Return to Video

Slovakia - Andrej

  • 2:16 - 2:19
    My name is Andrej, I come from Slovakia
  • 2:19 - 2:26
    presently, I am the national coordinator of TZM Slovakia and a European TZM coordinator
  • 2:26 - 2:33
    I am a 24-year old student of law and political science
  • 2:33 - 2:37
    I've been part of the Zeitgeist movement since the very beginning
  • 2:37 - 2:45
    when the movie Zeitgeist Addendum came out after which the movement was created
  • 2:45 - 2:52
    I contacted Peter Joseph, the movie director, and offered him my cooperation and assistance
  • 2:52 - 2:57
    in a sense that I would like to translate some materials into Slovak language and
  • 2:57 - 3:02
    if needed to kick-start activities in Slovakia.
  • 3:02 - 3:06
    This basically means that we were one of the first chapters worldwide
  • 3:06 - 3:14
    and immediately in that year, in March 2010, we organized the first Z-day in Bratislava
  • 3:14 - 3:21
    which enjoyed participation of many people, so we were very pleased to have it organized in such a short period of time
  • 3:21 - 3:31
    I met there some very interesting people from Slovakia who joined TZM and helped me personally
  • 3:31 - 3:37
    as well as the other TZM members to get the movement off the ground and shape it in the current form
  • 3:37 - 3:45
    presently, the structure of TZM Slovakia was developed during the last years
  • 3:45 - 3:52
    it is what we focused on from the very beginning, right when we started to brainstorm about TZM
  • 3:52 - 3:56
    and its organizational structure and how it should work in Slovakia
  • 3:56 - 4:00
    we realized all the drawbacks of international organizations
  • 4:00 - 4:09
    and we wanted to contribute with something new, we wanted to structure the entire movement
  • 4:09 - 4:18
    so that there would be decision making processes that would reflect expert approaches
  • 4:18 - 4:27
    scientific approaches and would highlight the tenets on which the movement was created and which fascinated me.
  • 4:28 - 4:35
    The reasons I joined TZM and establish a chapter in Slovakia were diverse
  • 4:35 - 4:42
    many people I talked to said that the Zeitgeist movie series opened their eyes
  • 4:42 - 4:47
    That was not exactly my case. My eyes had been open for some time already
  • 4:47 - 4:58
    I'd been interested in alternative systems and had been watching documentaries and reading so
  • 4:58 - 5:03
    by that time I'd been quite aware even after I watched the movies
  • 5:03 - 5:07
    For me the first movie was an interesting way of documenting
  • 5:07 - 5:13
    it is a very captivating documentary which, however, only brought up the issues
  • 5:13 - 5:17
    although it was done in a very interesting form but it did not offer any solutions
  • 5:17 - 5:33
    After watching Zeitgeist the movie I created my own blog where I published translated news items from alternative media
  • 5:33 - 5:39
    After watching Zeitgeist Addendum which presents the idea of Resource Based Economy
  • 5:39 - 5:45
    as well as it presents the issues of our current system, I immediately knew
  • 5:45 - 5:53
    that this was something different from all the other information on the internet
  • 5:56 - 6:03
    Basically, what was discussed in the movie, the tenets, values and ideas that underlie the resource based economy
  • 6:03 - 6:17
    reflected exactly what I was long convinced of and that is that society should be organized in this way, instead of the current way of organization.
  • 6:29 - 6:44
    ...what should be said next...
  • 6:44 - 6:58
  • 7:06 - 7:12
    Similarly to other countries, we had many people who joined our chapter.
  • 7:12 - 7:27
    In February 2010 we had a large nationwide meeting and we were very surprised those who started the chapter
  • 7:30 - 7:37
    that there was so much interest among people. Many of them came to Bratislava from far away just to participate,
  • 7:37 - 7:41
    to find out what was the movement about and to find ways they could contribute.
  • 7:43 - 7:52
    Similarly to other countries, and we found out about this only after some time, these people wanted to help
  • 7:52 - 8:00
    but as they, after a few months or even weeks, figured that it takes time to change the world
  • 8:00 - 8:13
    and that it requires a lot of work and effort and of course all this takes away spare time when people have to invest energy
  • 8:14 - 8:25
    and as they suddenly found out that this is not a game or a hobby but it is a mission that one really has to take on
  • 8:25 - 8:32
    once they realized that they had to add their own responsibility and be accountable for their own actions
  • 8:32 - 8:36
    then they got their hands off.
  • 8:36 - 8:43
    Later on, I found out that this was the case in many European countries and surely in many chapters across the world
  • 8:44 - 8:51
    but I take it as it comes. People come and go. Everyone has their own opinions, values and the
  • 8:52 - 9:06
