WEBVTT 00:00:00.914 --> 00:00:02.323 I suspect that 00:00:02.323 --> 00:00:04.080 every aid worker in Africa 00:00:04.080 --> 00:00:05.673 comes to a time in her career 00:00:05.673 --> 00:00:08.989 when she wants to take all the money for her project — 00:00:08.989 --> 00:00:12.091 maybe it's a school or a training program — 00:00:12.091 --> 00:00:13.980 pack it in a suitcase, 00:00:13.980 --> 00:00:17.964 get on a plane flying over the poorest villages in the country, 00:00:17.964 --> 00:00:21.148 and start throwing that money out the window. 00:00:21.148 --> 00:00:23.464 Because to a veteran aid worker, 00:00:23.464 --> 00:00:26.171 the idea of putting cold, hard cash 00:00:26.171 --> 00:00:29.210 into the hands of the poorest people on Earth 00:00:29.210 --> 00:00:30.865 doesn't sound crazy, 00:00:30.865 --> 00:00:34.941 it sounds really satisfying. NOTE Paragraph 00:00:34.941 --> 00:00:37.843 I had that moment right about the 10-year mark, 00:00:37.843 --> 00:00:40.310 and luckily, that's also when I learned 00:00:40.310 --> 00:00:43.974 that this idea actually exists, 00:00:43.974 --> 00:00:47.817 and it might be just what the aid system needs. 00:00:47.817 --> 00:00:50.520 Economists call it an unconditional cash transfer, 00:00:50.520 --> 00:00:52.680 and it's exactly that: It's cash given 00:00:52.680 --> 00:00:54.952 with no strings attached. 00:00:54.952 --> 00:00:56.516 Governments in developing countries 00:00:56.516 --> 00:00:58.192 have been doing this for decades, 00:00:58.192 --> 00:01:00.724 and it's only now, with more evidence 00:01:00.724 --> 00:01:03.915 and new technology that it's possible 00:01:03.915 --> 00:01:08.234 to make this a model for delivering aid. 00:01:08.234 --> 00:01:11.148 It's a pretty simple idea, right? NOTE Paragraph 00:01:11.148 --> 00:01:15.254 Well, why did I spend a decade doing other stuff 00:01:15.254 --> 00:01:17.392 for the poor? 00:01:17.392 --> 00:01:20.935 Honestly, I believed that I could do more good 00:01:20.935 --> 00:01:22.881 with money for the poor 00:01:22.881 --> 00:01:25.491 than the poor could do for themselves. 00:01:25.491 --> 00:01:26.524 I held two assumptions: 00:01:26.524 --> 00:01:29.113 One, that poor people are poor in part 00:01:29.113 --> 00:01:31.115 because they're uneducated and 00:01:31.115 --> 00:01:33.275 don't make good choices; 00:01:33.275 --> 00:01:35.986 two is that we then need people like me 00:01:35.986 --> 00:01:39.724 to figure out what they need and get it to them. 00:01:39.724 --> 00:01:43.946 It turns out, the evidence says otherwise. 00:01:43.946 --> 00:01:46.795 In recent years, researchers have been studying 00:01:46.795 --> 00:01:50.200 what happens when we give poor people cash. 00:01:50.200 --> 00:01:52.871 Dozens of studies show across the board 00:01:52.871 --> 00:01:55.627 that people use cash transfers 00:01:55.627 --> 00:01:57.795 to improve their own lives. 00:01:57.795 --> 00:02:00.643 Pregnant women in Uruguay buy better food 00:02:00.643 --> 00:02:02.877 and give birth to healthier babies. 00:02:02.877 --> 00:02:05.971 Sri Lankan men invest in their businesses. 00:02:05.971 --> 00:02:08.669 Researchers who studied our work in Kenya 00:02:08.669 --> 00:02:11.586 found that people invested in a range of assets, 00:02:11.586 --> 00:02:15.936 from livestock to equipment to home improvements, 00:02:15.936 --> 00:02:18.058 and they saw increases in income 00:02:18.058 --> 00:02:20.441 from business and farming 00:02:20.441 --> 00:02:24.131 one year after the cash was sent. 00:02:24.131 --> 00:02:26.695 None of these studies found that people 00:02:26.695 --> 00:02:29.104 spend more on drinking or smoking 00:02:29.104 --> 00:02:31.609 or that people work less. 00:02:31.609 --> 00:02:35.717 In fact, they work more. NOTE Paragraph 00:02:35.717 --> 00:02:38.980 Now, these are all material needs. 