0:00:00.944,0:00:04.809 I want to talk a little bit today[br]about labor and work. 0:00:06.500,0:00:09.222 When we think about how people work, 0:00:09.246,0:00:11.615 the naive intuition we have 0:00:11.639,0:00:14.003 is that people are like rats in a maze -- 0:00:14.027,0:00:15.996 that all people care about is money, 0:00:16.020,0:00:17.672 and the moment we give them money, 0:00:17.696,0:00:19.394 we can direct them to work one way, 0:00:19.418,0:00:21.398 we can direct them to work another way. 0:00:21.422,0:00:25.033 This is why we give bonuses to bankers[br]and pay in all kinds of ways. 0:00:25.057,0:00:28.525 And we really have[br]this incredibly simplistic view 0:00:28.549,0:00:32.819 of why people work, and what[br]the labor market looks like. 0:00:32.843,0:00:35.166 At the same time, if you think about it, 0:00:35.190,0:00:38.499 there's all kinds of strange behaviors[br]in the world around us. 0:00:38.910,0:00:42.251 Think about something like mountaineering[br]and mountain climbing. 0:00:42.275,0:00:46.526 If you read books of people[br]who climb mountains, difficult mountains, 0:00:46.550,0:00:51.239 do you think that those books are full[br]of moments of joy and happiness? 0:00:51.699,0:00:54.016 No, they are full of misery. 0:00:54.040,0:00:57.698 In fact, it's all about frostbite[br]and having difficulty walking, 0:00:57.722,0:00:59.382 and difficulty breathing -- 0:00:59.406,0:01:02.444 cold, challenging circumstances. 0:01:02.468,0:01:04.922 And if people were just trying[br]to be happy, 0:01:04.946,0:01:06.803 the moment they would get to the top, 0:01:06.827,0:01:08.952 they would say,[br]"This was a terrible mistake. 0:01:08.976,0:01:10.357 I'll never do it again." 0:01:10.381,0:01:11.498 (Laughter) 0:01:11.522,0:01:15.137 "Instead, let me sit on a beach[br]somewhere drinking mojitos." 0:01:15.161,0:01:18.835 But instead, people go down, 0:01:18.859,0:01:21.177 and after they recover, they go up again. 0:01:21.756,0:01:24.826 And if you think about[br]mountain climbing as an example, 0:01:24.850,0:01:26.865 it suggests all kinds of things. 0:01:27.206,0:01:30.793 It suggests that we care[br]about reaching the end, a peak. 0:01:31.135,0:01:34.642 It suggests that we care[br]about the fight, about the challenge. 0:01:34.666,0:01:38.126 It suggests that there's all kinds[br]of other things that motivate us 0:01:38.150,0:01:41.497 to work or behave in all kinds of ways. 0:01:42.322,0:01:44.797 And for me personally,[br]I started thinking about this 0:01:44.821,0:01:47.614 after a student came to visit me. 0:01:48.085,0:01:51.990 This was one of my students[br]from a few years earlier, 0:01:52.014,0:01:53.798 and he came one day back to campus. 0:01:54.204,0:01:56.047 And he told me the following story: 0:01:56.359,0:01:58.781 He said that for more than two weeks, 0:01:58.805,0:02:01.472 he was working[br]on a PowerPoint presentation. 0:02:01.850,0:02:03.596 He was working in a big bank, 0:02:03.620,0:02:07.009 and this was in preparation[br]for a merger and acquisition. 0:02:07.430,0:02:09.921 And he was working very hard[br]on this presentation -- 0:02:09.945,0:02:11.930 graphs, tables, information. 0:02:11.954,0:02:14.901 He stayed late at night every day. 0:02:15.464,0:02:17.654 And the day before it was due, 0:02:17.678,0:02:20.988 he sent his PowerPoint[br]presentation to his boss, 0:02:21.012,0:02:23.618 and his boss wrote him back and said, 0:02:23.642,0:02:27.134 "Nice presentation,[br]but the merger is canceled." 0:02:28.340,0:02:30.157 And the guy was deeply depressed. 0:02:30.475,0:02:32.635 Now at the moment when he was working, 0:02:32.659,0:02:34.519 he was actually quite happy. 0:02:34.543,0:02:36.798 Every night he was enjoying his work, 0:02:36.822,0:02:41.496 he was staying late, he was perfecting[br]this PowerPoint presentation. 