How to upgrade democracy for the Internet era
-
0:01 - 0:04I have the feeling that we can all agree
-
0:04 - 0:06that we're moving towards a new
-
0:06 - 0:09model of the state and society.
-
0:09 - 0:13But, we're absolutely clueless as to what this is
-
0:13 - 0:15or what it should be.
-
0:15 - 0:17It seems like we need to have
-
0:17 - 0:20a conversation about democracy
-
0:20 - 0:22in our day and age.
-
0:22 - 0:25Let's think about it this way:
-
0:25 - 0:29We are 21st-century citizens, doing our
-
0:29 - 0:35very, very best to interact with 19th century-designed
institutions -
0:35 - 0:40that are based on an information technology of the 15th century.
-
0:40 - 0:42Let's have a look at some of the
-
0:42 - 0:44characteristics of this system.
-
0:44 - 0:48First of all, it's designed for an information technology
-
0:48 - 0:51that's over 500 years old.
-
0:51 - 0:53And the best possible system
-
0:53 - 0:55that could be designed for it
-
0:55 - 0:59is one where the few make daily decisions
-
0:59 - 1:00in the name of the many.
-
1:00 - 1:06And the many get to vote once every
couple of years. -
1:06 - 1:07In the second place, the costs of
-
1:07 - 1:09participating in this system are
-
1:09 - 1:11incredibly high.
-
1:11 - 1:14You either have to have a fair
bit of money -
1:14 - 1:18and influence, or you have to devote your entire
-
1:18 - 1:20life to politics.
-
1:20 - 1:22You have to become a party member
-
1:22 - 1:25and slowly start working up the ranks
-
1:25 - 1:29until maybe, one day, you'll get
to sit at a table -
1:29 - 1:32where a decision is being made.
-
1:32 - 1:34And last but not least,
-
1:34 - 1:36the language of the system —
-
1:36 - 1:38it's incredibly cryptic.
-
1:38 - 1:41It's done for lawyers, by lawyers,
-
1:41 - 1:44and no one else can understand.
-
1:44 - 1:46So, it's a system where we can
-
1:46 - 1:48choose our authorities,
-
1:48 - 1:52but we are completely left out on how
those authorities -
1:52 - 1:55reach their decisions.
-
1:55 - 1:58So, in a day where a new information technology
-
1:58 - 2:04allows us to participate globally
in any conversation, -
2:04 - 2:08our barriers of information are completely lowered
-
2:08 - 2:11and we can, more than ever before,
-
2:11 - 2:15express our desires and our concerns.
-
2:15 - 2:18Our political system remains the same
-
2:18 - 2:21for the past 200 years
-
2:21 - 2:27and expects us to be contented with being
simply passive recipients -
2:27 - 2:29of a monologue.
-
2:29 - 2:31So, it's really not surprising that
-
2:31 - 2:34this kind of system is only able to produce
-
2:34 - 2:36two kinds of results:
-
2:36 - 2:40silence or noise.
-
2:40 - 2:44Silence, in terms of citizens not engaging,
-
2:44 - 2:47simply not wanting to participate.
-
2:47 - 2:50There's this commonplace
[idea] that I truly, truly dislike, -
2:50 - 2:54and it's this idea that we citizens are naturally
-
2:54 - 2:57apathetic. That we shun commitment.
-
2:57 - 2:59But, can you really blame us
-
2:59 - 3:02for not jumping at the opportunity of going
-
3:02 - 3:04to the middle of the city in the middle
-
3:04 - 3:07of a working day to attend, physically,
-
3:07 - 3:10a public hearing that has no impact
-
3:10 - 3:12whatsoever?
-
3:12 - 3:17Conflict is bound to happen between a system
-
3:17 - 3:23that no longer represents, nor has any dialogue capacity,
-
3:23 - 3:26and citizens that are increasingly used
-
3:26 - 3:28to representing themselves.
-
3:28 - 3:31And, then we find noise:
-
3:31 - 3:37Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico
Italy, France, Spain, the United States, -
3:37 - 3:39they're all democracies.
