have
-
but essential to have.
-
So when you're talking
about a heart pacemaker as a prosthetic,
-
you're talking about something
that isn't just, " I'm missing my leg,"
-
it's, "if I don't have this, I can die."
-
And at that point, a prosthetic
becomes a symbiotic relationship
-
with the human body.
-
And four of the smartest people
that I've ever met --
-
Ed Boyden, Hugh Herr,
Joe Jacobson, Bob Lander --
-
are working on a Center
for Extreme Bionics.
-
And the interesting thing
of what you're seeing here is
-
these prosthetics
now get integrated into the bone.
-
They get integrated into the skin.
-
They get integrated into the muscle.
-
And one of the other sides of Ed
-
is he's been thinking
about how to connect the brain
-
using light or other mechanisms
-
directly to things like these prosthetics.
-
And if you can do that,
-
then you can begin changing
fundamental aspects of humanity.
-
So how quickly you react to something
depends on the diameter of a nerve.
-
And of course, if you have nerves
that are external or prosthetic,
-
say with light or liquid metal,
-
then you can increase that diameter
-
and you could even increase it
theoretically to the point where,
-
as long as you could see the muzzle flash,
you could step out of the way of a bullet.
-
Those are the order of magnitude
of changes you're talking about.
-
This is a fourth
sort of level of prosthetics.
-
These are Phonak hearing aids,
-
and the reason
why these are so interesting
-
is because they cross the threshold
from where prosthetics are something
-
for somebody who is "disabled"
-
and they become something
that somebody who is "normal"
-
might want to actually have,
-
because what this prosthetic does,
which is really interesting,
-
is not only does it help you hear,
-
you can focus your hearing,
-
so it can hear the conversation
going on over there.
-
You can have superhearing.
-
You can have hearing in 360 degrees.
You can have white noise.
-
You can record, and oh, by the way,
they also put a phone into this.
-
So this functions as your hearing aid
and also as your phone.
-
And at that point, somebody might actually
want to have a prosthetic voluntarily.
-
All of these thousands
of loosely connected little pieces
-
are coming together,
-
and it's about time we ask the question,
-
how do we want to evolve human beings
over the next century or two?
-
And for that we turn
to a great philosopher
-
who was a very smart man
despite being a Yankee fan.
-
(Laughter)
-
And Yogi Berra used to say, of course,
that it's very tough to make predictions,
-
especially about the future.
-
(Laughter)
-
So instead of making a prediction
about the future to begin with,
-
let's take what's happening in the present
with people like Tony Atala,
-
who is redesigning 30-some-odd organs.
-
And maybe the ultimate prosthetic
isn't having something external, titanium.
-
Maybe the ultimate prosthetic
is take your own gene code,
-
remake your own body parts,
-
because that's a whole lot more effective
than any kind of a prosthetic.
-
But while you're at it, then you can take
the work of Craig Venter and Ham Smith.
-
And one of the things
that we've been doing
-
is trying to figure out
how to reprogram cells.
-
And if you can reprogram a cell,
-
then you can change the cells
in those organs.
-
So if you can change
the cells in those organs,
-
maybe you make those organs
more radiation-resistant.
-
Maybe you make them absorb more oxygen.
-
Maybe you make them more efficient
-
to filter out stuff
that you don't want in your body.
-
And over the last few weeks,
George Church has been in the news a lot
-
because he's been talking about taking
one of these programmable cells
-
and inserting an entire human genome
-
into that cell.
-
And once you can insert
an entire human genome into a cell,
-
then you begin to ask the question,
-
would you want
to enhance any of that genome?
-
Do you want to enhance a human body?
-
How would you want
to enhance a human body?
-
Where is it ethical
to enhance a human body
-
and where is it not ethical
to enhance a human body?
-
And all of a sudden, what we're doing
-
is we've got this
multidimensional chess board
-
where we can change
human genetics by using viruses
-
to attack things like AIDS,
-
or we can change the gene code
through gene therapy
-
to do away with some hereditary diseases,
-
or we can change the environment,
-
and change the expression
of those genes in the epigenome
-
and pass that on to the next generations.
