1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,625
So it turns out that mathematics is a very powerful language.

2
00:00:02,625 --> 00:00:05,875
It has generated considerable insight in physics,

3
00:00:05,875 --> 00:00:08,083
in biology and economics,

4
00:00:08,083 --> 00:00:10,792
but not that much in the humanities and in history.

5
00:00:10,792 --> 00:00:12,875
I think there's a belief that it's just impossible,

6
00:00:12,875 --> 00:00:15,583
that you cannot quantify the doings of mankind,

7
00:00:15,583 --> 00:00:17,333
that you cannot measure history.

8
00:00:17,333 --> 00:00:19,875
But I don't think that's right.

9
00:00:19,875 --> 00:00:21,917
I want to show you a couple of examples why.

10
00:00:21,917 --> 00:00:24,875
So my collaborator Erez and I were considering the following fact:

11
00:00:24,875 --> 00:00:27,250
that two kings separated by centuries

12
00:00:27,250 --> 00:00:28,125
will speak a very different language.

13
00:00:28,125 --> 00:00:29,875
That's a powerful historical force.

14
00:00:29,875 --> 00:00:33,417
So the king of England, Alfred the Great,

15
00:00:33,417 --> 00:00:35,042
will use a vocabulary and grammar

16
00:00:35,042 --> 00:00:37,542
that is quite different from the king of hip hop, Jay-Z.

17
00:00:37,542 --> 00:00:40,792
(Laughter)

18
00:00:40,792 --> 00:00:42,625
Now it's just the way it is.

19
00:00:42,625 --> 00:00:44,917
Language changes over time, and it's a powerful force.

20
00:00:44,917 --> 00:00:46,542
So Erez and I wanted to know more about that.

21
00:00:46,542 --> 00:00:50,292
So we paid attention to a particular grammatical rule, past-tense conjugation.

22
00:00:50,292 --> 00:00:54,125
So you just add "ed" to a verb at the end to signify the past.

23
00:00:54,125 --> 00:00:55,667
"Today I walk. Yesterday I walked."

24
00:00:55,667 --> 00:00:57,042
But some verbs are irregular.

25
00:00:57,042 --> 00:00:58,792
"Yesterday I thought."

26
00:00:58,792 --> 00:01:00,458
Now what's interesting about that

27
00:01:00,458 --> 00:01:04,042
is irregular verbs between Alfred and Jay-Z have become more regular.

28
00:01:04,042 --> 00:01:05,792
Like the verb "to wed" that you see here has become regular.

29
00:01:05,792 --> 00:01:10,583
So Erez and I followed the fate of over 100 irregular verbs

30
00:01:10,583 --> 00:01:12,333
through 12 centuries of English language,

31
00:01:12,333 --> 00:01:15,875
and we saw that there's actually a very simple mathematical pattern

32
00:01:15,875 --> 00:01:18,417
that captures this complex historical change,

33
00:01:18,417 --> 00:01:21,708
namely, if a verb is 100 times more frequent than another,

34
00:01:21,708 --> 00:01:24,250
it regularizes 10 times slower.

35
00:01:24,250 --> 00:01:28,000
That's a piece of history, but it comes in a mathematical wrapping.

36
00:01:28,000 --> 00:01:31,500
Now in some cases math can even help explain,

37
00:01:31,500 --> 00:01:34,625
or propose explanations for, historical forces.

38
00:01:34,625 --> 00:01:37,042
So here Steve Pinker and I

39
00:01:37,042 --> 00:01:40,125
were considering the magnitude of wars during the last two centuries.

40
00:01:40,125 --> 00:01:42,958
There's actually a well-known regularity to them

41
00:01:42,958 --> 00:01:46,042
where the number of wars that are 100 times deadlier

42
00:01:46,042 --> 00:01:47,917
is 10 times smaller.

43
00:01:47,917 --> 00:01:51,292
So there are 30 wars that are about as deadly as the Six Days War,

44
00:01:51,292 --> 00:01:54,542
but there's only four wars that are 100 times deadlier --

45
00:01:54,542 --> 00:01:56,458
like World War I.

