0:00:00.000,0:00:02.750 ♪ [music] ♪ 0:00:08.160,0:00:10.770 - [Prof. Alex Tabarrok] In this set[br]of lectures on labor markets, 0:00:10.770,0:00:12.520 we'll be looking at questions, 0:00:12.520,0:00:14.596 such as: How are wages determined? 0:00:14.596,0:00:18.296 Why do Americans[br]earn so much by global standards? 0:00:18.296,0:00:22.036 What's human capital and how[br]does it help us to increase wages? 0:00:22.036,0:00:24.105 Do labor unions help workers? 0:00:24.105,0:00:26.185 And if so, by how much? 0:00:26.185,0:00:29.055 And how does discrimination[br]affect labor markets? 0:00:29.605,0:00:31.834 We're going to begin[br]in this part of the lecture 0:00:31.834,0:00:34.314 with the determination of wages. 0:00:38.340,0:00:40.643 In this set of lectures[br]on labor markets, 0:00:40.643,0:00:42.440 we'll be looking at questions such as 0:00:42.440,0:00:44.380 How are wages determined? 0:00:44.380,0:00:47.920 Why do most Americans[br]earn so much by global standards? 0:00:47.920,0:00:49.400 What's human capital? 0:00:49.400,0:00:51.840 How does it help us[br]in increased wages? 0:00:51.840,0:00:55.230 Do labor unions help workers,[br]and if so, by how much? 0:00:55.230,0:00:58.018 And how does discrimination[br]affect labor markets? 0:00:58.018,0:01:00.042 We're going to begin[br]in this part of the lecture 0:01:00.042,0:01:02.622 with the determination of wages. 0:01:03.142,0:01:06.582 What makes the demand for labor[br]different than the demand for apples 0:01:06.582,0:01:10.495 is that the demand[br]for labor is a derived demand. 0:01:10.495,0:01:15.322 Firms hire workers because[br]the workers increase their revenues. 0:01:15.322,0:01:18.454 The key idea[br]behind the demand for labor 0:01:18.454,0:01:20.710 is the marginal product of labor, 0:01:20.710,0:01:22.960 the increase in a firm's revenues 0:01:22.960,0:01:25.640 created by hiring[br]an additional laborer. 0:01:25.640,0:01:27.270 And we're going to see[br]several important things 0:01:27.270,0:01:29.560 about this marginal[br]product of labor. 0:01:29.560,0:01:33.980 First, it declines[br]as more labor is added. 0:01:33.980,0:01:37.530 And this is because the first laborer[br]goes to the most important task, 0:01:37.530,0:01:40.750 the second laborer goes[br]to the second most important task 0:01:40.750,0:01:42.030 and so forth. 0:01:42.030,0:01:46.680 Moreover, firms[br]will hire workers, laborers, 0:01:46.680,0:01:51.520 as long as the wage is less[br]than the marginal product of labor. 0:01:51.520,0:01:53.550 Let's take a look[br]at this in a table. 0:01:54.030,0:01:56.870 This table shows how[br]a restaurant like McDonald’s 0:01:56.870,0:01:59.240 might think about hiring janitors. 0:01:59.240,0:02:02.740 The first janitor is assigned[br]to the most important task -- 0:02:02.740,0:02:04.820 cleaning the restrooms once a day. 0:02:04.820,0:02:09.640 That task adds $35[br]an hour to the firm’s revenues. 0:02:09.640,0:02:12.750 Customers like restaurants[br]with clean restrooms. 0:02:12.750,0:02:15.060 The second janitor empties the trash, 0:02:15.060,0:02:18.590 the third janitor hired will also[br]be assigned to cleaning restrooms, 0:02:18.590,0:02:20.390 now done twice a day -- 0:02:20.390,0:02:25.050 and that use increases revenues[br]by less -- by $24 an hour. 0:02:25.050,0:02:27.140 The demand curve for labor 0:02:27.140,0:02:30.250 is derived from[br]the marginal product of labor. 0:02:30.250,0:02:32.980 Notice that as the wage goes down, 0:02:32.980,0:02:36.720 the firm will want to hire[br]more and more janitors 0:02:36.720,0:02:39.730 and as the firm hires[br]more and more janitors, 0:02:39.730,0:02:42.110 the marginal product of labor falls. 