-
And all of a sudden,
it's not just one little bit,
-
it's all these stacked little bits
-
that allow you
to take little portions of it
-
until all the portions coming together
-
lead you to something
that's very different.
-
And a lot of people
are very scared by this stuff.
-
And it does sound scary,
and there are risks to this stuff.
-
So why in the world would you
ever want to do this stuff?
-
Why would we really want
to alter the human body
-
in a fundamental way?
-
The answer lies in part
-
with Lord Rees,
-
astronomer royal of Great Britain.
-
And one of his favorite sayings
is the universe is 100 percent malevolent.
-
So what does that mean?
-
It means if you take
any one of your bodies at random,
-
drop it anywhere in the universe,
-
drop it in space, you die.
-
Drop it on the Sun, you die.
-
Drop it on the surface
of Mercury, you die.
-
Drop it near a supernova, you die.
-
But fortunately, it's only
about 80 percent effective.
-
So as a great physicist once said,
-
there's these little
upstream eddies of biology
-
that create order
in this rapid torrent of entropy.
-
So as the universe dissipates energy,
-
there's these upstream eddies
that create biological order.
-
Now, the problem with eddies is,
-
they tend to disappear.
-
They shift. They move in rivers.
-
And because of that, when an eddy shifts,
-
when the Earth becomes a snowball,
when the Earth becomes very hot,
-
when the Earth gets hit by an asteroid,
when you have supervolcanoes,
-
when you have solar flares,
-
when you have potentially
extinction-level events
-
like the next election --
-
(Laughter)
-
then all of a sudden,
you can have periodic extinctions.
-
And by the way, that's happened
five times on Earth,
-
and therefore it is very likely
-
that the human species on Earth
is going to go extinct someday.
-
Not next week,
-
not next month,
-
maybe in November,
but maybe 10,000 years after that.
-
As you're thinking
of the consequence of that,
-
if you believe that extinctions
are common and natural
-
and normal and occur periodically,
-
it becomes a moral imperative
to diversify our species.
-
And it becomes a moral imperative
-
because it's going to be
really hard to live on Mars
-
if we don't fundamentally
modify the human body.
-
Right?
-
You go from one cell,
-
mom and dad coming together
to make one cell,
-
in a cascade to 10 trillion cells.
-
We don't know, if you change
the gravity substantially,
-
if the same thing will happen
to create your body.
-
We do know that if you expose
our bodies as they currently are
-
to a lot of radiation, we will die.
-
So as you're thinking of that,
you have to really redesign things
-
just to get to Mars.
-
Forget about the moons
of Neptune or Jupiter.
-
And to borrow from Nikolai Kardashev,
-
let's think about life
in a series of scales.
-
So Life One civilization
-
is a civilization that begins
to alter his or her looks.
-
And we've been doing that
for thousands of years.
-
You've got tummy tucks
and you've got this and you've got that.
-
You alter your looks and I'm told
-
that not all of those alterations
take place for medical reasons.
-
(Laughter)
-
Seems odd.
-
A Life Two civilization
is a different civilization.
-
A Life Two civilization alters
fundamental aspects of the body.
-
So you put human growth hormone in,
the person grows taller,
-
or you put x in and the person
gets fatter or loses metabolism
-
or does a whole series of things,
-
but you're altering the functions
in a fundamental way.
-
To become an intrasolar civilization,
-
we're going to have to create
a Life Three civilization,
-
and that looks very different
from what we've got here.
-
Maybe you splice in
Deinococcus radiodurans
-
so that the cells can resplice
after a lot of exposure to radiation.
-
Maybe you breathe by having oxygen
flow through your blood
-
instead of through your lungs.
-
But you're talking about
really radical redesigns
-
and one of the interesting things
that's happened in the last decade
-
is we've discovered
a whole lot of planets out there.
-
And some of them may be Earth-like.
-
The problem is, if we ever
want to get to these planets,
-
the fastest human objects --
-
Juno and Voyager
and the rest of this stuff --
-
take tens of thousands of years
-
to get from here
to the nearest solar system.
