0:00:00.717,0:00:04.014 An evolutionary biologist[br]at Purdue University 0:00:04.014,0:00:07.160 named William Muir studied chickens. 0:00:07.520,0:00:09.249 He was interested in productivity -- 0:00:09.249,0:00:11.539 I think it's something[br]that concerns all of us -- 0:00:11.539,0:00:14.827 but it's easy to measure in chickens[br]because you just count the eggs. 0:00:14.827,0:00:16.527 (Laughter) 0:00:16.527,0:00:19.944 He wanted to know what could make[br]his chickens more productive, 0:00:19.944,0:00:22.870 so he devised a beautiful experiment. 0:00:22.870,0:00:27.328 Chickens live in groups, so first of all,[br]he selected just an average flock, 0:00:27.328,0:00:30.718 and he let it alone for six generations. 0:00:30.718,0:00:32.807 But then he created a second group 0:00:32.807,0:00:35.315 of the individually[br]most productive chickens -- 0:00:35.315,0:00:38.270 you could call them superchickens -- 0:00:38.270,0:00:40.377 and he put them together in a superflock, 0:00:40.377,0:00:45.075 and each generation, he selected[br]only the most productive for breeding. 0:00:45.415,0:00:47.969 After six generations had passed, 0:00:47.969,0:00:49.717 what did he find? 0:00:49.717,0:00:53.548 Well, the first group, the average group,[br]was doing just fine. 0:00:53.548,0:00:56.074 They were all plump and fully feathered 0:00:56.074,0:00:58.352 and egg production[br]had increased dramatically. 0:00:58.702,0:01:00.559 What about the second group? 0:01:01.419,0:01:03.293 Well, all but three were dead. 0:01:04.253,0:01:06.413 They'd pecked the rest to death. 0:01:06.413,0:01:07.990 (Laughter) 0:01:07.990,0:01:13.501 The individually productive chickens[br]had only achieved their success 0:01:13.501,0:01:18.164 by suppressing the productivity[br]of the rest. 0:01:18.830,0:01:22.525 Now, as I've gone around the world[br]talking about this and telling this story 0:01:22.525,0:01:24.777 in all sorts of organizations[br]and companies, 0:01:24.777,0:01:27.353 people have seen[br]the relevance almost instantly, 0:01:27.353,0:01:29.659 and they come up and they say[br]things to me like, 0:01:29.659,0:01:32.750 "That superflock, that's my company." 0:01:32.750,0:01:34.715 (Laughter) 0:01:34.715,0:01:38.226 Or, "That's my country." 0:01:38.226,0:01:40.318 Or, "That's my life." 0:01:40.798,0:01:44.722 All my life I've been told that the way[br]we have to get ahead is to compete: 0:01:44.722,0:01:48.754 get into the right school,[br]get into the right job, get to the top, 0:01:48.754,0:01:52.492 and I've really never found it[br]very inspiring. 0:01:52.492,0:01:57.275 I've started and run businesses[br]because invention is a joy, 0:01:57.275,0:02:00.595 and because working alongside[br]brilliant, creative people 0:02:00.595,0:02:02.075 is its own reward. 0:02:02.755,0:02:08.397 And I've never really felt very motivated[br]by pecking orders or by superchickens 0:02:08.397,0:02:10.966 or by superstars. 0:02:11.276,0:02:13.220 But for the past 50 years, 0:02:13.220,0:02:17.452 we've run most organizations[br]and some societies 0:02:17.452,0:02:19.770 along the superchicken model. 0:02:19.960,0:02:23.582 We've thought that success is achieved[br]by picking the superstars, 0:02:23.582,0:02:27.731 the brightest men,[br]or occasionally women, in the room, 0:02:27.731,0:02:31.090 and giving them all the resources[br]and all the power. 0:02:31.430,0:02:35.493 And the result has been just the same[br]as in William Muir's experiment: 0:02:35.493,0:02:40.462 aggression, dysfunction and waste. 