0:00:00.813,0:00:03.402 So imagine, you're in the supermarket, 0:00:03.402,0:00:05.198 you're buying some groceries, 0:00:05.198,0:00:06.654 and you get given the option 0:00:06.654,0:00:10.258 for a plastic or a paper shopping bag. 0:00:10.258,0:00:12.280 Which one do you choose if you want to do 0:00:12.280,0:00:15.110 the right thing by the environment? 0:00:15.110,0:00:16.837 Most people do pick the paper. 0:00:16.837,0:00:18.235 Okay, let's think of why. 0:00:18.235,0:00:19.806 It's brown to start with. 0:00:19.806,0:00:21.358 Therefore, it must be good for the environment. 0:00:21.358,0:00:23.675 It's biodegradable. It's reusable. 0:00:23.675,0:00:25.748 In some cases, it's recyclable. 0:00:25.748,0:00:28.559 So when people are looking at the plastic bag, 0:00:28.559,0:00:31.349 it's likely they're thinking of something like this, 0:00:31.349,0:00:33.611 which we all know is absolutely terrible 0:00:33.611,0:00:36.078 and we should be avoiding at all expenses, 0:00:36.078,0:00:38.380 these kinds of environmental damages. 0:00:38.380,0:00:40.671 But people are often not thinking 0:00:40.671,0:00:42.734 of something like this, 0:00:42.734,0:00:45.159 which is the other end of the spectrum. 0:00:45.159,0:00:47.956 When we produce materials, 0:00:47.956,0:00:49.710 we need to extract them from the environment, 0:00:49.710,0:00:53.706 and we need a whole bunch[br]of environmental impacts. 0:00:53.706,0:00:55.513 You see, what happens is, when we need 0:00:55.513,0:00:57.489 to make complex choices, 0:00:57.489,0:00:59.987 us humans like really simple solutions, 0:00:59.987,0:01:02.634 and so we often ask for simple solutions. 0:01:02.634,0:01:04.215 And I work in design. 0:01:04.215,0:01:05.664 I advise designers 0:01:05.664,0:01:07.775 and innovators around sustainability, 0:01:07.775,0:01:09.623 and everyone always says to me, "Oh Leyla, 0:01:09.623,0:01:11.575 I just want the eco-materials." 0:01:11.575,0:01:13.535 And I say, "Well, that's very complex, 0:01:13.535,0:01:15.488 and we'll have to spend four hours talking about 0:01:15.488,0:01:17.495 what exactly an eco-material means, 0:01:17.495,0:01:19.647 because everything at some point 0:01:19.647,0:01:21.376 comes from nature, 0:01:21.376,0:01:23.425 and it's how you use the material 0:01:23.425,0:01:26.511 that dictates the environmental impact. 0:01:26.511,0:01:28.146 So what happens is, we have to rely 0:01:28.146,0:01:30.127 on some sort of intuitive framework 0:01:30.127,0:01:31.795 when we make decisions. 0:01:31.795,0:01:34.031 So I like to call that intuitive framework 0:01:34.031,0:01:36.751 our environmental folklore. 0:01:36.751,0:01:39.200 Okay, it's either the little voice[br]at the back of your head, 0:01:39.200,0:01:41.580 or it's that gut feeling you get 0:01:41.580,0:01:43.360 when you've done the right thing, 0:01:43.360,0:01:45.170 so when you've picked the paper bag 0:01:45.170,0:01:47.899 or when you've bought a fuel-efficient car. 0:01:47.899,0:01:50.858 And environmental folklore is a really important thing 0:01:50.858,0:01:53.306 because we're trying to do the right thing. 0:01:53.306,0:01:55.650 But how do we know if we're actually 0:01:55.650,0:01:58.042 reducing the net environmental impacts 0:01:58.042,0:02:01.314 that our actions as individuals and as professionals 0:02:01.314,0:02:03.482 and as a society are actually having 0:02:03.482,0:02:06.234 on the natural environment? 0:02:06.234,0:02:08.154 So the thing about environmental folklore is 0:02:08.154,0:02:09.916 it tends to be based on our experiences, 0:02:09.916,0:02:11.924 the things we've heard from other people. 0:02:11.924,0:02:14.456 It doesn't tend to be based[br]on any scientific framework. 