WEBVTT 00:00:08.375 --> 00:00:10.981 We speak ourselves into the world. 00:00:10.982 --> 00:00:14.497 We speak ourselves into transformation, or not. 00:00:15.162 --> 00:00:19.367 Into new possibilities and new results for ourselves, or not. 00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:22.152 TED is about ideas worth spreading, 00:00:22.153 --> 00:00:25.611 I believe it's also about ideas worth reminding ourselves of, 00:00:25.612 --> 00:00:27.744 because what I want to share with you today, 00:00:27.745 --> 00:00:29.722 I believe many of us know, or knew, 00:00:29.723 --> 00:00:32.803 but somehow, somewhere along the way, we forgot. 00:00:33.253 --> 00:00:35.500 And it's easy to forget this 00:00:35.501 --> 00:00:38.004 because in some ways it's so close we don't see it, 00:00:38.005 --> 00:00:39.637 it's so obvious we can miss it. 00:00:39.638 --> 00:00:41.743 What I would love to do today 00:00:41.744 --> 00:00:45.620 is to reintroduce you, to remind you of this idea 00:00:45.621 --> 00:00:48.262 - which is really two sides of the same coin, 00:00:48.263 --> 00:00:50.740 two aspects of the same powerful idea - 00:00:50.741 --> 00:00:53.488 and do so in such a way that you can leave here today 00:00:53.489 --> 00:00:56.072 more conscious and more aware 00:00:56.073 --> 00:00:59.403 of how to purposely apply this in your life. 00:01:00.003 --> 00:01:01.740 I ask a room full of people, 00:01:01.741 --> 00:01:03.957 "What is language? What is language for?" 00:01:03.958 --> 00:01:06.379 And what would the giant majority answer with? 00:01:07.179 --> 00:01:09.626 A tool for communication, or some variation of this. 00:01:09.627 --> 00:01:12.262 This is such a widely held idea, 00:01:12.263 --> 00:01:14.371 or a way of understanding language, 00:01:14.372 --> 00:01:16.619 that most people don't see it as an idea at all. 00:01:16.620 --> 00:01:20.952 We see it as a definition. As a fact. 00:01:20.953 --> 00:01:25.529 I offer this: if language is a tool, it's a tool we cannot put down. 00:01:25.530 --> 00:01:27.728 When we look a little bit more closely, 00:01:27.729 --> 00:01:31.005 we can see that we are doing a great deal more 00:01:31.006 --> 00:01:34.080 than communicate and describe with our language. 00:01:34.081 --> 00:01:35.284 So, point number one: 00:01:35.285 --> 00:01:38.901 language creates and generates, it does not simply describe. 00:01:39.541 --> 00:01:42.674 Some examples: think about every single time in your life 00:01:42.675 --> 00:01:45.020 you've ever said the word "yes". 00:01:45.021 --> 00:01:46.520 Every time. 00:01:46.521 --> 00:01:49.281 Now consider: if all those times you had said no, 00:01:49.282 --> 00:01:51.003 would your life be different? 00:01:51.773 --> 00:01:53.494 You wouldn't be here. 00:01:53.495 --> 00:01:56.482 The simple act of saying yes, you move in the world this way, 00:01:56.501 --> 00:01:59.002 these doors open, these doors close, and vice versa. 00:01:59.003 --> 00:02:00.639 We're not describing. 00:02:00.640 --> 00:02:03.238 One of my favorite stories about how language creates 00:02:03.239 --> 00:02:04.500 is a baseball story. 00:02:04.501 --> 00:02:07.556 Two umpires sitting around talking, and the first one is saying, 00:02:07.557 --> 00:02:09.466 "You know, Joe is a fabulous umpire: 00:02:09.467 --> 00:02:12.253 there's balls in his strikes, he calls them like they are." 00:02:12.254 --> 00:02:14.929 The second umpire said, "No no no, Joe is a great umpire. 00:02:14.930 --> 00:02:18.127 There's balls in his strikes, but he calls them like he sees them." 00:02:18.128 --> 00:02:19.583 Joe said, "Ya'll both wrong." 00:02:19.584 --> 00:02:23.304 He says, "There's balls in my strikes, but they are nothing till I call them." 00:02:23.305 --> 00:02:24.443 (Laughter) 00:02:24.444 --> 00:02:28.155 When he says "Strike three", it is "Strike three". 00:02:28.156 --> 00:02:29.605 This question is for everybody 00:02:29.606 --> 00:02:31.779 who is married, or who has ever been married. 00:02:31.780 --> 00:02:32.886 It's a simple question: 00:02:32.887 --> 00:02:35.940 Is it different being married than not being married? 00:02:37.190 --> 00:02:38.421 Yes. 00:02:38.422 --> 00:02:42.472 It's different legally, socially, sexually, emotionally, financially. 00:02:42.473 --> 00:02:43.522 It's different. 00:02:43.523 --> 00:02:44.531 So the question: 00:02:44.532 --> 00:02:48.136 how do we go from being not married to being married? 00:02:48.137 --> 00:02:49.459 How'd that happen? 00:02:50.359 --> 00:02:52.336 Somebody said something. 00:02:52.337 --> 00:02:54.177 And in that moment it's different, 00:02:54.178 --> 00:02:56.966 and it's not a little bit different, it's really different. 00:02:56.967 --> 00:02:59.406 We speak ourselves into the world. 00:02:59.906 --> 00:03:02.683 How was the United States of America created? 00:03:03.463 --> 00:03:06.625 What is there, in the Archives, right next to the Constitution 00:03:06.626 --> 00:03:07.975 in Washington D.C.? 00:03:07.976 --> 00:03:09.066 The Declaration. 00:03:09.067 --> 00:03:11.575 This country was declared into being. 00:03:11.576 --> 00:03:13.631 Now, there was work to do after that, yes, 00:03:13.632 --> 00:03:16.601 but without the Declaration does not happen. 00:03:16.602 --> 00:03:19.551 How was Jim's Auto Body Shop down the street created? 00:03:20.391 --> 00:03:22.770 And all organizations for that matter? 00:03:23.180 --> 00:03:25.318 They were also declared into being, 00:03:25.319 --> 00:03:28.616 and Jim and the rest of us can find the evidence in the file cabinet, 00:03:28.626 --> 00:03:31.078 "We hereby shareholders declare part 100, a, b, c; 00:03:31.079 --> 00:03:34.729 August, 1, the company doesn't exist, August, 2, it does." 00:03:34.730 --> 00:03:37.923 Leaders get paid to have effective conversations. 00:03:38.673 --> 00:03:42.428 Leaders create and continually sustain and cultivate 00:03:42.429 --> 00:03:45.293 this non-physical but very real and very powerful thing 00:03:45.294 --> 00:03:46.893 called corporate culture, 00:03:46.894 --> 00:03:50.027 not with shovels and fertilizer, of course, 00:03:50.028 --> 00:03:53.798 but with the conversations they have, the conversations they require, 00:03:53.799 --> 00:03:57.032 and the conversations they prohibit in their organizations. 00:03:58.002 --> 00:04:01.237 These conversations shape and impact that culture 00:04:01.238 --> 00:04:05.947 every bit as much as the culture influences the workplace conversations. 00:04:06.537 --> 00:04:08.370 Causality is two-way. 00:04:09.520 --> 00:04:11.334 Now, let's get personal. 00:04:11.335 --> 00:04:13.231 Think about somebody in your life 00:04:13.232 --> 00:04:16.522 with whom you have a close, deep, excellent relationship. 00:04:17.402 --> 00:04:19.742 Your conversations with that person 00:04:19.743 --> 00:04:22.621 create the experience of intimacy, 00:04:22.622 --> 00:04:27.527 generate the space of authenticity and vulnerability, not describe it. 00:04:28.531 --> 00:04:30.702 You change those conversations, 00:04:31.462 --> 00:04:33.237 and you change that relationship. 00:04:33.867 --> 00:04:35.582 You end those conversations, 00:04:36.342 --> 00:04:38.420 and you end the relationship. 00:04:38.566 --> 00:04:41.422 Back to the wedding: Is there not a moment in most weddings 00:04:41.423 --> 00:04:44.472 when the person doing the ceremony will say some version of this: 00:04:44.473 --> 00:04:47.854 "Anybody here thinks that so and so and so and so should not be married? 00:04:47.855 --> 00:04:49.718 Speak now, or forever hold your peace." 