0:00:00.153,0:00:05.716 ♪ [music] ♪ 0:00:09.468,0:00:10.638 - [Tyler] In our last video, 0:00:10.638,0:00:13.798 we saw that price discrimination[br]is good for the monopolist. 0:00:13.798,0:00:15.227 It increases profits, 0:00:15.227,0:00:17.512 but what about [br]for society as a whole, 0:00:17.512,0:00:20.638 does price discrimination[br]increase social welfare? 0:00:20.638,0:00:22.557 That's the topic of today's talk. 0:00:27.769,0:00:30.294 It's complicated, but here's[br]a rule of thumb -- 0:00:30.294,0:00:32.908 if price discrimination[br]increases output 0:00:32.908,0:00:35.186 then it's very likely[br]to be beneficial, 0:00:35.186,0:00:37.059 to increase social welfare. 0:00:37.059,0:00:39.169 If output, however,[br]does not increase 0:00:39.169,0:00:41.688 then welfare probably is reduced. 0:00:41.688,0:00:42.969 Let's give some intuition 0:00:42.969,0:00:46.098 for when price discrimination[br]increases welfare. 0:00:46.098,0:00:47.798 Think about our previous example 0:00:47.798,0:00:50.638 of the pharmaceutical company GSK 0:00:50.638,0:00:52.599 setting a high drug price in Europe 0:00:52.599,0:00:54.888 and a lower drug price in Africa. 0:00:54.888,0:00:58.554 Suppose that GSK were forced[br]to charge only one price. 0:00:58.983,0:01:02.019 Do you think it would charge[br]closer to the European price 0:01:02.019,0:01:04.290 of $12.50 per pill 0:01:04.290,0:01:07.681 or closer to the African price[br]of 50 cents per pill? 0:01:08.124,0:01:09.759 What's more likely to happen 0:01:09.759,0:01:12.938 if GSK is required[br]to set only one price? 0:01:13.440,0:01:15.381 If they can't price discriminate, 0:01:15.381,0:01:19.509 GSK very likely will simply abandon[br]the African market 0:01:19.509,0:01:22.101 where they weren't making[br]that much profit anyway 0:01:22.101,0:01:24.009 and set a single world price 0:01:24.009,0:01:26.219 pretty close to the European level. 0:01:26.707,0:01:29.801 People sometimes think that[br]if only everyone were allowed 0:01:29.801,0:01:33.048 to import pharmaceuticals[br]to the United States 0:01:33.048,0:01:36.200 from Canada, Mexico, or Africa[br]where they're cheaper, 0:01:36.200,0:01:38.441 then we would all enjoy[br]lower prices. 0:01:38.902,0:01:40.038 Probably not. 0:01:40.200,0:01:43.451 If smuggling or legal re-importation[br]of pharmaceuticals 0:01:43.451,0:01:44.969 were to become more common, 0:01:44.969,0:01:48.726 then pharmaceutical companies[br]would stop price discriminating 0:01:48.726,0:01:50.934 and set higher prices for everyone. 0:01:51.892,0:01:55.068 Who would be made better off[br]by the resulting single price? 0:01:55.450,0:01:57.350 Well, Europeans are not better off 0:01:57.350,0:01:59.361 because they're still paying[br]a high price 0:01:59.361,0:02:01.291 under the single price rule, 0:02:01.291,0:02:03.231 but Africans are going[br]to be worse off, 0:02:03.231,0:02:05.281 because they will no longer[br]have the option 0:02:05.281,0:02:08.174 of buying important drugs[br]at the lower prices. 0:02:08.880,0:02:11.592 In this case,[br]price discrimination is beneficial 0:02:11.592,0:02:13.701 because it increases output. 0:02:13.701,0:02:17.058 It gives some Africans[br]the chance to buy at a lower price 0:02:17.058,0:02:19.390 when they otherwise would not[br]have had that chance 0:02:19.390,0:02:21.964 under a no price discrimination rule. 0:02:22.461,0:02:24.662 For industries[br]with high fixed costs, 0:02:24.662,0:02:26.873 price discrimination[br]has another benefit -- 0:02:27.334,0:02:30.615 the extra profits generated[br]by price discrimination 0:02:30.615,0:02:32.851 mean that it's more profitable[br]for the company 0:02:32.851,0:02:35.270 to engage in research[br]and development 0:02:35.270,0:02:37.534 to produce more new drugs[br]for instance. 