WEBVTT
00:00:04.450 --> 00:00:06.780
*Art ...*
00:00:06.780 --> 00:00:08.130
ArtSleuth
00:00:13.880 --> 00:00:16.300
A man
00:00:16.320 --> 00:00:18.280
Among rocks
00:00:20.770 --> 00:00:23.750
With a town in the background
00:00:23.810 --> 00:00:25.810
A picture by Giovanni Bellini
00:00:27.760 --> 00:00:30.560
A hero seeking inspiration in a glorious landscape?
00:00:32.500 --> 00:00:33.640
Better than that:
00:00:34.380 --> 00:00:37.960
the supreme champion of life lived simply and in harmony with nature:
00:00:38.020 --> 00:00:39.500
Saint Francis of Assisi ...
00:00:39.680 --> 00:00:43.180
… in a landscape touched by the fantastic!
00:00:43.280 --> 00:00:45.040
• two suns light the scene:
00:00:45.060 --> 00:00:48.680
• one in the direction the saint is looking
00:00:48.820 --> 00:00:50.160
• the other in the background
00:00:52.560 --> 00:00:57.380
• and the palms of his hands are bleeding
00:00:57.440 --> 00:00:59.480
The last recalls a miracle
00:00:59.500 --> 00:01:04.060
which Bellini’s predecessors happily gave the full Hollywood treatment:
00:01:04.140 --> 00:01:05.760
Celestial beings,
00:01:05.800 --> 00:01:06.940
bright light from on high,
00:01:09.380 --> 00:01:11.040
gaping wounds.
00:01:12.260 --> 00:01:15.080
So why does Bellini tone everything down?
00:01:15.200 --> 00:01:19.620
250 years have passed since the death of Saint Francis
00:01:19.700 --> 00:01:23.960
This sumptuous picture has been acquired by a group of Venetian magnates…
00:01:24.020 --> 00:01:26.280
… one of them a fabulously rich merchant banker:
00:01:26.320 --> 00:01:30.080
do they really believe in the poverty preached by the saint?
00:01:30.160 --> 00:01:35.300
And does Bellini - Renaissance painter and scholar in one, have doubts concerning miracles
00:01:35.300 --> 00:01:39.520
… which subvert the natural order?
00:01:39.560 --> 00:01:44.150
Or does he really want to paint a dazzling landscape, with Saint Francis as mere pretext?
00:01:44.160 --> 00:01:45.780
*BELLINI – Saint Francis in the desert*
00:01:45.800 --> 00:01:47.640
*Not miracle, but landscape?*
00:01:49.450 --> 00:01:51.260
Part 1. *Natural miracle*
00:01:52.750 --> 00:01:57.100
Is Bellini trying to make the miracle seem natural?
00:01:57.200 --> 00:02:01.300
The saint’s holy retreat in the mountains occupies the foreground …
00:02:01.300 --> 00:02:03.300
…close to a cave where he has made his home.
00:02:04.450 --> 00:02:07.100
Further back, a rural landscape,
00:02:07.100 --> 00:02:10.750
separated from the foreground by jagged rocks
00:02:10.750 --> 00:02:12.750
and this screen of vegetation
00:02:22.400 --> 00:02:28.350
and, behind a quietly flowing river, urban civilisation:
00:02:28.350 --> 00:02:30.850
a town ...
00:02:30.850 --> 00:02:34.450
…and buildings perched on hilltops,
00:02:34.450 --> 00:02:38.250
beneath a peaceful sky
00:02:38.250 --> 00:02:40.250
Standing firmly erect in his rough, homespun habit,
00:02:40.250 --> 00:02:43.050
the saint is in the world, and yet outside it too,
00:02:43.050 --> 00:02:45.450
with his gaze fixed on a strange source of light.
00:02:45.450 --> 00:02:48.050
Is it the autumn sun?
00:02:48.050 --> 00:02:51.350
Since the saint is either open-mouthed in wonder, or possibly singing,
00:02:51.350 --> 00:02:55.800
since this bewildered rabbit has started from its burrow
00:02:55.800 --> 00:02:59.600
since the saint has dropped his stick and sandals,
00:03:01.150 --> 00:03:03.350
since this foliage is lit from the front ...
00:03:03.350 --> 00:03:06.850
although the walls in the distance are in shadow …
00:03:08.450 --> 00:03:12.400
…we tend to feel that something less mundane is happening.
00:03:12.400 --> 00:03:17.350
Is the angel, the seraph, appearing to Saint Francis?