00:04:49.719 --> 00:04:51.387 Here's my promise to you: 00:04:51.388 --> 00:04:54.375 you stand up in that moment and you scream: "I object!", 00:04:54.376 --> 00:04:57.972 you are not describing, you are creating. (Laughter) 00:04:57.973 --> 00:04:59.275 Think about it. 00:04:59.276 --> 00:05:02.071 You're creating chaos, a crisis, 00:05:02.072 --> 00:05:06.058 you're also creating a brand new relationship with the groom. 00:05:06.928 --> 00:05:08.492 Think about it. 00:05:08.493 --> 00:05:12.064 And a brand, spanking new public identity for yourself. 00:05:12.065 --> 00:05:14.750 (Laughter) 00:05:14.751 --> 00:05:17.113 I am not saying we don't describe with language. 00:05:17.114 --> 00:05:20.022 What I'm saying is that is not all that we do. 00:05:21.452 --> 00:05:24.633 And it's this whole other "not all that we do" 00:05:24.634 --> 00:05:26.479 that's worth looking at. 00:05:27.209 --> 00:05:29.218 One more example. 00:05:29.219 --> 00:05:33.282 In times of ongoing change, exactly like those we live in today, 00:05:34.172 --> 00:05:38.671 our ability to continually learn is critically important. 00:05:39.481 --> 00:05:43.707 And one of the most spectacularly powerful prerequisites for learning, 00:05:43.708 --> 00:05:46.212 regardless of whether we're learning to ride a bike, 00:05:46.213 --> 00:05:49.486 learning to rebuild a relationship, learning to lead a company, 00:05:49.487 --> 00:05:51.265 that prerequisite is a language step, 00:05:51.266 --> 00:05:54.216 and it's when the learner says, either internally or out loud, 00:05:54.217 --> 00:05:55.705 "I don't know." 00:05:57.687 --> 00:06:00.899 Declaring "I don't know" does not describe a state of affairs, 00:06:00.900 --> 00:06:02.277 it produces something. 00:06:02.737 --> 00:06:05.237 What it produces is called a context for learning; 00:06:05.238 --> 00:06:07.106 not physical, very real. 00:06:07.876 --> 00:06:10.997 We declare beginnerhood into being. 00:06:10.998 --> 00:06:12.668 We speak it so. 00:06:12.669 --> 00:06:14.579 Just like the umpire. 00:06:16.069 --> 00:06:17.458 Everybody here knows this: 00:06:17.459 --> 00:06:20.532 Who here in this room has ever tried to teach somebody something 00:06:20.533 --> 00:06:22.790 when the learner thought they already knew it? 00:06:22.791 --> 00:06:24.995 How much learning takes place? 00:06:25.495 --> 00:06:26.840 Not much. 00:06:26.841 --> 00:06:28.029 So point number one: 00:06:28.030 --> 00:06:31.254 language creates and generates, it does not simply describe. 00:06:31.255 --> 00:06:34.482 Point number two: we live in language. 00:06:35.938 --> 00:06:37.564 We live in language. 00:06:37.565 --> 00:06:39.621 Now, that expression, what does it mean? 00:06:39.622 --> 00:06:41.353 I like to frame it this way. 00:06:41.354 --> 00:06:44.871 Who here in this room has the little voice inside? 00:06:44.872 --> 00:06:47.081 When it's saying, "What's he talking about?" 00:06:47.083 --> 00:06:48.625 that's what I'm talking about. 00:06:48.626 --> 00:06:50.150 Who has a debate team? 00:06:50.151 --> 00:06:51.790 (Laughter) 00:06:52.420 --> 00:06:55.369 One of my favorite quotes of all time is Mark Twain. 00:06:55.370 --> 00:06:58.402 He said, "I'm always in a conversation. 00:06:58.403 --> 00:07:00.484 And sometimes, other people are involved." 00:07:00.485 --> 00:07:02.531 (Laughter) 00:07:02.532 --> 00:07:04.997 It's not just Mark Twain, it's us. 00:07:04.998 --> 00:07:06.163 It's all of us. 00:07:06.164 --> 00:07:09.164 And because we live in language, this is what we do. 00:07:09.165 --> 00:07:12.251 You, and I, and all of us, we are confronted with events. 00:07:12.252 --> 00:07:15.004 Events at home, events at work, events with our kids, 00:07:15.005 --> 00:07:17.504 events in college, events at the beach; events. 