0:00:01.920,0:00:04.699 ♪ [music] ♪ 0:00:09.370,0:00:13.780 - In our last video, we saw that price[br]discrimination is good for the monopolist. 0:00:13.960,0:00:17.930 It increases profits, but what about for[br]society as a whole, this price 0:00:18.110,0:00:24.359 discrimination increase social welfare?[br]That's the topic of today's talk. 0:00:28.030,0:00:32.140 It's complicated but here's a rule of[br]thumb, if price discrimination increases 0:00:32.320,0:00:37.240 output then it's very likely to be[br]beneficial to increase social welfare, if 0:00:37.420,0:00:42.000 output however does not increase then[br]welfare probably is reduced. Let's give 0:00:42.180,0:00:46.300 some intuition for when price[br]discrimination increases welfare. Think 0:00:46.480,0:00:51.260 about our previous example of the[br]pharmaceutical company GSK setting a high 0:00:51.440,0:00:56.300 drug price in Europe and they lower drug[br]price in Africa. Suppose that GSK were 0:00:56.480,0:01:00.740 forced to charge only one price. Do you[br]think it would charge closer to the 0:01:00.920,0:01:06.910 European price of $12.50 per pill or[br]closer to the African price of 50 cents 0:01:07.090,0:01:13.590 per pill? What's more likely to happen if[br]GSK's required to set only one price? If 0:01:13.770,0:01:18.720 they can't price discriminate, GSK very[br]likely will simply abandon the African 0:01:18.900,0:01:24.050 market for they weren't making that much[br]profit anyway and set a single world price 0:01:24.230,0:01:29.410 pretty close to the European level. People[br]sometimes think that if only everyone were 0:01:29.590,0:01:34.580 aloud to import pharmaceuticals to the[br]United States from Canada, Mexico or 0:01:34.760,0:01:40.230 Africa where they're cheaper then we would[br]all enjoy lower prices. Probably not. 0:01:40.410,0:01:45.030 Smuggling or illegal re-emportation of[br]pharmaceuticals were to become more common 0:01:45.210,0:01:49.820 than pharmaceutical companies would stop[br]price discriminating and set higher prices 0:01:50.000,0:01:55.950 for everyone. Who would be made better off[br]by the resulting single price? Well, 0:01:56.130,0:01:59.590 Europeans are not better off because[br]they're still paying a high price under 0:01:59.770,0:02:03.250 the single price rule, but Africans are[br]going to be worse off. 0:02:03.430,0:02:06.880 Because they will no longer have the[br]option of buying important drugs at the 0:02:07.060,0:02:12.050 lower prices. In this case, price[br]discrimination is beneficial because it 0:02:12.230,0:02:17.230 increases output. It gives some Africans[br]the chance to buy at a lower price when 0:02:17.410,0:02:21.030 they otherwise would not have had that[br]chance under a no price discrimination 0:02:21.210,0:02:27.220 rule. For industries with high fixed costs[br]price discrimination has another benefit, 0:02:27.400,0:02:31.330 the extra profits generated by price[br]discrimination mean that it's more 0:02:31.510,0:02:35.950 profitable for the company to engage in[br]research and development to produce more 0:02:36.130,0:02:41.520 new drugs for instance. For example the[br]extra profits from selling in Africa mean 0:02:41.700,0:02:45.610 that research and development is more[br]profitable, and that benefits Europeans 0:02:45.790,0:02:51.280 too. When it comes to new drugs, you might[br]say that misery loves company. That is the 0:02:51.460,0:02:55.350 larger the market for a potential drug the[br]more research and development will be 0:02:55.530,0:03:01.210 applied. Price discrimination similarly[br]means airlines can offer more flights to 0:03:01.390,0:03:06.080 more places at better times, and that also[br]helps business people. Even though they're 0:03:06.260,0:03:09.760 paying the higher prices, they have a[br]better chance at being able to get there 0:03:09.940,0:03:15.040 at a good time in the first place. When it[br]comes to software, lower price is for the 0:03:15.220,0:03:20.810 students also is going to help support[br]software R and D. If the students wouldn't 0:03:20.990,0:03:25.480 buy the software at all at the higher[br]price, well, then the price discrimination 0:03:25.660,0:03:30.450 is a net benefit to pretty much everyone.[br]More generally price discrimination can 0:03:30.630,0:03:35.550 help spread the fixed costs of research[br]and development over a larger population 0:03:35.730,0:03:40.590 and that means more innovation which is to[br]virtually everyone's benefit. The ultimate 0:03:40.770,0:03:45.430 form of price discrimination is when each[br]person is charged his or her maximum 0:03:45.610,0:03:50.840 willingness to pay. Economist call this[br]'perfect price discrimination,' under 0:03:51.020,0:03:56.540 perfect price discrimination consumers end[br]up with zero consumers surplus. All of the 0:03:56.720,0:04:00.980 gains from trade go to the monopolist, but[br]the efficient quantity is produced. 