1 00:00:01,202 --> 00:00:02,711 Scientific breakthrough, 2 00:00:02,711 --> 00:00:05,324 the kind that can potentially save lives, 3 00:00:05,324 --> 00:00:07,388 can sometimes be lying right out in the open 4 00:00:07,388 --> 00:00:08,950 for us to discover, 5 00:00:08,950 --> 00:00:11,156 in the evolved, accumulated body 6 00:00:11,156 --> 00:00:13,748 of human anecdote, for example, 7 00:00:13,748 --> 00:00:15,774 or in the time-tested adaptations 8 00:00:15,774 --> 00:00:19,236 that we observe in the natural world around us. 9 00:00:19,236 --> 00:00:21,856 Science starts with observation, 10 00:00:21,856 --> 00:00:25,252 but the trick is to identify the patterns and signatures 11 00:00:25,252 --> 00:00:27,197 that we might otherwise dismiss 12 00:00:27,197 --> 00:00:29,064 as myth or coincidence, 13 00:00:29,064 --> 00:00:32,917 isolate them, and test them with scientific rigor. 14 00:00:32,917 --> 00:00:36,975 And when we do, the results will often surprise. 15 00:00:36,975 --> 00:00:38,855 Western Australia has had a particular problem 16 00:00:38,855 --> 00:00:42,070 with shark attacks over the last three years, 17 00:00:42,070 --> 00:00:44,251 unfortunately and tragically culminating 18 00:00:44,251 --> 00:00:47,331 in five fatal shark attacks in a 10-month period 19 00:00:47,331 --> 00:00:49,091 during that time. 20 00:00:49,091 --> 00:00:51,220 But Western Australia is not alone in this. 21 00:00:51,220 --> 00:00:54,125 The incident of shark engagements on humans 22 00:00:54,125 --> 00:00:56,469 is escalating worldwide. 23 00:00:56,469 --> 00:00:58,213 And so it's not surprising, perhaps, 24 00:00:58,213 --> 00:00:59,856 that in July of this year, 25 00:00:59,856 --> 00:01:02,335 Shark Attack Mitigation Systems in collaboration 26 00:01:02,335 --> 00:01:05,399 with the University of Western Australia Oceans Institute 27 00:01:05,399 --> 00:01:08,173 made an announcement which captured the attention 28 00:01:08,173 --> 00:01:10,409 of the worldwide media and of ocean users 29 00:01:10,409 --> 00:01:12,200 worldwide, 30 00:01:12,200 --> 00:01:13,931 and that was around the development of technology 31 00:01:13,931 --> 00:01:16,572 to mitigate or reduce the risk of shark attack 32 00:01:16,572 --> 00:01:19,720 based on the science of what sharks can see. 33 00:01:19,720 --> 00:01:21,309 And I have for you today 34 00:01:21,309 --> 00:01:23,176 the story of that journey, 35 00:01:23,176 --> 00:01:25,516 but also the notion that science can be 36 00:01:25,516 --> 00:01:27,981 as powerful as a translator 37 00:01:27,981 --> 00:01:31,340 as it can be for invention. 38 00:01:31,340 --> 00:01:33,046 When we began this process, 39 00:01:33,046 --> 00:01:36,228 we were looking, it was about three years ago, 40 00:01:36,228 --> 00:01:39,650 and we'd just had the first two fatal shark attacks 41 00:01:39,650 --> 00:01:41,421 in Western Australia, 42 00:01:41,421 --> 00:01:43,628 and by chance, in a previous role, 43 00:01:43,628 --> 00:01:46,551 I happened to be having dinner with Harry Butler. 44 00:01:46,551 --> 00:01:50,258 Now Harry Butler, who most Australians would know is a famous naturalist, 45 00:01:50,258 --> 00:01:52,593 had spent a lot of time in the marine environment. 46 00:01:52,593 --> 00:01:54,699 Harry Butler is a precursor, if you like, 47 00:01:54,699 --> 00:01:56,610 to the late Steve Irwin. 