Return to Video

Why we need to rethink capitalism

  • 0:02 - 0:05
    This is a story about capitalism.
  • 0:05 - 0:07
    It's a system I love
  • 0:07 - 0:11
    because of the successes and opportunities
    it's afforded me and millions of others.
  • 0:12 - 0:18
    I started in my 20s trading commodities,
    cotton in particular, in the pits,
  • 0:18 - 0:22
    and if there was ever a free market
    free-for-all, this was it,
  • 0:22 - 0:25
    where men wearing ties
    but acting like gladiators
  • 0:25 - 0:29
    fought literally
    and physically for a profit.
  • 0:29 - 0:32
    Fortunately, I was good enough
    that by the time I was 30,
  • 0:32 - 0:36
    I was able to move into the upstairs
    world of money management,
  • 0:36 - 0:40
    where I spent the next three decades
    as a global macro trader.
  • 0:40 - 0:43
    And over that time, I've seen
    a lot of crazy things in the markets,
  • 0:43 - 0:48
    and I've traded a lot of crazy manias.
  • 0:48 - 0:50
    And unfortunately,
  • 0:50 - 0:53
    I'm sad to report that right now
    we might be in the grips
  • 0:53 - 0:57
    of one of the most disastrous,
    certainly of my career,
  • 0:57 - 1:00
    and one consistent takeaway is
    manias never end well.
  • 1:01 - 1:04
    Now, over the past 50 years,
  • 1:04 - 1:09
    we as a society have come to view
    our companies and corporations
  • 1:09 - 1:14
    in a very narrow, almost
    monomaniacal fashion
  • 1:15 - 1:18
    with regard to how we value them,
  • 1:18 - 1:22
    and we have put
    so much emphasis on profits,
  • 1:22 - 1:25
    on short-term quarterly
    earnings and share prices,
  • 1:25 - 1:28
    at the exclusion of all else.
  • 1:28 - 1:32
    It's like we've ripped the humanity
    out of our companies.
  • 1:32 - 1:36
    Now, we don't do that --
    conveniently reduce something
  • 1:36 - 1:40
    to a set of numbers that you
    can play with like Lego toys --
  • 1:40 - 1:42
    we don't do that in our individual life.
  • 1:42 - 1:45
    We don't treat somebody or value them
  • 1:45 - 1:49
    based on their monthly income
    or their credit score,
  • 1:49 - 1:51
    but we have this double standard
  • 1:51 - 1:54
    when it comes to the way
    that we value our businesses,
  • 1:54 - 1:55
    and you know what?
  • 1:55 - 1:58
    It's threatening the very
    underpinnings of our society.
  • 1:58 - 2:00
    And here's how you'll see.
  • 2:00 - 2:04
    This chart is corporate profit margins
    going back 40 years
  • 2:04 - 2:06
    as a percentage of revenues,
  • 2:06 - 2:11
    and you can see that we're
    at a 40-year high of 12.5 percent.
  • 2:11 - 2:14
    Now, hooray if you're a shareholder,
  • 2:14 - 2:19
    but if you're the other side of that,
    and you're the average American worker,
  • 2:19 - 2:22
    then you can see it's not
    such a good thing.
  • 2:22 - 2:25
    ["U.S. Share of Income Going to Labor vs.
    CEO-to-Worker Compensation Ratio"]
  • 2:25 - 2:29
    Now, higher profit margins
    do not increase societal wealth.
  • 2:29 - 2:34
    What they actually do is they
    exacerbate income inequality,
  • 2:34 - 2:36
    and that's not a good thing.
  • 2:36 - 2:39
    But intuitively, that makes sense, right?
  • 2:39 - 2:42
    Because if the top 10 percent
    of American families
  • 2:42 - 2:45
    own 90 percent of the stocks,
  • 2:45 - 2:48
    as they take a greater share
    of corporate profits,
  • 2:48 - 2:52
    then there's less wealth left
    for the rest of society.
  • 2:52 - 2:54
    Again, income inequality
    is not a good thing.
  • 2:54 - 2:57
    This next chart,
    made by The Equality Trust,
  • 2:57 - 3:02
    shows 21 countries from Austria
    to Japan to New Zealand.
  • 3:02 - 3:05
    On the horizontal axis
    is income inequality.
  • 3:05 - 3:08
    The further to the right you go,
    the greater the income inequality.
  • 3:08 - 3:11
    On the vertical axis
    are nine social and health metrics.
  • 3:11 - 3:14
    The more you go up that,
    the worse the problems are,