0:02:41.520,0:02:46.191 But knowing that nobody would ever[br]watch it made him quite depressed. 0:02:46.779,0:02:49.303 So I started thinking[br]about how do we experiment 0:02:49.327,0:02:52.596 with this idea of the fruits of our labor. 0:02:53.366,0:02:57.564 And to start with, we created[br]a little experiment 0:02:57.588,0:03:00.594 in which we gave people Legos, 0:03:00.618,0:03:03.142 and we asked them to build with Legos. 0:03:03.960,0:03:07.477 And for some people,[br]we gave them Legos and we said, 0:03:07.501,0:03:12.246 "Hey, would you like to build[br]this Bionicle for three dollars? 0:03:12.270,0:03:14.320 We'll pay you three dollars for it." 0:03:14.344,0:03:17.491 And people said yes,[br]and they built with these Legos. 0:03:17.872,0:03:21.438 And when they finished, we took it,[br]we put it under the table, 0:03:21.462,0:03:24.447 and we said, "Would you like[br]to build another one, 0:03:24.471,0:03:26.096 this time for $2.70?" 0:03:26.471,0:03:28.488 If they said yes,[br]we gave them another one, 0:03:28.512,0:03:30.369 and when they finished, we asked them, 0:03:30.393,0:03:34.213 "Do you want to build another one?"[br]for $2.40, $2.10, and so on, 0:03:34.237,0:03:36.087 until at some point people said, 0:03:36.111,0:03:38.832 "No more. It's not worth it for me." 0:03:40.102,0:03:42.754 This was what we called[br]the meaningful condition. 0:03:42.778,0:03:45.805 People built one Bionicle after another. 0:03:45.829,0:03:47.655 After they finished every one of them, 0:03:47.679,0:03:49.024 we put them under the table. 0:03:49.048,0:03:51.432 And we told them that at the end[br]of the experiment, 0:03:51.456,0:03:54.532 we will take all these Bionicles,[br]we will disassemble them, 0:03:54.556,0:03:56.379 we will put them back in the boxes, 0:03:56.403,0:03:58.743 and we will use it[br]for the next participant. 0:03:59.727,0:04:01.258 There was another condition. 0:04:01.282,0:04:05.338 This other condition was inspired[br]by David, my student. 0:04:05.814,0:04:09.242 And this other condition we called[br]the Sisyphic condition. 0:04:09.266,0:04:11.451 And if you remember[br]the story about Sisyphus, 0:04:11.475,0:04:16.702 Sisyphus was punished by the gods[br]to push the same rock up a hill, 0:04:16.726,0:04:18.787 and when he almost got to the end, 0:04:18.811,0:04:21.771 the rock would roll over,[br]and he would have to start again. 0:04:21.795,0:04:26.667 And you can think about this[br]as the essence of doing futile work. 0:04:26.691,0:04:29.644 You can imagine that if he pushed[br]the rock on different hills, 0:04:29.668,0:04:32.292 at least he would have[br]some sense of progress. 0:04:32.316,0:04:35.000 Also, if you look at prison movies, 0:04:35.024,0:04:38.183 sometimes the way that the guards[br]torture the prisoners 0:04:38.207,0:04:41.842 is to get them to dig a hole,[br]and when the prisoner is finished, 0:04:41.866,0:04:44.865 they ask him to fill the hole[br]back up and then dig again. 0:04:44.889,0:04:47.071 There's something[br]about this cyclical version 0:04:47.095,0:04:49.710 of doing something over and over and over 0:04:49.734,0:04:52.187 that seems to be[br]particularly demotivating. 0:04:52.575,0:04:54.782 So in the second condition[br]of this experiment, 0:04:54.806,0:04:56.472 that's exactly what we did. 0:04:56.496,0:04:57.783 We asked people, 0:04:57.807,0:05:00.966 "Would you like to build[br]one Bionicle for three dollars?" 0:05:00.990,0:05:02.879 And if they said yes, they built it. 0:05:03.309,0:05:06.714 Then we asked them, "Do you want[br]to build another one for $2.70?" 0:05:06.738,0:05:09.882 And if they said yes,[br]we gave them a new one, 0:05:09.906,0:05:11.691 and as they were building it, 0:05:11.715,0:05:14.428 we took apart the one[br]that they just finished. 