-
Not Synced
There's a man out there somewhere
-
Not Synced
who looks a little bit like
the actor Idris Elba,
-
Not Synced
or at least he did 20 years ago.
-
Not Synced
I don't know anything else about him,
-
Not Synced
except that he once saved my life
-
Not Synced
by putting his own life in danger.
-
Not Synced
This man ran across four lanes of freeway
traffic in the middle of the night
-
Not Synced
to bring me back to safety
-
Not Synced
after a car accident
that could have killed me.
-
Not Synced
And the whole thing left me
really shaken up, obviously,
-
Not Synced
but it also left me with this kind of
burning, gnawing need to understand
-
Not Synced
why he did it,
-
Not Synced
what forces within him caused him
to make the choice
-
Not Synced
that I owe my life to,
-
Not Synced
to risk his own life
to save the life of a stranger?
-
Not Synced
In other words, what are the causes of his
or anybody else's capacity for altruism?
-
Not Synced
Well, first let me tell you what happened.
-
Not Synced
That night, I was 19 years old
-
Not Synced
and driving back to my home
in Tacoma, Washington,
-
Not Synced
down the Interstate 5 freeway,
-
Not Synced
when a little dog darted out
in front of my car,
-
Not Synced
and I did exactly what
you're not supposed to do,
-
Not Synced
which is swerve to avoid it.
-
Not Synced
And I discovered why
you're not supposed to do that.
-
Not Synced
I hit the dog anyways,
-
Not Synced
and that sent the car into a fishtail,
-
Not Synced
and then a spin across the freeway,
-
Not Synced
until finally I wound up
in the fast lane of the freeway
-
Not Synced
faced backwards into oncoming traffic
-
Not Synced
and then the engine died.
-
Not Synced
And I was sure in that moment
that I was about to die too,
-
Not Synced
but I didn't
-
Not Synced
because of the actions
of that one brave man
-
Not Synced
who must have made the decision
within a fraction of a second
-
Not Synced
of seeing my stranded car
-
Not Synced
to pull over and run across
four lanes of freeway traffic
-
Not Synced
in the dark
-
Not Synced
to save my life.
-
Not Synced
And then after he got
my car working again
-
Not Synced
and got me back to safety
-
Not Synced
and made sure I was going to be all right,
-
Not Synced
he drove off again.
-
Not Synced
He never even told me his name,
-
Not Synced
and I'm pretty sure
I forgot to say thank you.
-
Not Synced
So before I go any further,
-
Not Synced
I really want to take a moment
to stop and say
-
Not Synced
thank you to that stranger.
-
Not Synced
(Applause)
-
Not Synced
I tell you all of this because
-
Not Synced
the events of that night changed
the course of my life to some degree.
-
Not Synced
I became a psychology researcher,
-
Not Synced
and I've devoted my work to understanding
the human capacity to care for others.
-
Not Synced
Where does it come from,
and how does it develop,
-
Not Synced
and what are the extreme forms
that it can take?
-
Not Synced
These questions are really important
to understanding basic aspects
-
Not Synced
of human social nature.
-
Not Synced
A lot of people, and this includes
everybody from philosophers
-
Not Synced
and economists to ordinary people
-
Not Synced
believe that human nature
is fundamentally selfish,
-
Not Synced
that we're only ever really motivated
by our own welfare.
-
Not Synced
But if that's true, why do some people,
-
Not Synced
like the stranger who rescued me,
-
Not Synced
do selfless things
like helping other people
-
Not Synced
at enormous risk and cost to themselves?
-
Not Synced
Answering this question requires
-
Not Synced
exploring the roots of extraordinary
acts of altruism,
-
Not Synced
and what might make people
who engage in such acts
-
Not Synced
different than other people.
-
Not Synced
But until recently, very little work
on this topic had been done.
-
Not Synced
The actions of the man who rescued me
-
Not Synced
meet the most stringent
definition of altruism,
-
Not Synced
which is a voluntary, costly behavior
-
Not Synced
motivated by the desire
to help another individual.
-
Not Synced
So it's a selfless act intended
to benefit only the other.
-
Not Synced
What could possibly explain
an action like that?
-
Not Synced
One answer is compassion, obviously,
-
Not Synced
which is a key driver of altruism.
-
Not Synced
But then the question becomes,
-
Not Synced
why do some people seem to have
more of it than others?
-
Not Synced
And the answer may be that the brains
of highly altruistic people
-
Not Synced
are different in fundamental ways.
-
Not Synced
But to figure out how,
-
Not Synced
I actually started from the opposite end,
-
Not Synced
with psychopaths.
-
Not Synced
A common approach to understanding
basic aspects of human nature,
-
Not Synced
like the desire to help other people,
-
Not Synced
is to study people in whom
that desire is missing,
-
Not Synced
and psychopaths are exactly such a group.