0:02:14.456,0:02:16.123 And this is really hard, because we live 0:02:16.123,0:02:18.143 in incredibly complex systems. 0:02:18.143,0:02:19.863 We have the human systems 0:02:19.863,0:02:21.629 of how we communicate and interrelate 0:02:21.629,0:02:24.168 and have our whole constructed society, 0:02:24.168,0:02:25.978 of the industrial systems, 0:02:25.978,0:02:28.087 which is essentially the entire economy, 0:02:28.087,0:02:29.890 and then all of that has to operate 0:02:29.890,0:02:31.615 within the biggest system, 0:02:31.615,0:02:33.507 and, I would argue, the most important, 0:02:33.507,0:02:35.364 the ecosystem. 0:02:35.364,0:02:37.103 And you see, the choices that we make 0:02:37.103,0:02:38.735 as an individual, 0:02:38.735,0:02:39.954 but the choices that we make 0:02:39.954,0:02:42.128 in every single job that we have, 0:02:42.128,0:02:44.672 no matter how high or low[br]you are in the pecking order, 0:02:44.672,0:02:47.784 has an impact on all of these systems. 0:02:47.784,0:02:49.934 And the thing is that we have to find ways 0:02:49.934,0:02:52.181 if we're actually going to address sustainability 0:02:52.181,0:02:54.822 of interlocking those complex systems 0:02:54.822,0:02:57.750 and making better choices that result 0:02:57.750,0:03:00.873 in net environmental gains. 0:03:00.873,0:03:02.536 What we need to do is we need to learn 0:03:02.536,0:03:04.581 to do more with less. 0:03:04.581,0:03:06.380 We have an increasing population, 0:03:06.380,0:03:07.998 and everybody likes their mobile phones, 0:03:07.998,0:03:10.096 especially in this situation here. 0:03:10.096,0:03:12.646 So we need to find innovative ways of solving 0:03:12.646,0:03:14.354 some of these problems that we face. 0:03:14.354,0:03:15.703 And that's where this process called 0:03:15.703,0:03:17.566 life cycle thinking comes in. 0:03:17.566,0:03:20.030 So essentially, everything that is created 0:03:20.030,0:03:22.888 goes through a series of life cycle stages, 0:03:22.888,0:03:24.734 and we use this scientific process 0:03:24.734,0:03:26.489 called life cycle assessment, 0:03:26.489,0:03:28.891 or in America, you guys say life cycle analysis, 0:03:28.891,0:03:32.269 in order to have a clearer picture of how 0:03:32.269,0:03:36.244 everything that we do in the[br]technical part of those systems 0:03:36.244,0:03:38.287 affects the natural environment. 0:03:38.287,0:03:40.119 So we go all the way back 0:03:40.119,0:03:42.198 to the extraction of raw materials, 0:03:42.198,0:03:44.017 and then we look at manufacturing, 0:03:44.017,0:03:46.105 we look at packaging and transportation, 0:03:46.105,0:03:47.678 use, and end of life, 0:03:47.678,0:03:50.611 and at every single one of these stages, 0:03:50.611,0:03:52.070 the things that we do 0:03:52.070,0:03:54.030 have an interaction with the natural environment, 0:03:54.030,0:03:56.434 and we can monitor how that interaction 0:03:56.434,0:04:00.061 is actually affecting the systems and services 0:04:00.061,0:04:02.125 that make life on earth possible. 0:04:02.125,0:04:03.853 And through doing this, 0:04:03.853,0:04:07.374 we've learned some absolutely fascinating things. 0:04:07.374,0:04:09.718 And we've busted a bunch of myths. 0:04:09.718,0:04:12.568 So to start with, 0:04:12.568,0:04:14.441 there's a word that's used a lot. 0:04:14.441,0:04:16.408 It's used a lot in marketing, 0:04:16.408,0:04:18.392 and it's used a lot, I think, in our conversation 0:04:18.392,0:04:20.234 when we're talking about sustainability, 0:04:20.234,0:04:22.648 and that's the word biodegradability. 0:04:22.648,0:04:27.905 Now biodegradability is a material property. 