0:05:15.515,0:05:17.112 And when they finished that, 0:05:17.136,0:05:19.308 we said, "Would you like[br]to build another one, 0:05:19.332,0:05:20.854 this time for 30 cents less?" 0:05:20.878,0:05:22.077 And if they said yes, 0:05:22.101,0:05:25.252 we gave them the one[br]that they built and we broke. 0:05:25.276,0:05:28.863 So this was an endless cycle[br]of them building, 0:05:28.887,0:05:31.413 and us destroying in front of their eyes. 0:05:32.643,0:05:36.319 Now what happens when you compare[br]these two conditions? 0:05:36.343,0:05:39.874 The first thing that happened was[br]that people built many more Bionicles -- 0:05:39.898,0:05:42.136 eleven in the meaningful condition, 0:05:42.160,0:05:44.898 versus seven in the Sisyphus condition. 0:05:44.922,0:05:48.035 And by the way, we should point out[br]that this was not big meaning. 0:05:48.059,0:05:50.596 People were not curing cancer[br]or building bridges. 0:05:50.620,0:05:54.359 People were building[br]Bionicles for a few cents. 0:05:54.383,0:05:56.336 And not only that, everybody knew 0:05:56.360,0:05:59.662 that the Bionicles[br]would be destroyed quite soon. 0:05:59.686,0:06:02.517 So there was not a real[br]opportunity for big meaning. 0:06:02.541,0:06:05.646 But even the small meaning[br]made a difference. 0:06:06.471,0:06:08.789 Now we had another version[br]of this experiment. 0:06:08.813,0:06:10.728 In this other version of the experiment, 0:06:10.752,0:06:12.695 we didn't put people in this situation, 0:06:12.719,0:06:14.725 we just described to them the situation, 0:06:14.749,0:06:16.855 much as I am describing to you now, 0:06:16.879,0:06:20.234 and we asked them to predict[br]what the result would be. 0:06:20.258,0:06:21.417 What happened? 0:06:21.441,0:06:25.117 People predicted the right direction[br]but not the right magnitude. 0:06:25.491,0:06:29.174 People who were just given[br]the description of the experiment 0:06:29.198,0:06:31.086 said that in the meaningful condition, 0:06:31.110,0:06:33.768 people would probably build[br]one more Bionicle. 0:06:33.792,0:06:36.021 So people understand[br]that meaning is important, 0:06:36.045,0:06:38.879 they just don't understand[br]the magnitude of the importance, 0:06:38.903,0:06:40.854 the extent to which it's important. 0:06:41.657,0:06:44.101 There was one other piece[br]of data we looked at. 0:06:44.474,0:06:47.331 If you think about it, there are[br]some people who love Legos, 0:06:47.355,0:06:48.817 and some people who don't. 0:06:48.841,0:06:51.404 And you would speculate[br]that the people who love Legos 0:06:51.428,0:06:53.520 would build more Legos,[br]even for less money, 0:06:53.544,0:06:56.741 because after all,[br]they get more internal joy from it. 0:06:56.765,0:06:59.861 And the people who love Legos less[br]would build less Legos 0:06:59.885,0:07:02.789 because the enjoyment[br]that they derive from it is lower. 0:07:02.813,0:07:05.741 And that's actually what we found[br]in the meaningful condition. 0:07:05.765,0:07:08.574 There was a very nice correlation[br]between the love of Legos 0:07:08.598,0:07:10.703 and the amount of Legos people built. 0:07:11.012,0:07:13.254 What happened in the Sisyphic condition? 0:07:13.679,0:07:16.290 In that condition,[br]the correlation was zero -- 0:07:16.314,0:07:19.035 there was no relationship[br]between the love of Legos, 0:07:19.059,0:07:20.822 and how much people built, 0:07:20.846,0:07:23.521 which suggests to me[br]that with this manipulation 0:07:23.545,0:07:25.983 of breaking things[br]in front of people's eyes, 0:07:26.007,0:07:30.556 we basically crushed any joy[br]that they could get out of this activity. 0:07:30.580,0:07:32.238 We basically eliminated it. 0:07:33.833,0:07:37.054 Soon after I finished[br]running this experiment, 0:07:37.078,0:07:40.498 I went to talk to a big[br]software company in Seattle. 