00:02:38.980 --> 00:02:42.151 In Vietnam, elderly recipients used 00:02:42.151 --> 00:02:46.662 their cash transfers to pay for coffins. 00:02:46.662 --> 00:02:50.673 As someone who wonders if Maslow got it wrong, 00:02:50.673 --> 00:02:55.400 I find this choice to prioritize spiritual needs 00:02:55.400 --> 00:02:57.667 deeply humbling. 00:02:57.667 --> 00:02:59.880 I don't know if I would have chosen to give food 00:02:59.880 --> 00:03:03.491 or equipment or coffins, 00:03:03.491 --> 00:03:05.781 which begs the question: 00:03:05.781 --> 00:03:08.777 How good are we at allocating resources 00:03:08.777 --> 00:03:10.622 on behalf of the poor? 00:03:10.622 --> 00:03:13.517 Are we worth the cost? 00:03:13.517 --> 00:03:15.460 Again, we can look at empirical evidence 00:03:15.460 --> 00:03:18.250 on what happens when we give people stuff 00:03:18.250 --> 00:03:20.926 of our choosing. 00:03:20.926 --> 00:03:23.795 One very telling study looked at a program in India 00:03:23.795 --> 00:03:27.102 that gives livestock to the so-called ultra-poor, 00:03:27.102 --> 00:03:31.023 and they found that 30 percent of recipients 00:03:31.023 --> 00:03:35.176 had turned around and sold the livestock they had been given 00:03:35.176 --> 00:03:38.529 for cash. 00:03:38.529 --> 00:03:40.087 The real irony is, 00:03:40.087 --> 00:03:42.668 for every 100 dollars worth of assets 00:03:42.668 --> 00:03:44.820 this program gave someone, 00:03:44.820 --> 00:03:49.506 they spent another 99 dollars to do it. 00:03:49.506 --> 00:03:53.152 What if, instead, we use technology to put cash, 00:03:53.152 --> 00:03:57.739 whether from aid agencies or from any one of us 00:03:57.739 --> 00:04:01.509 directly into a poor person's hands. 00:04:01.509 --> 00:04:04.379 Today, three in four Kenyans use mobile money, 00:04:04.379 --> 00:04:07.202 which is basically a bank account that can run 00:04:07.202 --> 00:04:08.700 on any cell phone. 00:04:08.700 --> 00:04:12.166 A sender can pay a 1.6 percent fee 00:04:12.166 --> 00:04:14.204 and with the click of a button 00:04:14.204 --> 00:04:17.155 send money directly to a recipient's account 00:04:17.155 --> 00:04:19.885 with no intermediaries. 00:04:19.885 --> 00:04:22.748 Like the technologies that are disrupting industries 00:04:22.748 --> 00:04:24.547 in our own lives, 00:04:24.547 --> 00:04:27.110 payments technology in poor countries 00:04:27.110 --> 00:04:30.217 could disrupt aid. 00:04:30.217 --> 00:04:32.529 It's spreading so quickly that it's possible 00:04:32.529 --> 00:04:35.061 to imagine reaching billions 00:04:35.061 --> 00:04:37.860 of the world's poor this way. NOTE Paragraph 00:04:37.860 --> 00:04:40.481 That's what we've started to do at GiveDirectly. 00:04:40.481 --> 00:04:42.146 We're the first organization 00:04:42.146 --> 00:04:45.319 dedicated to providing cash transfers to the poor. 00:04:45.319 --> 00:04:49.987 We've sent cash to 35,000 people across rural Kenya 00:04:49.987 --> 00:04:51.154 and Uganda 00:04:51.154 --> 00:04:54.332 in one-time payments of 1,000 dollars 00:04:54.332 --> 00:04:56.917 per family. 