1 00:00:11,762 --> 00:00:17,556 So after the morning's talks I thought, you know: what can I do to improve? 2 00:00:17,556 --> 00:00:20,227 So, you know, Paul took off his shirt, I can't do that -- 3 00:00:20,227 --> 00:00:24,833 But, you know, I thought: maybe I'll take off my -- No. 4 00:00:24,833 --> 00:00:29,337 So I want to talk a little bit about labor and motivation. 5 00:00:29,337 --> 00:00:33,664 And, when we think about people as workforce, 6 00:00:33,664 --> 00:00:36,819 we often think about people like rats in a maze. 7 00:00:36,819 --> 00:00:40,332 We think that people hate working, we think that all that people want to do 8 00:00:40,332 --> 00:00:43,589 is to sit on the beach drinking mojitos and the only reason that they work 9 00:00:43,589 --> 00:00:47,954 is that we pay them so they can seat on the beach drinking mojitos. 10 00:00:47,954 --> 00:00:49,391 But is this the case? 11 00:00:49,391 --> 00:00:52,299 We have things like mountain climbing. 12 00:00:52,299 --> 00:00:54,470 Mountain climbing is a really challenging thing. 13 00:00:54,470 --> 00:00:57,137 When you read books of people who climb mountains 14 00:00:57,137 --> 00:01:01,116 you would think that those books would be filled with moments of elation and joy -- 15 00:01:01,116 --> 00:01:07,028 No! They're filled with moments of misery and pain, frostbites -- 16 00:01:07,028 --> 00:01:10,647 So you would think that once people get up with these experiences and come down 17 00:01:10,647 --> 00:01:15,654 they will say, "My goodness, this was a terrible mistake, I'll never do it again!" 18 00:01:15,654 --> 00:01:20,701 No! They go straight up! They get to heal, they get to recover and they go straight up! 19 00:01:20,701 --> 00:01:24,238 And this, I think, proposes a real challenge for what do we think about joy, 20 00:01:24,238 --> 00:01:29,320 and what do we think about motivation, and what actually gets people to care. 21 00:01:29,320 --> 00:01:34,061 I started thinking about meaning and motivation in the workplace 22 00:01:34,061 --> 00:01:37,603 when one of my ex-students came back to see me. 23 00:01:37,603 --> 00:01:39,868 His name was David - still is David - he came to see me, 24 00:01:39,868 --> 00:01:42,710 and he told me the following story: 25 00:01:42,710 --> 00:01:45,180 He said that he was working at an investment bank, 26 00:01:45,182 --> 00:01:49,573 preparing a PowerPoint presentation for a merger and acquisition. 27 00:01:49,574 --> 00:01:52,553 He was working on it for weeks. He was working hard, 28 00:01:52,554 --> 00:01:55,439 staying up late at night -- And the day before 29 00:01:55,439 --> 00:01:57,326 the merger and acquisition was going to take place 30 00:01:57,326 --> 00:02:00,221 he mailed his PowerPoint presentation to his boss 31 00:02:00,221 --> 00:02:07,531 and his boss wrote him quickly back saying, "Nice job! The deal is cancelled." 32 00:02:07,531 --> 00:02:10,159 Now, throughout the process he was incredibly excited! 33 00:02:10,159 --> 00:02:13,931 He was working, he was thinking happy, his boss appreciated it. 34 00:02:13,931 --> 00:02:17,563 But the fact that nobody was going to see it deflated him. 35 00:02:17,563 --> 00:02:20,184 In fact, when he was looking at his next projects, 36 00:02:20,184 --> 00:02:23,106 he couldn't really find that much motivation. 37 00:02:23,106 --> 00:02:27,188 And if you think about it, it's interesting because physically, everything was OK. 38 00:02:27,189 --> 00:02:30,806 His boss appreciated it, he would probably get a raise, everything was OK -- 39 00:02:30,806 --> 00:02:33,739 But something was missing that is more, kind of a more 40 00:02:33,740 --> 00:02:36,009 general meaning for what he was doing. 41 00:02:36,009 --> 00:02:40,067 So I thought, you know: how can we capture it with some simple experiments? 42 00:02:40,067 --> 00:02:43,024 So I decided to build Legos. 