0:04:01.160,0:04:06.100 There's no dead weight loss. Let's look at[br]this with a diagram. Think of the demand 0:04:06.280,0:04:10.840 curve as showing the maximum willingness[br]to pay by different individuals to buy a 0:04:11.020,0:04:17.029 single unit of this good. Here for example[br]is Alex's willingness to pay, here's 0:04:17.209,0:04:22.320 Tyler's willingness to pay, Robin's and on[br]all the way down to Brian's willingness to 0:04:22.500,0:04:27.890 pay for the good. If the monopolist could[br]charge each and every consumer his or her 0:04:28.070,0:04:33.020 maximum willingness to pay, the monopolist[br]would walk down the demand curve producing 0:04:33.200,0:04:38.980 each unit such that the willingness to pay[br]just exceeded the marginal cost. In other 0:04:39.160,0:04:43.890 words the monopolist would produce every[br]unit up until the efficient quantity of 0:04:44.070,0:04:48.680 output, the same quantity as would be[br]produced by a competitive industry. The 0:04:48.860,0:04:52.730 difference being that in the competitive[br]industry the gains would go to the 0:04:52.910,0:04:57.790 consumers. In the case of perfect price[br]discrimination, all the gains go to the 0:04:57.970,0:05:01.670 monopolist. This kind of price[br]discrimination requires that the 0:05:01.850,0:05:07.080 monopolist have a lot of information about[br]each consumer. Are there examples of this 0:05:07.260,0:05:12.850 in practice? In fact there are some, and[br]you maybe very familiar with one of them. 0:05:13.030,0:05:16.840 Universities are fabulous price[br]discriminators. They're even better than 0:05:17.020,0:05:22.150 airlines, especially because few people[br]realize what is actually going on. 0:05:22.330,0:05:26.880 Universities give many students financial[br]aid, which is another way of saying that 0:05:27.060,0:05:31.360 they charge some of their students more[br]than others. Financial aid is a way of 0:05:31.540,0:05:36.270 doing well while doing good because it's a[br]form of price discrimination. It increases 0:05:36.450,0:05:41.600 profits for universities. Moreover to get[br]the aid, students and their parents must 0:05:41.780,0:05:46.030 give the university an incredible amount[br]to financial information, including their 0:05:46.210,0:05:51.640 tax forms, their W2's, information about[br]their bank accounts, the home they own and 0:05:51.820,0:05:56.930 so on. All of this information means the[br]universities can create many many 0:05:57.110,0:06:01.640 different prices in a way that approaches[br]perfect price discrimination. 0:06:01.820,0:06:06.460 At William's College for instance, half[br]the students pay full fare. Which is about 0:06:06.640,0:06:11.850 $32,000 a year, the other half gets some[br]form of financial aid but the amount 0:06:12.030,0:06:18.090 varies tremendously. Students whose[br]parents have incomes of about $91,000 a 0:06:18.270,0:06:23.940 year or higher, they pay an average[br]intuition of about $22,000 a year. While 0:06:24.120,0:06:30.108 students from very poor families may pay[br]as little as $1,600 a year. That's 0:06:30.108,0:06:34.953 meaning that one price can be about 20[br]times higher than the other, that's a lot 0:06:34.953,0:06:38.754 of price discrimination. Price[br]discrimination makes a lot of sense for 0:06:38.754,0:06:43.033 universities because their marginal costs[br]are low while their fixed costs are pretty 0:06:43.033,0:06:48.493 high. If a professor is teaching[br]economics 101 anyway, then the marginal 0:06:48.493,0:06:53.589 cost of putting an extra student in the[br]classroom is pretty close to zero. Even a 0:06:53.589,0:06:58.729 student who is paying a smaller amount in[br]tuition is probably adding more to profits 0:06:58.729,0:07:04.533 than to costs. That helps the university[br]cover its fixed costs such as the salaries 0:07:04.533,0:07:10.285 and the buildings necessary to support the[br]operations of the university. So again 0:07:10.285,0:07:15.446 price discrimination by the universities[br]increases profits but it also probably 0:07:15.446,0:07:20.518 increases their output as well. More[br]students attend university then otherwise 0:07:20.518,0:07:25.170 would be the case. And again, price[br]discrimination also helps to spread the 0:07:25.170,0:07:30.521 fixed costs around a larger number of[br]customers. For these reasons, price 0:07:30.521,0:07:35.776 discrimination by universities probably[br]increase the social welfare. That's it for 0:07:35.776,0:07:39.874 the more obvious forms of price[br]discrimination. In the next talk we'll be 0:07:39.874,0:07:44.229 looking at the some quite common pricing[br]strategies, such as tying and bundling, 0:07:44.229,0:07:49.373 which also can be understood as more[br]subtle forms of price discrimination. 0:07:51.175,0:07:54.665 - If you want to test yourself, click[br]practice questions. 0:07:54.800,0:07:58.368 Or, if you're ready to move on,[br]just click 'next video.' 0:07:59.488,0:08:02.137 ♪ [music] ♪