0:07:41.392,0:07:45.236 I can't tell you who they were,[br]but they were a big company in Seattle. 0:07:45.260,0:07:47.348 This was a group[br]within the software company 0:07:47.372,0:07:49.164 that was put in a different building, 0:07:49.188,0:07:50.808 and they asked them to innovate, 0:07:50.832,0:07:54.090 and create the next big product[br]for this company. 0:07:54.590,0:07:56.119 And the week before I showed up, 0:07:56.143,0:08:00.550 the CEO of this big software company[br]went to that group, 200 engineers, 0:08:00.574,0:08:02.522 and canceled the project. 0:08:03.311,0:08:05.341 And I stood there in front of 200 0:08:05.365,0:08:08.441 of the most depressed[br]people I've ever talked to. 0:08:09.014,0:08:11.637 And I described to them[br]some of these Lego experiments, 0:08:11.661,0:08:16.561 and they said they felt like they had[br]just been through that experiment. 0:08:17.053,0:08:18.276 And I asked them, I said, 0:08:18.300,0:08:21.892 "How many of you now show up[br]to work later than you used to?" 0:08:21.916,0:08:23.870 And everybody raised their hand. 0:08:23.894,0:08:27.069 I said, "How many of you now go home[br]earlier than you used to?" 0:08:27.093,0:08:28.619 Everybody raised their hand. 0:08:29.006,0:08:31.685 I asked them, "How many of you now add 0:08:31.709,0:08:34.842 not-so-kosher things[br]to your expense reports?" 0:08:34.866,0:08:36.517 And they didn't raise their hands, 0:08:36.541,0:08:37.986 but they took me out to dinner 0:08:38.010,0:08:40.599 and showed me what they could do[br]with expense reports. 0:08:42.580,0:08:44.032 And then I asked them, I said, 0:08:44.056,0:08:48.397 "What could the CEO have done[br]to make you not as depressed?" 0:08:48.421,0:08:50.524 And they came up with all kinds of ideas. 0:08:50.548,0:08:53.929 They said the CEO could have asked[br]them to present to the whole company 0:08:53.953,0:08:55.956 about their journey[br]over the last two years 0:08:55.980,0:08:57.382 and what they decided to do. 0:08:57.406,0:09:01.166 He could have asked them to think[br]about which aspect of their technology 0:09:01.190,0:09:04.512 could fit with other parts[br]of the organization. 0:09:04.536,0:09:07.854 He could have asked them to build[br]some next-generation prototypes, 0:09:07.878,0:09:09.879 and see how they would work. 0:09:09.903,0:09:14.888 But the thing is that any one of those[br]would require some effort and motivation. 0:09:14.912,0:09:19.092 And I think the CEO basically did not[br]understand the importance of meaning. 0:09:19.116,0:09:21.314 If the CEO, just like our participants, 0:09:21.338,0:09:24.299 thought the essence[br]of meaning is unimportant, 0:09:24.323,0:09:25.537 then he [wouldn't] care. 0:09:25.561,0:09:28.460 And he would say, "At the moment[br]I directed you in this way, 0:09:28.484,0:09:30.507 and now that I'm directing[br]you in this way, 0:09:30.531,0:09:32.053 everything will be okay." 0:09:32.077,0:09:34.752 But if you understood[br]how important meaning is, 0:09:34.776,0:09:37.354 then you would figure out[br]that it's actually important 0:09:37.378,0:09:39.172 to spend some time, energy and effort 0:09:39.196,0:09:42.100 in getting people to care more[br]about what they're doing. 0:09:43.322,0:09:45.433 The next experiment[br]was slightly different. 0:09:45.457,0:09:48.092 We took a sheet of paper[br]with random letters, 0:09:48.116,0:09:50.203 and we asked people[br]to find pairs of letters 0:09:50.227,0:09:52.258 that were identical next to each other. 0:09:52.282,0:09:53.442 That was the task. 0:09:53.466,0:09:54.870 People did the first sheet, 0:09:54.894,0:09:58.239 then we asked if they wanted to do[br]another for a little less money, 0:09:58.263,0:10:01.139 the next sheet for a little bit[br]less, and so on and so forth. 