-
3:39 - 3:41Their citizens have access to
-
3:41 - 3:45the ballot boxes. But they still feel the need,
-
3:45 - 3:51they need to take to the streets in order
to be heard. -
3:51 - 3:55To me, it seems like the 18th-century
-
3:55 - 3:58slogan that was the basis for the formation
-
3:58 - 4:02of our modern democracies, "No taxation
-
4:02 - 4:04without representation,"
-
4:04 - 4:11can now be updated to "No representation
without a conversation." -
4:11 - 4:16We want our seat at the table.
-
4:16 - 4:18And rightly so.
-
4:18 - 4:20But in order to be part of this conversation,
-
4:20 - 4:24we need to know what we want to do next,
-
4:24 - 4:27because political action is being able
-
4:27 - 4:29to move from agitation
-
4:29 - 4:31to construction.
-
4:31 - 4:35My generation has been incredibly good at
-
4:35 - 4:38using new networks and technologies
-
4:38 - 4:40to organize protests,
-
4:40 - 4:43protests that were able to successfully
-
4:43 - 4:45impose agendas,
-
4:45 - 4:48roll back extremely pernicious legislation,
-
4:48 - 4:51and even overthrow authoritarian governments.
-
4:51 - 4:53And we should be immensely
-
4:53 - 4:56proud of this.
-
4:56 - 4:57But, we also must admit that we
-
4:57 - 5:00haven't been good at using those
-
5:00 - 5:03same networks and technologies
-
5:03 - 5:08to successfully articulate an alternative
to what we're seeing -
5:08 - 5:13and find the consensus and build
the alliances that are needed -
5:13 - 5:15to make it happen.
-
5:15 - 5:18And so the risk that we face
-
5:18 - 5:21is that we can create these huge power vacuums
-
5:21 - 5:25that will very quickly get filled up by de facto
-
5:25 - 5:28powers, like the military or highly
-
5:28 - 5:31motivated and already organized groups
-
5:31 - 5:35that generally lie on the extremes.
-
5:35 - 5:37But our democracy is neither
-
5:37 - 5:39just a matter of voting once every
-
5:39 - 5:41couple of years.
-
5:41 - 5:47But it's not either the ability to bring millions
onto the streets. -
5:47 - 5:49So the question I'd like to raise here,
-
5:49 - 5:53and I do believe it's the most important
question we need to answer, -
5:53 - 5:54is this one:
-
5:54 - 5:58If Internet is the new printing press,
-
5:58 - 6:03then what is democracy for the Internet era?
-
6:03 - 6:06What institutions do we want to build
-
6:06 - 6:10for the 21st-century society?
-
6:10 - 6:13I don't have the answer, just in case.
-
6:13 - 6:14I don't think anyone does.
-
6:14 - 6:19But I truly believe we can't afford
to ignore this question anymore. -
6:19 - 6:21So, I'd like to share our experience
-
6:21 - 6:23and what we've learned so far
-
6:23 - 6:26and hopefully contribute two cents
-
6:26 - 6:28to this conversation.
-
6:28 - 6:31Two years ago, with a group of friends
from Argentina, -
6:31 - 6:35we started thinking, "how can
we get our representatives, -
6:35 - 6:37our elected representatives,
-
6:37 - 6:42to represent us?"
-
6:42 - 6:46Marshall McLuhan once said that politics
-
6:46 - 6:50is solving today's problems with yesterday's tools.
-
6:50 - 6:53So the question that motivated us was,
-
6:53 - 6:57can we try and solve some of today's problems
-
6:57 - 7:01with the tools that we use every single
day of our lives? -
7:01 - 7:04Our first approach was to design and develop
-
7:04 - 7:07a piece of software called DemocracyOS.
-
7:07 - 7:10DemocracyOS is an open-source web application
-
7:10 - 7:13that is designed to become a bridge
-
7:13 - 7:17between citizens and their elected representatives
-
7:17 - 7:22to make it easier for us to participate
from our everyday lives. -
7:22 - 7:26So first of all, you can get informed so every new
-
7:26 - 7:28project that gets introduced in Congress
-
7:28 - 7:31gets immediately translated and explained
-
7:31 - 7:34in plain language on this platform.