0:04:27.905,0:04:30.983 It is not a definition of environmental benefits. 0:04:30.983,0:04:32.840 Allow me to explain. 0:04:32.840,0:04:34.578 When something natural, 0:04:34.578,0:04:36.400 something that's made from a cellulose fiber 0:04:36.400,0:04:40.056 like a piece of bread, even, or any food waste, 0:04:40.056,0:04:42.370 or even a piece of paper, 0:04:42.370,0:04:44.276 when something natural ends up 0:04:44.276,0:04:46.915 in the natural environment, it degrades normally. 0:04:46.915,0:04:48.717 Its little carbon molecules that it stored up 0:04:48.717,0:04:50.808 as it was growing are naturally released 0:04:50.808,0:04:53.373 back into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide, 0:04:53.373,0:04:55.377 but this is a net situation. 0:04:55.377,0:04:56.819 Most natural things 0:04:56.819,0:04:58.627 don't actually end up in nature. 0:04:58.627,0:05:00.176 Most of the things, the waste that we produce, 0:05:00.176,0:05:01.856 end up in landfill. 0:05:01.856,0:05:04.193 Landfill is a different environment. 0:05:04.193,0:05:06.729 In landfill, those same carbon molecules 0:05:06.729,0:05:08.354 degrade in a different way, 0:05:08.354,0:05:10.128 because a landfill is anaerobic. 0:05:10.128,0:05:13.393 It's got no oxygen. It's tightly compacted and hot. 0:05:13.393,0:05:15.694 Those same molecules, they become methane, 0:05:15.694,0:05:18.565 and methane is a 25 times more potent 0:05:18.565,0:05:21.726 greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. 0:05:21.726,0:05:24.111 So our old lettuces and products 0:05:24.111,0:05:25.936 that we have thrown out that are made 0:05:25.936,0:05:27.597 out of biodegradable materials, 0:05:27.597,0:05:29.317 if they end up in landfill, 0:05:29.317,0:05:31.282 contribute to climate change. 0:05:31.282,0:05:32.581 You see, there are facilities now 0:05:32.581,0:05:34.301 that can actually capture that methane 0:05:34.301,0:05:35.908 and generate power, 0:05:35.908,0:05:38.484 displacing the need for fossil fuel power, 0:05:38.484,0:05:40.165 but we need to be smart about this. 0:05:40.165,0:05:43.036 We need to identify how we can start to leverage 0:05:43.036,0:05:45.525 these types of things that are already happening 0:05:45.525,0:05:47.332 and start to design systems and services 0:05:47.332,0:05:49.108 that alleviate these problems. 0:05:49.108,0:05:52.123 Because right now, what people do[br]is they turn around and they say, 0:05:52.123,0:05:54.988 "Let's ban plastic bags. We'll give people paper 0:05:54.988,0:05:56.946 because that is better for the environment." 0:05:56.946,0:05:58.503 But if you're throwing it in the bin, 0:05:58.503,0:05:59.857 and your local landfill facility 0:05:59.857,0:06:01.956 is just a normal one, 0:06:01.956,0:06:07.339 then we're having what's called a double negative. 0:06:07.339,0:06:10.061 Okay, I'm also a product designer by trade. 0:06:10.061,0:06:11.494 I then did social science. 0:06:11.494,0:06:12.942 And so I'm absolutely fascinated 0:06:12.942,0:06:14.879 by consumer goods and how the consumer goods 0:06:14.879,0:06:17.217 that we have kind of become immune to 0:06:17.217,0:06:18.702 that fill our lives 0:06:18.702,0:06:20.356 have an impact on the natural environment. 0:06:20.356,0:06:22.783 And these guys are, like, serial offenders, 0:06:22.783,0:06:24.631 and I'm pretty sure everyone in this room 0:06:24.631,0:06:26.323 has a refrigerator. 0:06:26.323,0:06:28.074 Now America has this amazing ability 0:06:28.074,0:06:29.917 to keep growing refrigerators. 