-
Not Synced
Psychopathy is a developmental disorder
-
Not Synced
with strongly genetic origins,
-
Not Synced
and it results in a personality
that's cold and uncaring
-
Not Synced
and a tendency to engage in antisocial
and sometimes very violent behavior.
-
Not Synced
Once my colleagues and I
at the National Institute of Mental Health
-
Not Synced
conducted some of the first ever
brain imaging research
-
Not Synced
of psychopathic adolescents,
-
Not Synced
and our findings, and the findings
of other researchers now, have shown
-
Not Synced
that people who are psychopathic
pretty reliably exhibit
-
Not Synced
three characteristics.
-
Not Synced
First, although they're not generally
insensitive to other people's emotions,
-
Not Synced
they are insensitive to signs
that other people are in distress.
-
Not Synced
And in particular, they have difficulty
recognizing fearful facial expressions
-
Not Synced
like this one.
-
Not Synced
And fearful expressions convey
urgent need and emotional distress,
-
Not Synced
and they usually elicit compassion and
a desire to help in people who see them,
-
Not Synced
so it makes sense that people
who tend to lack compassion
-
Not Synced
also tend to be insensitive to these cues.
-
Not Synced
The part of the brain that's
the most important for recognizing
-
Not Synced
fearful expressions
is called the amygdala.
-
Not Synced
There are very rare cases of people
who lack amygdalas completely,
-
Not Synced
and they're profoundly impaired
in recognizing fearful expressions.
-
Not Synced
And whereas healthy adults and children
-
Not Synced
usually show big spikes
in amygdala activity
-
Not Synced
when they look at fearful expressions,
-
Not Synced
psychopaths' amygdalas are
underreactive to these expressions.
-
Not Synced
Sometimes they don't react at all,
-
Not Synced
which may be why they have trouble
detecting these cues.
-
Not Synced
Finally, psychopaths' amygdalas
are smaller than average
-
Not Synced
by about 18 or 20 percent.
-
Not Synced
So all of these findings
are reliable and robust,
-
Not Synced
and they're very interesting.
-
Not Synced
But remember that my main interest
-
Not Synced
is not understanding why people
don't care about others.
-
Not Synced
It's understanding why they do.
-
Not Synced
So the real question is,
-
Not Synced
could extraordinary altruism,
-
Not Synced
which is the opposite of psychopathy
-
Not Synced
in terms of compassion
and the desire to help other people,
-
Not Synced
emerge from a brain that is also
the opposite of psychopathy?
-
Not Synced
A sort of anti-psychopathic brain,
-
Not Synced
better able to recognize
other people's fear,
-
Not Synced
an amygdala that's more reactive
to this expression
-
Not Synced
and maybe large than average as well?
-
Not Synced
As my research has now shown,
-
Not Synced
all three things are true.
-
Not Synced
And we discovered this by testing
a population
-
Not Synced
of truly extraordinary altruists.
-
Not Synced
This is people who have given
one of their own kidneys
-
Not Synced
to a complete stranger.
-
Not Synced
So these are people who have volunteered
to undergo major surgery
-
Not Synced
so that one of their own
healthy kidneys can be removed
-
Not Synced
and transplanted into a very ill stranger
-
Not Synced
that they've never met and may never meet.
-
Not Synced
"Why would anybody do this?"
is a very common question.
-
Not Synced
And the answer may be
-
Not Synced
that the brains of these
extraordinary altruists
-
Not Synced
have certain special characteristics.
-
Not Synced
They are better at recognizing
other people's fear.
-
Not Synced
They're literally better at detecting
when somebody else is in distress.
-
Not Synced
This may be in part because their amygdala
-
Not Synced
is more reactive to these expressions.
-
Not Synced
And remember, this is the same part
of the brain that we found
-
Not Synced
was underreactive in people
who are psychopathic.
-
Not Synced
And finally, their amygdalas
are larger than average as well,
-
Not Synced
by about eight percent.
-
Not Synced
So together, what these data suggest
-
Not Synced
is the existence of something
like a caring continuum in the world
-
Not Synced
that's anchored at the one end
by people who are highly psychopathic,
-
Not Synced
and at the other by people
who are very compassionate
-
Not Synced
and driven to acts of extreme altruism.
-
Not Synced
But I should add that what makes
extraordinary altruists so different
-
Not Synced
is not just that they're more
compassionate than average.
-
Not Synced
They are,
-
Not Synced
but what's even more unusual about them
-
Not Synced
is that they're compassionate
and altruistic
-
Not Synced
not just towards people who are
in their own innermost circle
-
Not Synced
of friends and family. Right?
-
Not Synced
Because to have compassion for people
that you love and identify with
-
Not Synced
is not extraordinary.
-
Not Synced
Truly extraordinary altruists' compassion
extends way beyond that circle,
-
Not Synced
even beyond their wider
circle of acquaintances
-
Not Synced
to people who are outside
their social circle altogether,
-
Not Synced
total strangers,
-
Not Synced
just like the man who rescued me.