48 00:01:56,610 --> 00:01:57,921 When I asked him about 49 00:01:57,921 --> 00:02:01,219 what the solution to the problem might be, 50 00:02:01,219 --> 00:02:02,731 the answer was quite surprising. 51 00:02:02,731 --> 00:02:04,606 He said, "Take a black wetsuit, 52 00:02:04,606 --> 00:02:07,371 band it in yellow stripes like a bumblebee, 53 00:02:07,371 --> 00:02:09,659 and you'll be mimicking the warning systems 54 00:02:09,659 --> 00:02:11,968 of most marine species." 55 00:02:11,968 --> 00:02:13,866 I didn't think about that much at the time, 56 00:02:13,866 --> 00:02:17,456 and it wasn't until the next three fatal shark attacks happened, 57 00:02:17,456 --> 00:02:18,890 and it caused me to think, 58 00:02:18,890 --> 00:02:21,021 maybe there's some merit to this idea. 59 00:02:21,021 --> 00:02:22,486 And I turned to the web 60 00:02:22,486 --> 00:02:24,741 to see if there might be some clues. 61 00:02:24,741 --> 00:02:27,018 And it turns out the web is awash 62 00:02:27,018 --> 00:02:29,414 with this sort of evidence that supports 63 00:02:29,414 --> 00:02:30,976 this sort of thinking. 64 00:02:30,976 --> 00:02:32,960 So biologically, there are plenty of species 65 00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:35,556 that display banding or patterns, warning patterns, 66 00:02:35,556 --> 00:02:37,258 to either be cryptical in the water 67 00:02:37,258 --> 00:02:39,842 or warn against being attacked, 68 00:02:39,842 --> 00:02:41,955 not the least of which is the pilot fish 69 00:02:41,955 --> 00:02:44,111 which spends a big slab of its life 70 00:02:44,111 --> 00:02:46,390 around the business end of a shark. 71 00:02:46,390 --> 00:02:49,481 On the human side, Walter Starck, an oceanographer, 72 00:02:49,481 --> 00:02:52,343 has been painting his wetsuit since the 1970s, 73 00:02:52,343 --> 00:02:53,965 and anthropologically, 74 00:02:53,965 --> 00:02:57,595 Pacific island tribes painted themselves in bands 75 00:02:57,595 --> 00:02:59,376 in a sea snake ceremony 76 00:02:59,376 --> 00:03:01,970 to ward off the shark god. 77 00:03:01,970 --> 00:03:03,412 So what's going on here? 78 00:03:03,412 --> 00:03:06,290 Is this an idea lying wide out in the open 79 00:03:06,290 --> 00:03:09,421 for us to consider and define? 80 00:03:09,421 --> 00:03:13,790 We know that sharks use a range of sensors 81 00:03:13,790 --> 00:03:17,162 when they engage, particularly for attack, 82 00:03:17,162 --> 00:03:19,122 but the sight sensor is the one that they use 83 00:03:19,122 --> 00:03:20,686 to identify the target, and particularly 84 00:03:20,686 --> 00:03:24,420 in the last number of meters before the attack. 85 00:03:24,420 --> 00:03:27,378 It makes sense to pay attention to the biological anecdote 86 00:03:27,378 --> 00:03:29,230 because that's time-tested evolution 87 00:03:29,230 --> 00:03:31,703 over many millennia. 88 00:03:31,703 --> 00:03:35,180 But isn't human anecdote also an evolution of sorts, 89 00:03:35,180 --> 00:03:36,911 the idea that there's a kernel of truth 90 00:03:36,911 --> 00:03:38,503 thought to be important, 91 00:03:38,503 --> 00:03:41,788 passed down from generation to generation, 92 00:03:41,788 --> 00:03:45,103 so that it actually ends up shaping human behavior? 