  • 3:14 - 3:19
    and those metrics include life expectancy,
    teenage pregnancy, literacy,
  • 3:19 - 3:22
    social mobility, just to name a few.
  • 3:22 - 3:25
    Now, those of you in the audience
    who are Americans may wonder,
  • 3:25 - 3:28
    well, where does the United States rank?
  • 3:28 - 3:30
    Where does it lie on that chart?
  • 3:30 - 3:31
    And guess what?
  • 3:31 - 3:33
    We're literally off the chart.
  • 3:34 - 3:36
    Yes, that's us,
  • 3:36 - 3:38
    with the greatest income inequality
  • 3:38 - 3:42
    and the greatest social problems,
    according to those metrics.
  • 3:42 - 3:45
    Now, here's a macro forecast
    that's easy to make,
  • 3:45 - 3:48
    and that's, that gap between
    the wealthiest and the poorest,
  • 3:48 - 3:50
    it will get closed.
  • 3:50 - 3:52
    History always does it.
  • 3:52 - 3:54
    It typically happens in one of three ways:
  • 3:54 - 4:01
    either through revolution,
    higher taxes, or wars.
  • 4:01 - 4:03
    None of those are on my bucket list.
  • 4:03 - 4:04
    (Laughter)
  • 4:04 - 4:06
    Now, there's another way to do it,
  • 4:06 - 4:10
    and that's by increasing justness
    in corporate behavior,
  • 4:10 - 4:13
    but the way that we're
    operating right now,
  • 4:13 - 4:17
    that would require
    a tremendous change in behavior,
  • 4:17 - 4:21
    and like an addict trying to kick a habit,
  • 4:21 - 4:24
    the first step is to acknowledge
    that you have a problem.
  • 4:24 - 4:28
    And let me just say,
    this profits mania that we're on
  • 4:28 - 4:31
    is so deeply entrenched
  • 4:31 - 4:33
    that we don't even realize
    how we're harming society.
  • 4:33 - 4:37
    Here's a small but startling example
    of exactly how we're doing that:
  • 4:37 - 4:40
    this chart shows corporate giving
  • 4:40 - 4:46
    as a percentage of profits,
    not revenues, over the last 30 years.
  • 4:46 - 4:51
    Juxtapose that to the earlier chart
    of corporate profit margins,
  • 4:51 - 4:56
    and I ask you, does that feel right?
  • 4:57 - 5:00
    In all fairness, when I
    started writing this, I thought,
  • 5:00 - 5:02
    "Oh wow, what does my company,
    what does Tudor do?"
  • 5:02 - 5:08
    And I realized we give one percent
    of corporate profits
  • 5:08 - 5:09
    to charity every year.
  • 5:09 - 5:13
    And I'm supposed to be a philanthropist.
  • 5:13 - 5:20
    When I realized that, I literally
    wanted to throw up.
  • 5:20 - 5:22
    But the point is, this mania
    is so deeply entrenched
  • 5:22 - 5:27
    that well-intentioned people like myself
    don't even realize that we're part of it.
  • 5:28 - 5:30
    Now, we're not going
    to change corporate behavior
  • 5:30 - 5:36
    by simply increasing corporate
    philanthropy or charitable contributions.
  • 5:36 - 5:39
    And oh, by the way,
    we've since quadrupled that,
  • 5:39 - 5:43
    but -- (Applause) -- Please.
  • 5:43 - 5:47
    But we can do it by driving
    more just behavior.
  • 5:47 - 5:50
    And one way to do it is actually trusting
  • 5:50 - 5:52
    the system that got us
    here in the first place,
  • 5:52 - 5:54
    and that's the free market system.
  • 5:54 - 5:57
    About a year ago,
    some friends of mine and I
  • 5:57 - 6:00
    started a not-for-profit
    called Just Capital.
  • 6:00 - 6:01
    Its mission is very simple:
  • 6:01 - 6:04
    to help companies and corporations
  • 6:04 - 6:09
    learn how to operate in a more just
    fashion by using the public's input
  • 6:09 - 6:16
    to define exactly what the criteria are
    for just corporate behavior.
  • 6:16 - 6:18
    Now, right now, there's
    no widely accepted standard
  • 6:18 - 6:22
    that a company or corporation can follow,
    and that's where Just Capital comes in,
  • 6:22 - 6:28
    because beginning this year and every year
    we'll be conducting a nationwide survey
  • 6:28 - 6:32
    of a representative sample
    of 20,000 Americans
  • 6:32 - 6:35
    to find out exactly what they think
  • 6:35 - 6:39