-
Not Synced
And I've had the opportunity now
to ask a lot of altruistic kidney donors
-
Not Synced
how it is that they manage to generate
such a wide circle of compassion
-
Not Synced
that they were willing to give
a complete stranger their kidney.
-
Not Synced
And I found it's a really difficult
question for them to answer.
-
Not Synced
I say, "How is it that you're willing
to do this thing
-
Not Synced
when so many other people don't?
-
Not Synced
You're one of fewer than 2,000 Americans
-
Not Synced
who has ever given a kidney to a stranger?
-
Not Synced
What is it that makes you so special?"
-
Not Synced
And what do they say?
-
Not Synced
They say, "Nothing.
-
Not Synced
There's nothing special about me.
-
Not Synced
I'm just the same as everybody else."
-
Not Synced
And I think that's actually
a really telling answer,
-
Not Synced
because it suggests that the circles
of these altruists don't look like this,
-
Not Synced
they look more like this.
-
Not Synced
They have no center.
-
Not Synced
These altruists literally don't think
of themselves as being
-
Not Synced
at the center of anything,
-
Not Synced
as being better or more
inherently important than anybody else.
-
Not Synced
When I asked one altruist why
donating her kidney made sense to her,
-
Not Synced
she said,
-
Not Synced
"Because it's not about me."
-
Not Synced
Another said,
-
Not Synced
"I'm not different. I'm not unique.
-
Not Synced
Your study here is going to find out
that I'm just the same as you."
-
Not Synced
I think the best description for this
amazing lack of self-centeredness
-
Not Synced
is humility,
-
Not Synced
which is that quality that in the words
of St. Augustine
-
Not Synced
makes men as angels.
-
Not Synced
And why is that?
-
Not Synced
It's because if there's no
center of your circle,
-
Not Synced
there can be no inner rings
or outer rings,
-
Not Synced
nobody who is more or less worthy
of your care and compassion
-
Not Synced
than anybody else.
-
Not Synced
And I think that this is what really
distinguishes extraordinary altruists
-
Not Synced
from the average person.
-
Not Synced
But I also think that this is a view
of the world that's attainable
-
Not Synced
by many and maybe even most people,
-
Not Synced
and I think this because
at the societal level,
-
Not Synced
expansions of altruism and compassion
are already happening everywhere.
-
Not Synced
The psychologist Steven Pinker
and others have shown
-
Not Synced
that all around the world people
are becoming less and less accepting
-
Not Synced
of suffering in ever-widening
circles of others,
-
Not Synced
which has led to declines of all kinds
of cruelty and violence,
-
Not Synced
from animal abuse to domestic violence
to capital punishment.
-
Not Synced
And it's led to increases
in all kinds of altruism.
-
Not Synced
A hundred years ago, people would have
thought it was ludicrous
-
Not Synced
how normal and ordinary it is
for people to donate their blood
-
Not Synced
and bone marrow
-
Not Synced
to complete strangers today.
-
Not Synced
Is it possible that
a hundred years from now
-
Not Synced
people will think that donating
a kidney to a stranger
-
Not Synced
is just as normal and ordinary
-
Not Synced
as we think donating blood
and bone marrow is today?
-
Not Synced
Maybe.
-
Not Synced
So what's at the root of all
these amazing changes?
-
Not Synced
In part it seems to me
-
Not Synced
increases in wealth
and standards of living.
-
Not Synced
As societies become
wealthier and better off,
-
Not Synced
people seem to turn their focus
of attention outward,
-
Not Synced
and as a result, all kinds of altruism
towards strangers increases,
-
Not Synced
from volunteering to charitable donations
-
Not Synced
and even altruistic kidney donations.
-
Not Synced
But all of these changes also yield
-
Not Synced
a strange and paradoxical result,
-
Not Synced
which is that even as the world
is becoming a better
-
Not Synced
and more humane place, which it is,
-
Not Synced
there's a very common perception
that it's becoming worse
-
Not Synced
and more cruel, which it's not.
-
Not Synced
And I don't know exactly why this is,
-
Not Synced
but I think it may be that we just know
so much more about the suffering
-
Not Synced
of strangers in distant places,
-
Not Synced
and so we now care a lot more
-
Not Synced
about the suffering
of those distant strangers.
-
Not Synced
But what's clear is the kinds
of changes we're seeing show
-
Not Synced
that the roots of altruism and compassion
-
Not Synced
are just as much a part of human nature
as cruelty and violence,
-
Not Synced
maybe even more so,
-
Not Synced
and while some people do seem
to be inherently more sensitive
-
Not Synced
to the suffering of distant others,
-
Not Synced
I really believe that the ability
to remove oneself
-
Not Synced
from the center of the circle
-
Not Synced
and expand the circle of compassion
outward to include even strangers
-
Not Synced
is within reach for almost everyone.
-
Not Synced
Thank you.
-
Not Synced
(Applause)