00:03:17.350 --> 00:03:20.100
Legend has it that night turned to day,
00:03:20.100 --> 00:03:22.750
to the near-by shepherds’ amazement.
00:03:26.550 --> 00:03:29.300
Of course, that might explain why the town is so quiet
00:03:29.300 --> 00:03:31.300
- not a soul in sight!
00:03:33.250 --> 00:03:37.450
But there’s no physical trace of the angel:
00:03:37.450 --> 00:03:39.450
the light in the foreground might come from a comet,
00:03:43.850 --> 00:03:46.900
and that in the background from the sun.
00:03:50.900 --> 00:03:52.850
But the painter goes even further.
00:03:52.850 --> 00:03:55.850
The heart of the miracle was the stigmata,
00:03:55.850 --> 00:03:58.800
the five wounds of the crucified Christ,
00:03:58.800 --> 00:04:01.750
which Saint Francis received kneeling down.
00:04:03.200 --> 00:04:05.150
Here, however, he is standing
00:04:05.150 --> 00:04:07.450
- and the wounds have been touched in so lightly that,
00:04:07.450 --> 00:04:11.200
on the left foot, they have vanished.
00:04:11.200 --> 00:04:13.200
And the wounds are simply marked with blood,
00:04:14.950 --> 00:04:20.050
although the saint’s first biographers tell us that his own flesh took on the shape of the nails…
00:04:20.050 --> 00:04:22.550
… and the wound in the side,
00:04:22.550 --> 00:04:25.350
which distinguished Christ from the thieves crucified with him…
00:04:25.350 --> 00:04:27.350
… does not appear in the picture.
00:04:30.450 --> 00:04:33.550
Light and perspective make the saint’s stigmatisation *a metaphor: *
00:04:33.550 --> 00:04:37.100
he is, as it were,
00:04:37.100 --> 00:04:38.800
virtually nailed to this crucifix,
00:04:38.800 --> 00:04:45.150
relegated to the edge of the picture.**
00:04:45.150 --> 00:04:47.200
In other words, he is no longer singled out by a spectacular manifestation of divine power:
00:04:47.200 --> 00:04:50.200
we are reminded of the miracle, but are not necessarily seeing it happen.
00:04:51.100 --> 00:04:55.700
The picture’s originality is more a matter of the saint’s posture and relationship with nature.
00:04:55.700 --> 00:05:02.000
Is the landscape indeed its real subject?
00:05:03.810 --> 00:05:05.900
Part 2. Nature v. town?
00:05:06.700 --> 00:05:10.370
There is no river or town near the real Monte Alverna,
00:05:10.370 --> 00:05:12.370
the saint’s chief retreat.
00:05:14.050 --> 00:05:15.850
And so this is not an actual landscape,
00:05:15.850 --> 00:05:18.300
but a figment of Bellini’s imagination!
00:05:19.200 --> 00:05:22.650
The town stands for the saint’s former life:
00:05:28.470 --> 00:05:32.870
The life of an arrogant “rich kid” from a family of cloth merchants.
00:05:34.250 --> 00:05:37.000
The life of the new bourgeoisie who,
00:05:37.000 --> 00:05:39.000
with their talent for trade and finance,
00:05:39.000 --> 00:05:41.000
are making Italy’s cities wealthy
00:05:41.000 --> 00:05:43.000
- and starting to worry about their own salvation.
00:05:43.370 --> 00:05:46.570
A life which Saint Francis puts behind him:
00:05:46.570 --> 00:05:48.570
he renounces his possessions;
00:05:51.120 --> 00:05:55.020
the bridge in the picture is symbolically cut
00:05:57.950 --> 00:06:01.000
every knot on his coarse habit represents a vow
00:06:01.000 --> 00:06:02.420
- of poverty,
00:06:02.420 --> 00:06:04.070
chastity,
00:06:04.070 --> 00:06:07.250
obedience - …
00:06:07.250 --> 00:06:10.720
… which he clearly honours :
00:06:10.720 --> 00:06:13.770
• The only trace of a meal, this simple pitcher,
00:06:13.770 --> 00:06:15.770
• The only sign of a church, this handbell,
00:06:16.650 --> 00:06:20.150
• His only means of study, this book and parchment.
00:06:20.150 --> 00:06:22.820
• A heron as symbol of fidelity to the Church
00:06:22.820 --> 00:06:24.820
- or of the old sybaritic lifestyle.
00:06:24.820 --> 00:06:30.150
• And the donkey to carry him - and symbolise bodily service,
00:06:30.150 --> 00:06:33.670
But the town itself is not demonised:
00:06:33.670 --> 00:06:37.050
•the donkey reminds us that Jesus returned to Jerusalem,
00:06:37.050 --> 00:06:41.470
•the shepherd that the gospel must be preached to the “lost sheep”…,
00:06:43.700 --> 00:06:49.350
Saint Francis seems to be saying that city-dwellers have forgotten the meaning of gratitude.
00:06:49.350 --> 00:06:52.220
The light we see is a gift from heaven
00:06:53.420 --> 00:06:58.570
As he sings a hymn to his creator, Saint Francis seems to be imitating a bird,
00:06:58.570 --> 00:07:01.770
and his body echoes the curve of the laurel bush
00:07:04.020 --> 00:07:06.450
But this isn’t the garden of Eden either
00:07:06.450 --> 00:07:10.850
- labour is man’s return for nature’s bounty, as he turns:
00:07:10.850 --> 00:07:13.670
• a cave into a home,
00:07:13.670 --> 00:07:15.670
• a vine into a pergola,
00:07:17.570 --> 00:07:20.270
• a fold in the ground into a garden,
00:07:20.820 --> 00:07:22.920
• and a spring into a conduit
00:07:25.250 --> 00:07:29.070
If we cannot imitate Christ’s *sacrifice *on the cross,
00:07:29.070 --> 00:07:34.170
Bellini suggests a life of giving and of prayer *as a modest alternative.*
00:07:34.170 --> 00:07:36.170
Building a chapel,
00:07:36.170 --> 00:07:38.170
donating a religious painting
00:07:38.170 --> 00:07:41.070
- these are some of the good works the rich can perform
00:07:41.070 --> 00:07:43.070
in the hope of gaining paradise.
00:07:43.370 --> 00:07:47.870
At the time Bellini paints his picture, the Franciscans are setting up special loan agencies - the Monte di Pietà
00:07:47.870 --> 00:07:49.870
- to help the poorest of the poor in Italy.
00:07:50.570 --> 00:07:54.820
The poverty of Saint Francis has become a *giving-based economic system, *
00:07:54.820 --> 00:07:56.820
and is steadily making the Franciscans more powerful.
00:07:57.800 --> 00:08:00.850
They control hundreds of buildings in town centres,
00:08:00.850 --> 00:08:03.570
and have already given the Church two popes.
00:08:04.250 --> 00:08:08.370
So - is Bellini simply their mouthpiece ?
00:08:09.700 --> 00:08:11.860
Part 3. The religion of nature
00:08:13.860 --> 00:08:16.920
The hallowed landscape is not Bellini’s invention.
00:08:17.920 --> 00:08:20.000
Traditionally, it is a stylised background
00:08:20.000 --> 00:08:22.000
which indicates that the saint portrayed
00:08:22.000 --> 00:08:25.350
is in a *different world from the viewer.*
00:08:25.870 --> 00:08:29.770
But interest in landscape as such becomes more marked in Italian and French art
00:08:29.770 --> 00:08:31.770
from the start of the XVth century.
00:08:33.500 --> 00:08:35.870
This pictorial version of the story of Saint Anthony is an example:
00:08:37.300 --> 00:08:42.270
While most of the episodes take place beneath a gilded sky or in a church,
00:08:42.370 --> 00:08:46.150
those where the saint is tempted in the desert
00:08:46.150 --> 00:08:48.820
are set in a real landscape.
00:08:48.820 --> 00:08:50.820
As in the desert scene with Saint Francis:
00:08:50.820 --> 00:08:52.820
There is a broken sky
00:08:52.820 --> 00:08:54.820
- blue, yellow and white
00:08:55.620 --> 00:08:57.100
and the high viewpoint allows us
00:08:57.100 --> 00:09:00.150
to explore the setting in depth.
00:09:03.020 --> 00:09:06.450
Contemporary Flemish painters
00:09:06.450 --> 00:09:09.320
take this mixture of the sacred and profane even further:
00:09:09.320 --> 00:09:13.570
Van Eyck puts the Virgin face-to-face with Chancellor Rolin,
00:09:13.570 --> 00:09:15.770
who has commissioned the picture.
00:09:15.770 --> 00:09:18.870
The landscape in the background
00:09:18.870 --> 00:09:22.320
is an idealised image of his territories, which he can then compare
00:09:22.320 --> 00:09:23.670
... to an ideal city…
00:09:23.670 --> 00:09:25.670
…with the Virgin as its queen.
00:09:27.400 --> 00:09:30.570
In spite of the crenellated wall which separates her from the secular world,
00:09:30.570 --> 00:09:33.670
she is almost *being used* to convey a political message!