-
So if you want to start exploring
beaches somewhere else,
-
or you want to see two-sun sunsets,
-
then you're talking
about something that is very different,
-
because you have to change
the timescale and the body of humans
-
in ways which may be
absolutely unrecognizable.
-
And that's a Life Four civilization.
-
Now, we can't even begin
to imagine what that might look like,
-
but we're beginning to get glimpses
-
of instruments that might
take us even that far.
-
And let me give you two examples.
-
So this is the wonderful Floyd Romesberg,
-
and one of the things
that Floyd's been doing
-
is he's been playing
with the basic chemistry of life.
-
So all life on this planet
is made in ATCGs, the four letters of DNA.
-
All bacteria, all plants,
all animals, all humans, all cows,
-
everything else.
-
And what Floyd did is he changed out
two of those base pairs,
-
so it's ATXY.
-
And that means that you now have
a parallel system to make life,
-
to make babies, to reproduce, to evolve,
-
that doesn't mate
with most things on Earth
-
or in fact maybe with nothing on Earth.
-
Maybe you make plants
that are immune to all bacteria.
-
Maybe you make plants
that are immune to all viruses.
-
But why is that so interesting?
-
It means that we
are not a unique solution.
-
It means you can create
alternate chemistries to us
-
that could be chemistries
adaptable to a very different planet
-
that could create life and heredity.
-
The second experiment,
-
or the other implication
of this experiment,
-
is that all of you, all life
is based on 20 amino acids.
-
If you don't substitute two amino acids,
-
if you don't say ATXY,
if you say ATCG + XY,
-
then you go from
20 building blocks to 172,
-
and all of a sudden you've got
172 building blocks of amino acids
-
to build life-forms
in very different shapes.
-
The second experiment to think about
is a really weird experiment
-
that's been taking place in China.
-
So this guy has been transplanting
hundreds of mouse heads.
-
Right?
-
And why is that an interesting experiment?
-
Well, think of the first
heart transplants.
-
One of the things they used to do
-
is they used to bring in
the wife or the daughter of the donor
-
so the donee could tell the doctors,
-
"Do you recognize this person?
Do you love this person?
-
Do you feel anything for this person?"
-
We laugh about that today.
-
We laugh because we know
the heart is a muscle,
-
but for hundreds of thousands of years,
or tens of thousands of years,
-
"I gave her my heart.
She took my heart. She broke my heart."
-
We thought this was emotion
-
and we thought maybe emotions
were transplanted with the heart. Nope.
-
So how about the brain?
-
Two possible outcomes to this experiment.
-
If you can get a mouse
-
that is functional,
-
then you can see,
-
is the new brain a blank slate?
-
And boy, does that have implications.
-
Second option:
-
the new mouse recognizes Minnie Mouse.
-
The new mouse
remembers what it's afraid of,
-
remembers how to navigate the maze,
-
and if that is true,
-
then you can transplant
memory and consciousness.
-
And then the really
interesting question is,
-
if you can transplant this,
is the only input-output mechanism
-
this down here?
-
Or could you transplant
that consciousness into something
-
that would be very different,
-
that would last in space,
-
that would last
tens of thousands of years,
-
that would be a completely redesigned body
-
that could hold consciousness
for a long, long period of time?
-
And let's come back to the first question:
-
why would you ever want to do that?
-
Well, I'll tell you why.
-
Because this is the ultimate selfie.
-
(Laughter)
-
This is taken from six billion miles away,
-
and that's Earth.
-
And that's all of us.
-
And if that little thing goes,
all of humanity goes.
-
And the reason you want
to alter the human body
-
is because you eventually
want a picture that says,
-
that's us, and that's us,
-
and that's us,
-
because that's the way humanity
survives long-term extinction.
-
And that's the reason why it turns out
-
it's actually unethical
not to evolve the human body
-
even though it can be scary,
even though it can be challenging,
-
but it's what's going
to allow us to explore, live,
-
and get to places
we can't even dream of today,
-
but which our great-great-great-great-
grandchildren might someday.
-
Thank you very much.
-
(Applause)