46
00:01:56,458 --> 00:01:59,458
So what kind of historical mechanism can produce that?

47
00:01:59,458 --> 00:02:01,458
What's the origin of this?

48
00:02:01,458 --> 00:02:03,292
So Steve and I, through mathematical analysis,

49
00:02:03,292 --> 00:02:08,333
propose that there's actually a very simple phenomenon at the root of this,

50
00:02:08,333 --> 00:02:09,208
which lies in our brains.

51
00:02:09,208 --> 00:02:12,042
This is a very well-known feature

52
00:02:12,042 --> 00:02:14,125
in which we perceive quantities in relative ways --

53
00:02:14,125 --> 00:02:17,625
quantities like the intensity of light or the loudness of a sound.

54
00:02:17,625 --> 00:02:24,042
For instance, committing 10,000 soldiers to the next battle sounds like a lot.

55
00:02:24,042 --> 00:02:26,917
It's relatively enormous if you've already committed 1,000 soldiers previously.

56
00:02:26,917 --> 00:02:28,667
But it doesn't sound so much,

57
00:02:28,667 --> 00:02:32,333
it's not relatively enough, it won't make a difference

58
00:02:32,333 --> 00:02:34,500
if you've already committed 100,000 soldiers previously.

59
00:02:34,500 --> 00:02:38,667
So you see that because of the way we perceive quantities,

60
00:02:38,667 --> 00:02:39,542
as the war drags on,

61
00:02:39,542 --> 00:02:43,750
the number of soldiers committed to it and the casualties

62
00:02:43,750 --> 00:02:45,125
will increase not linearly --

63
00:02:45,125 --> 00:02:46,875
like 10,000, 11,000, 12,000 --

64
00:02:46,875 --> 00:02:51,042
but exponentially -- 10,000, later 20,000, later 40,000.

65
00:02:51,042 --> 00:02:54,250
And so that explains this pattern that we've seen before.

66
00:02:54,250 --> 00:02:59,625
So here mathematics is able to link a well-known feature of the individual mind

67
00:02:59,625 --> 00:03:03,583
with a long-term historical pattern

68
00:03:03,583 --> 00:03:05,333
that unfolds over centuries and across continents.

69
00:03:05,333 --> 00:03:10,042
So this type of example, today there is just a few of them,

70
00:03:10,042 --> 00:03:12,500
but I think in the next decade they will become commonplace.

71
00:03:12,500 --> 00:03:14,292
The reason for that is that the historical record

72
00:03:14,292 --> 00:03:17,583
is becoming digitized at a very fast pace.

73
00:03:17,583 --> 00:03:19,208
So there's about 130 million books

74
00:03:19,208 --> 00:03:21,750
that have been written since the dawn of time.

75
00:03:21,750 --> 00:03:24,958
Companies like Google have digitized many of them --

76
00:03:24,958 --> 00:03:26,542
above 20 million actually.

77
00:03:26,542 --> 00:03:29,458
And when the stuff of history is available in digital form,

78
00:03:29,458 --> 00:03:32,500
it makes it possible for a mathematical analysis

79
00:03:32,500 --> 00:03:34,875
to very quickly and very conveniently

80
00:03:34,875 --> 00:03:37,292
review trends in our history and our culture.

81
00:03:37,292 --> 00:03:39,875
So I think in the next decade,

82
00:03:39,875 --> 00:03:41,625
the sciences and the humanities will come closer together

83
00:03:41,625 --> 00:03:45,708
to be able to answer deep questions about mankind.

84
00:03:45,708 --> 00:03:49,583
And I think that mathematics will be a very powerful language to do that.

85
00:03:49,583 --> 00:03:53,667
It will be able to reveal new trends in our history,

86
00:03:53,667 --> 00:03:55,417
sometimes to explain them,

87
00:03:55,417 --> 00:03:58,200
and maybe even in the future to predict what's going to happen.

88
00:03:58,200 --> 00:03:59,583
Thank you very much.

89
00:03:59,583 --> 00:04:03,892
(Applause)