0:06:29.917,0:06:31.865 In the last few years, they've grown one cubic foot 0:06:31.865,0:06:33.713 on average, the standard size 0:06:33.713,0:06:35.357 of a refrigerator, 0:06:35.357,0:06:37.385 and the problem is, they're so big now, 0:06:37.385,0:06:39.825 it's easier for us to buy more food 0:06:39.825,0:06:41.970 that we can't eat or find. 0:06:41.970,0:06:43.689 I mean, I have things at the back of my refrigerator 0:06:43.689,0:06:45.915 that have been there for years, all right? 0:06:45.915,0:06:48.412 And so what happens is, we waste more food. 0:06:48.412,0:06:51.833 And as I was just explaining,[br]food waste is a problem. 0:06:51.833,0:06:55.149 In fact, here in the U.S., 40 percent 0:06:55.149,0:06:57.097 of food purchased for the home is wasted. 0:06:57.097,0:07:02.121 Half of the world's produced food is wasted. 0:07:02.121,0:07:04.897 That's the latest U.N. stats. Up to half of the food. 0:07:04.897,0:07:08.957 It's insane. It's 1.3 billion tons of food per annum. 0:07:08.957,0:07:11.346 And I blame it on the refrigerator, 0:07:11.346,0:07:12.905 well, especially in Western cultures, 0:07:12.905,0:07:14.708 because it makes it easier. 0:07:14.708,0:07:16.793 I mean, there's a lot of complex[br]systems going on here. 0:07:16.793,0:07:18.977 I don't want to make it so simplistic. 0:07:18.977,0:07:21.865 But the refrigerator is a serious contributor to this, 0:07:21.865,0:07:23.601 and one of the features of it 0:07:23.601,0:07:26.347 is the crisper drawer. 0:07:26.347,0:07:27.713 You all got crisper drawers? 0:07:27.713,0:07:29.337 You know, the draw that you put your lettuces in? 0:07:29.337,0:07:31.078 Lettuces have a habit of going soggy 0:07:31.078,0:07:32.837 in the crisper drawer, don't they. 0:07:32.837,0:07:34.401 Yeah? Soggy lettuces? 0:07:34.401,0:07:36.371 In the U.K., this is such a problem 0:07:36.371,0:07:38.100 that there was a government report a few years ago 0:07:38.100,0:07:40.857 that actually said the second-biggest offender 0:07:40.857,0:07:43.475 of wasted food in the U.K. is the soggy lettuce. 0:07:43.475,0:07:45.985 It was called "the soggy lettuce report." 0:07:45.985,0:07:47.905 Okay? So this is a problem, people. 0:07:47.905,0:07:50.200 These poor little lettuces are getting thrown out 0:07:50.200,0:07:51.920 left, right, and center, because the crisper drawers 0:07:51.920,0:07:54.770 are not designed to actually keep things crisp. 0:07:54.770,0:07:57.024 Okay. You need a tight environment. 0:07:57.024,0:07:58.848 You need, like, an airless environment 0:07:58.848,0:08:02.088 to prevent the degrading that[br]would happen naturally. 0:08:02.088,0:08:03.816 But the crisper drawers, they're just a drawer 0:08:03.816,0:08:05.509 with, like, a slightly better seal. 0:08:05.509,0:08:07.673 Anyway, I'm clearly obsessed. All right? 0:08:07.673,0:08:08.984 Don't ever invite me over because I'll just 0:08:08.984,0:08:10.794 start going through your refrigerator 0:08:10.794,0:08:12.240 and looking at all sorts of things like that. 0:08:12.240,0:08:13.896 But essentially, this is a big problem. 0:08:13.896,0:08:16.578 Because when we lose something[br]like the lettuce from the system, 0:08:16.578,0:08:18.453 not only do we have that impact I just explained 0:08:18.453,0:08:20.376 at the end of life, 0:08:20.376,0:08:22.817 but we actually have had to grow that lettuce. 0:08:22.817,0:08:26.078 The life cycle impact of that lettuce is astronomical. 0:08:26.078,0:08:27.659 We've had to clear land. 0:08:27.659,0:08:29.340 We've had to plant seeds, phosphorus, 0:08:29.340,0:08:31.740 fertilizers, nutrients, water, sunlight. 0:08:31.740,0:08:33.828 All of the embodied impacts in that lettuce 0:08:33.828,0:08:35.540 get lost from the system, 0:08:35.540,0:08:37.890 which makes it a far bigger environmental impact 0:08:37.890,0:08:41.989 than the loss of the energy from the fridge. 