43 00:02:43,024 --> 00:02:47,628 So we paid people to build Lego Bionicles, like the ones that you see. 44 00:02:47,628 --> 00:02:50,879 And we paid people in diminishing rate. 45 00:02:50,879 --> 00:02:52,977 So here's what happened: you came in and we say, 46 00:02:52,977 --> 00:02:55,320 "Would you like to build one Bionicle?" 47 00:02:55,320 --> 00:02:57,405 "We'll pay you 3 dollars for it." 48 00:02:57,406 --> 00:03:00,788 And if you said "yes" you would build it and when you finished, we took it back 49 00:03:00,788 --> 00:03:04,553 and we say, "Would you like to build another one? For 2.70?" 50 00:03:04,553 --> 00:03:08,172 And if you finished that and wanted another one? For 2.40 and so on -- 51 00:03:08,173 --> 00:03:12,217 And the question was, "At what point will people stop?" 52 00:03:12,217 --> 00:03:15,440 And we told people that we take the Bionicles, we'll put them under the desk, 53 00:03:15,441 --> 00:03:19,987 and we'll break them into pieces for the next participant. 54 00:03:19,987 --> 00:03:22,459 (Laughter) 55 00:03:23,367 --> 00:03:25,468 This was the first condition. 56 00:03:25,468 --> 00:03:29,313 People build one after the other, after the other, after the other. 57 00:03:29,313 --> 00:03:32,265 The second condition we called the 'Sisyphic Condition.' 58 00:03:32,265 --> 00:03:36,658 If you remember the story of Sisyphus -- Sisyphus basically was sentenced by the gods 59 00:03:36,658 --> 00:03:40,987 to push a rock up a big mountain and the almost moment he got there -- 60 00:03:40,987 --> 00:03:43,488 The rock would roll back and he would have to do it again. 61 00:03:43,504 --> 00:03:46,403 And you could think about how demotivating this is, right? 62 00:03:46,403 --> 00:03:50,640 And how better it would be if at least it were different mountains he would push the rock over. 63 00:03:50,640 --> 00:03:54,737 But being the same mountain over and over and over is demotivating. 64 00:03:54,737 --> 00:03:57,479 So that's what we tried to do in the 'Sisyphic Condition.' 65 00:03:57,479 --> 00:03:59,188 We gave people a Bionicle, 66 00:03:59,188 --> 00:04:01,686 when they finished it, we said, "Would you like to build another one?" 67 00:04:01,686 --> 00:04:03,874 If they said "yes", we gave them the second one, 68 00:04:03,874 --> 00:04:08,235 but as they were working on the second one we took the first one to pieces. 69 00:04:08,235 --> 00:04:10,087 In front of their eyes. 70 00:04:10,087 --> 00:04:14,573 And then, if they wanted to build a third one, we gave the first one back to them. 71 00:04:14,573 --> 00:04:16,851 (Laughter) 72 00:04:16,851 --> 00:04:22,005 So we had an endless cycle of breaking and creating, creating and breaking. 73 00:04:22,006 --> 00:04:23,965 What happened? The first thing that happened, 74 00:04:23,965 --> 00:04:26,407 was that people built many more Bionicles 75 00:04:26,407 --> 00:04:30,042 in the 'Meaningful Condition' compared to the 'Sisyphic Condition.' 76 00:04:30,042 --> 00:04:33,367 And what I should point out here is that the meaning in the 'Meaningful Condition' 77 00:04:33,367 --> 00:04:36,886 was not really high meaning. This was a tiny meaning. Right? 78 00:04:36,886 --> 00:04:40,223 So the fact that just destroying it in front of their eyes a few minutes earlier 79 00:04:40,223 --> 00:04:43,194 made a difference, is quite important. 80 00:04:43,194 --> 00:04:46,135 The second thing is that we asked another group of people 81 00:04:46,151 --> 00:04:48,786 to predict how big the effect will be. 82 00:04:48,786 --> 00:04:51,360 We said, "If you were in this experiment, how many Bionicles do you think 83 00:04:51,360 --> 00:04:54,460 people would build here and how many will they build here?" 84 00:04:54,460 --> 00:04:57,800 And people understood that the 'Meaningful Condition' would create 85 00:04:57,800 --> 00:05:01,433 higher motivation, but they didn't understand the magnitude of that. 86 00:05:01,434 --> 00:05:06,255 So people thought that the difference was one Bionicle. In fact it was much larger. 