0:02:38.000,0:02:41.330 For example, the extra profits[br]from selling in Africa 0:02:41.330,0:02:44.260 mean that research[br]and development is more profitable, 0:02:44.260,0:02:46.370 and that benefits Europeans too. 0:02:46.672,0:02:48.145 When it comes to new drugs, 0:02:48.145,0:02:50.487 you might say that misery[br]loves company. 0:02:50.771,0:02:53.562 That is, the larger the market[br]for a potential drug, 0:02:53.562,0:02:56.268 the more research[br]and development will be applied. 0:02:56.797,0:03:00.381 Price discrimination similarly[br]means airlines can offer 0:03:00.381,0:03:03.262 more flights to more places[br]at better times, 0:03:03.262,0:03:05.632 and that also helps business people. 0:03:05.632,0:03:07.682 Even though they're paying[br]the higher prices, 0:03:07.682,0:03:09.928 they have a better chance[br]at being able to get there 0:03:09.928,0:03:12.121 at a good time in the first place. 0:03:12.808,0:03:15.681 When it comes to software,[br]lower prices for the students 0:03:15.681,0:03:19.303 also is going to help[br]support software R&D. 0:03:19.709,0:03:22.423 If the students wouldn't buy[br]the software at all 0:03:22.423,0:03:25.443 at the higher price,[br]well then the price discrimination 0:03:25.443,0:03:27.955 is a net benefit[br]to pretty much everyone. 0:03:28.323,0:03:31.921 More generally, price discrimination[br]can help spread the fixed costs 0:03:31.921,0:03:35.603 of research and development[br]over a larger population, 0:03:35.603,0:03:37.123 and that means more innovation 0:03:37.123,0:03:39.703 which is to virtually[br]everyone's benefit. 0:03:40.113,0:03:42.474 The ultimate form[br]of price discrimination 0:03:42.474,0:03:44.409 is when each person is charged 0:03:44.409,0:03:46.740 his or her maximum[br]willingness to pay. 0:03:47.041,0:03:50.573 Economists call this[br]“perfect price discrimination.” 0:03:50.573,0:03:52.572 Under perfect price discrimination, 0:03:52.572,0:03:55.773 consumers end up[br]with zero consumer surplus. 0:03:56.185,0:03:58.844 All of the gains from trade[br]go to the monopolist, 0:03:58.844,0:04:00.974 but the efficient quantity[br]is produced. 0:04:00.974,0:04:02.813 There's no deadweight loss. 0:04:03.284,0:04:05.374 Let's look at this with a diagram. 0:04:05.374,0:04:08.949 Think of the demand curve as showing[br]the maximum willingness to pay 0:04:08.949,0:04:12.995 by different individuals to buy[br]a single unit of this good. 0:04:13.605,0:04:16.844 Here, for example,[br]is Alex's willingness to pay. 0:04:16.844,0:04:20.443 Here's Tyler's willingness to pay,[br]Robin's, and on, 0:04:20.443,0:04:23.734 all the way down to Brian's[br]willingness to pay for the good. 0:04:24.264,0:04:27.536 If the monopolist could charge[br]each and every consumer 0:04:27.536,0:04:29.633 his or her maximum[br]willingness to pay, 0:04:29.633,0:04:32.513 the monopolist would walk[br]down the demand curve 0:04:32.513,0:04:35.984 producing each unit such[br]that the willingness to pay 0:04:35.984,0:04:37.924 just exceeded the marginal cost. 0:04:38.773,0:04:41.911 In other words, the monopolist[br]would produce every unit 0:04:41.911,0:04:44.821 up until the efficient[br]quantity of output, 0:04:44.821,0:04:48.352 the same quantity as would be[br]produced by a competitive industry. 0:04:48.352,0:04:51.561 The difference being that[br]in the competitive industry, 0:04:51.561,0:04:53.882 the gains would go[br]to the consumers. 0:04:54.426,0:04:56.751 In the case of[br]perfect price discrimination, 0:04:56.751,0:04:58.909 all the gains go to the monopolist. 0:04:59.195,0:05:02.592 This kind of price discrimination[br]requires that the monopolist 0:05:02.592,0:05:05.181 have a lot of information[br]about each consumer. 0:05:05.766,0:05:08.138 Are there examples[br]of this in practice? 0:05:08.362,0:05:09.734 In fact there are some, 0:05:09.992,0:05:12.471 and you may be very familiar[br]with one of them. 0:05:12.921,0:05:16.050 Universities are fabulous[br]price discriminators. 