00:09:34.350 --> 00:09:38.570
There is, therefore, a risk that landscape may destroy the *necessary distance *
00:09:38.570 --> 00:09:41.450
between the profane and the sacred.
00:09:41.450 --> 00:09:43.070
In his Saint Francis,
00:09:43.070 --> 00:09:45.900
Bellini deploys three separate solutions to the problem.
00:09:48.000 --> 00:09:49.150
First solution:
00:09:49.150 --> 00:09:52.400
he marks off areas where the supernatural holds sway.
00:09:52.400 --> 00:09:56.050
Bellini sometimes uses paved spaces with sturdy balustrades,
00:09:57.500 --> 00:10:00.170
... where certain events take place unseen by people in the background,
00:10:00.170 --> 00:10:02.170
... [to be translated]
00:10:04.000 --> 00:10:06.220
Compare this *transfiguration scene, *
00:10:06.220 --> 00:10:08.470
where a ravine protected by a frail wooden barrier
00:10:08.470 --> 00:10:10.470
separates us from the mountain where the miracle is taking place.
00:10:12.900 --> 00:10:18.570
Here, variations in the terrain serve this separating function.
00:10:20.470 --> 00:10:23.800
Variety and precision of detail also make us forget
00:10:23.800 --> 00:10:25.800
that the whole scene is imagined:
00:10:27.350 --> 00:10:30.400
we feel that we are really seeing the beauties of nature,
00:10:32.950 --> 00:10:35.720
a nature so delightful that it seems good
00:10:35.720 --> 00:10:38.470
- and so *good *that we feel it was created *for us *
00:10:38.470 --> 00:10:39.820
by a benevolent divinity.
00:10:41.820 --> 00:10:46.200
Second solution: signal the sanctity of the central figure.
00:10:46.200 --> 00:10:49.750
Instead of using the conventional halo …
00:10:49.750 --> 00:10:52.870
Bellini invests the saint’s posture with mystery.
00:10:54.200 --> 00:10:59.250
That mystery lies in the contrast between an unusually powerful and clearly defined *physical presence*
00:10:59.250 --> 00:11:02.100
....which stands out against the pale stone behind it...
00:11:02.100 --> 00:11:05.020
… and the outward signs of *spiritual ecstasy:*
00:11:05.020 --> 00:11:09.370
he is directly *in front of us, *and yet his attention is *elsewhere. *
00:11:11.870 --> 00:11:14.620
Third solution: light.
00:11:14.620 --> 00:11:18.000
Bellini applies very thin layers of paint on top of one another,
00:11:18.000 --> 00:11:20.000
which creates transparent effects…
00:11:25.370 --> 00:11:29.020
but also makes certain surfaces, like the stone, seem luminous:
00:11:29.020 --> 00:11:31.020
the underlying bright colours
00:11:31.020 --> 00:11:34.650
light them from within.
00:11:36.700 --> 00:11:39.020
Bellini’s Saint Francis thus seems
00:11:39.020 --> 00:11:41.220
a subtle forerunner of what we now call “fantasy” in literature and film:
00:11:42.850 --> 00:11:47.250
in an ordinary natural setting, something in a person’s behaviour,
00:11:47.250 --> 00:11:49.750
a brightness in the air
00:11:49.750 --> 00:11:51.420
and unexpected details
00:11:51.420 --> 00:11:53.420
all suggest the presence of the supernatural.
00:11:59.180 --> 00:12:01.180
Next episode: *the Young Knight* by Vittore Carpaccio
00:12:01.180 --> 00:12:04.500
Youth'promises
00:12:04.500 --> 00:12:10.000
*Find more information on: www.canal-educatif.fr*
00:12:11.710 --> 00:12:14.130
Written & directed by:
00:12:14.130 --> 00:12:16.610
Produced by:
00:12:16.610 --> 00:12:18.960
Scientific advisor:
00:12:18.960 --> 00:12:21.360
This film was made possible thanks to the support of sponsors (including you?) and of the French Ministry of Culture
00:12:21.360 --> 00:12:23.760
Voiceover:
00:12:23.760 --> 00:12:26.160
Editing and motion effects:
00:12:26.160 --> 00:12:28.560
Postproduction and sound recording:
00:12:28.560 --> 00:12:30.960
Musical selection:
00:12:30.960 --> 00:12:33.360
Musics
00:12:33.360 --> 00:12:35.760
Photographic credits
00:12:35.760 --> 00:12:38.160
Special thanks - English translation: Vincent Nash
00:12:38.160 --> 00:12:38.160
A CED production