0:02:42.410,0:02:45.850 So let's take a closer look[br]at this derivation. 0:02:47.410,0:02:49.650 Here's the marginal product[br]of labor schedule 0:02:49.650,0:02:53.360 and here is the demand for labor[br]derived from that schedule. 0:02:53.360,0:02:57.800 Notice that if the wage[br]were greater than $35 an hour 0:02:57.800,0:03:00.500 the firm would demand no janitors. 0:03:00.500,0:03:03.160 That's because[br]the very first janitor 0:03:03.160,0:03:06.530 adds $35 an hour[br]to the firm's revenues. 0:03:06.530,0:03:10.430 If the wage is higher than that,[br]that janitor is not worth hiring. 0:03:10.980,0:03:12.970 As the wage falls, however, 0:03:12.970,0:03:16.350 more and more janitors[br]become worthwhile to hire. 0:03:16.350,0:03:20.150 If the market wage were $10,[br]7 janitors would be hired. 0:03:20.150,0:03:24.510 If the market wage were $30,[br]only 1 janitor would be hired. 0:03:24.510,0:03:27.860 Now this is the demand for janitors[br]from a single firm. 0:03:27.860,0:03:31.230 Now consider summing up[br]the quantity of janitors 0:03:31.230,0:03:36.090 demanded at each wage[br]for all the firms in the market. 0:03:36.090,0:03:39.952 That's how we get[br]to the market demand for janitors. 0:03:39.952,0:03:42.080 So let's go to the market demand. 0:03:42.380,0:03:45.220 So here's the market for janitors[br]in the United States. 0:03:45.220,0:03:48.240 We have a demand curve derived[br]from the marginal product of labor 0:03:48.240,0:03:49.700 and a supply curve. 0:03:49.700,0:03:52.230 The supply curve says[br]that as the wage increases 0:03:52.230,0:03:55.580 the quantity of janitors supplied[br]will also increase. 0:03:55.580,0:03:57.680 That's intuitive[br]but I want to say a little bit more 0:03:57.680,0:03:59.853 about the supply curve in a moment 0:03:59.853,0:04:02.113 because there's[br]one possible complication 0:04:02.113,0:04:03.639 which we should discuss. 0:04:03.639,0:04:06.349 For now, however,[br]let's focus on the main point, 0:04:06.349,0:04:09.730 which is that the wage[br]is determined as usual 0:04:09.730,0:04:11.860 by the point[br]where the quantity demanded 0:04:11.860,0:04:13.470 is equal to the quantity supplied -- 0:04:13.470,0:04:16.220 the intersection of the demand[br]and the supply curve. 0:04:16.220,0:04:17.282 In the United States, 0:04:17.282,0:04:20.442 the wage for janitors[br]is about $10 an hour 0:04:20.442,0:04:24.542 and the quantity supplied[br]is about 168 million hours per week. 0:04:24.542,0:04:28.760 Overall, there are about 4.2 million[br]janitors in the United States. 0:04:29.170,0:04:33.570 So the key here is really that we can[br]use our tools of demand and supply 0:04:33.570,0:04:35.770 to understand the market for labor. 0:04:35.770,0:04:39.000 So we can predict what will happen[br]with an increased demand for labor 0:04:39.000,0:04:40.834 or a reduced supply. 0:04:40.834,0:04:44.757 Other factors which might influence[br]the demand and supply of labor -- 0:04:44.757,0:04:47.700 we now know[br]how to analyze this market. 0:04:48.510,0:04:51.520 Let's add one qualification[br]to the supply of labor. 0:04:51.520,0:04:53.010 We need to make a distinction 0:04:53.010,0:04:55.820 between an individual’s[br]supply curve for labor 0:04:55.820,0:04:58.440 and the market[br]supply curve for labor. 0:04:58.440,0:05:02.260 So let's suppose we have a janitor --[br]let's call him Joe -- 0:05:02.260,0:05:07.330 and let's imagine that his wage[br]is currently $16 an hour 0:05:07.330,0:05:10.060 and he's working 40 hours a week. 0:05:10.060,0:05:12.760 If the wage were[br]to increase to $20 an hour, 0:05:12.760,0:05:16.680 Joe decides he may work more,[br]50 hours per week, 0:05:16.680,0:05:19.010 in order to take advantage[br]of that higher wage. 0:05:19.460,0:05:24.340 But now suppose that the wage[br]increases even more to $28 an hour. 0:05:24.340,0:05:29.690 Well, will Joe choose to work more[br]at $28 an hour than he did at $20? 