How to create cleaner coal - Emma Bryce

View full lesson here: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/how-to-create-cleaner-coal-emma-bryce

It takes a lot of fuel to heat our homes, preserve our food, and power our gadgets. And for 40 percent of the world, cheap, plentiful coal gets the job done. But coal also releases pollutants into the air, causing environmental damage like acid rain and serious health problems. Can we create a cleaner version of coal? Emma Bryce details the three ways we might strip coal of its foul forces.

Lesson by Emma Bryce, animation by Artrake Studio.

What lights up the screen
that you're looking at right now?

Trace back
the battery chargers and power cords

and you'll end up at an electrical outlet,

providing easy, safe access
to reliable electricity.

But beyond that outlet,
the picture gets messier.

It takes a lot of fuel to heat our homes,

preserve our food,

and our power our gadgets
around the clock.

And for 40% of the world,
that fuel is cheap, plentiful,

and it's called coal.

But coal also releases
pollutants into the air,

like sulfur dioxide,

nitrogen oxides,

soot,

and toxic metals, like mercury.

These cause environmental damage,
like acid rain,

and serious health problems.

In fact, in 1952, coal burning
caused such heavy smog in London

that pedestrians
couldn't even see their feet,

and thousands of people died
from ill health.

Since then, many countries
have deployed technology

to remove most of these pollutants
before they reach the air.

But now we have a new
air pollution problem on our hands,

one that doesn't show up
in a cloud of dark smog,

but in rising seas,

floods,

and heat waves.

It's global climate change,

and again, the main culprit is coal.

It's responsible for 44%
of global carbon dioxide emissions,

which trap the sun's heat
in the Earth's atmosphere,

instead of letting it escape.

So now the question is
how do we remove that bad stuff as well?

That's the idea behind cleaner coal.

Creating cleaner coal is really about
trying to contain its ill effects

with the help of special technologies
that make the end product more acceptable.

Just like the most intriguing superheroes

often have their own dark powers
to overcome,

so we can try and keep
coal's negative forces in check.

But why don't we just exterminate coal

if it takes that much effort
to clean it up?

Simply, coal is extremely valuable to us,
and it's easy to come by.

Compressed underground for ages,

coal holds chemical energy from plants

that were fed from by the sun
hundreds of millions of years ago,

long before humans evolved.

That makes coal energy dense,
meaning it can be burned 'round the clock.

It's also cheap,
if you ignore the pollution costs,

and should last us
through the end of the 21st century.

We've already got all the infrastructure
in place for harnessing its power,

and globally,

although countries are making a move

towards energy from
cleaner and more renewable sources,

there's no sign yet
that coal use is slowing down.

In fact, as of 2012,

over 1000 new coal plants
have been proposed,

mostly in China and India.

Since for the time being
coal is here to stay,

experts say that if we want to reduce
its emissions' impact on the atmosphere,

and slow down climate change,

we'll have to think of creative ways
of reducing coal's destructive power.

To do that, we need
to strip it of its foul forces,

all that toxic carbon dioxide
that causes havoc in the atmosphere.

Then, we need to store
the CO2 somewhere else.

This mission is called
carbon capture and sequestration,

or CCS.

And as if carbon dioxide were some
evil genie we didn't want to escape,

once it has been separated from coal,

we've devised ways
to banish it underground.

We can do this by injecting it
deep into the Earth,

or by placing it deep
under the ocean's surface.

Stripping away coal's negative elements
can happen in three ways.

First, and most commonly,

as coal burns,

the exhaust gas can be mixed
with a compound called monoethanolamine.

Like a forceful power-stripping magnet,
this compound bonds to the CO2,

yanking it out of the gas stream

so it can be stored
separately underground.

Another method is
to relieve coal of its CO2

before it even has a chance
to be released as exhaust.

In this process, steam and oxygen
swoop in to the rescue

to convert coal into a special
product called syngas,

made up of carbon monoxide and hydrogen
and some CO2.

Zap that with some water vapor,

and the carbon monoxide
gets converted into carbon dioxide,

which can be isolated.

The leftover hydrogen gas is then
used as energy to generate electricity,

so there's an added bonus.

A third technique
exposes coal to pure oxygen,

instead of burning it in air.

This creates exhaust gas with higher
concentrations of carbon dioxide,

which makes it easy to isolate
and to banish to the chasms below.

All this can reduce emissions
at a power plant by up to 90%,

but as with any superhero
struggling with their destructive powers,

it takes a lot of effort
to switch over from the dark side.

So these positive
pollution-busting forces,

although they're available,

have barely been used
in commercial power plants

because they cost a lot.

But ultimately, the bigger problem
is that in most parts of the world,

it's still too easy and much cheaper
to keep emitting carbon dioxide,

and that makes it tempting
to completely ignore coal's dark side.

In this case, the most powerful
force for good is regulation,

the rules that can restrict
the amount of carbon dioxide

emitted from power plants,

and make energy companies
around the world

wary of what they put into the air.

Until then,

every time you turn on a screen
or flick a light switch,

coal is lurking in the background,

carrying its dark powers with it
wherever it goes.