0:10:01.163,0:10:02.723 And we had three conditions. 0:10:02.747,0:10:06.327 In the first condition, people[br]wrote their name on the sheet, 0:10:06.351,0:10:08.641 found all the pairs of letters, 0:10:08.665,0:10:10.306 gave it to the experimenter, 0:10:10.330,0:10:12.213 the experimenter would look at it, 0:10:12.237,0:10:13.972 scan it from top to bottom, 0:10:13.996,0:10:17.910 say "Uh huh," and put it[br]on the pile next to them. 0:10:18.680,0:10:21.966 In the second condition,[br]people did not write their name on it. 0:10:21.990,0:10:24.355 The experimenter looked at it, 0:10:24.379,0:10:27.322 took the sheet of paper,[br]did not look at it, did not scan it, 0:10:27.346,0:10:30.950 and simply put it on the pile of pages. 0:10:30.974,0:10:33.510 So you take a piece,[br]you just put it on the side. 0:10:33.534,0:10:34.859 In the third condition, 0:10:34.883,0:10:37.226 the experimenter got the sheet of paper, 0:10:37.250,0:10:39.732 and put it directly into a shredder. 0:10:39.756,0:10:41.756 (Laughter) 0:10:43.177,0:10:45.970 What happened in those three conditions? 0:10:45.994,0:10:50.196 In this plot I'm showing you[br]at what pay rate people stopped. 0:10:50.220,0:10:52.802 So low numbers mean[br]that people worked harder. 0:10:52.826,0:10:54.928 They worked for much longer. 0:10:54.952,0:10:56.506 In the acknowledged condition, 0:10:56.530,0:10:59.630 people worked all the way[br]down to 15 cents. 0:10:59.654,0:11:01.271 At 15 cents per page, 0:11:01.295,0:11:03.119 they basically stopped these efforts. 0:11:03.642,0:11:08.129 In the shredder condition, it was twice[br]as much -- 30 cents per sheet. 0:11:08.153,0:11:10.392 And this is basically[br]the result we had before. 0:11:10.416,0:11:13.780 You shred people's efforts, output -- 0:11:13.804,0:11:16.464 you get them not to be as happy[br]with what they're doing. 0:11:16.488,0:11:18.192 But I should point out, by the way, 0:11:18.216,0:11:20.946 that in the shredder condition,[br]people could have cheated. 0:11:20.970,0:11:22.975 They could have done not so good work, 0:11:22.999,0:11:25.498 because they realized[br]people were just shredding it. 0:11:25.522,0:11:27.609 So maybe the first sheet[br]you'd do good work, 0:11:27.633,0:11:29.768 but then you see nobody[br]is really testing it, 0:11:29.792,0:11:31.705 so you would do more and more and more. 0:11:31.729,0:11:33.569 So in fact, in the shredder condition, 0:11:33.593,0:11:36.427 people could have submitted more work[br]and gotten more money, 0:11:36.451,0:11:37.831 and put less effort into it. 0:11:38.471,0:11:40.416 But what about the ignored condition? 0:11:40.440,0:11:43.170 Would the ignored condition[br]be more like the acknowledged 0:11:43.194,0:11:46.113 or more like the shredder,[br]or somewhere in the middle? 0:11:46.137,0:11:48.561 It turns out it was[br]almost like the shredder. 0:11:49.473,0:11:52.141 Now there's good news and bad news here. 0:11:52.917,0:11:56.980 The bad news is that ignoring[br]the performance of people 0:11:57.004,0:12:01.276 is almost as bad as shredding[br]their effort in front of their eyes. 0:12:01.300,0:12:04.649 Ignoring gets you a whole way out there. 0:12:05.213,0:12:09.522 The good news is that by simply looking[br]at something that somebody has done, 0:12:09.546,0:12:11.539 scanning it and saying "Uh huh," 0:12:11.563,0:12:13.149 that seems to be quite sufficient 0:12:13.173,0:12:15.942 to dramatically improve[br]people's motivations. 0:12:16.585,0:12:19.365 So the good news is that adding motivation 0:12:19.389,0:12:21.888 doesn't seem to be so difficult. 