00:07:17.505 --> 00:07:20.902 And what we do as a human beings, we make up stories about these events, 00:07:20.903 --> 00:07:22.714 we hold these stories to be the truth, 00:07:22.715 --> 00:07:24.654 and we forget that we made them up. 00:07:24.655 --> 00:07:26.121 (Laughter) 00:07:26.122 --> 00:07:29.000 Now, when I say "story", I don't mean fib, or fabrication, 00:07:29.001 --> 00:07:32.894 it's not a purposeful manipulation, it's not a self-deception. 00:07:32.895 --> 00:07:34.883 It's an interpretation. 00:07:34.884 --> 00:07:36.859 An explanation. 00:07:36.860 --> 00:07:40.270 A crucial distinction for us to possess 00:07:40.271 --> 00:07:43.009 is event is not equal explanation. 00:07:43.949 --> 00:07:46.541 Event is not equal explanation. 00:07:47.441 --> 00:07:48.495 One example: 00:07:48.496 --> 00:07:50.480 your child comes home from school, 00:07:50.481 --> 00:07:53.942 looks up at you straight in the eye, and says, "I'm stupid." 00:07:53.943 --> 00:07:56.510 "What are you talking about?" "I'm stupid." 00:07:56.511 --> 00:07:58.583 "What are you talking about?" 00:07:58.584 --> 00:08:02.543 "I got an F on my English test." 00:08:02.564 --> 00:08:05.620 In this little example, what's the event? 00:08:06.965 --> 00:08:08.088 The F on the test. 00:08:08.089 --> 00:08:10.360 What's the explanation? 00:08:10.361 --> 00:08:11.386 "I'm stupid." 00:08:11.387 --> 00:08:14.509 Question: if that kid lives in that conversation long enough, 00:08:14.510 --> 00:08:16.934 is that a descriptive thing or a creative thing? 00:08:16.935 --> 00:08:18.507 That's a creative thing. 00:08:18.508 --> 00:08:21.717 And let's back up from the F on the test and think more broadly. 00:08:21.718 --> 00:08:26.315 Is it the events of your life or your explanations about those events 00:08:26.316 --> 00:08:28.103 that are more influential 00:08:28.104 --> 00:08:31.144 as to the actual actions you end up taking in the world? 00:08:31.964 --> 00:08:33.410 It's the explanations. 00:08:33.412 --> 00:08:35.916 And not only actual actions we take in the world, 00:08:35.917 --> 00:08:38.688 we produce something called results in the world 00:08:38.690 --> 00:08:41.395 in a wide variety of areas, do we not? 00:08:42.075 --> 00:08:43.529 Yes. 00:08:43.530 --> 00:08:46.805 And the explanation is the spring board, not the event. 00:08:47.525 --> 00:08:49.088 Out of any given event, 00:08:49.089 --> 00:08:51.405 how many possible explanations are there? 00:08:52.515 --> 00:08:53.827 Infinite. 00:08:55.587 --> 00:08:57.279 What if we can break a habit? 00:08:57.280 --> 00:09:01.121 What if we can break the habit of throwing the right wrong scaffolding 00:09:01.122 --> 00:09:03.586 on top of our and other people's explanations? 00:09:03.587 --> 00:09:07.171 "My explanation is right, yours is wrong, this is right, this is wrong." 00:09:07.172 --> 00:09:08.857 What if we can stop that, 00:09:08.876 --> 00:09:12.290 and instead have something called 'powerful-unpowerful'. 00:09:12.291 --> 00:09:13.747 It would look like this: 00:09:13.748 --> 00:09:16.140 Is your explanation powerful or unpowerful, 00:09:16.141 --> 00:09:19.113 given the results you say you want? 00:09:20.523 --> 00:09:24.243 Does my explanation serve me or not serve me, 00:09:24.244 --> 00:09:28.545 given what I say I want to be, do, or have in this situation, 00:09:28.546 --> 00:09:30.333 in this relationship? 00:09:30.334 --> 00:09:33.709 Always with the tagline "given the results we say we want" 00:09:33.741 --> 00:09:35.486 never in a vacuum. 00:09:35.986 --> 00:09:37.901 Never in a vacuum. 00:09:37.902 --> 00:09:41.083 Because we're doing it already anyway. 00:09:41.084 --> 00:09:42.514 That's not in doubt. 00:09:42.515 --> 00:09:43.998 We are Mark Twain. 00:09:44.898 --> 00:09:48.157 Have you ever known someone who didn't see themselves as doing this? 00:09:48.158 --> 00:09:50.761 Because this is about self awareness. 