0:08:41.989,0:08:45.100 So we need to design things like this far better 0:08:45.100,0:08:48.281 if we're going to start addressing[br]serious environmental problems. 0:08:48.281,0:08:50.148 We could start with the crisper drawer and the size. 0:08:50.148,0:08:51.931 For those of you in the room who do design fridges, 0:08:51.931,0:08:53.547 that would be great. 0:08:53.547,0:08:56.066 Okay, so the problem is, so imagine if we 0:08:56.066,0:08:59.203 actually started to reconsider how we design things. 0:08:59.203,0:09:02.748 So I look at the refrigerator as a sign of modernity, 0:09:02.748,0:09:04.723 but we actually haven't really changed the design 0:09:04.723,0:09:07.517 of them that much since the 1950s. 0:09:07.517,0:09:10.450 A little bit, but essentially they're still big boxes, 0:09:10.450,0:09:12.602 cold boxes that we store stuff in. 0:09:12.602,0:09:14.407 So imagine if we actually really started 0:09:14.407,0:09:17.137 to identify these problems and use that 0:09:17.137,0:09:21.181 as the foundation for finding innovative and elegant 0:09:21.181,0:09:24.058 design solutions that will solve those problems. 0:09:24.058,0:09:26.698 This is design-led system change, 0:09:26.698,0:09:30.454 design dictating the way in which the system 0:09:30.454,0:09:33.234 can be far more sustainable. 0:09:33.234,0:09:35.282 Forty percent food waste is a major problem. 0:09:35.282,0:09:39.378 Imagine if we designed fridges that halved that. 0:09:39.378,0:09:41.560 Another item that I find fascinating 0:09:41.560,0:09:42.828 is the electric tea kettle, 0:09:42.828,0:09:44.730 which I found out that you guys don't really, 0:09:44.730,0:09:47.610 you don't do tea kettles in[br]this country, really, do you. 0:09:47.610,0:09:49.652 But that's really big in the U.K. 0:09:49.652,0:09:51.579 Ninety-seven percent of households 0:09:51.579,0:09:54.618 in the United Kingdom own an electric tea kettle. 0:09:54.618,0:09:56.363 So they're very popular. 0:09:56.363,0:09:58.779 And, I mean, if I were to work with a design firm 0:09:58.779,0:10:01.353 or a designer, and they were designing one of these, 0:10:01.353,0:10:02.931 and they wanted to do it eco, 0:10:02.931,0:10:04.803 they'd usually ask me two things. 0:10:04.803,0:10:07.770 They'd say, "Leyla, how do I[br]make it technically efficient?" 0:10:07.770,0:10:11.075 Because obviously energy's[br]a problem with this product. 0:10:11.075,0:10:14.080 Or, "How do I make it green materials? 0:10:14.080,0:10:16.603 How do I make the materials green 0:10:16.603,0:10:18.702 in the manufacturing?" 0:10:18.702,0:10:20.596 Would you ask me those questions? 0:10:20.596,0:10:23.021 They seem logical, right? Yeah. 0:10:23.021,0:10:26.017 Well I'd say, "You're looking at the wrong problems." 0:10:26.017,0:10:28.022 Because the problem is with use. 0:10:28.022,0:10:30.818 It's with how people use the product. 0:10:30.818,0:10:32.653 Sixty-five percent of Brits 0:10:32.653,0:10:34.781 admit to over-filling their kettle 0:10:34.781,0:10:37.583 when they only need one cup of tea. 0:10:37.583,0:10:40.387 All of this extra water that's being boiled 0:10:40.387,0:10:44.309 requires energy, and it's been calculated 0:10:44.309,0:10:46.980 that in one day of extra energy use 0:10:46.980,0:10:48.829 from boiling kettles 0:10:48.829,0:10:51.533 is enough to light all of the streetlights 0:10:51.533,0:10:54.633 in England for a night. 0:10:54.633,0:10:56.029 But this is the thing, right? 0:10:56.029,0:10:58.068 This is what I call a product person failure. 0:10:58.068,0:11:00.734 But we've got a product system failure[br]going on with these little guys, 0:11:00.734,0:11:02.182 and they're so ubiquitous, you know, 0:11:02.182,0:11:03.774 you don't even notice they're there. 0:11:03.774,0:11:05.995 And this guy over here, though, he does. 0:11:05.995,0:11:07.210 He's named Simon. 0:11:07.210,0:11:10.363 Simon works for the national[br]electricity company in the U.K. 0:11:10.363,0:11:12.305 He has a very important job of monitoring 0:11:12.305,0:11:14.438 all of the electricity coming into the system 0:11:14.438,0:11:16.126 to make sure there is enough 0:11:16.126,0:11:18.162 that it powers everybody's homes. 0:11:18.162,0:11:20.266 He's also watching television. 0:11:20.266,0:11:22.224 The reason is is because there's a unique 0:11:22.224,0:11:24.078 phenomenon that happens in the U.K. 0:11:24.078,0:11:27.897 the moment that very popular TV shows end. 0:11:27.897,0:11:30.333 The minute the ad break comes on, 0:11:30.333,0:11:32.140 this man has to rush 0:11:32.140,0:11:35.226 to buy nuclear power from France, 0:11:35.226,0:11:37.684 because everybody turns their kettles on 0:11:37.684,0:11:40.180 at the same time. 0:11:40.180,0:11:42.380 (Laughter) 0:11:42.380,0:11:48.457 1.5 million kettles, seriously problematic. 0:11:48.457,0:11:52.149 So imagine if you designed kettles, 0:11:52.149,0:11:54.890 you actually found a way to[br]solve these system failures, 0:11:54.890,0:11:57.447 because this is a huge amount of pressure 0:11:57.447,0:11:58.792 on the system, 0:11:58.792,0:12:02.092 just because the product hasn't[br]thought about the problem 0:12:02.092,0:12:03.968 that it's going to have when it exists in the world. 0:12:03.968,0:12:06.805 Now, I looked at a number of[br]kettles available on the market, 0:12:06.805,0:12:08.781 and found the minimum fill lines, 0:12:08.781,0:12:10.501 so the little piece of information that tells you 0:12:10.501,0:12:12.165 how much you need to put in there, 0:12:12.165,0:12:14.562 was between two and a five-and-a-half cups of water 0:12:14.562,0:12:18.349 just to make one cup of tea. 0:12:18.349,0:12:20.310 So this kettle here is an example of one where 0:12:20.310,0:12:22.169 it actually has two boiling chambers, 0:12:22.169,0:12:23.325 or, sorry, two reservoirs. 0:12:23.325,0:12:25.540 One's a boiling chamber, and one's the water holder. 0:12:25.540,0:12:27.589 The user actually has to push that button 0:12:27.589,0:12:29.357 to get their hot water boiled, 0:12:29.357,0:12:31.097 which means, because we're all lazy, 0:12:31.097,0:12:33.072 you only fill exactly what you need. 0:12:33.072,0:12:35.165 And this is what I call behavior-changing products: 0:12:35.165,0:12:37.277 products, systems, or services 0:12:37.277,0:12:41.413 that intervene and solve these problems up front. 0:12:41.413,0:12:43.786 Now, this is a technology arena, 0:12:43.786,0:12:45.771 so obviously these things are quite popular, 0:12:45.771,0:12:47.600 but I think if we're going to keep 0:12:47.600,0:12:50.479 designing, buying, and using and throwing out 0:12:50.479,0:12:52.315 these kinds of products at the rate we currently do, 0:12:52.315,0:12:54.179 which is astronomically high, 0:12:54.179,0:12:56.396 there are seven billion people, right, 0:12:56.396,0:12:57.976 who live in the world right now. 0:12:57.976,0:13:00.147 There are six billion mobile phone subscriptions 0:13:00.147,0:13:03.952 as of last year. 0:13:03.952,0:13:07.092 Every single year, 1.5 billion mobile phones 0:13:07.092,0:13:08.604 roll off production lines, 0:13:08.604,0:13:10.675 and some companies report their production rate 0:13:10.675,0:13:13.549 as being greater than the human birthrate. 0:13:13.549,0:13:15.939 152 million phones were thrown[br]out in the U.S. last year. 0:13:15.939,0:13:17.809 Only 11 percent were recycled. 0:13:17.809,0:13:21.227 I'm from Australia. We have a[br]population of 22 million. Don't laugh. 0:13:21.227,0:13:24.116 And it's been reported that 22 million phones 0:13:24.116,0:13:27.020 are in people's drawers. 0:13:27.020,0:13:30.782 We need to find ways of solving[br]the problems around this, 0:13:30.782,0:13:33.495 because these things are so complicated. 0:13:33.495,0:13:36.524 They have so much locked up inside them. 0:13:36.524,0:13:40.764 Gold: did you know that it's actually cheaper now 0:13:40.764,0:13:44.211 to get gold out of a ton of old mobile phones 0:13:44.211,0:13:47.532 than it is out of a ton of gold ore? 0:13:47.532,0:13:49.860 There's a number of highly complex and valuable 0:13:49.860,0:13:51.477 materials embodied inside these things, 0:13:51.477,0:13:54.015 so we need to find ways of encouraging disassembly, 0:13:54.015,0:13:56.252 because this is otherwise what happens. 0:13:56.252,0:13:57.988 This is a community in Ghana, 0:13:57.988,0:14:00.020 and e-waste is reported, or electronic waste 0:14:00.020,0:14:01.869 is reported by the U.N. 0:14:01.869,0:14:05.030 as being up to 50 million tons trafficked. 0:14:05.030,0:14:06.537 This is how they get the gold 0:14:06.537,0:14:07.995 and the other valuable materials out. 0:14:07.995,0:14:09.809 They burn the electronic waste 0:14:09.809,0:14:11.948 in open spaces. 0:14:11.948,0:14:14.944 These are communities, and this[br]is happening all over the world. 0:14:14.944,0:14:17.491 And because we don't see the ramifications 0:14:17.491,0:14:19.459 of the choices that we make as designers, 0:14:19.459,0:14:21.945 as businesspeople, as consumers, 0:14:21.945,0:14:23.619 then these kinds of externalities happen, 0:14:23.619,0:14:25.860 and these are people's lives. 0:14:25.860,0:14:30.060 So we need to find smarter, more systems-based, 0:14:30.060,0:14:33.469 innovative solutions to these problems, 0:14:33.469,0:14:37.153 if we're going to start to live[br]sustainably within this world. 0:14:37.153,0:14:40.818 So imagine if, when you bought your mobile phone, 0:14:40.818,0:14:42.710 your new one because you replaced your old one 0:14:42.710,0:14:44.883 — after 15 to 18 months is the average time 0:14:44.883,0:14:46.987 that people replace their phones, by the way — 0:14:46.987,0:14:49.419 so if we're going to keep this kind of expedient 0:14:49.419,0:14:52.075 mobile phone replacing, then we should 0:14:52.075,0:14:54.259 be looking at closing the loop on the systems. 0:14:54.259,0:14:56.094 The people who produce these phones, 0:14:56.094,0:14:57.907 and some of which I'm sure[br]are in the room right now, 0:14:57.907,0:15:00.847 could potentially look at what[br]we call closed-loop systems, 0:15:00.847,0:15:02.507 or product system services, 0:15:02.507,0:15:04.739 so identifying that there is a market demand 0:15:04.739,0:15:06.571 and that market demand's not going to go anywhere, 0:15:06.571,0:15:09.531 so you design the product to solve the problem. 0:15:09.531,0:15:11.716 Design for disassembly, design for light-weighting. 0:15:11.716,0:15:14.005 We heard some of those kinds of strategies 0:15:14.005,0:15:17.028 being used in the Tesla Motors car today. 0:15:17.028,0:15:19.147 These kinds of approaches are not hard, 0:15:19.147,0:15:20.973 but understanding the system 0:15:20.973,0:15:24.075 and then looking for viable, market-driven 0:15:24.075,0:15:26.595 consumer demand alternatives 0:15:26.595,0:15:28.808 is how we can start radically altering 0:15:28.808,0:15:30.969 the sustainability agenda, 0:15:30.969,0:15:32.901 because I hate to break it to you all: 0:15:32.901,0:15:35.627 consumption is the biggest problem. 0:15:35.627,0:15:40.859 But design is one of the best solutions. 0:15:40.859,0:15:43.180 These kinds of products are everywhere. 0:15:43.180,0:15:45.571 By identifying alternative ways of doing things, 0:15:45.571,0:15:47.166 we can actually start to innovate, 0:15:47.166,0:15:48.744 and I say actually start to innovate. 0:15:48.744,0:15:50.768 I'm sure everyone in this room is very innovative. 0:15:50.768,0:15:53.491 But in the regards to using sustainability 0:15:53.491,0:15:55.963 as a parameter, as a criteria 0:15:55.963,0:16:00.318 for fueling systems-based solutions, 0:16:00.318,0:16:03.361 because as I've just demonstrated[br]with these simple products, 0:16:03.361,0:16:06.814 they're participating in these major problems. 0:16:06.814,0:16:08.923 So we need to look across the entire life 0:16:08.923,0:16:10.760 of the things that we do. 0:16:10.760,0:16:12.306 If you just had paper or plastic, 0:16:12.306,0:16:14.854 obviously reusable is far more beneficial, 0:16:14.854,0:16:18.556 then the paper is worse, 0:16:18.556,0:16:20.403 and the paper is worse because it weighs 0:16:20.403,0:16:22.475 four to 10 times more than the plastic, 0:16:22.475,0:16:25.015 and when we actually compare,[br]from a life cycle perspective, 0:16:25.015,0:16:27.532 a kilo of plastic and a kilo of paper, 0:16:27.532,0:16:29.363 the paper is far better, 0:16:29.363,0:16:31.718 but the functionality of a plastic or a paper bag 0:16:31.718,0:16:33.151 to carry your groceries home 0:16:33.151,0:16:35.633 is not done with a kilo of each material. 0:16:35.633,0:16:37.441 It's done with a very small amount of plastic 0:16:37.441,0:16:39.505 and quite a lot more paper. 0:16:39.505,0:16:42.060 Because functionality defines environmental impact, 0:16:42.060,0:16:44.786 and I said earlier that the designers[br]always ask me for the eco-materials. 0:16:44.786,0:16:46.995 I say, you know, there's only a few materials 0:16:46.995,0:16:48.217 that you should completely avoid. 0:16:48.217,0:16:49.977 The rest of them, it's all about application, 0:16:49.977,0:16:52.289 and at the end of the day, everything[br]we design and produce in the economy 0:16:52.289,0:16:55.305 or buy as consumers is done so for function. 0:16:55.305,0:16:57.468 We want something, therefore we buy it. 0:16:57.468,0:16:59.596 So breaking things back down and delivering 0:16:59.596,0:17:04.361 smartly, elegantly, sophisticated solutions 0:17:04.361,0:17:07.129 that take into consideration the entire system 0:17:07.129,0:17:09.931 and the entire life of the thing, everything, 0:17:09.931,0:17:12.905 all the way back to the extraction[br]through to the end of life, 0:17:12.905,0:17:16.154 we can start to actually find[br]really innovative solutions. 0:17:16.154,0:17:18.208 And I'll just leave you with one very quick thing 0:17:18.208,0:17:21.129 that a designer said to me recently who I work with, 0:17:21.129,0:17:22.236 a senior designer, I said, 0:17:22.236,0:17:24.064 "How come you're not doing sustainability? 0:17:24.064,0:17:25.271 You know, I know you know this." 0:17:25.271,0:17:28.405 And he said, "Well, recently I pitched[br]a sustainability project to a client, 0:17:28.405,0:17:31.023 and turned and he said to me, 0:17:31.023,0:17:33.127 'I know it's going to cost less, 0:17:33.127,0:17:34.622 I know it's going to sell more, 0:17:34.622,0:17:39.588 but we're not pioneers, because[br]pioneers have arrows in their backs.'" 0:17:39.588,0:17:41.358 I think we've got a roomful of pioneers, 0:17:41.358,0:17:42.935 and I hope there are far more pioneers out there, 0:17:42.935,0:17:44.244 because we need to solve these problems. 0:17:44.244,0:17:47.220 Thank you. 0:17:47.220,0:17:50.021 (Applause)