87 00:05:06,255 --> 00:05:10,584 And finally, we looked at the correlation between how much people love Bionicles 88 00:05:10,584 --> 00:05:13,642 and how many Bionicles they created. 89 00:05:13,642 --> 00:05:16,171 You would expect that, naturally, people who love Bionicles more 90 00:05:16,171 --> 00:05:18,593 would build more Bionicles, even for less money. 91 00:05:18,594 --> 00:05:20,341 And that's indeed what we saw. 92 00:05:20,341 --> 00:05:22,938 In the 'Meaningful Condition' there was a nice correlation. 93 00:05:22,938 --> 00:05:26,478 People who like Bionicles build more, people who don't like Bionicles as much 94 00:05:26,478 --> 00:05:27,891 don't build as much. 95 00:05:27,891 --> 00:05:30,459 What happened in the 'Sisyphic Condition'? 96 00:05:30,460 --> 00:05:33,192 In the 'Sisyphic Condition' there was no correlation. 97 00:05:33,192 --> 00:05:37,349 We were basically able, by destroying people's labor in front of their eyes, 98 00:05:37,365 --> 00:05:40,264 to crash the joy out of this process. 99 00:05:40,264 --> 00:05:43,168 (Laughter) 100 00:05:45,831 --> 00:05:51,312 After I finished this study, I went to talk to a big software company in Seattle. 101 00:05:51,312 --> 00:05:54,121 (Laughter) 102 00:05:54,121 --> 00:05:57,306 And this was a big room full of 200 engineers 103 00:05:57,306 --> 00:05:59,582 and these were engineers that worked for 2 years 104 00:05:59,582 --> 00:06:02,923 about the project that they thought would be the next development 105 00:06:02,923 --> 00:06:04,770 for this big software company. 106 00:06:04,770 --> 00:06:09,432 And a week before I came the CEO cancelled the project. 107 00:06:09,432 --> 00:06:13,576 And I never sat in front of a group of more depressed people -- 108 00:06:13,576 --> 00:06:17,788 And I asked them,"How many of you show up later for work these days?" 109 00:06:17,788 --> 00:06:19,602 They all raised their hands. 110 00:06:19,602 --> 00:06:22,121 I said, "How many of you leave earlier?" 111 00:06:22,121 --> 00:06:23,915 They all raised their hands. 112 00:06:23,915 --> 00:06:28,295 I said, "How many of you charge extra things on your expense accounts?" 113 00:06:28,295 --> 00:06:31,120 Nobody raised their hands, but they took me for dinner that night. 114 00:06:31,120 --> 00:06:33,933 (Laughter) 115 00:06:33,936 --> 00:06:38,952 They showed me what they could do, with creativity -- 116 00:06:38,952 --> 00:06:42,171 And they said they felt just like in the Lego experiment. 117 00:06:42,171 --> 00:06:46,305 They basically felt that somebody cancelled something in front of their eyes, under their feet, 118 00:06:46,305 --> 00:06:49,685 without letting them have any meaning of what they were doing. 119 00:06:49,685 --> 00:06:52,795 Now, here's the thing: I think the CEO of that company 120 00:06:52,795 --> 00:06:54,679 did not understand the meaning of labor. 121 00:06:54,679 --> 00:06:57,780 He just said, "OK, we directed you in this direction up to now, 122 00:06:57,780 --> 00:07:01,116 let me redirect you somewhere else, and you will just go in the way I think." 123 00:07:01,117 --> 00:07:03,640 This is not how people operate. 124 00:07:03,640 --> 00:07:07,997 And I asked these people, "What could the CEO have done? Let's say he had to cancel the project. 125 00:07:07,998 --> 00:07:11,052 What could he have done to keep some of your motivation?" 126 00:07:11,052 --> 00:07:13,155 And they came up with all kinds of ideas. 127 00:07:13,155 --> 00:07:17,121 They said, "What if he allowed them to do a presentation in front of the whole company?" 128 00:07:17,121 --> 00:07:20,322 "What if he asked them to build a few more prototypes, to try and think about 129 00:07:20,322 --> 00:07:25,592 what aspect of the technology that they were developing could fit in other projects?" 