93 00:03:45,103 --> 00:03:46,763 I wanted to test this idea. 94 00:03:46,763 --> 00:03:47,981 I wanted to put some science 95 00:03:47,981 --> 00:03:50,317 to this anecdotal evidence, 96 00:03:50,317 --> 00:03:52,273 because if science could support this concept, 97 00:03:52,273 --> 00:03:54,368 then we might have at least part of the solution 98 00:03:54,368 --> 00:03:57,426 to shark attack right under our very nose. 99 00:03:57,426 --> 00:03:59,221 To do that, I needed some experts 100 00:03:59,221 --> 00:04:01,074 in shark vision and shark neurology, 101 00:04:01,074 --> 00:04:02,883 and a worldwide search, again, 102 00:04:02,883 --> 00:04:04,322 led to the University of W.A. 103 00:04:04,322 --> 00:04:06,725 on the doorstep here, with the Oceans Institute. 104 00:04:06,725 --> 00:04:09,322 And professor Nathan Hart and his team 105 00:04:09,322 --> 00:04:11,982 had just written a paper which tells us, 106 00:04:11,982 --> 00:04:14,334 confirms that predatory sharks see 107 00:04:14,334 --> 00:04:17,197 in black and white, or grayscale. 108 00:04:17,197 --> 00:04:19,000 So I called up Nathan, 109 00:04:19,000 --> 00:04:20,866 a little bit sheepishly, actually, about this idea 110 00:04:20,866 --> 00:04:22,747 that maybe we could use these patterns and shapes 111 00:04:22,747 --> 00:04:26,253 to produce a wetsuit to try and mitigate the risk of shark attack, 112 00:04:26,253 --> 00:04:28,425 and fortunately, he thought that was a good idea. 113 00:04:28,425 --> 00:04:30,887 So what ensued is a collaborative bit of research 114 00:04:30,887 --> 00:04:33,511 supported by the West Australian State Government. 115 00:04:33,511 --> 00:04:36,070 And we did three key things. 116 00:04:36,070 --> 00:04:38,790 The first is that we mapped the characteristics, 117 00:04:38,790 --> 00:04:40,810 the physical characteristics of the eyes 118 00:04:40,810 --> 00:04:42,748 of the three main predatory sharks, 119 00:04:42,748 --> 00:04:46,466 so the great white, tiger and bull shark. 120 00:04:46,466 --> 00:04:48,020 We did that genetically 121 00:04:48,020 --> 00:04:50,920 and we did that anatomically. 122 00:04:50,920 --> 00:04:52,762 The next thing we did was to understand, 123 00:04:52,762 --> 00:04:54,197 using complex computer modeling, 124 00:04:54,197 --> 00:04:56,251 what that eye can see 125 00:04:56,251 --> 00:04:58,020 at different depths, distances, 126 00:04:58,020 --> 00:05:02,261 light conditions, and water clarity in the ocean. 127 00:05:02,261 --> 00:05:03,451 And from there, we were able to pinpoint 128 00:05:03,451 --> 00:05:05,251 two key characteristics: 129 00:05:05,251 --> 00:05:08,284 what patterns and shapes would present the wearer 130 00:05:08,284 --> 00:05:11,516 as hidden or hard to make out in the water, cryptic, 131 00:05:11,516 --> 00:05:13,012 and what patterns and shapes might provide 132 00:05:13,012 --> 00:05:15,933 the greatest contrast but provide the greatest 133 00:05:15,933 --> 00:05:17,390 breakup of profile 134 00:05:17,390 --> 00:05:21,034 so that that person wasn't confused for shark prey 135 00:05:21,034 --> 00:05:23,387 or shark food. 136 00:05:23,387 --> 00:05:25,579 The next thing we needed to do was to convert this 137 00:05:25,579 --> 00:05:28,328 into wetsuits that people might actually wear, 138 00:05:28,328 --> 00:05:30,950 and to that end, I invited Ray Smith, 139 00:05:30,950 --> 00:05:34,180 a surfer, industrial designer, wetsuit designer, 140 00:05:34,180 --> 00:05:36,542 and in fact the guy that designed the original Quiksilver logo, 141 00:05:36,542 --> 00:05:38,827 to come over and sit with the science team 142 00:05:38,827 --> 00:05:42,423 and interpret that science 143 00:05:42,423 --> 00:05:45,565 into aesthetic wetsuits that people might actually wear. 144 00:05:45,565 --> 00:05:48,021 And here's an example of one of the first drawings. 