0:05:30.030,0:05:31.420 Not necessarily. 0:05:31.420,0:05:34.230 After all, there's only[br]so many hours in the week. 0:05:34.230,0:05:37.160 Anyway, Joe has other things[br]to do with his time. 0:05:37.160,0:05:38.760 Now that his wage is higher, 0:05:38.760,0:05:41.260 Joe might want[br]to take his family on a vacation. 0:05:41.260,0:05:43.940 His income[br]is pretty high as well now -- 0:05:43.940,0:05:46.460 $28 an hour, 40 hours a week, 0:05:46.460,0:05:50.620 Joe may decide he in fact[br]would like to work a little bit less. 0:05:50.620,0:05:54.140 He in fact would like[br]to buy more leisure 0:05:54.140,0:05:57.240 with the income[br]which he is earning from his job. 0:05:58.220,0:06:01.330 So an individual’s labor supply curve 0:06:01.330,0:06:05.040 could possibly have[br]a backward bending component. 0:06:05.040,0:06:08.170 There's nothing irrational[br]or peculiar about that. 0:06:08.170,0:06:09.990 Although it's possible for an individual 0:06:09.990,0:06:12.800 to have a backward bending[br]labor supply component, 0:06:12.800,0:06:15.792 it's less likely[br]for the market as a whole, 0:06:15.792,0:06:19.312 because even as the wage[br]for janitors increases 0:06:19.312,0:06:21.500 and Joe works a little bit less, 0:06:21.500,0:06:25.250 there are lots of other people --[br]Mary, and Jose and Rita -- 0:06:25.250,0:06:29.160 who are currently employed,[br]say waiting tables or as sales staff, 0:06:29.160,0:06:31.980 who would be willing[br]to work in janitorial services 0:06:31.980,0:06:33.890 if the wage were higher. 0:06:34.210,0:06:36.700 So consider a wage of $20 an hour -- 0:06:36.700,0:06:41.320 the market supply has 320 million[br]hours of janitorial services. 0:06:41.320,0:06:43.890 As the wage goes up to $28, 0:06:43.890,0:06:46.500 well Joe works a little bit less, 0:06:46.500,0:06:48.490 and maybe some[br]of the other people in the industry 0:06:48.490,0:06:49.710 work a little bit less -- 0:06:49.710,0:06:51.810 people who are[br]already in the industry -- 0:06:51.810,0:06:56.130 but more people enter the market[br]for janitorial services 0:06:56.130,0:07:00.280 when the wage is $28[br]than when it was $20. 0:07:00.280,0:07:02.870 So as the wage increases, 0:07:02.870,0:07:07.050 the quantity supplied[br]of janitorial services increases 0:07:07.050,0:07:08.780 for two reasons. 0:07:08.780,0:07:12.260 The people who are[br]already janitors may work more, 0:07:12.260,0:07:14.130 but even more importantly, 0:07:14.130,0:07:16.720 as the wage for janitors increases 0:07:16.720,0:07:20.050 more people[br]enter the janitorial industry. 0:07:20.050,0:07:24.200 So what this means[br]is that our labor supply curve 0:07:24.200,0:07:27.000 will typically have our usual shape -- 0:07:27.000,0:07:29.520 an upward sloped[br]labor supply curve. 0:07:29.520,0:07:32.160 Even when some individuals[br]might have a backward slope 0:07:32.160,0:07:34.450 over some portion of the curve, 0:07:34.450,0:07:37.290 the market slope[br]is going to have our typical shape. 0:07:38.020,0:07:40.176 So why do janitors[br]in the United States 0:07:40.176,0:07:42.630 earn more than janitors in India? 0:07:42.630,0:07:44.170 After all, they're doing[br]pretty much the same thing -- 0:07:44.170,0:07:45.990 sweeping floors and so forth. 0:07:45.990,0:07:49.640 It certainly isn't the case[br]that janitors in the United States 0:07:49.640,0:07:53.830 are sweeping more floors per hour[br]or working so many more hours. 0:07:53.830,0:07:57.750 If you answered demand and supply,[br]give yourselves half points. 