0:12:21.912,0:12:24.066 The bad news is[br]that eliminating motivations 0:12:24.090,0:12:25.841 seems to be incredibly easy, 0:12:25.865,0:12:29.657 and if we don't think about it[br]carefully, we might overdo it. 0:12:29.681,0:12:33.092 So this is all in terms[br]of negative motivation, 0:12:33.116,0:12:35.450 or eliminating negative motivation. 0:12:36.426,0:12:39.905 The next part I want to show you[br]is something about positive motivation. 0:12:40.473,0:12:44.160 So there is a store[br]in the U.S. called IKEA. 0:12:44.970,0:12:49.175 And IKEA is a store[br]with kind of okay furniture 0:12:49.199,0:12:51.183 that takes a long time to assemble. 0:12:51.667,0:12:53.316 (Laughter) 0:12:53.714,0:12:54.866 I don't know about you, 0:12:54.890,0:12:56.763 but every time I assemble one of those, 0:12:56.787,0:12:59.128 it takes me much longer,[br]it's much more effortful, 0:12:59.152,0:13:02.517 it's much more confusing,[br]I put things in the wrong way -- 0:13:03.186,0:13:05.766 I can't say I enjoy those pieces. 0:13:06.175,0:13:08.473 I can't say I enjoy the process. 0:13:09.040,0:13:10.676 But when I finish it, 0:13:10.700,0:13:12.818 I seem to like those[br]IKEA pieces of furniture 0:13:12.842,0:13:14.694 more than I like other ones. 0:13:14.718,0:13:15.774 (Laughter) 0:13:15.798,0:13:19.151 And there's an old story about cake mixes. 0:13:19.758,0:13:22.985 So when they started[br]cake mixes in the '40s, 0:13:23.009,0:13:26.465 they would take this powder[br]and they would put it in a box, 0:13:26.489,0:13:29.530 and they would ask housewives[br]to basically pour it in, 0:13:29.554,0:13:31.276 stir some water in it, 0:13:31.300,0:13:35.562 mix it, put it in the oven,[br]and -- voila -- you had cake. 0:13:35.586,0:13:37.615 But it turns out they were very unpopular. 0:13:37.639,0:13:39.450 People did not want them, 0:13:39.474,0:13:41.999 and they thought about[br]all kinds of reasons for that. 0:13:42.023,0:13:43.432 Maybe the taste was not good? 0:13:43.456,0:13:44.632 No, the taste was great. 0:13:44.656,0:13:49.656 What they figured out was[br]that there was not enough effort involved. 0:13:49.680,0:13:53.057 It was so easy that nobody[br]could serve cake to their guests 0:13:53.081,0:13:55.365 and say, "Here is my cake." 0:13:55.389,0:13:58.965 No, it was somebody else's cake,[br]as if you bought it in the store. 0:13:58.989,0:14:01.232 It didn't really feel like your own. 0:14:01.574,0:14:03.019 So what did they do? 0:14:03.043,0:14:06.289 They took the eggs and the milk[br]out of the powder. 0:14:06.313,0:14:08.039 (Laughter) 0:14:08.063,0:14:11.880 Now you had to break[br]the eggs and add them, 0:14:11.904,0:14:15.060 you had to measure the milk[br]and add it, mixing it. 0:14:15.084,0:14:17.917 Now it was your cake.[br]Now everything was fine. 0:14:17.941,0:14:20.305 (Laughter) 0:14:20.329,0:14:27.251 (Applause) 0:14:27.904,0:14:30.133 Now, I think a little bit[br]like the IKEA effect, 0:14:30.157,0:14:31.785 by getting people to work harder, 0:14:31.809,0:14:34.222 they actually got them to love[br]what they're doing 0:14:34.246,0:14:35.762 to a higher degree. 0:14:36.150,0:14:38.586 So how do we look at this[br]question experimentally? 0:14:39.046,0:14:41.199 We asked people to build some origami. 0:14:41.223,0:14:43.976 We gave them instructions[br]on how to create origami, 0:14:44.000,0:14:45.738 and we gave them a sheet of paper. 0:14:45.762,0:14:47.580 And these were all novices, 0:14:47.604,0:14:50.158 and they built something[br]that was really quite ugly -- 0:14:50.182,0:14:52.317 nothing like a frog or a crane. 0:14:53.086,0:14:56.127 But then we told them,[br]"Look, this origami really belongs to us. 0:14:56.151,0:14:59.175 You worked for us, but I'll tell[br]you what, we'll sell it to you. 0:14:59.199,0:15:01.203 How much do you want to pay for it?" 0:15:01.610,0:15:04.286 And we measured how much[br]they were willing to pay for it. 0:15:04.310,0:15:06.118 And we had two types of people: 0:15:06.142,0:15:08.086 We had the people who built it, 0:15:08.110,0:15:09.889 and the people who did not build it, 0:15:09.913,0:15:12.713 and just looked at it[br]as external observers. 