0:02:40.462,0:02:44.572 If the only way the most productive[br]can be successful 0:02:44.572,0:02:47.753 is by suppressing[br]the productivity of the rest, 0:02:47.753,0:02:51.236 then we badly need to find[br]a better way to work 0:02:51.236,0:02:54.010 and a richer way to live. 0:02:54.510,0:02:58.921 (Applause) 0:02:58.921,0:03:02.915 So what is it that makes some groups 0:03:02.915,0:03:06.390 obviously more successful[br]and more productive than others? 0:03:06.700,0:03:09.974 Well, that's the question[br]a team at MIT took to research. 0:03:09.974,0:03:12.400 They brought in hundreds of volunteers, 0:03:12.400,0:03:15.894 they put them into groups, and they[br]gave them very hard problems to solve. 0:03:15.894,0:03:18.625 And what happened was exactly[br]what you'd expect, 0:03:18.625,0:03:21.931 that some groups were very much[br]more successful than others, 0:03:21.931,0:03:25.461 but what was really interesting[br]was that the high-achieving groups 0:03:25.461,0:03:28.108 were not those where they had[br]one or two people 0:03:28.108,0:03:31.149 with spectacularly high I.Q. 0:03:31.149,0:03:34.748 Nor were the most successful groups[br]the ones that had the highest 0:03:34.748,0:03:37.117 aggregate I.Q. 0:03:37.117,0:03:42.991 Instead, they had three characteristics,[br]the really successful teams. 0:03:42.991,0:03:48.633 First of all, they showed high degrees[br]of social sensitivity to each other. 0:03:48.633,0:03:52.232 This is measured by something called[br]the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test. 0:03:52.232,0:03:54.717 It's broadly considered[br]a test for empathy, 0:03:54.717,0:03:56.914 and the groups that scored highly on this 0:03:56.914,0:03:58.864 did better. 0:03:58.864,0:04:03.972 Secondly, the successful groups[br]gave roughly equal time to each other, 0:04:03.972,0:04:06.317 so that no one voice dominated, 0:04:06.317,0:04:09.103 but neither were there any passengers. 0:04:09.103,0:04:11.820 And thirdly, the more successful groups 0:04:11.820,0:04:14.165 had more women in them. 0:04:14.165,0:04:16.162 (Applause) 0:04:16.162,0:04:20.437 Now, was this because women[br]typically score more highly on 0:04:20.437,0:04:22.310 the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, 0:04:22.310,0:04:25.037 so you're getting a doubling down[br]on the empathy quotient? 0:04:25.037,0:04:27.795 Or was it because they brought[br]a more diverse perspective? 0:04:27.795,0:04:31.951 We don't really know, but the striking[br]thing about this experiment 0:04:31.951,0:04:36.380 is that it showed what we know, which is[br]some groups do better than others, 0:04:36.380,0:04:38.731 but what's key to that 0:04:38.731,0:04:42.378 is their social connectedness[br]to each other. 0:04:43.543,0:04:46.375 So how does this play out[br]in the real world? 0:04:46.375,0:04:51.716 Well, it means that what happens[br]between people really counts, 0:04:51.716,0:04:55.524 because in groups that are highly[br]attuned and sensitive to each other, 0:04:55.524,0:04:58.780 ideas can flow and grow. 0:04:58.780,0:05:02.768 People don't get stuck.[br]They don't waste energy down dead ends. 0:05:02.768,0:05:07.482 An example: Arup is one of the world's[br]most successful engineering firms, 0:05:07.482,0:05:10.134 and it was commissioned to build[br]the equestrian center 0:05:10.134,0:05:12.000 for the Beijing Olympics. 0:05:12.000,0:05:13.826 Now, this building had to receive 0:05:13.826,0:05:19.120 two and a half thousand[br]really highly strung thoroughbred horses 0:05:19.120,0:05:21.209 that were coming off long-haul flights, 0:05:21.209,0:05:24.692 highly jet-lagged,[br]not feeling their finest. 0:05:24.692,0:05:28.104 And the problem[br]the engineer confronted was, 0:05:28.104,0:05:31.780 what quantity of waste to cater for? 0:05:32.540,0:05:37.184 Now, you don't get taught this[br]in engineering school -- (Laughter) -- 0:05:37.184,0:05:40.388 and it's not really the kind of thing[br]you want to get wrong, 0:05:40.388,0:05:43.853 so he could have spent months[br]talking to vets, doing the research, 0:05:43.853,0:05:45.654 tweaking the spreadsheet. 