0:05:16.050,0:05:17.933 They're even better than the airlines, 0:05:17.933,0:05:21.759 especially because few people[br]realize what is actually going on. 0:05:22.187,0:05:25.374 Universities give many students[br]financial aid, 0:05:25.374,0:05:27.343 which is another way[br]of saying that they charge[br] 0:05:27.343,0:05:29.602 some of their students[br]more than others. 0:05:30.062,0:05:33.133 Financial aid is a way[br]of doing well while doing good 0:05:33.133,0:05:35.673 because it's a form[br]of price discrimination. 0:05:35.673,0:05:38.141 It increases profits[br]for universities. 0:05:38.443,0:05:39.943 Moreover, to get the aid, 0:05:39.943,0:05:42.712 students and their parents[br]must give the university 0:05:42.712,0:05:45.433 an incredible amount[br]of financial information, 0:05:45.433,0:05:48.552 including their tax forms,[br]their W2's, 0:05:48.552,0:05:50.563 information[br]about their bank accounts, 0:05:50.563,0:05:52.405 the home they own and so on. 0:05:52.853,0:05:56.313 All of this information means [br]the universities can create 0:05:56.313,0:05:58.042 many, many different prices 0:05:58.042,0:06:01.315 in a way that approaches[br]perfect price discrimination. 0:06:01.653,0:06:03.633 At Williams College for instance, 0:06:03.633,0:06:05.872 half the students pay full fare, 0:06:05.872,0:06:08.744 which is about $32,000 a year. 0:06:08.744,0:06:11.374 The other half gets some form[br]of financial aid, 0:06:11.374,0:06:13.529 but the amount varies tremendously. 0:06:14.032,0:06:19.224 Students whose parents have incomes[br]of about $91,000 a year or higher, 0:06:19.224,0:06:23.625 they pay an average in tuition[br]of about $22,000 a year. 0:06:23.625,0:06:25.904 While students[br]from very poor families 0:06:25.904,0:06:29.563 may pay as little as $1,600 a year. 0:06:29.804,0:06:31.243 That's meaning[br]that one price can be 0:06:31.243,0:06:33.984 about 20 times higher[br]than the other. 0:06:33.984,0:06:36.038 That's a lot of price discrimination. 0:06:36.540,0:06:39.734 Price discrimination makes[br]a lot of sense for universities 0:06:39.734,0:06:41.731 because their marginal costs are low 0:06:41.731,0:06:43.816 while their fixed costs[br]are pretty high. 0:06:44.126,0:06:47.705 If a professor is teaching[br]Economics 101 anyway, 0:06:47.705,0:06:51.104 then the marginal cost of putting[br]an extra student in the classroom 0:06:51.104,0:06:52.837 is pretty close to zero. 0:06:53.130,0:06:56.735 Even a student who is paying[br]a smaller amount in tuition 0:06:56.735,0:06:59.779 is probably adding more[br]to profits than to costs. 0:07:00.040,0:07:03.205 That helps the university[br]cover its fixed costs 0:07:03.205,0:07:05.464 such as the salaries[br]and the buildings 0:07:05.464,0:07:08.920 necessary to support[br]the operations of the university. 0:07:09.508,0:07:12.525 So again, price discrimination[br]by the universities 0:07:12.525,0:07:14.196 increases profits, 0:07:14.196,0:07:17.504 but it also probably increases[br]their output as well. 0:07:17.504,0:07:21.685 More students attend university[br]than otherwise would be the case. 0:07:21.685,0:07:25.721 And again, price discrimination[br]also helps to spread the fixed costs 0:07:25.721,0:07:28.306 around a larger number[br]of customers. 0:07:28.561,0:07:31.965 For these reasons,[br]price discrimination by universities 0:07:31.965,0:07:34.656 probably increases social welfare. 0:07:35.045,0:07:38.556 That's it for the more obvious[br]forms of price discrimination. 0:07:38.556,0:07:40.257 In the next talk we'll be looking 0:07:40.257,0:07:42.784 at some quite common[br]pricing strategies, 0:07:42.784,0:07:44.466 such as tying and bundling, 0:07:44.466,0:07:46.127 which also can be understood 0:07:46.127,0:07:49.306 as more subtle forms[br]of price discrimination. 0:07:51.074,0:07:52.687 - [Announcer] If you want[br]to test yourself, 0:07:52.687,0:07:54.197 click “Practice Questions.” 0:07:55.018,0:07:58.271 Or, if you're ready to move on,[br]just click “Next Video.” 0:07:58.497,0:08:02.396 ♪ [music] ♪