-
The origin of copyright law takes us back to the 1710 and Queen Anne, the Monarch who
-
had just overseen the Unification of England and Scotland into then, brand-new Great Britain.
-
Also on her busy schedule was the Statute of Anne: the very first copyright law. It
-
gave authors control over who could make copies of their books or build on their work a limited
-
time. Later a group of rebellious colonists, thought
-
the Statue of Anne was a good idea, and so copy/pasted it into their own constitution
-
giving congress the power: “To promote the Progress of Science and
-
useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors… the exclusive right to their
-
respective Writings”. Basically, copyright is a contract between
-
authors and society: if you promise to make more stuff, we promise not to copy it or build
-
on it for 28 years. Here’s an example from the modern day: let’s
-
say you’re trying to be a director and you’re looking for a project to get started.
-
Harry Potter is a story you’d love to remake. But since J. K. Rowling published ‘The Sorcerer’s
-
Stone’ in the United States in 1998 it still has copyright protection, so you can’t use
-
it. Instead you need find something from a long
-
time ago, like, for example: Star Wars: A New Hope!
-
George Lucas released Star Wars: A New Hope in 1977! That’s more than 28 years ago,
-
So great! Get filming! Alas, no.
-
While Star Wars should have lost copyright protection in 2005 it’s actually copyrighted
-
until 2072! That’s 95 years after publication, not 28!
-
So you can’t use it unless Lucas lets you. Why does his copyright last for ages?
-
Well, as long as there has been copyright there have been authors arguing that it’s
-
too short. And perhaps, they’re right. How’s a poor
-
guy like George Lucas supposed turn a profit in the mere 28 years between 1977 and 2005?
-
There was only the first theatrical release of ‘A New Hope’,
-
And the theatrical re-released in 1978 and 1979
-
and 1981 and 1982
-
and then there was the 1982 VHS and Betamax releases
-
the 1984 broadcast television release the 1985 Laser disc release
-
the 1989 widescreen Laser disc release the 1990 VHS re-release
-
the 1992 widescreen VHS release the 1993 Laserdisc re-release
-
the 1995 VHS re-re-release and the 1997 special edition theatrical release
-
Han shot first, you bastard. and the 1997 VHS special edition release
-
and the 2004 DVD release And now you, dear filmmaker, come along and
-
want make your own version of Star Wars: a New Hope? For shame!
-
That like stealing food right out of George’s Lucas’ mouth.
-
Four times Congress has agreed with authors that the length of copyright is too short
-
to turn a profit and so extended it: First in 1831 from 28 years to 42 years, then
-
again in 1909 to 56 years, in 1976 to the lifetime of the author plus 50 years, and
-
in1998 to the lifetime of the author plus 70 years.
-
That’s a great deal for authors who have already made stuff, but does it really help
-
society get more movies and books? It’s hard to imagine, for example, that
-
Edgar Rice Burroughs started writing ‘A Princess of Mars’ and ‘Tarzan’ in 1911
-
because the copyright laws had just been extended and would not have done so otherwise.
-
Or that J. K. Rowling, while living on benefits in Scotland, was busy doing the math and wouldn’t
-
have written Harry Potter if the copyright protection was just for her whole life and
-
not an additional seven decades thereafter. Because, exactly who needs incentives after
-
they’re dead? Dead is the point at which literally no incentives in the whole universe
-
can motivate you to write one more screenplay. Because you’re dead.
-
If you’re the kind of person who is only motivated by plans that unravel after your
-
demise, you’re either amazingly awesome or deranged.
-
But so what? So what if every kindergartner’s macaroni artwork is protected by copyright
-
for 175 years? Why does it matter?
-
Because the main beneficiaries of copyright after death are not the authors, or society
-
but companies. Companies like… Disney. Remember all the good old Disney movies?
-
Yeah, all of them came from works no longer under copyright protection at the time.
-
The whole of the Disney Empire and all the childhood magic that it produces only exist
-
because there was copyright free work for Walt Disney – you know the guy who actually
-
started the whole company – to rework and update.
-
But the corporate, Waltless Disney was the big pusher of the 1998 life +70 years copyright
-
extension. It made sure that no one could make more popular versions of their movies
-
in the same way they made a more popular version of Alice in Wonderland.
-
This near-infinite control subverts the whole purpose of copyright which is to promote the
-
creation of more books and movies, not to give companies the power to stop people making
-
new creative works based on the efforts on their long-dead founders.
-
New directors and authors need the freedom to take what came before to remake and remix
-
(romeo & juliet, emma). And they should be able to use creative material from their own
-
lifetime to do so, not just be limited to the work of previous generations.
-
At the turn of the century, George Lucas wrought upon civilization a new word: anticipointment.
-
The tremendous let-down that was the lazy, bland, and soulless new trilogy.
-
George Lucas’s was completely within his rights to make those movies into the sterile,
-
toy-marketing vehicles they were. He owned Darth Vader and could tell the origin story
-
as he wished – and that’s the only version you’ll ever get to see.
-
But, imagine for a moment, if copyright still worked as first intended.
-
In 2011 the whole of the original Star Wars trilogy – all of its artwork, its characters,
-
its music – would have left copyright protection and been available to aspiring directors and
-
writers to build upon and make their own versions of.
-
There would be a treasure trove of new Star Wars stories for fans to enjoy.
-
But as long as the current copyright laws remain as they are, no living person will
-
ever get to tell a Darth Vader story, or a Harry Potter Story, or a Hobbit Story or any
-
other story that matters to them, that the author or, when after their death, their company,
-
disagrees with.