0:15:13.173,0:15:15.404 And what we found[br]was that the builders thought 0:15:15.428,0:15:18.056 that these were beautiful[br]pieces of origami -- 0:15:18.080,0:15:19.342 (Laughter) 0:15:19.366,0:15:21.857 and they were willing to pay[br]five times more for them 0:15:21.881,0:15:24.485 than the people who just[br]evaluated them externally. 0:15:24.890,0:15:27.918 Now you could say --[br]if you were a builder, 0:15:27.942,0:15:31.110 do you think [you'd say],[br]"Oh, I love this origami, 0:15:31.134,0:15:33.728 but I know that nobody[br]else would love it?" 0:15:34.474,0:15:39.868 Or "I love this origami,[br]and everybody else will love it as well?" 0:15:39.892,0:15:42.273 Which one of those two is correct? 0:15:42.297,0:15:45.749 Turns out the builders[br]not only loved the origami more, 0:15:45.773,0:15:49.077 they thought that everybody[br]would see the world in their view. 0:15:49.101,0:15:51.793 They thought everybody else[br]would love it more as well. 0:15:52.451,0:15:54.889 In the next version,[br]we tried to do the IKEA effect. 0:15:54.913,0:15:56.777 We tried to make it more difficult. 0:15:57.126,0:15:59.754 So for some people, we gave the same task. 0:15:59.778,0:16:03.636 For some people, we made it harder[br]by hiding the instructions. 0:16:04.001,0:16:06.383 At the top of the sheet,[br]we had little diagrams 0:16:06.407,0:16:08.366 of how you fold origami. 0:16:08.390,0:16:10.719 For some people, we just eliminated that. 0:16:11.151,0:16:12.484 So now this was tougher. 0:16:12.867,0:16:14.024 What happened? 0:16:14.048,0:16:16.095 Well in an objective way, 0:16:16.119,0:16:19.585 the origami now was uglier,[br]it was more difficult. 0:16:20.064,0:16:23.071 Now when we looked at the easy[br]origami, we saw the same thing -- 0:16:23.095,0:16:26.317 builders loved it more,[br]evaluators loved it less. 0:16:26.341,0:16:28.500 When you looked at the hard instructions, 0:16:28.524,0:16:31.222 the effect was larger. 0:16:31.246,0:16:32.398 Why? 0:16:32.422,0:16:35.492 Because now the builders[br]loved it even more. 0:16:35.516,0:16:36.722 (Laughter) 0:16:36.746,0:16:38.902 They put all this extra effort into it. 0:16:39.352,0:16:41.188 And evaluators? 0:16:41.212,0:16:42.839 They loved it even less. 0:16:42.863,0:16:46.712 Because in reality, it was even uglier[br]than the first version. 0:16:46.736,0:16:48.077 (Laughter) 0:16:48.101,0:16:52.073 Of course, this tells you something[br]about how we evaluate things. 0:16:52.835,0:16:54.414 Now think about kids. 0:16:55.216,0:16:58.323 Imagine I asked you, "How much[br]would you sell your kids for?" 0:16:59.748,0:17:01.756 Your memories and associations and so on. 0:17:01.780,0:17:04.419 Most people would say[br]for a lot, a lot of money. 0:17:04.443,0:17:05.607 (Laughter) 0:17:05.631,0:17:07.015 On good days. 0:17:07.039,0:17:08.279 (Laughter) 0:17:08.303,0:17:10.208 But imagine this was slightly different. 0:17:10.232,0:17:12.042 Imagine if you did not have your kids. 0:17:12.066,0:17:14.801 And one day you went to the park[br]and you met some kids. 0:17:14.825,0:17:16.307 They were just like your kids, 0:17:16.331,0:17:18.349 and you played with them for a few hours, 0:17:18.373,0:17:21.722 and when you were about to leave,[br]the parents said, "Hey, by the way, 0:17:21.746,0:17:24.729 just before you leave,[br]if you're interested, they're for sale." 0:17:24.753,0:17:26.859 (Laughter) 0:17:26.883,0:17:29.113 How much would you pay for them now? 0:17:29.803,0:17:31.900 Most people say not that much. 0:17:32.549,0:17:36.719 And this is because our kids[br]are so valuable, 0:17:36.743,0:17:38.873 not just because of who they are, 0:17:38.897,0:17:40.508 but because of us, 0:17:40.532,0:17:42.692 because they are so connected to us, 0:17:42.716,0:17:45.287 and because of the time and connection. 