    alternative spectrum is very wide. In the entire alternative sphere with all the alternatives to be put in place instead of the current system
  • 9:06 - 9:15
    they are very distinct. So it is perfectly natural that people come and think that TZM is what expresses them
  • 9:15 - 9:20
    but after a while they simply realize that it is not exactly what they thought.
  • 9:20 - 9:31
    This is mainly because people are not informed enough about the tenets and values of TZM and as a result they leave.
  • 9:31 - 9:36
    It is not a tragedy for us. We are very happy and appreciate every single member who joins
  • 9:36 - 9:47
    and we value their inputs regardless whether they stay for a week or three years.
  • 9:51 - 10:00
    As far as the history of TZM Slovakia, as I alluded to prior, after the first Z-Day in 2009 we decided,
  • 10:00 - 10:12
    also in the light of many people leaving the movement without stating concrete reasons, we decided to develop organizational structure.
  • 10:13 - 10:23
    We were convinced that the movement can only function efficiently there is a need for clear rules
  • 10:24 - 10:31
    and clear levels of responsibility and people have to have roles as much as it is in every other organization.
  • 10:31 - 10:36
    TZM is no different. I know that especially within this movement there are many people who think
  • 10:36 - 10:46
    that everything should be solved loosely, that people should do what they want and when do they want it
  • 10:47 - 10:54
    I understand this position but if we want to achieve anything, we have to conform to certain common rules
  • 10:54 - 10:58
    which we will agree upon collectively.
  • 10:59 - 11:14
    Organizational structure of TZM Slovakia as it exists represents the exact values TZM stands upon
  • 11:14 - 11:18
    or based on which TZM should work according to our beliefs.
  • 11:18 - 11:26
    We defined several basic pillars that should support the movement and the organizational structure of TZM Slovakia
  • 11:26 - 11:35
    these include holistic approach, which recognizes the world as a single organism
  • 11:35 - 11:42
    and my actions in one part of the world affects other places
  • 11:42 - 11:52
    I cannot simply expect that my actions won't have effect on something else
  • 11:52 - 11:56
    therefore, every action must be realized as something influencing many other factors
  • 11:56 - 12:04
    and I have to work with the feedback, which I get back and further to implement this feedback in the future solutions
  • 12:04 - 12:13
    Next pillar is humanism. Solutions that TZM is offering should be focused on human beings
  • 12:14 - 12:25
    Humanism is a very large concept which we tried to define so that people would have a clear picture of our understanding of humanism
  • 12:25 - 12:31
    Essential component of TZM is the scientific method and its application.
  • 12:31 - 12:37
    This is perfectly self-evident also in the movies and the teachings of Jacque Fresco and Peter Joseph
  • 12:37 - 12:52
    and in general in the nature of RBE. The scientific method does not proclaim itself to be the one with the best solutions
  • 12:52 - 12:56
    The scientific method offers solutions based on the current understanding.
  • 12:57 - 13:09
    The solutions do not have to be right or wrong because the most interesting property of the scientific method
  • 13:10 - 13:16
    and at the same time what makes it proportionally different from other methods is
  • 13:16 - 13:19
    its fallibility.
  • 13:19 - 13:24
    The scientific method acknowledges that because when we speak about the scientific method
  • 13:24 - 13:30
    we speak about the system, the processes and mechanisms of discovering unknown.
  • 13:30 - 13:36
    When I speak about science and the scientific method I speak about the people. And people who apply this method
  • 13:36 - 13:42
    to acquire understanding of some phenomenon or become able to explain it are and have to be
  • 13:42 - 13:53
    aware of their discoveries being changeable because science is about probability.
  • 14:30 - 14:36
    To the contrary of other methods, the scientific method is able to self-correct itself
  • 14:36 - 14:43
    this means when someone new comes along with a new discovery or a new theory which is accepted
  • 14:43 - 14:47
    it does not mean that this theory will be accepted dogmatically.
  • 14:47 - 14:52
    It is the current state of affairs but that does not mean that someone in the future cannot
  • 14:52 - 14:59
    question the established, prove his/her own truth, come up with new discoveries, new facts
  • 14:59 - 15:04
    and simply explain the matter better than the previous person
  • 15:04 - 15:10
    and that is, according to me, the most important aspect differentiating the scientific method from other methods.
  • 15:33 - 15:39
    A lot of people, and this is something a lot of people experience on a daily basis, discover that when I
  • 15:39 - 15:45
    argue with someone about something or when I am having a discussion and that person
  • 15:45 - 15:52
    in the majority of cases perceives the discourse as something negative
  • 15:52 - 15:58
    especially when I try to persuade him/her about something which he or she thinks it's the truth.
  • 15:58 - 16:06
    When I try to derail his or her worldview, it is perceived as personal attack.
  • 16:06 - 16:15
    This is a mindset that should be changed because the fact that I am convinced of something does not mean it's the truth.
  • 16:15 - 16:21
    Likewise, we have learn how to respect and be open to the opinions of the other people.
  • 16:21 - 16:28
    Because if I allow my worldview to block my own acceptance of any other worldviews
  • 16:28 - 16:31
    then from the epistemic standpoint I am simply finished.
  • 16:32 - 16:41
    I cannot go on, I cannot further develop myself when every time someone questions my opinions
  • 16:41 - 16:44
    I begin to think I am being attacked.
  • 17:19 - 17:27
    A "loss" in a discussion should not be understood as a failure or a personal attack
  • 17:27 - 17:34
    when someone persuades me about something it does not imply I am stupid
  • 17:34 - 17:43
    it is not about trying to prove I was the stupid one who believed in something because I had limited amount of information
  • 17:43 - 17:47
    when I am persuaded by someone about something I should perceive it positively
  • 17:47 - 17:52
    it is about broadening the horizon and acquiring new information
  • 17:52 - 17:58
    the more information once receives, the more open one is, the more of human he or she becomes
  • 17:59 - 18:04
    on the other hand it is important to remark that it is not needed to be fully open to anything
  • 18:04 - 18:08
    we should always find the balance. This is something I always underline.
  • 18:08 - 18:16
    Everything requires a balanced approach. So when I say it's important to be open to new ideas
  • 18:16 - 18:26
    I also mean it is necessary to question the current structures and the contemporary truth that is accepted almost universally
  • 18:26 - 18:31
    and that is also one of the tenets of the scientific method according to my interpretation
  • 18:31 - 18:37
    Critical thinking is the only thing that can move us forward
  • 18:37 - 18:48
    because when people stop questioning and start to believe the current society is the best there will ever be
  • 18:49 - 18:56
    then, at that moment, it is as if we stopped the evolutionary process of the society
  • 18:56 - 19:03
    Society evolves through evolution just like there is biological evolution, there is societal evolution, which must always continue
  • 19:03 - 19:08
    we cannot live in an illusion of reaching a peak.
  • 19:08 - 19:17
    And when we speak about the RBE, as an alternative to the current model, we do not speak about RBE
  • 19:17 - 19:29
    as the final stage which will bring salvation. No, RBE is simply better than what we have now that is something to be stressed
  • 19:29 - 19:46
    it is not about pushing RBE as the final global system, it is about RBE offering a better life for all the people.
  • 19:46 - 19:51
    You can cut this out if you think it's not good enough :)))
  • 19:51 - 20:06
    Questions?...
  • 20:07 - 20:11
    How does the socio-political-economic situation look like in Slovakia?
  • 20:25 - 20:35
    The current socio-political-economic situation in Slovakia is not very different from other countries in Europe or Western world
  • 20:35 - 20:39
    We have the same problems in Slovakia as they have in other countries.
  • 20:39 - 20:45
    Many people like to blame the politicians that the do not govern the society well
  • 20:45 - 20:56
    Tomas: This sentence was not finished, I did not translate it.
  • 21:29 - 21:34
    My opinion is that the basis of any society are three pillars
  • 21:34 - 21:36
    1) politics
  • 21:36 - 21:38
    2) economy
  • 21:38 - 21:40
    3) culture
  • 21:40 - 21:48
    These three pillars can be found in different form in every social system.
  • 21:48 - 21:58
    In the current political establishment, economy has a prevailing position
  • 21:58 - 22:03
    the political and cultural systems are derived from the economic system
  • 22:03 - 22:28
    the current economic system in any of the countries is based on egoism, exploitation of other people and on greed
  • 22:28 - 22:38
    these principles of the economic system to some extent penetrate the political and cultural systems
  • 22:38 - 22:48
    if we have a system that incites greed, egoism and competitiveness at the expense of
  • 22:48 - 22:59
    cooperation, creativity and symbiosis how can we expect that people living in that very system will behave differently?
  • 22:59 - 23:02
    or how should they change the system?
  • 23:22 - 23:24
    It is basically a vicious circle.
  • 25:00 - 25:24
    Tomas: I am not translating this...he's going to rephrase it...
  • 25:25 - 25:34
    In Slovakia, we were able, coincidentally, to get together a bunch of people from the same city who lived close to each other
