Could we create dark matter? - Rolf Landua

Check out our Patreon page: https://www.patreon.com/teded

View full lesson: https://ed.ted.com/lessons/could-we-create-dark-matter-rolf-landua

Eighty-five percent of the matter in our universe is dark matter. We don’t know what dark matter is made of, and we’ve yet to directly observe it, but scientists theorize that we may actually be able to create it in the Large Hadron Collider, the most powerful particle collider in the world. So how would that work? CERN scientist Rolf Landua explains how to discover a new particle.

Lesson by Rolf Landua, animation by Lazy Chief.

85% of the matter in our universe
is a mystery.

We don't know what it's made of,
which is why we call it dark matter.

But we know it's out there because we
can observe its gravitational attraction

on galaxies and other celestial objects.

We've yet to directly observe dark matter,

but scientists theorize that we may
actually be able to create it

in the most powerful particle collider
in the world.

That's the 27 kilometer-long
Large Hadron Collider, or LHC,

in Geneva, Switzerland.

So how would that work?

In the LHC, two proton beams
move in opposite directions

and are accelerated
to near the speed of light.

At four collision points, the beams cross
and protons smash into each other.

Protons are made of much smaller
components called quarks and gluons

In most ordinary collisions, the two
protons pass through each other

without any significant outcome.

However, in about
one in a million collisions,

two components hit each other
so violently,

that most of the collision energy
is set free

producing thousands of new particles.

It's only in these collisions that very
massive particles,

like the theorized dark matter,
can be produced.

The collision points
are surrounded by detectors

containing about 100 million sensors.

Like huge three-dimensional cameras,

they gather information
on those new particles,

including their trajectory,

electrical charge,

and energy.

Once processed, the computers can depict
a collision as an image.

Each line is the path
of a different particle,

and different types of particles
are color-coded.

Data from the detectors
allows scientists to determine

what each of these particles is,

things like photons and electrons.

Now, the detectors take snapshots of about
a billion of these collisions per second

to find signs of extremely rare
massive particles.

To add to the difficulty,

the particles we're looking for
may be unstable

and decay into more familiar particles
before reaching the sensors.

Take, for example, the Higgs boson,

a long-theorized particle that wasn't
observed until 2012.

The odds of a given collision producing
a Higgs boson are about one in 10 billion,

and it only lasts for
a tiny fraction of a second

before decaying.

But scientists developed theoretical
models to tell them what to look for.

For the Higgs, they thought it would
sometimes decay into two photons.

So they first examined only
the high-energy events

that included two photons.

But there's a problem here.

There are innumerable
particle interactions

that can produce two random photons.

So how do you separate out the Higgs
from everything else?

The answer is mass.

The information gathered by the detectors
allows the scientists to go a step back

and determine the mass of whatever it was
that produced two photons.

They put that mass value into a graph

and then repeat the process
for all events with two photons.

The vast majority of these events
are just random photon observations,

what scientists call background events.

But when a Higgs boson is produced
and decays into two photons,

the mass always comes out to be the same.

Therefore, the tell-tale sign
of the Higgs boson

would be a little bump sitting on top
of the background.

It takes billions of observations
before a bump like this can appear,

and it's only considered
a meaningful result

if that bump becomes significantly
higher than the background.

In the case of the Higgs boson,

the scientists at the LHC announced their
groundbreaking result

when there was only
a one in 3 million chance

this bump could have
appeared by a statistical fluke.

So back to the dark matter.

If the LHC's proton beams have enough
energy to produce it,

that's probably an even rarer occurrence
than the Higgs boson.

So it takes quadrillions of collisions
combined with theoretical models

to even start to look.

That's what the LHC is currently doing.

By generating a mountain of data,

we're hoping to find more tiny bumps
in graphs

that will provide evidence for
yet unknown particles, like dark matter.

Or maybe what we'll
find won't be dark matter,

but something else

that would reshape our understanding
of how the universe works entirely.

That's part of the fun at this point.

We have no idea what we're
going to find.