0:07:57.750,0:07:59.390 Let's go a little bit deeper. 0:07:59.390,0:08:03.070 The demand for janitors[br]is higher in the United States 0:08:03.070,0:08:06.500 because the United States[br]is a more productive economy 0:08:06.500,0:08:07.930 than the Indian economy. 0:08:07.930,0:08:10.160 There's more and better[br]capital to work with, 0:08:10.160,0:08:12.390 the office workers[br]are more productive, 0:08:12.390,0:08:16.800 and the American office[br]produces a more valuable product. 0:08:16.800,0:08:19.490 The result[br]is that it's more valuable 0:08:19.490,0:08:21.850 to keep a U.S. office building clean -- 0:08:21.850,0:08:25.140 that's one of the reasons[br]why American janitors earn more. 0:08:25.140,0:08:27.230 The demand[br]for their services is higher. 0:08:27.730,0:08:29.410 This is a useful reminder -- 0:08:29.410,0:08:31.610 you may have[br]a number of valuable skills. 0:08:31.610,0:08:33.179 Perhaps you're able[br]to program a computer, 0:08:33.179,0:08:35.699 or write a report,[br]or motivate sales staff, 0:08:35.699,0:08:36.917 and so forth. 0:08:36.917,0:08:40.717 But your skills only have value[br]within a given context. 0:08:40.717,0:08:42.817 If you were transplanted[br]to a different economy, 0:08:42.817,0:08:44.900 your skills might be worth less -- 0:08:44.900,0:08:47.182 maybe because your skills[br]would be less useful, 0:08:47.182,0:08:51.062 but also because other people[br]might not have the money 0:08:51.062,0:08:52.582 to pay for your skills. 0:08:53.152,0:08:55.460 It's better to be a barber[br]in a rich country 0:08:55.460,0:08:57.280 than in a poor country, 0:08:57.280,0:09:00.250 even when the same number[br]of people need a haircut. 0:09:00.480,0:09:01.280 Okay. 0:09:01.280,0:09:04.600 So that's one reason why janitors[br]in the United States earn more. 0:09:04.600,0:09:06.930 The demand[br]for their services is higher 0:09:06.930,0:09:09.750 because the United States[br]is a more productive economy. 0:09:10.630,0:09:13.490 Wages, of course,[br]are about demand and about supply. 0:09:13.490,0:09:14.960 So here's the other half -- 0:09:14.960,0:09:18.350 India has more workers[br]than in the United States, 0:09:18.350,0:09:22.470 and in particular India[br]has more low-skilled workers 0:09:22.470,0:09:26.010 who eagerly compete[br]for the job of janitor. 0:09:26.010,0:09:29.600 A janitor could be[br]a quite high paying job in India, 0:09:29.600,0:09:31.960 a well-respected job in India. 0:09:31.960,0:09:34.030 So Indian janitors earn less 0:09:34.030,0:09:36.070 because U.S. firms[br]are more productive, 0:09:36.070,0:09:37.790 the demand for labor is higher 0:09:37.790,0:09:40.180 and also because the supply[br]of low-skilled workers 0:09:40.180,0:09:42.030 is greater in India. 0:09:43.120,0:09:45.600 Here's a graph[br]summarizing what we just said. 0:09:45.600,0:09:48.860 Here's the demand and supply[br]of janitors in the Unites States 0:09:48.860,0:09:51.070 with the wage of $10 an hour. 0:09:51.070,0:09:53.840 And here's the demand[br]and supply in India. 0:09:53.840,0:09:55.950 The demand is lower,[br]the supply is higher 0:09:55.950,0:09:58.210 so the wage is lower. 0:09:58.470,0:09:59.410 Okay. 0:09:59.410,0:10:01.470 Next time we'll be[br]looking at some of the factors 0:10:01.470,0:10:03.220 which can increase wages, 0:10:03.220,0:10:04.968 particularly human capital, 0:10:04.968,0:10:07.703 and then we'll turn[br]to discrimination and other topics. 0:10:08.962,0:10:10.630 - [Narrator][br]If you want to test yourself, 0:10:10.630,0:10:12.850 click "Practice questions." 0:10:12.850,0:10:16.100 Or, if you're ready to move on,[br]just click, "Next Video." 0:10:16.510,0:10:19.500 ♪ [music] ♪