    are the criteria for justness
    in corporate behavior.
  • 6:39 - 6:42
    Now, this is a model that's going
    to start in the United States
  • 6:42 - 6:44
    but can be expanded
    anywhere around the globe,
  • 6:44 - 6:46
    and maybe we'll find out
  • 6:46 - 6:49
    that the most important
    thing for the public
  • 6:49 - 6:54
    is that we create living wage jobs,
    or make healthy products,
  • 6:54 - 6:58
    or help, not harm, the environment.
  • 6:58 - 7:02
    At Just Capital, we don't know,
    and it's not for us to decide.
  • 7:02 - 7:04
    We're but messengers,
  • 7:04 - 7:08
    but we have 100 percent confidence
    and faith in the American public
  • 7:08 - 7:09
    to get it right.
  • 7:10 - 7:13
    So we'll release the findings
    this September for the first time,
  • 7:13 - 7:16
    and then next year, we'll poll again,
  • 7:16 - 7:18
    and we'll take the additive step this time
  • 7:18 - 7:21
    of ranking the 1,000
    largest U.S. companies
  • 7:21 - 7:26
    from number one to number 1,000
    and everything in between.
  • 7:26 - 7:29
    We're calling it the Just Index,
  • 7:29 - 7:34
    and remember, we're an independent
    not-for-profit with no bias,
  • 7:34 - 7:39
    and we will be giving
    the American public a voice.
  • 7:39 - 7:43
    And maybe over time, we'll find out
    that as people come to know
  • 7:43 - 7:45
    which companies are the most just,
  • 7:45 - 7:49
    human and economic resources
    will be driven towards them,
  • 7:49 - 7:51
    and they'll become the most prosperous
  • 7:51 - 7:54
    and help our country
    be the most prosperous.
  • 7:55 - 7:59
    Now, capitalism has been responsible
    for every major innovation
  • 7:59 - 8:04
    that's made this world a more inspiring
    and wonderful place to live in.
  • 8:05 - 8:07
    Capitalism has to be based on justice.
  • 8:07 - 8:10
    It has to be, and now more than ever,
  • 8:10 - 8:13
    with economic divisions
    growing wider every day.
  • 8:13 - 8:16
    It's estimated that 47 percent
    of American workers
  • 8:16 - 8:20
    can be displaced in the next 20 years.
  • 8:20 - 8:22
    I'm not against progress.
  • 8:22 - 8:27
    I want the driverless car and the jet pack
    just like everyone else.
  • 8:27 - 8:32
    But I'm pleading for recognition
    that with increased wealth and profits
  • 8:32 - 8:38
    has to come greater
    corporate social responsibility.
  • 8:38 - 8:44
    "If justice is removed," said Adam Smith,
    the father of capitalism,
  • 8:44 - 8:49
    "the great, the immense fabric
    of human society must in a moment
  • 8:49 - 8:54
    crumble into atoms."
  • 8:54 - 8:57
    Now, when I was young,
    and there was a problem,
  • 8:57 - 9:02
    my mama used to always
    sigh and shake her head and say,
  • 9:02 - 9:06
    "Have mercy, have mercy."
  • 9:06 - 9:10
    Now's not the time for us,
    for the rest of us to show them mercy.
  • 9:10 - 9:13
    The time is now for us
    to show them fairness,
  • 9:13 - 9:16
    and we can do that, you and I,
  • 9:16 - 9:21
    by starting where we work,
    in the businesses that we operate in.
  • 9:21 - 9:24
    And when we put justness
    on par with profits,
  • 9:24 - 9:28
    we'll get the most wonderful thing
    in all the world.
  • 9:28 - 9:32
    We'll take back our humanity.
  • 9:32 - 9:34
    Thank you.
  • 9:34 - 9:38
    (Applause)
Title:
Why we need to rethink capitalism
Speaker:
Paul Tudor Jones
Description:

Paul Tudor Jones II loves capitalism. It's a system that has done him very well over the last few decades. Nonetheless, the hedge fund manager and philanthropist is concerned that a laser focus on profits is, as he puts it, "threatening the very underpinnings of society." In this thoughtful, passionate talk, he outlines his planned counter-offensive, which centers on the concept of "justness."

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Team:
closed TED
Project:
TEDTalks
Duration:
09:51

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions