0:00:02.180,0:00:05.524
- So, hello everyone.

0:00:05.524,0:00:08.408
I'd like to state and for the record,[br]

0:00:08.409,0:00:10.577
I love the blue dots.

0:00:10.577,0:00:11.976
(audience laughs)

0:00:11.976,0:00:16.507
I've been sitting there[br]watching the blue dots.

0:00:16.507,0:00:23.116
So, I've been cast in the role of [br]the person who finds the problems

0:00:23.116,0:00:26.203
with the topic that we're all praising.

0:00:26.203,0:00:29.228
I do like agile design, I like it a lot.

0:00:29.228,0:00:32.804
And I like the concept of [br]agile <i>learning</i> design,

0:00:32.804,0:00:34.981
I like it a lot.

0:00:34.981,0:00:40.536
But, you know, I've been in the field [br]of programming for many years.

0:00:40.536,0:00:43.840
I've been in the field of learning design [br]for many years.

0:00:43.840,0:00:47.561
I've worked on small projects,[br]I've worked on big projects,

0:00:47.566,0:00:50.111
I've been the peon [br]at the bottom of the pile

0:00:50.111,0:00:55.171
and currently I'm the program leader[br]responsible for producing outcomes.

0:00:55.171,0:00:57.204
So I've seen it from different angles.

0:00:57.204,0:01:00.838
And there's so many ways it can go wrong,

0:01:00.838,0:01:03.922
especially when we move

0:01:03.922,0:01:08.212
from the fairly static domain[br]of software design

0:01:08.212,0:01:13.533
to the far less static domain[br]of learning design.

0:01:13.540,0:01:16.006
That's learning design.[br]

0:01:16.006,0:01:20.991
It's the least agile thing [br]you'll ever see.

0:01:20.991,0:01:25.277
That's actually a graphic from IMS

0:01:25.277,0:01:28.960
which produced the learning design [br]specification.

0:01:28.960,0:01:31.554
That's supposed to be [br]pretty open and flexible,

0:01:31.554,0:01:36.426
It's like a play with a director and roles[br]and all of that.

0:01:36.426,0:01:40.296
But, you know, once you're into the thing,

0:01:40.296,0:01:42.803
there isn't a whole lot of flexibility [br]happening

0:01:42.803,0:01:48.910
and it leads to questioning just [br]what is it that we're up to

0:01:48.910,0:01:51.774
when we are talking about [br]agile learning design?

0:01:51.774,0:01:56.676
Are we talking about [br]agile learning design

0:01:56.676,0:02:01.781
or are we talking about [br]the design of agile learning?

0:02:01.781,0:02:03.773
Two different things.

0:02:03.773,0:02:06.415
And it seems to me that [br]it doesn't make sense

0:02:06.415,0:02:11.040
to give the instructional designers[br]all that freedom and flexibility

0:02:11.040,0:02:13.920
if we're gonna march students[br]lockstep through

0:02:13.920,0:02:18.252
a predefined kind of process.

0:02:18.252,0:02:22.495
Here's what agile learning design[br]ought to look like.

0:02:22.495,0:02:24.513
There's a flow.

0:02:24.513,0:02:26.677
This is agile design generally, right?[br]

0:02:26.677,0:02:28.505
And it's an iterative thing,

0:02:28.505,0:02:30.781
and yet people don't talk [br]about that so much

0:02:30.781,0:02:32.765
but it's an iterative thing.

0:02:32.765,0:02:38.750
Each iteration is like designing a full[br]and complete product,

0:02:38.750,0:02:42.866
and then you might spin off [br]some side things, some prototype things

0:02:42.866,0:02:47.467
as you need to, but, you know, [br]version one, version two,

0:02:47.480,0:02:50.441
you're doing the same thing over again.

0:02:50.441,0:02:53.281
No course in the world,[br]well, maybe not no course,

0:02:53.281,0:02:56.779
but few courses in the world [br]are designed that way.

0:02:56.779,0:03:00.402
Courses progress from lesson one, [br]lesson two, lesson three, lesson four.

0:03:00.402,0:03:05.869
They don't cover all of geometry [br]and then all of geometry in more detail

0:03:05.869,0:03:07.590
and all of geometry in more detail.

0:03:07.590,0:03:13.130
It's a different way of thinking[br]about the process.

0:03:13.130,0:03:18.587
So, one of the major concepts[br]in agile learning design,

0:03:18.587,0:03:21.432
in agile design generally, is the Scrum.

0:03:21.432,0:03:27.351
The Scrum is basically [br]a self-organizing development team.

0:03:27.351,0:03:30.178
It is originally drawn from the idea that

0:03:30.178,0:03:34.864
programmers are the smartest people [br]in the world and do not need management.

0:03:34.864,0:03:39.669
No, I'm just kidding, but there is [br]the idea here that

0:03:39.669,0:03:45.502
the programmers know how to program, and[br]they know how to produce the outcomes,

0:03:45.503,0:03:50.252
if they're left to do the job for [br]themselves, to organize for themselves.

0:03:50.252,0:03:54.791
And indeed, in the Scrum meeting,[br]as you are mapping out the task,

0:03:54.791,0:04:00.031
each of the tasks, in the Scrum,[br]is self-selected by the programmer.

0:04:00.031,0:04:03.589
So, they're volunteering to jump in,[br]to do these things.

0:04:03.589,0:04:08.414
They're taking commitments on themselves,[br]they're specifying how much time,

0:04:08.414,0:04:11.980
how much effort will be required [br]to produce the commitment.

0:04:11.980,0:04:16.589
So, okay, that's good[br]

0:04:16.589,0:04:20.249
but this doesn't happen by magic.

0:04:20.249,0:04:25.221
It takes time, and agile [br]is typically employed

0:04:25.221,0:04:27.744
in larger software development projects.

0:04:27.744,0:04:31.824
But when we're doing learning design,[br]we're doing something a lot smaller

0:04:31.824,0:04:33.445
and a lot more precise.

0:04:33.445,0:04:35.099
The question came up earlier, you know,

0:04:35.099,0:04:38.481
"What about, you know, high-volume[br]instructional design?"

0:04:38.481,0:04:44.548
Well, high-volume instructional design:[br]you don't have time for 3,4,5,6,7 weeks

0:04:44.548,0:04:50.405
of your development team [br]organizing itself.

0:04:50.408,0:04:52.541
Another problem:

0:04:52.541,0:04:58.822
as your projects get bigger, and we've [br]worked on some very large projects,

0:04:58.822,0:05:02.464
your teams get very large.

0:05:02.464,0:05:04.882
If you think about [br]all the different people who can,

0:05:04.882,0:05:08.859
and eventually will get involved[br]in the design of your learning,

0:05:08.859,0:05:11.983
or in the delivery of your agile learning,

0:05:11.995,0:05:17.023
you've got designers, you've got[br]subject matter experts,

0:05:17.023,0:05:23.101
you've got programmers, you've got[br]human interaction specialists, etc.

0:05:23.101,0:05:27.381
Eventually you get a very large,[br]very complex team.

0:05:27.381,0:05:32.729
As you get larger teams, you do not[br]generate more efficiency, it's well known,

0:05:32.729,0:05:35.069
you generate less efficiency.

0:05:35.069,0:05:37.163
So, what's the solution?[br]Split the teams.

0:05:37.163,0:05:42.447
Okay, now you have competing[br]development teams

0:05:42.447,0:05:45.447
working on the same project.

0:05:45.447,0:05:49.747
This sounds, like, you know, OK, [br]we've split the task, it's great.

0:05:49.747,0:05:53.041
But when you split the task,

0:05:53.041,0:05:59.032
you now have two different groups [br]of people with different objectives,

0:05:59.032,0:06:01.188
different responsibilities.

0:06:01.188,0:06:05.958
They're competing often for resources,[br]they're competing often for priority.

0:06:05.958,0:06:09.880
We have a project where we had [br]two agile teams.

0:06:09.880,0:06:15.032
We ended up with two versions [br]of the thing that we were developing.

0:06:15.032,0:06:19.245
Basically, they had, they didn't split[br]into functional groups,

0:06:19.245,0:06:22.379
they, what's the word for it? [br]

0:06:22.379,0:06:26.969
Ah, when cells divide, mitosis.

0:06:26.969,0:06:33.589
So basically, we got two small versions[br]of the project we were trying to create.

0:06:33.589,0:06:36.141
Another pitfall:

0:06:36.141,0:06:41.708
if you try to organize your groups into,[br]you know, okay,

0:06:41.708,0:06:44.734
this group will do <i>this</i> part of it,[br]this group will do <i>that</i> part of it,

0:06:44.734,0:06:48.560
you get specialized Scrums.

0:06:48.560,0:06:53.805
So now, nobody's working on [br]the final project, on the final product.

0:06:53.805,0:06:57.641
And there is the danger, and I've [br]seen this and we've had this,

0:06:57.641,0:07:00.701
and in fact, I'm living this [br]at this very moment

0:07:00.710,0:07:06.580
where everybody, all the teams [br]want to do the analysis bit,

0:07:06.584,0:07:09.837
or the rapid prototyping bit.

0:07:09.837,0:07:16.463
But we're trying to bring a product [br]to actual users, at the end.

0:07:16.463,0:07:18.879
We want it to be a deliverable product.

0:07:18.879,0:07:25.445
Nobody wants to do the last stage[br]of error testing, of hardening the code.

0:07:25.445,0:07:29.117
That's the least popular scrum.

0:07:29.117,0:07:34.655
So they go back to, they all want [br]to do prototyping again.

0:07:34.655,0:07:39.064
Finally, well, not quite finally[br]but we're getting there,

0:07:39.064,0:07:42.058
who is the product owner?

0:07:42.058,0:07:47.242
In the Scrum process, [br]you're delivering outcomes

0:07:47.242,0:07:52.031
and the idea is that, [br]as you go through each sprint,

0:07:52.031,0:07:56.477
which is short-term cycle[br]through your development process,

0:07:56.477,0:07:59.919
you're producing outcomes,[br]you're producing deliverables

0:07:59.919,0:08:04.038
and these deliverables [br]are delivered to the product owner

0:08:04.038,0:08:08.487
who will set the deliverable,[br]and even more importantly,

0:08:08.487,0:08:13.150
define the conditions for the completion[br]of that deliverable.

0:08:13.150,0:08:15.237
Did you do it or not?[br]How do you know?

0:08:15.237,0:08:19.450
Well, you have to have certain criteria.[br]It passed this test.

0:08:19.450,0:08:21.490
It produced this function.

0:08:21.490,0:08:24.172
It has to be really solid [br]and concrete.

0:08:24.172,0:08:28.960
Well, that good in education, or sorry, [br]that's good in software development,

0:08:28.960,0:08:31.592
your product owner is your client,

0:08:31.592,0:08:34.738
perhaps your architect, [br]somebody like that.

0:08:34.738,0:08:36.841
They know what they want.

0:08:36.841,0:08:39.581
Education is completely different.

0:08:39.581,0:08:44.755
In education, there is [br]no product owner per se.

0:08:44.755,0:08:50.448
Think about it, think about the different[br]populations that are involved in learning.

0:08:50.448,0:08:54.379
There is the end user, [br]also known as the student,

0:08:54.379,0:08:59.339
who, in the typical instructional design[br]process, does not show up until

0:08:59.339,0:09:03.302
after the instructional design [br]has been done.

0:09:03.302,0:09:05.938
It makes it very hard to be agile.

0:09:05.938,0:09:11.311
There is the subject matter expert,[br]also known as the professor.

0:09:11.311,0:09:16.016
The professor has his or her own ideas[br]of what the deliverable must be.

0:09:16.016,0:09:20.522
Then there is the administrator, [br]the dean or the president,

0:09:20.522,0:09:23.636
or the department of extended learning,[br]or whatever,

0:09:23.636,0:09:27.438
who have other objectives, [br]often revenue objectives,

0:09:27.438,0:09:31.906
or course completion objectives.[br]They have their own definition.

0:09:31.906,0:09:34.491
All of these definitions are different.

0:09:34.491,0:09:38.484
I guarantee you they're conflicting[br]and they're competing.

0:09:38.484,0:09:41.862
You can't just pick one, [br]because if you pick one,

0:09:41.862,0:09:47.159
you're not being agile for the others.

0:09:47.159,0:09:48.870
What's worse?

0:09:48.870,0:09:54.930
To have not just competing interests,[br]to have different levels of expertise.

0:09:54.930,0:09:58.276
We're designing a system right now,

0:09:58.276,0:10:02.363
where we're trying to create [br]agile learning itself.

0:10:02.363,0:10:04.904
This is, I'm not going to talk [br]about that,

0:10:04.904,0:10:07.388
but that's not the purpose [br]of this particular talk,

0:10:07.388,0:10:12.797
but the ideas here is that[br]as the learning is unfolding,

0:10:12.797,0:10:16.398
the process, the outcomes, [br]the deliverables and all of that

0:10:16.398,0:10:20.487
can change [br]as the needs of the learner change.