145 00:05:48,021 --> 00:05:51,025 So this is what I call a "don't eat me" wetsuit. 146 00:05:51,025 --> 00:05:55,294 So this takes that banding idea, 147 00:05:55,294 --> 00:05:57,880 takes that banding idea, it's highly visible, 148 00:05:57,880 --> 00:05:59,885 provides a highly disruptive profile, 149 00:05:59,885 --> 00:06:01,712 and is intended to prevent the shark 150 00:06:01,712 --> 00:06:04,380 from considering that you would be ordinary food, 151 00:06:04,380 --> 00:06:07,726 and potentially even create confusion for the shark. 152 00:06:07,726 --> 00:06:11,501 And this one's configured to go with a surfboard. 153 00:06:11,501 --> 00:06:14,114 You can see that dark, opaque panel on the front, 154 00:06:14,114 --> 00:06:16,841 and it's particularly better for the surface, 155 00:06:16,841 --> 00:06:19,689 where being backlit and providing a silhouette 156 00:06:19,689 --> 00:06:21,301 is problematic. 157 00:06:21,301 --> 00:06:24,209 Second iteration is the cryptic wetsuit, 158 00:06:24,209 --> 00:06:25,820 or the one which attempts to hide the wearer 159 00:06:25,820 --> 00:06:27,310 in the water column. 160 00:06:27,310 --> 00:06:29,000 There are three panels on this suit, 161 00:06:29,000 --> 00:06:30,624 and in any given conditions, 162 00:06:30,624 --> 00:06:31,979 one or more of those panels 163 00:06:31,979 --> 00:06:34,569 will match the reflective spectra of the water 164 00:06:34,569 --> 00:06:37,168 so as to disappear fully or partially, 165 00:06:37,168 --> 00:06:39,360 leaving the last panel or panels 166 00:06:39,360 --> 00:06:42,247 to create a disruptive profile in the water column. 167 00:06:42,247 --> 00:06:44,412 And this one's particularly well-suited 168 00:06:44,412 --> 00:06:46,859 to the dive configuration, 169 00:06:46,859 --> 00:06:49,927 so when you're deeper under the water. 170 00:06:49,927 --> 00:06:51,637 So we knew that we had 171 00:06:51,637 --> 00:06:53,407 some really solid science here. 172 00:06:53,407 --> 00:06:55,033 We knew, if you wanted to stand out, 173 00:06:55,033 --> 00:06:56,205 you needed to look stripy, 174 00:06:56,205 --> 00:06:57,629 and we knew if you wanted to be cryptic, 175 00:06:57,629 --> 00:06:59,181 you needed to look like this. 176 00:06:59,181 --> 00:07:01,007 But the acid test is always going to be, 177 00:07:01,007 --> 00:07:02,339 how would sharks really behave 178 00:07:02,339 --> 00:07:05,070 in the context of these patterns and shapes. 179 00:07:05,070 --> 00:07:08,381 And testing to simulate a person in a wetsuit 180 00:07:08,381 --> 00:07:09,929 in the water with a predatory shark 181 00:07:09,929 --> 00:07:11,295 in a natural environment 182 00:07:11,295 --> 00:07:13,247 is actually a lot harder than you might think. 183 00:07:13,247 --> 00:07:16,598 (Laughter) 184 00:07:16,598 --> 00:07:19,164 So we have to bait the rig, 185 00:07:19,164 --> 00:07:20,708 because we need to get the statistical number 186 00:07:20,708 --> 00:07:23,732 of samples through to get the scientific evidence, 187 00:07:23,732 --> 00:07:24,521 and by baiting the rig, 188 00:07:24,521 --> 00:07:26,750 we're obviously changing shark behavior. 189 00:07:26,750 --> 00:07:28,567 We can't put humans in the water. 190 00:07:28,567 --> 00:07:31,453 We're ethically precluded from even using 191 00:07:31,453 --> 00:07:34,100 humanoid shapes and baiting them up in the water. 