0:17:45.311,0:17:48.218 By the way, if you think[br]IKEA instructions are not good, 0:17:48.242,0:17:51.630 what about the instructions that come[br]with kids, those are really tough. 0:17:51.654,0:17:52.662 (Laughter) 0:17:52.686,0:17:56.928 By the way, these are my kids, which,[br]of course, are wonderful and so on. 0:17:56.952,0:17:58.876 Which comes to tell you one more thing, 0:17:58.900,0:18:01.350 which is, much like our builders, 0:18:01.374,0:18:05.215 when they look at the creature[br]of their creation, 0:18:05.239,0:18:08.503 we don't see that other people[br]don't see things our way. 0:18:10.463,0:18:12.297 Let me say one last comment. 0:18:13.162,0:18:16.955 If you think about Adam Smith[br]versus Karl Marx, 0:18:16.979,0:18:20.194 Adam Smith had a very important[br]notion of efficiency. 0:18:20.750,0:18:22.892 He gave an example of a pin factory. 0:18:23.464,0:18:26.421 He said pins have 12 different steps, 0:18:26.445,0:18:30.350 and if one person does all 12 steps,[br]production is very low. 0:18:30.818,0:18:32.946 But if you get one person to do step one, 0:18:32.970,0:18:35.723 and one person to do step two[br]and step three and so on, 0:18:35.747,0:18:38.358 production can increase tremendously. 0:18:38.382,0:18:40.121 And indeed, this is a great example, 0:18:40.145,0:18:43.596 and the reason for the Industrial[br]Revolution and efficiency. 0:18:44.270,0:18:45.856 Karl Marx, on the other hand, 0:18:45.880,0:18:49.341 said that the alienation[br]of labor is incredibly important 0:18:49.365,0:18:52.761 in how people think about the connection[br]to what they are doing. 0:18:52.785,0:18:56.055 And if you do all 12 steps,[br]you care about the pin. 0:18:56.079,0:18:59.531 But if you do one step every time,[br]maybe you don't care as much. 0:19:00.568,0:19:03.353 I think that in the Industrial Revolution, 0:19:03.377,0:19:05.964 Adam Smith was more[br]correct than Karl Marx. 0:19:06.488,0:19:09.323 But the reality is that we've switched, 0:19:09.347,0:19:11.355 and now we're in the knowledge economy. 0:19:11.379,0:19:14.266 You can ask yourself, what happens[br]in a knowledge economy? 0:19:14.290,0:19:17.537 Is efficiency still more[br]important than meaning? 0:19:17.561,0:19:18.971 I think the answer is no. 0:19:18.995,0:19:21.189 I think that as we move to situations 0:19:21.213,0:19:24.172 in which people have[br]to decide on their own 0:19:24.196,0:19:28.366 about how much effort, attention,[br]caring, how connected they feel to it, 0:19:28.390,0:19:30.765 are they thinking about labor[br]on the way to work, 0:19:30.789,0:19:32.366 and in the shower and so on, 0:19:32.390,0:19:35.978 all of a sudden Marx[br]has more things to say to us. 0:19:36.843,0:19:38.249 So when we think about labor, 0:19:38.273,0:19:41.673 we usually think about motivation[br]and payment as the same thing, 0:19:41.697,0:19:45.299 but the reality is that we should[br]probably add all kinds of things to it -- 0:19:45.323,0:19:49.519 meaning, creation, challenges,[br]ownership, identity, pride, etc. 0:19:49.823,0:19:52.506 The good news is that if we added[br]all of those components 0:19:52.530,0:19:54.108 and thought about them -- 0:19:54.132,0:19:57.545 how do we create our own[br]meaning, pride, motivation, 0:19:57.569,0:19:59.419 and how do we do it in our workplace, 0:19:59.443,0:20:00.841 and for the employees -- 0:20:00.865,0:20:04.830 I think we could get people to be[br]both more productive and happier. 0:20:04.854,0:20:06.160 Thank you very much. 0:20:06.184,0:20:07.984 (Applause)