-
7:34 - 7:38But we all know that social change
-
7:38 - 7:40is not going to come from just knowing
-
7:40 - 7:42more information,
-
7:42 - 7:44but from doing something with it.
-
7:44 - 7:46So better access to information
-
7:46 - 7:49should lead to a conversation
-
7:49 - 7:51about what we're going to do next,
-
7:51 - 7:53and DemocracyOS allows for that.
-
7:53 - 7:55Because we believe that democracy is
-
7:55 - 7:57not just a matter of stacking up
-
7:57 - 8:00preferences, one on top of each other,
-
8:00 - 8:03but that our healthy and robust public debate
-
8:03 - 8:08should be, once again, one of its fundamental values.
-
8:08 - 8:12So DemocracyOS is about persuading
and being persuaded. -
8:12 - 8:14It's about reaching a consensus
-
8:14 - 8:18as much as finding a proper way
-
8:18 - 8:20of channeling our disagreement.
-
8:20 - 8:22And finally, you can vote
-
8:22 - 8:27how you would like your elected
representative to vote. -
8:27 - 8:28And if you do not feel comfortable
-
8:28 - 8:30voting on a certain issue,
-
8:30 - 8:32you can always delegate your vote
-
8:32 - 8:34to someone else, allowing
-
8:34 - 8:39for a dynamic and emerging social leadership.
-
8:39 - 8:41It suddenly became very easy for us
-
8:41 - 8:43to simply compare these results
-
8:43 - 8:45with how our representatives were
-
8:45 - 8:47voting in Congress.
-
8:47 - 8:49But, it also became very evident that
-
8:49 - 8:53technology was not going to do the trick.
-
8:53 - 8:55What we needed to do to was to find
-
8:55 - 8:57actors that were able to
-
8:57 - 9:00grab this distributed knowledge
-
9:00 - 9:06in society and use it to make better
and more fair decisions. -
9:06 - 9:10So we reached out to traditional political parties
-
9:10 - 9:12and we offered them DemocracyOS.
-
9:12 - 9:16We said, "Look, here you have a platform
that you can use to build -
9:16 - 9:20a two-way conversation with your constituencies."
-
9:20 - 9:23And yes, we failed.
-
9:23 - 9:26We failed big time.
-
9:26 - 9:30We were sent to play
outside like little kids. -
9:30 - 9:32Amongst other things, we were called naive.
-
9:32 - 9:36And I must be honest: I think, in hindsight, we were.
-
9:36 - 9:39Because the challenges that we face, they're not
-
9:39 - 9:42technological, they're cultural.
-
9:42 - 9:44Political parties were never willing
-
9:44 - 9:48to change the way they make their decisions.
-
9:48 - 9:50So it suddenly became a bit obvious
-
9:50 - 9:53that if we wanted to move forward
with this idea, -
9:53 - 9:56we needed to do it ourselves.
-
9:56 - 9:58And so we took quite a leap of faith,
-
9:58 - 10:01and in August last year, we founded
-
10:01 - 10:03our own political party,
-
10:03 - 10:04El Partido de la Red,
-
10:04 - 10:08or the Net Party, in the city of
Buenos Aires. -
10:08 - 10:12And taking an even bigger leap of faith,
-
10:12 - 10:16we ran for elections in October last year
-
10:16 - 10:18with this idea:
-
10:18 - 10:20if we want a seat in Congress,
-
10:20 - 10:22our candidate, our representatives
-
10:22 - 10:26were always going to vote according to
-
10:26 - 10:29what citizens decided on DemocracyOS.
-
10:29 - 10:32Every single project that got introduced
-
10:32 - 10:34in Congress, we were going vote
-
10:34 - 10:39according to what citizens decided
on an online platform. -
10:39 - 10:42It was our way of hacking the political system.
-
10:42 - 10:44We understood that if we wanted
-
10:44 - 10:47to become part of the conversation,
-
10:47 - 10:48to have a seat at the table,
-
10:48 - 10:52we needed to become valid stakeholders,
-
10:52 - 10:56and the only way of doing it is to play by the
system rules. -
10:56 - 10:59But we were hacking it in the sense that
-
10:59 - 11:03we were radically changing the way a political party
-
11:03 - 11:05makes its decisions.
-
11:05 - 11:08For the first time, we were making our decisions
-
11:08 - 11:11together with those who we were
-
11:11 - 11:15affecting directly by those decisions.
-
11:15 - 11:19It was a very, very bold move for a two-month-old party
-
11:19 - 11:21in the city of Buenos Aires.
-
11:21 - 11:22But it got attention.
-
11:22 - 11:27We got 22,000 votes, that's 1.2 percent of the votes,
-
11:27 - 11:31and we came in second for the local options.
-
11:31 - 11:33So, even if that wasn't enough to win a
-
11:33 - 11:35seat in Congress, it was enough
-
11:35 - 11:39for us to become part of the conversation,
-
11:39 - 11:42to the extent that next month,
-
11:42 - 11:45Congress, as an institution, is launching
-
11:45 - 11:48for the first time in Argentina's history,
-
11:48 - 11:51a DemocracyOS to discuss,
-
11:51 - 11:54with the citizens, three pieces of legislation:
-
11:54 - 11:56two on urban transportation and
-
11:56 - 11:59one on the use of public space.
-
11:59 - 12:02Of course, our elected representatives are not
-
12:02 - 12:04saying, "Yes, we're going to vote
-
12:04 - 12:07according to what citizens decide,"
-
12:07 - 12:09but they're willing to try.
-
12:09 - 12:12They're willing to open up a new space
-
12:12 - 12:15for citizen engagement and hopefully
-
12:15 - 12:18they'll be willing to listen as well.
-
12:18 - 12:22Our political system can be transformed,
-
12:22 - 12:26and not by subverting it, by destroying it,
-
12:26 - 12:29but by rewiring it with the tools that
-
12:29 - 12:32Internet affords us now.
-
12:32 - 12:36But a real challenge is to find, to design
-
12:36 - 12:40to create, to empower those connectors
-
12:40 - 12:44that are able to innovate, to transform
-
12:44 - 12:46noise and silence into signal
-
12:46 - 12:48and finally bring our democracies
-
12:48 - 12:51to the 21st century.
-
12:51 - 12:53I'm not saying it's easy.
-
12:53 - 12:57But in our experience, we actually stand a chance
-
12:57 - 12:59of making it work.
-
12:59 - 13:02And in my heart, it's most definitely
-
13:02 - 13:04worth trying.
-
13:04 - 13:05Thank you.
-
13:05 - 13:11(Applause)
- Title:
- How to upgrade democracy for the Internet era
- Speaker:
- Pia Mancini
- Description:
-
Pia Mancini and her colleagues want to upgrade democracy in Argentina and beyond. Through their open-source mobile platform they want to bring citizens inside the legislative process, and run candidates who will listen to what they say.
- Video Language:
- English
- Team:
- closed TED
- Project:
- TEDTalks
- Duration:
- 13:24
Adrian Dobroiu commented on English subtitles for How to upgrade democracy for the Internet era | ||
Adrian Dobroiu commented on English subtitles for How to upgrade democracy for the Internet era | ||
Adrian Dobroiu commented on English subtitles for How to upgrade democracy for the Internet era | ||
HAST Junho Kim commented on English subtitles for How to upgrade democracy for the Internet era | ||
Cynthia Betubiza edited English subtitles for How to upgrade democracy for the Internet era | ||
Morton Bast approved English subtitles for How to upgrade democracy for the Internet era | ||
Morton Bast edited English subtitles for How to upgrade democracy for the Internet era | ||
Morton Bast edited English subtitles for How to upgrade democracy for the Internet era |
HAST Junho Kim
i would like to translate this into korean since no one had tried it
how can i start it?
there is no choice to make subtitles on korean for this video
plz tell me how
Adrian Dobroiu
In the current version (number 20), the paragraph splits are in the wrong places. Please fix.
Adrian Dobroiu
10:17 if we want a seat in Congress,
That should be "if we won a seat in Congress". The speaker talks about the promise of her party in case they get a seat the Argentinian Congress, not about what they need to do in order to secure a seat.
Adrian Dobroiu
10:20 our candidate, our representatives
> candidates