192 00:07:34,100 --> 00:07:36,372 But nevertheless, we started the testing process 193 00:07:36,372 --> 00:07:38,220 in January of this year, 194 00:07:38,220 --> 00:07:39,356 initially with tiger sharks 195 00:07:39,356 --> 00:07:42,695 and subsequently with great white sharks. 196 00:07:42,695 --> 00:07:44,130 The way we did that 197 00:07:44,130 --> 00:07:48,885 was to get a perforated drum which is full of bait, 198 00:07:48,885 --> 00:07:50,781 wrap it in a neoprene skin, 199 00:07:50,781 --> 00:07:53,344 and then run two stereo underwater cameras 200 00:07:53,344 --> 00:07:56,693 to watch how the shark actually engages with that rig. 201 00:07:56,693 --> 00:07:58,381 And because we use stereo, 202 00:07:58,381 --> 00:08:01,173 we can capture all the statistics on how big the shark is, 203 00:08:01,173 --> 00:08:03,429 what angle it comes in at, how quickly it leaves, 204 00:08:03,429 --> 00:08:05,285 and what its behavior is 205 00:08:05,285 --> 00:08:08,491 in an empirical rather than a subjective way. 206 00:08:08,491 --> 00:08:10,979 Because we needed to preserve the scientific method, 207 00:08:10,979 --> 00:08:12,677 we ran a control rig 208 00:08:12,677 --> 00:08:16,389 which was a black neoprene rig 209 00:08:16,389 --> 00:08:18,198 just like a normal black wetsuit 210 00:08:18,198 --> 00:08:19,677 against the, what we call, 211 00:08:19,677 --> 00:08:21,805 SAMS technology rig. 212 00:08:21,805 --> 00:08:24,533 And the results were not just exciting, 213 00:08:24,533 --> 00:08:25,971 but very encouraging, 214 00:08:25,971 --> 00:08:28,519 and today I would like to just give you a snapshot 215 00:08:28,519 --> 00:08:32,181 of two of those engagements. 216 00:08:32,181 --> 00:08:34,301 So here we've got a four-meter tiger shark 217 00:08:34,301 --> 00:08:37,388 engaging the black control rig, 218 00:08:37,388 --> 00:08:38,729 which it had encountered about 219 00:08:38,729 --> 00:08:42,689 a minute and a half before. 220 00:08:59,780 --> 00:09:02,210 Now that exact same shark had engaged, 221 00:09:02,210 --> 00:09:04,040 or encountered this SAMS rig, 222 00:09:04,040 --> 00:09:05,652 which is the Elude SAMS rig, 223 00:09:05,652 --> 00:09:06,831 about eight minutes before, 224 00:09:06,831 --> 00:09:09,974 and spent six minutes circling it, hunting for it, 225 00:09:09,974 --> 00:09:12,779 looking for what it could smell and sense but not see, 226 00:09:12,779 --> 00:09:15,251 and this was the final engagement. 227 00:09:17,734 --> 00:09:20,687 Great white sharks are more confident than the tigers, 228 00:09:20,687 --> 00:09:22,735 and here you see great white shark 229 00:09:22,735 --> 00:09:24,142 engaging a control rig, 230 00:09:24,142 --> 00:09:25,975 so a black neoprene wetsuit, 231 00:09:25,975 --> 00:09:27,559 and going straight to the bottom, 232 00:09:27,559 --> 00:09:30,110 coming up 233 00:09:30,110 --> 00:09:33,147 and engaging. 234 00:09:34,257 --> 00:09:36,940 In contrast to the SAMS technology rig, 235 00:09:36,940 --> 00:09:38,409 this is the banded one, 236 00:09:38,409 --> 00:09:40,350 where it's more tactile, 237 00:09:40,350 --> 00:09:41,860 it's more investigative, 238 00:09:41,860 --> 00:09:43,494 it's more apprehensive, 239 00:09:43,494 --> 00:09:47,499 and shows a reluctance to come straight in and go. 240 00:09:56,297 --> 00:10:03,600 (Applause) 241 00:10:06,601 --> 00:10:10,877 So, it's important for us that all the testing is done independently, 242 00:10:10,877 --> 00:10:13,195 and the University of W.A. is doing the testing. 