0:05:45.654,0:05:48.799 Instead, he asked for help 0:05:48.799,0:05:53.285 and he found someone who had designed[br]the Jockey Club in New York. 0:05:53.285,0:05:57.404 The problem was solved in less than a day. 0:05:57.404,0:06:00.191 Arup believes that[br]the culture of helpfulness 0:06:00.191,0:06:02.959 is central to their success. 0:06:03.279,0:06:07.400 Now, helpfulness sounds really anemic, 0:06:07.400,0:06:11.498 but it's absolutely core[br]to successful teams, 0:06:11.498,0:06:16.707 and it routinely outperforms[br]individual intelligence. 0:06:17.117,0:06:20.322 Helpfulness means I don't[br]have to know everything, 0:06:20.322,0:06:25.600 I just have to work among people[br]who are good at getting and giving help. 0:06:25.600,0:06:31.361 At SAP, they reckon that you can answer[br]any question in 17 minutes. 0:06:32.131,0:06:35.126 But there isn't a single[br]high-tech company I've worked with 0:06:35.126,0:06:40.571 that imagines for a moment[br]that this is a technology issue, 0:06:40.571,0:06:45.041 because what drives helpfulness[br]is people getting to know each other. 0:06:45.771,0:06:50.782 Now that sounds so obvious, and we think[br]it'll just happen normally, 0:06:50.782,0:06:52.410 but it doesn't. 0:06:52.410,0:06:55.704 When I was running[br]my first software company, 0:06:55.704,0:06:57.738 I realized that we were getting stuck. 0:06:57.738,0:07:01.523 There was a lot of friction,[br]but not much else, 0:07:01.523,0:07:06.399 and I gradually realized the brilliant,[br]creative people that I'd hired 0:07:06.399,0:07:08.364 didn't know each other. 0:07:08.364,0:07:12.241 They were so focused[br]on their own individual work, 0:07:12.241,0:07:15.970 they didn't even know[br]who they were sitting next to, 0:07:15.970,0:07:18.541 and it was only when I insisted[br]that we stop working 0:07:18.541,0:07:21.125 and invest time in getting[br]to know each other 0:07:21.125,0:07:24.223 that we achieved real momentum. 0:07:24.813,0:07:27.409 Now, that was 20 years ago,[br]and now I visit companies 0:07:27.409,0:07:30.311 that have banned coffee cups at desks 0:07:30.311,0:07:34.305 because they want people to hang out[br]around the coffee machines 0:07:34.305,0:07:36.139 and talk to each other. 0:07:36.139,0:07:38.647 The Swedes even have[br]a special term for this. 0:07:38.647,0:07:42.007 They call it fika, which means[br]more than a coffee break. 0:07:42.007,0:07:45.613 It means collective restoration. 0:07:45.613,0:07:48.724 At Idexx, a company up in Maine, 0:07:48.724,0:07:51.516 they've created vegetable gardens[br]on campus so that people 0:07:51.516,0:07:53.768 from different parts of the business 0:07:53.768,0:07:58.644 can work together and get to know[br]the whole business that way. 0:07:58.644,0:08:00.989 Have they all gone mad? 0:08:00.989,0:08:04.542 Quite the opposite -- they've figured out[br]that when the going gets tough, 0:08:04.542,0:08:06.585 and it always will get tough 0:08:06.585,0:08:09.301 if you're doing breakthrough work[br]that really matters, 0:08:09.301,0:08:11.972 what people need is social support, 0:08:11.972,0:08:15.199 and they need to know who to ask for help. 0:08:15.199,0:08:19.936 Companies don't have ideas;[br]only people do. 0:08:19.936,0:08:22.536 And what motivates people 0:08:22.536,0:08:27.030 are the bonds and loyalty and trust[br]they develop between each other. 0:08:27.566,0:08:31.260 What matters is the mortar, 0:08:31.260,0:08:33.549 not just the bricks. 