130 00:07:25,592 --> 00:07:29,465 Now, the thing is that, any one of those aspects, any one of those approaches would demand 131 00:07:29,465 --> 00:07:33,039 some effort, attention and time, and if you don't think people 132 00:07:33,039 --> 00:07:35,726 care about their meaning you wouldn't spend their time. 133 00:07:35,726 --> 00:07:40,076 But if you understand how important meaning is, you might do that. 134 00:07:40,076 --> 00:07:42,893 In the next experiment, we took this a step further. 135 00:07:42,893 --> 00:07:46,131 We asked people to find some letters in a sheet of paper. 136 00:07:46,146 --> 00:07:49,768 And again they got more money for the first sheet, then less for the second 137 00:07:49,768 --> 00:07:51,923 and less for the third, and so on. 138 00:07:51,923 --> 00:07:54,985 And for some people we had what we called the 'Meaningful Condition.' 139 00:07:54,986 --> 00:07:58,635 We asked people to write their name on each sheet and when they gave it to the experimenter, 140 00:07:58,635 --> 00:08:04,105 the experimenter looked at it from top to bottom, said "aha" and put it on the side. 141 00:08:04,105 --> 00:08:06,738 In the second condition, the experimenter didn't look at it. 142 00:08:06,739 --> 00:08:12,986 There was no name, the experimenter just took it from the participant and put it on the desk. 143 00:08:12,986 --> 00:08:16,217 In the third condition, the experimenter simply took the sheet 144 00:08:16,217 --> 00:08:23,693 and directly put it through a shredder. (Laughter) 145 00:08:23,693 --> 00:08:27,174 Now, I should point out that in this third condition, 146 00:08:27,175 --> 00:08:30,160 when the page goes directly into a shredder, nobody looks. 147 00:08:30,177 --> 00:08:31,391 You could cheat. Right? 148 00:08:31,391 --> 00:08:36,287 You could be dishonest and do more sheets for less money and put less effort into it. 149 00:08:36,288 --> 00:08:37,905 What were the results? 150 00:08:37,905 --> 00:08:40,188 In the 'Acknowledged Condition' - when we looked at it - 151 00:08:40,188 --> 00:08:44,938 people worked all the way down to 15 cents. They worked quite a lot. 152 00:08:44,938 --> 00:08:48,225 In the 'Shredded Condition,' people stopped much faster. 153 00:08:48,225 --> 00:08:53,365 So people cared more about -- They enjoyed more the labor in the 'Acknowledged Condition.' 154 00:08:53,365 --> 00:08:56,813 What about the 'Ignored Condition'? Where does it sit in the middle? 155 00:08:56,816 --> 00:09:00,387 Is it close to the 'Acknowledged,' the 'Shredded' or somewhere in the middle? 156 00:09:00,387 --> 00:09:03,941 Well, very very close to the 'Shredded Condition.' 157 00:09:03,941 --> 00:09:08,620 So, I guess the good news here is that if you want to motivate people, 158 00:09:08,620 --> 00:09:13,211 simply looking at what they've done and say, "I've acknowledged, 159 00:09:13,211 --> 00:09:16,062 I've seen that you've done something," seems to be sufficient. 160 00:09:16,064 --> 00:09:19,339 Even without the nice word - just acknowledge people. 161 00:09:19,340 --> 00:09:23,240 On the other hand, it turns out that if you really want to demotivate people, 162 00:09:23,240 --> 00:09:25,512 it's incredibly easy! 163 00:09:25,512 --> 00:09:29,892 Shredding, of course, is the optimal way to demotivate people! If you want to. 164 00:09:29,892 --> 00:09:35,339 But just ignoring what they're doing gets you almost all the way there. 165 00:09:35,339 --> 00:09:37,709 So this was all about demotivating people. 166 00:09:37,709 --> 00:09:41,515 There are lot's of ways to demotivate people, and we should try to avoid those. 167 00:09:41,531 --> 00:09:42,917 What about motivating people? 168 00:09:42,917 --> 00:09:45,811 What about the second part of this equation? 