243 00:10:13,195 --> 00:10:14,947 It'll be an ongoing process. 244 00:10:14,947 --> 00:10:17,356 It's subject to peer review and subject to publication. 245 00:10:17,356 --> 00:10:19,699 It's so important that this concept 246 00:10:19,699 --> 00:10:21,497 is led with the science. 247 00:10:21,497 --> 00:10:23,741 From the perspective of Shark Attack Mitigation Systems, 248 00:10:23,741 --> 00:10:26,146 we're a biotechnology licensing company, 249 00:10:26,146 --> 00:10:28,433 so we don't make wetsuits ourselves. 250 00:10:28,433 --> 00:10:30,713 We'll license others to do that. 251 00:10:30,713 --> 00:10:31,672 But I thought you might be interested 252 00:10:31,672 --> 00:10:33,673 in seeing what SAMS technology looks like 253 00:10:33,673 --> 00:10:36,672 embedded in a wetsuit, and to that end, 254 00:10:36,672 --> 00:10:39,888 for the first time, live, worldwide -- 255 00:10:39,888 --> 00:10:41,862 (Laughter) — 256 00:10:41,862 --> 00:10:44,758 I can show you what biological adaptation, 257 00:10:44,758 --> 00:10:48,285 science and design looks like in real life. 258 00:10:48,285 --> 00:10:50,182 So I can welcome Sam, the surfer, 259 00:10:50,182 --> 00:10:52,890 from this side. Where are you, Sam? 260 00:10:52,890 --> 00:10:54,686 (Applause) 261 00:10:54,686 --> 00:10:56,356 And Eduardo. 262 00:10:56,356 --> 00:10:58,172 (Applause) 263 00:10:58,172 --> 00:11:00,866 Cheers, mate. 264 00:11:00,866 --> 00:11:02,956 Cheers. 265 00:11:02,956 --> 00:11:07,920 Thanks, gentlemen. (Applause) 266 00:11:09,656 --> 00:11:10,943 So what have we done here? 267 00:11:10,943 --> 00:11:13,960 Well, to my mind, rather than take a blank sheet 268 00:11:13,960 --> 00:11:17,280 and use science as a tool for invention, 269 00:11:17,280 --> 00:11:20,136 we've paid attention to the biological evidence, 270 00:11:20,136 --> 00:11:21,826 we've put importance to the 271 00:11:21,826 --> 00:11:23,536 human anecdotal evidence, 272 00:11:23,536 --> 00:11:26,618 and we've used science as a tool 273 00:11:26,618 --> 00:11:28,021 for translation, 274 00:11:28,021 --> 00:11:30,248 translation of something that was already there 275 00:11:30,248 --> 00:11:33,819 into something that we can use for the benefit of mankind. 276 00:11:33,819 --> 00:11:35,743 And it strikes me that this idea of science 277 00:11:35,743 --> 00:11:38,799 as a tool for translation rather than invention 278 00:11:38,799 --> 00:11:41,463 is one that we can apply much more widely than this 279 00:11:41,463 --> 00:11:43,410 in the pursuit of innovation. 280 00:11:43,410 --> 00:11:45,735 After all, did the Wright brothers 281 00:11:45,735 --> 00:11:47,787 discover manned flight, 282 00:11:47,787 --> 00:11:50,976 or did they observe the biological fact of flight 283 00:11:50,976 --> 00:11:54,168 and translate that mechanically, replicate it 284 00:11:54,168 --> 00:11:56,685 in a way that humans could use? 285 00:11:56,685 --> 00:11:58,219 As for the humble wetsuit, 286 00:11:58,219 --> 00:12:00,160 who knows what oceanwear will look like 287 00:12:00,160 --> 00:12:03,111 in two years' time, in five years' time 288 00:12:03,111 --> 00:12:06,203 or in 50 years' time, but with this new thinking, 289 00:12:06,203 --> 00:12:07,469 I'm guessing there's a fair chance 290 00:12:07,469 --> 00:12:09,190 it won't be pure black. 291 00:12:09,190 --> 00:12:11,359 Thank you. 292 00:12:11,359 --> 00:12:15,270 (Applause)