0:08:34.299,0:08:36.273 Now, when you put all of this together, 0:08:36.273,0:08:39.431 what you get is something[br]called social capital. 0:08:39.431,0:08:44.980 Social capital is the reliance[br]and interdependency that builds trust. 0:08:44.980,0:08:48.471 The term comes from sociologists[br]who were studying communities 0:08:48.471,0:08:52.739 that proved particularly resilient[br]in times of stress. 0:08:53.409,0:08:57.960 Social capital is what[br]gives companies momentum, 0:08:57.960,0:09:03.222 and social capital[br]is what makes companies robust. 0:09:04.182,0:09:06.442 What does this mean in practical terms? 0:09:06.852,0:09:10.759 It means that time is everything, 0:09:10.759,0:09:15.426 because social capital[br]compounds with time. 0:09:15.426,0:09:20.534 So teams that work together longer[br]get better, because it takes time 0:09:20.534,0:09:26.041 to develop the trust you need[br]for real candor and openness. 0:09:26.461,0:09:29.925 And time is what builds value. 0:09:30.625,0:09:32.878 When Alex Pentland[br]suggested to one company 0:09:32.878,0:09:35.594 that they synchronize coffee breaks 0:09:35.594,0:09:39.495 so that people would have time[br]to talk to each other, 0:09:39.495,0:09:42.978 profits went up 15 million dollars, 0:09:42.978,0:09:46.832 and employee satisfaction[br]went up 10 percent. 0:09:46.832,0:09:49.933 Not a bad return on social capital, 0:09:49.933,0:09:53.960 which compounds even as you spend it. 0:09:53.960,0:10:00.022 Now, this isn't about chumminess,[br]and it's no charter for slackers, 0:10:00.022,0:10:04.656 because people who work this way[br]tend to be kind of scratchy, 0:10:04.656,0:10:08.690 impatient, absolutely determined[br]to think for themselves 0:10:08.690,0:10:12.680 because that's what their contribution is. 0:10:12.680,0:10:17.979 Conflict is frequent[br]because candor is safe. 0:10:18.280,0:10:23.471 And that's how good ideas[br]turn into great ideas, 0:10:23.471,0:10:26.571 because no idea is born fully formed. 0:10:26.571,0:10:29.900 It emerges a little bit[br]as a child is born, 0:10:29.900,0:10:34.489 kind of messy and confused,[br]but full of possibilities. 0:10:34.489,0:10:40.610 And it's only through the generous[br]contribution, faith and challenge 0:10:40.610,0:10:43.892 that they achieve their potential. 0:10:43.892,0:10:47.955 And that's what social capital supports. 0:10:49.455,0:10:52.228 Now, we aren't really used[br]to talking about this, 0:10:52.228,0:10:56.198 about talent, about creativity,[br]in this way. 0:10:56.198,0:10:59.932 We're used to talking about stars. 0:11:00.262,0:11:04.371 So I started to wonder,[br]well, if we start working this way, 0:11:04.371,0:11:06.595 does that mean no more stars? 0:11:07.445,0:11:09.805 So I went and I sat in on the auditions 0:11:09.805,0:11:13.661 at the Royal Academy[br]of Dramatic Art in London. 0:11:13.661,0:11:16.886 And what I saw there really surprised me, 0:11:16.886,0:11:21.786 because the teachers weren't looking[br]for individual pyrotechnics. 0:11:21.786,0:11:26.476 They were looking for what happened[br]between the students, 0:11:26.476,0:11:30.586 because that's where the drama is. 0:11:30.586,0:11:32.875 And when I talked[br]to producers of hit albums, 0:11:32.875,0:11:36.103 they said, "Oh sure, we have[br]lots of superstars in music. 0:11:36.103,0:11:39.220 It's just, they don't last very long. 0:11:39.220,0:11:43.220 It's the outstanding collaborators[br]who enjoy the long careers, 0:11:43.220,0:11:47.432 because bringing out the best in others[br]is how they found the best 0:11:47.432,0:11:49.076 in themselves." 0:11:49.686,0:11:52.115 And when I went to visit companies[br]that are renowned 0:11:52.115,0:11:54.182 for their ingenuity and creativity, 0:11:54.182,0:11:57.107 I couldn't even see any superstars, 0:11:57.107,0:12:01.445 because everybody there really mattered. 