00:04:56.917 --> 00:04:59.177 So far, we've looked for the poorest people 00:04:59.177 --> 00:05:02.480 in the poorest villages, and in this part of the world, 00:05:02.480 --> 00:05:03.924 they're the ones living in homes 00:05:03.924 --> 00:05:05.102 made of mud and thatch, 00:05:05.102 --> 00:05:07.562 not cement and iron. 00:05:07.562 --> 00:05:09.784 So let's say that's your family. 00:05:09.784 --> 00:05:12.236 We show up at your door with an Android phone. 00:05:12.236 --> 00:05:14.563 We'll get your name, take your photo 00:05:14.563 --> 00:05:15.979 and a photo of your hut 00:05:15.979 --> 00:05:18.454 and grab the GPS coordinates. 00:05:18.454 --> 00:05:20.554 That night, we send all the data to the cloud, 00:05:20.554 --> 00:05:22.834 and each piece gets checked 00:05:22.834 --> 00:05:24.712 by an independent team 00:05:24.712 --> 00:05:28.103 using, for one example, satellite images. 00:05:28.103 --> 00:05:30.099 Then, we'll come back, 00:05:30.099 --> 00:05:32.490 we'll sell you a basic cell phone 00:05:32.490 --> 00:05:34.757 if you don't have one already, 00:05:34.757 --> 00:05:37.078 and a few weeks later, 00:05:37.078 --> 00:05:39.369 we send money to it. 00:05:39.369 --> 00:05:40.930 Something that five years ago 00:05:40.930 --> 00:05:42.458 would have seemed impossible 00:05:42.458 --> 00:05:45.343 we can now do efficiently 00:05:45.343 --> 00:05:47.481 and free of corruption. NOTE Paragraph 00:05:47.481 --> 00:05:49.797 The more cash we give to the poor, 00:05:49.797 --> 00:05:53.453 and the more evidence we have that it works, 00:05:53.453 --> 00:05:55.861 the more we have to reconsider 00:05:55.861 --> 00:05:58.350 everything else we give. 00:05:58.350 --> 00:06:01.938 Today, the logic behind aid is too often, 00:06:01.938 --> 00:06:05.050 well, we do at least some good. 00:06:05.050 --> 00:06:06.466 When we're complacent 00:06:06.466 --> 00:06:08.836 with that as our bar, 00:06:08.836 --> 00:06:11.428 when we tell ourselves that giving aid 00:06:11.428 --> 00:06:14.342 is better than no aid at all, 00:06:14.342 --> 00:06:16.614 we tend to invest inefficiently, 00:06:16.614 --> 00:06:20.596 in our own ideas that strike us as innovative, 00:06:20.596 --> 00:06:22.750 on writing reports, 00:06:22.750 --> 00:06:26.596 on plane tickets and SUVs. 00:06:26.596 --> 00:06:28.920 What if the logic was, 00:06:28.920 --> 00:06:34.191 will we do better than cash given directly? 00:06:34.191 --> 00:06:35.701 Organizations would have to prove 00:06:35.701 --> 00:06:37.930 that they're doing more good for the poor 00:06:37.930 --> 00:06:40.686 than the poor can do for themselves. 00:06:40.686 --> 00:06:43.634 Of course, giving cash won't create public goods 00:06:43.634 --> 00:06:48.952 like eradicating disease or building strong institutions, 00:06:48.952 --> 00:06:51.178 but it could set a higher bar 00:06:51.178 --> 00:06:54.140 for how we help individual families 00:06:54.140 --> 00:06:57.166 improve their lives. NOTE Paragraph 00:06:57.166 --> 00:06:58.729 I believe in aid. 00:06:58.729 --> 00:07:01.828 I believe most aid is better than just 00:07:01.828 --> 00:07:03.740 throwing money out of a plane. 00:07:03.740 --> 00:07:06.288 I am also absolutely certain 00:07:06.288 --> 00:07:08.521 that a lot of aid today 00:07:08.521 --> 00:07:12.046 isn't better than giving directly to the poor. 00:07:12.046 --> 00:07:15.922 I hope that one day, it will be. NOTE Paragraph 00:07:15.922 --> 00:07:17.978 Thank you. NOTE Paragraph 00:07:17.978 --> 00:07:21.945 (Applause)