169 00:09:45,811 --> 00:09:51,919 And, for me the insight for this part of the story came from IKEA. 170 00:09:51,919 --> 00:09:55,154 So, I don't know about you, but I have some IKEA furniture -- 171 00:09:55,154 --> 00:09:58,567 and when I reflect back on the experience, it turns out 172 00:09:58,582 --> 00:10:04,840 that it took me a long time to assemble these instructions, to assemble this furniture. 173 00:10:04,841 --> 00:10:08,352 The instructions were not clear, I would put things in the wrong place, 174 00:10:08,352 --> 00:10:11,910 I would have to disassemble it -- But what I've also noticed 175 00:10:11,910 --> 00:10:16,256 is that I keep on looking fondly at this IKEA furniture. 176 00:10:16,256 --> 00:10:21,772 We share something in common that I think is more than just buying something in the store. 177 00:10:21,772 --> 00:10:25,205 And you can wonder, "What happens when you invest some of your love and effort 178 00:10:25,205 --> 00:10:28,555 and attention, even frustration, into something?" 179 00:10:28,555 --> 00:10:31,026 Do you start loving it more? 180 00:10:31,043 --> 00:10:34,745 And there's an old story - it's kind of a nice story - it's a story about cake mixes. 181 00:10:34,745 --> 00:10:37,277 When they introduced cake mixes in the US, 182 00:10:37,277 --> 00:10:40,976 it turns out housewives at the time did not accept them. 183 00:10:40,976 --> 00:10:45,061 They had mixes for all kinds of things: for muffins, for bread -- 184 00:10:45,061 --> 00:10:48,306 Cake mixes, not so much. And they wondered why? 185 00:10:48,306 --> 00:10:50,206 The taste was perfectly fine. 186 00:10:50,206 --> 00:10:54,175 They found out that what was missing was a feeling of labor. 187 00:10:54,175 --> 00:10:57,565 If you basically put some water in the cake mix, mix it together, put it in the oven 188 00:10:57,565 --> 00:11:01,580 and the cake comes out -- You can't take credit for that! 189 00:11:01,580 --> 00:11:02,832 (Laughter) 190 00:11:02,832 --> 00:11:07,907 If somebody comes and says, "Nice cake, thank you!" you've not done anything! 191 00:11:07,908 --> 00:11:09,238 So what did they do? 192 00:11:09,238 --> 00:11:11,748 They took the eggs and the milk out of it. 193 00:11:11,748 --> 00:11:14,973 (Laughter) 194 00:11:14,975 --> 00:11:17,509 Now you put the cake mix, you break some eggs, you put some milk -- 195 00:11:17,509 --> 00:11:20,506 Now it's your cake! (Laughter) 196 00:11:20,506 --> 00:11:26,188 (Applause) 197 00:11:26,188 --> 00:11:28,610 So, how do we test this idea? 198 00:11:28,626 --> 00:11:31,605 We started by asking people to build origami. 199 00:11:31,605 --> 00:11:34,771 We gave people instructions on how to fold origami. 200 00:11:34,771 --> 00:11:36,992 And these were people who don't really know how to do origami, 201 00:11:36,992 --> 00:11:40,979 so they came up with kind of ugly origami, but that's OK. 202 00:11:40,979 --> 00:11:43,618 And then we told them that we actually owned that origami 203 00:11:43,618 --> 00:11:46,726 and we asked them, "How much would you pay for you to keep it?" 204 00:11:46,742 --> 00:11:50,761 And we tried to measure how valuable they thought this origami was. 205 00:11:50,777 --> 00:11:54,005 And people loved the origamis that they created. 206 00:11:54,005 --> 00:11:59,065 (Laughter) 207 00:11:59,065 --> 00:12:03,054 Then we asked other people that did not build that origami 208 00:12:03,054 --> 00:12:05,183 what they thought about this origami -- 209 00:12:05,183 --> 00:12:06,906 (Laughter) 210 00:12:06,906 --> 00:12:09,805 And they didn't like it as much. 211 00:12:09,805 --> 00:12:15,219 So the builders thought this origami was fantastic, the evaluators not so much. 212 00:12:15,219 --> 00:12:18,436 Now, the question is: are the builders, in their mind, 213 00:12:18,436 --> 00:12:21,366 do they think that they are the only ones who love this origami? 