  • 25:34 - 25:42
    and therefore had an opportunity to meet regularly and better organize the movement
  • 25:42 - 25:51
    ...it's not my best day today...
  • 25:51 - 26:29
    Tomas the Translator: Don't worry Andrej, you're doing great!
  • 26:54 - 27:00
    When we speak about RBE, we could spend hours discussing how the future will look like
  • 27:00 - 27:06
    how different things will be compared to the current system
  • 27:06 - 27:13
    but when we stop talking about this, the first question asked is: "How to get there?"
  • 27:13 - 27:31
    We believe that TZM does not have a concrete blueprint for the transition period
  • 27:31 - 27:39
    this means how to get from point A to point B, from the current monetary system to RBE
  • 27:39 - 27:46
    that is why we've concentrated on this question from the very beginning
  • 27:46 - 28:04
    we wanted to offer to TZM Global, a certain step-by-step methodology of transitioning by means of evolution, not revolution
  • 28:04 - 28:06
    into RBE
  • 28:21 - 29:20
    Tomas is taking a break here...
  • 29:20 - 29:25
    One of the rudimentary problems we encountered in Slovakia was
  • 29:25 - 29:31
    that despite the willingness of many people to contribute and participate in the projects
  • 29:31 - 29:41
    they simply do not have time. The current system has them by the balls and coerces them to work to survive
  • 29:41 - 29:51
    and they can only be activists in their spare time and of course we cannot expect from everyone
  • 29:51 - 29:55
    that they will invest 90% of their time in TZM
  • 29:55 - 29:59
    of course it would be great if we found more people who put their hearts in it
  • 29:59 - 30:07
    who are convinced enough and who are willing to invest the majority of their spare time in TZM
  • 30:07 - 30:12
    but that not how the reality looks like. Many are dependent on the system
  • 30:12 - 30:24
    and are not willing, or sometimes are willing but cannot be active at the expense of their jobs
  • 30:24 - 30:33
    when a person should make a decision between going to work to earn living, pay mortgage, and have the basic human needs met
  • 30:33 - 30:38
    or to come to us to talk about some projects and to attempt to change the world
  • 30:38 - 30:45
    then the decision is always to make ends meet
  • 30:45 - 30:50
    so when we speak about the transition period, we've been thinking as follows -
  • 30:57 - 31:08
    we are now elaborating a concept which would allow the members and supporters to become active
  • 31:08 - 31:17
    and invest all the time and creativity in the projects, which would lay a groundwork for a transition into RBE
  • 31:20 - 31:26
    a tentative title of the concept is an Organization of a new type
  • 31:26 - 31:36
    such an organization should provide TZM members a possibility to get a job, be active in what they know the best
  • 31:36 - 31:40
    simply do what they have expertise in because when people work in a field they know well
  • 31:40 - 31:43
    they like the job and produce high-quality outcomes
  • 31:43 - 31:46
    and that is what the foundations should be
  • 31:52 - 31:57
    What the movement can do is derived from the knowledge of its members
  • 31:57 - 32:02
    this means individual competencies, skills, knowledge of its members
  • 32:02 - 32:07
    the movement should capitalize on this to the largest extent possible
  • 32:07 - 32:11
    and by doing so try to lay the groundwork for RBE.
  • 32:17 - 33:29
    brainstorming....
  • 33:41 - 33:43
    My message to the people of the world
  • 33:43 - 33:51
    first of all, people should realize their own responsibility and not to rely on
  • 33:51 - 34:00
    someone else solving the world's problems whether it is a supernatural entity, a guru or an organization
  • 34:00 - 34:07
    which offers salvation. It is always about people and every single one has to feel this individual responsibility
  • 34:07 - 34:13
    and do the maximum for the change to be achieved
  • 34:13 - 34:20
    change will not come by if we wait around and meditate for things to change miraculously
  • 34:20 - 34:27
    we have to put in all our efforts based on our own skills, potential and capabilities
  • 34:27 - 34:35
    it is also about humility, we should not perceive ourselves as the best there is...
  • 35:02 - 35:11
    I would suggest you cut this out and replace me because I cannot simply organize my thoughts right now
  • 35:15 - 35:22
    replace this part with someone else, OK? I haven't done enough of preparation for this.
Title:
Slovakia - Andrej
Description:

Help us caption & translate this video!

http://amara.org/v/CPLJ/

more » « less
Video Language:
Slovak
Duration:
35:25
rehacek.tomas edited English subtitles for Slovakia - Andrej
rehacek.tomas edited English subtitles for Slovakia - Andrej
rehacek.tomas edited English subtitles for Slovakia - Andrej
rehacek.tomas edited English subtitles for Slovakia - Andrej
rehacek.tomas edited English subtitles for Slovakia - Andrej

English subtitles

Revisions