0:10:20.487,0:10:23.058
Very ambitious, really hard.

0:10:23.058,0:10:27.210
We have to think about learning [br]differently, in order to do that.

0:10:27.210,0:10:29.621
Well, we've got our development teams.

0:10:29.621,0:10:34.937
Our development teams were raised[br]in the traditional educational system.

0:10:34.937,0:10:38.322
Their idea of education [br]and online learning is

0:10:38.322,0:10:41.860
create some videos, put them online.

0:10:41.860,0:10:47.236
Well, if we're iterating over a project,[br]the first version of the project,

0:10:47.236,0:10:51.064
also known as [br]the minimally viable product,

0:10:51.064,0:10:55.152
it's going to be pretty simple and it's [br]going to be something that you could do

0:10:55.152,0:10:57.530
with fairly traditional methods.

0:10:57.530,0:11:02.397
And your programmers and developers,[br]all other things being equal,

0:11:02.397,0:11:05.262
will fall back on the traditional methods

0:11:05.262,0:11:08.862
because they're not being challenged[br]with the minimal viable product.

0:11:08.862,0:11:14.853
The end goal where you want to get to[br]is something really flexible and dynamic,

0:11:14.853,0:11:17.966
but by the time you get [br]to stage five or so,

0:11:17.966,0:11:22.548
they've built many, many [br]static structures,

0:11:22.548,0:11:26.370
because that's what it took to [br]the minimally viable product

0:11:26.370,0:11:29.843
at each release, at each iteration.

0:11:29.843,0:11:32.454
So you have to start over.

0:11:32.454,0:11:36.059
And you start over and everybody agrees,

0:11:36.059,0:11:40.308
okay, the project is about something[br]a lot more flexible than that

0:11:40.308,0:11:44.877
and you start developing again[br]and the same sort of problem happens

0:11:44.877,0:11:48.743
because your developers and your designer

0:11:48.743,0:11:52.543
did not acquire that expertise [br]in the meantime.

0:11:52.543,0:11:54.667
So they go back on what they already know.

0:11:54.667,0:11:56.954
So there's a difficulty here.

0:11:56.954,0:12:03.221
In instructional design, we're attempting[br]to create an outcome

0:12:03.221,0:12:10.244
that is not part of the skill set of the[br]people producing the product

0:12:10.244,0:12:14.107
that results in the instructional design.

0:12:14.107,0:12:16.905
Finally, learning objectives.

0:12:16.905,0:12:19.772
This is the meta thing, right?

0:12:19.772,0:12:24.053
And I get this one all the time: we do[br]connectivist-style MOOCs,

0:12:24.053,0:12:28.228
the connectivist-style MOOC.[br]We say there is no curriculum.

0:12:28.228,0:12:32.099
It's not about acquiring a certain [br]predefined body of content,

0:12:32.099,0:12:37.319
because we want to meet [br]participants' needs

0:12:37.319,0:12:42.301
as they go through the course, and [br]these needs are different for every person

0:12:42.301,0:12:45.360
and these needs change over time.

0:12:45.360,0:12:51.515
And it should be up to the participant,[br]who ought to be the product owner,

0:12:51.515,0:12:56.081
to define what success is and [br]define what the outcome should be.

0:12:56.081,0:12:58.425
It's a moving target.

0:12:58.425,0:13:04.547
Nobody who funds education [br]wants to deal with that. Nobody.

0:13:04.547,0:13:10.178
Every last one of them wants to see[br]course completions, certificates,

0:13:10.178,0:13:13.651
competencies, curricular outcomes.

0:13:13.651,0:13:18.229
They want them defined ahead of time.[br]They want them approved

0:13:18.229,0:13:22.478
by the curriculum board or [br]the school board or whoever is in charge.

0:13:22.478,0:13:26.428
All of this must be set ahead of time.

0:13:26.428,0:13:28.938
And then you're supposed to go[br]and be agile.

0:13:28.938,0:13:34.258
It is two very contradictory perspectives [br]at work here.

0:13:34.258,0:13:40.920
It's not possible to do agile learning,[br]much less agile learning design

0:13:40.920,0:13:46.868
in an environment where the structures[br]and the outcomes are all predefined.

0:13:49.058,0:13:52.635
That's meek, that's my short talk[br]and I thank you very much.

0:13:52.635,0:13:54.912
(applause)