214 00:12:21,366 --> 00:12:25,313 So, do I look at this origami and say, "Oh, this is mine, I think it's wonderful! 215 00:12:25,313 --> 00:12:28,970 I know that nobody would like it, but for me it's wonderful!" 216 00:12:28,970 --> 00:12:32,386 No. They think everybody would love it as much as they do. 217 00:12:32,386 --> 00:12:34,347 (Laughter) 218 00:12:34,349 --> 00:12:36,439 The next thing was the IKEA effect, right? The IKEA -- 219 00:12:36,439 --> 00:12:40,882 What about the instructions? What if the instructions are difficult and complex? 220 00:12:40,883 --> 00:12:45,716 So we gave the easy instructions to some people and for other people we hid what's on the top, 221 00:12:45,716 --> 00:12:49,047 which is the manual of what does a fold mean and so on. 222 00:12:49,047 --> 00:12:52,318 So the hard instructions were really baffling. 223 00:12:52,334 --> 00:12:53,980 What happened now? 224 00:12:53,980 --> 00:12:57,620 So, first of all, we got the basic result: the builders loved their own origami 225 00:12:57,620 --> 00:13:02,798 more than the evaluators -- What happens when the instructions are more difficult? 226 00:13:02,798 --> 00:13:09,831 Now the builders love it even more, and the evaluators dislike it even more. 227 00:13:09,831 --> 00:13:13,113 Why? Because objectively it was worse off! 228 00:13:13,113 --> 00:13:15,478 So the evaluators saw the objective quality 229 00:13:15,478 --> 00:13:18,668 of these crumbled pieces of paper and didn't like it as much; 230 00:13:18,668 --> 00:13:21,612 the builders thought it was even more fantastic! 231 00:13:21,612 --> 00:13:26,624 So, not only is labor leading to love, more labor and more effort 232 00:13:26,624 --> 00:13:30,321 and more investment leads to higher love. 233 00:13:30,321 --> 00:13:33,991 I think you could also think about kids this way. 234 00:13:33,991 --> 00:13:35,846 So imagine that you have kids and I ask you, 235 00:13:35,846 --> 00:13:38,259 "How much would you sell me your kids for?" 236 00:13:38,259 --> 00:13:40,566 (Laughter) 237 00:13:40,567 --> 00:13:43,979 Your memory and attention, and experience about them -- 238 00:13:43,979 --> 00:13:46,736 And most people in a good day say, "A lot of money!" 239 00:13:46,736 --> 00:13:50,065 (Laughter) 240 00:13:50,065 --> 00:13:51,793 But imagine you didn't have your kids. 241 00:13:51,793 --> 00:13:55,576 And you went to the park, and you met some kids very much like yours, 242 00:13:55,576 --> 00:13:58,465 and you played with them for a few hours, and then you were about to say goodbye, 243 00:13:58,465 --> 00:14:01,827 and before you left, their parents said, "By the way, you know, they're for sale!" 244 00:14:01,827 --> 00:14:06,144 (Laughter) 245 00:14:06,146 --> 00:14:08,844 "How much would you pay for them?" 246 00:14:08,844 --> 00:14:10,951 Most people realize, "not that much!" 247 00:14:10,951 --> 00:14:12,789 (Laughter) 248 00:14:12,791 --> 00:14:18,014 And I think it's because the kids are really kind of the optimal example for the IKEA effect. 249 00:14:18,014 --> 00:14:21,611 (Laughter) 250 00:14:21,612 --> 00:14:27,705 (Applause) 251 00:14:28,262 --> 00:14:32,155 They are complex, they are difficult, the instruction manual is not that good -- 252 00:14:32,155 --> 00:14:33,764 (Laughter) 253 00:14:33,764 --> 00:14:37,267 We invest a lot of effort in them and our tremendous love [for] them 254 00:14:37,267 --> 00:14:41,905 is largely a part of us investing in them rather than who they are. 255 00:14:41,905 --> 00:14:44,611 These are, by the way, my kids, who are wonderful! 256 00:14:44,611 --> 00:14:48,211 And, not only are our kids wonderful, 257 00:14:48,211 --> 00:14:54,264 we don't understand that other people don't see our kids in the way that we do. 258 00:14:54,264 --> 00:14:57,202 So what do we have to say about all of this? 259 00:14:57,202 --> 00:15:02,344 There's kind of two competing theories about labor: Adam Smith and Karl Marx. 260 00:15:02,344 --> 00:15:06,814 Adam Smith gave us this wonderful example of efficiency in the labor market. 