0:12:01.445,0:12:04.328 And when I reflected on my own career, 0:12:04.328,0:12:08.252 and the extraordinary people[br]I've had the privilege to work with, 0:12:08.252,0:12:13.796 I realized how much more[br]we could give each other 0:12:13.796,0:12:18.917 if we just stopped trying[br]to be superchickens. 0:12:19.815,0:12:24.970 (Laughter) (Applause) 0:12:24.970,0:12:31.346 Once you appreciate[br]truly how social work is, 0:12:31.346,0:12:34.443 a lot of things have to change. 0:12:34.443,0:12:38.530 Management by talent contest[br]has routinely pitted 0:12:38.530,0:12:40.991 employees against each other. 0:12:40.991,0:12:45.505 Now, rivalry has to be replaced[br]by social capital. 0:12:46.355,0:12:49.480 For decades, we've tried[br]to motivate people with money, 0:12:49.480,0:12:52.360 even though we've got[br]a vast amount of research that shows 0:12:52.360,0:12:56.191 that money erodes social connectedness. 0:12:56.851,0:13:02.186 Now, we need to let people[br]motivate each other. 0:13:02.646,0:13:07.570 And for years, we've thought that leaders[br]were heroic soloists who were expected, 0:13:07.570,0:13:10.726 all by themselves,[br]to solve complex problems. 0:13:10.726,0:13:14.278 Now, we need to redefine leadership 0:13:14.278,0:13:18.342 as an activity in which[br]conditions are created 0:13:18.342,0:13:24.300 in which everyone can do their most[br]courageous thinking together. 0:13:24.300,0:13:27.820 We know that this works. 0:13:28.210,0:13:32.505 When the Montreal Protocol called[br]for the phasing out of CFCs, 0:13:32.505,0:13:36.847 the chlorofluorocarbons implicated[br]in the hole in the ozone layer, 0:13:36.847,0:13:39.032 the risks were immense. 0:13:39.332,0:13:42.231 CFCs were everywhere, 0:13:42.231,0:13:44.780 and nobody knew if a substitute[br]could be found. 0:13:45.360,0:13:50.671 But one team that rose to the challenge[br]adopted three key principles. 0:13:51.289,0:13:54.647 The first was the head of engineering,[br]Frank Maslen, said, 0:13:54.647,0:13:57.980 there will be no stars in this team. 0:13:57.980,0:14:00.257 We need everybody. 0:14:00.257,0:14:02.985 Everybody has a valid perspective. 0:14:03.485,0:14:07.711 Second, we work to one standard only: 0:14:07.711,0:14:10.310 the best imaginable. 0:14:10.590,0:14:13.632 And third, he told his boss,[br]Geoff Tudhope, 0:14:13.632,0:14:15.605 that he had to butt out, 0:14:15.605,0:14:18.856 because he knew[br]how disruptive power can be. 0:14:18.856,0:14:21.689 Now, this didn't mean Tudhope did nothing. 0:14:21.689,0:14:23.430 He gave the team air cover, 0:14:23.430,0:14:27.540 and he listened to ensure[br]that they honored their principles. 0:14:28.190,0:14:34.260 And it worked: Ahead of all the other[br]companies tackling this hard problem, 0:14:34.260,0:14:37.518 this group cracked it first. 0:14:37.738,0:14:40.339 And to date, the Montreal Protocol 0:14:40.339,0:14:46.060 is the most successful international[br]environmental agreement 0:14:46.060,0:14:47.982 ever implemented. 0:14:49.402,0:14:51.940 There was a lot at stake then, 0:14:51.940,0:14:54.679 and there's a lot at stake now, 0:14:54.679,0:14:59.207 and we won't solve our problems[br]if we expect it to be solved 0:14:59.207,0:15:01.808 by a few supermen or superwomen. 0:15:01.808,0:15:05.314 Now we need everybody, 0:15:05.314,0:15:11.540 because it is only when we accept[br]that everybody has value 0:15:11.540,0:15:18.586 that we will liberate the energy[br]and imagination and momentum we need 0:15:18.586,0:15:23.360 to create the best beyond measure. 0:15:23.360,0:15:26.100 Thank you. 0:15:26.100,0:15:30.100 (Applause)