261 00:15:06,815 --> 00:15:09,021 He showed how you can take a pin factory 262 00:15:09,021 --> 00:15:14,435 and if you take one laborer who makes all steps, all 12 steps to create a pin, 263 00:15:14,435 --> 00:15:16,138 that's really inefficient. 264 00:15:16,138 --> 00:15:21,398 And if you break the job into 12 pieces and each person does their own piece of the work, 265 00:15:21,398 --> 00:15:26,873 the efficiency of the whole is incredibly increasing. Dramatically increasing. 266 00:15:26,873 --> 00:15:32,202 And that's really what the Industrial Revolution has given us in terms of increasing productivity. 267 00:15:32,202 --> 00:15:35,703 Karl Marx, on the other hand, told us that it's about alienation of labor, 268 00:15:35,703 --> 00:15:38,403 and how much do you feel connected to your labor. 269 00:15:38,404 --> 00:15:41,756 And these ideas are really standing in opposition to each other. 270 00:15:41,756 --> 00:15:47,083 Which one is more important? The efficiency or the feeling of connection to the labor? 271 00:15:47,083 --> 00:15:50,295 So if you think about taking a big job and breaking it into pieces, 272 00:15:50,295 --> 00:15:53,737 it might become more efficient. But as you break it into pieces, 273 00:15:53,737 --> 00:15:57,401 the people who do each of the pieces don't feel connected, to the same degree, 274 00:15:57,401 --> 00:16:00,600 to what they're doing. So, which one is more important? 275 00:16:00,600 --> 00:16:05,607 So, I think that in the Industrial Economy time Smith was more correct than Marx. 276 00:16:05,607 --> 00:16:07,916 There were tremendous efficiency gains. 277 00:16:07,916 --> 00:16:10,938 But what's happening now, in the Knowledge Economy? 278 00:16:10,938 --> 00:16:14,503 What happens when people have more control over what they're doing? 279 00:16:14,503 --> 00:16:18,770 When we want people to think about their labor in the shower and talk to friends, 280 00:16:18,770 --> 00:16:21,208 and when we want people to be fully engaged, 281 00:16:21,208 --> 00:16:23,738 and really immersed in what they're doing -- 282 00:16:23,738 --> 00:16:26,298 I think that now things have changed. In the Knowledge Economy, 283 00:16:26,298 --> 00:16:29,823 I think the notion of Marx is actually more important. 284 00:16:29,824 --> 00:16:32,707 And it might be useful to sometimes sacrifice 285 00:16:32,707 --> 00:16:37,177 some efficiency for more meaning at work. 286 00:16:37,177 --> 00:16:40,015 So, you know, we have this very simple model of labor, 287 00:16:40,015 --> 00:16:42,985 which says that people work for money. 288 00:16:42,985 --> 00:16:46,278 And often we pay people just with this notion. 289 00:16:46,278 --> 00:16:49,648 But I think there are two things to consider: the first one is that we care about 290 00:16:49,648 --> 00:16:52,880 [many] more things than money. We care about meaning, 291 00:16:52,880 --> 00:16:58,189 we care about creation, challenge, ownership, identity, pride, and so on -- 292 00:16:58,189 --> 00:17:02,331 And the really good news about it is that if we're able to create workplaces 293 00:17:02,347 --> 00:17:06,631 that give people all of those things, everybody would be better off. 294 00:17:06,631 --> 00:17:09,758 The workplace would be better off, the individual would be better off -- 295 00:17:09,759 --> 00:17:13,138 It's a tremendous wonderful thing about human nature that we can be motivated 296 00:17:13,138 --> 00:17:15,302 by a whole range of aspects. 297 00:17:15,302 --> 00:17:19,036 The question is, how do we use the workplace and society in general 298 00:17:19,036 --> 00:17:21,886 to tap into all of those motivations? 299 00:17:21,886 --> 00:17:23,333 Thank you very much. 300 00:17:23,333 --> 00:17:25,252 (Applause)