00:09:50.771 --> 00:09:52.970 It's not a problem that we do this. 00:09:52.971 --> 00:09:55.461 The only problem is we don't see that we're doing it! 00:09:55.462 --> 00:09:59.237 Here's what someone must look like who does not see himself as doing this. 00:09:59.238 --> 00:10:02.990 It's wonderful to meet everyone today, and it's obvious to me how each of you 00:10:02.991 --> 00:10:05.878 are necessarily influenced by your age, your race, your sex, 00:10:05.879 --> 00:10:08.560 your degree of travel or non-travel when you were little, 00:10:08.561 --> 00:10:10.994 and your cultural, educational, and work histories, 00:10:10.995 --> 00:10:14.396 and all these necessarily service filters to which you perceive reality. 00:10:14.397 --> 00:10:17.474 I, on the other hand, am somehow blessed with cosmic objectivity, 00:10:17.475 --> 00:10:19.695 was somehow born unfettered in this regard, 00:10:19.696 --> 00:10:21.490 and unburdened by all the cognitive, 00:10:21.491 --> 00:10:23.894 emotional, and cultural filters that clog you up. 00:10:23.895 --> 00:10:26.179 My eyes are more like clear panes of glass, 00:10:26.180 --> 00:10:28.589 amazingly allowing me access to native reality 00:10:28.590 --> 00:10:31.576 in such a way that it yields cosmically objective viewpoints. 00:10:31.577 --> 00:10:32.726 How excellent for me 00:10:32.727 --> 00:10:35.534 that I was somehow born and blessed with such a gift? 00:10:35.535 --> 00:10:37.268 (Laughter) (Applause) 00:10:41.262 --> 00:10:42.988 I get to this part in a workshop, 00:10:42.989 --> 00:10:45.351 a guy stands up in the back of the room and says, 00:10:45.352 --> 00:10:48.789 "My brother, my brother, finally! Someone who understands me!" (Laughter) 00:10:48.790 --> 00:10:51.765 "I thought I was alone! The burden of this gift! 00:10:51.766 --> 00:10:54.050 The only one with any objectivity!" 00:10:56.386 --> 00:10:59.083 Everybody is interpreting, no matter what, 00:10:59.084 --> 00:11:00.526 no exceptions, ever. 00:11:00.527 --> 00:11:01.932 One of my teachers said this, 00:11:01.933 --> 00:11:05.007 "Everything that is said, is said by someone." 00:11:06.497 --> 00:11:08.466 (Laughter) 00:11:08.467 --> 00:11:09.582 Think about it. 00:11:09.583 --> 00:11:11.726 Somebody who was born somewhere, 00:11:11.727 --> 00:11:14.463 in some culture, in some time period somewhere, 00:11:14.464 --> 00:11:16.657 raised by individual human beings, 00:11:16.658 --> 00:11:19.495 each of whom had standards, distinctions, values, practices, 00:11:19.496 --> 00:11:21.787 experiences, moods, like each of us. 00:11:22.487 --> 00:11:25.162 But folks, here is the consequence, and we know this: 00:11:25.163 --> 00:11:29.994 if you do not see yourself as doing this now, making up explanations, 00:11:29.995 --> 00:11:32.089 and you couple that with not producing 00:11:32.090 --> 00:11:34.703 some important result that you say you want, 00:11:34.704 --> 00:11:38.264 well, then the option for you of offering a more powerful interpretation, 00:11:38.265 --> 00:11:40.399 it'll never occur to you. 00:11:40.400 --> 00:11:42.319 It'll be off your radar screen, 00:11:42.320 --> 00:11:44.581 because if you don't think you're doing it now, 00:11:44.582 --> 00:11:46.434 there's nothing to update. 00:11:47.504 --> 00:11:51.036 And what you have effectively done is take off the table 00:11:51.037 --> 00:11:52.838 a spectacular leverage point. 00:11:52.839 --> 00:11:54.240 For intervening at the level 00:11:54.241 --> 00:11:56.430 you can make a real difference, which is you. 00:11:56.431 --> 00:11:58.644 We live in language like a fish lives in water. 00:11:58.645 --> 00:12:01.568 A fish is born in water, lives in water; water, water, water. 00:12:01.569 --> 00:12:05.919 Question: when would a fish first know, he's born in water and lives in water? 00:12:05.920 --> 00:12:08.108 When would he first know that? 00:12:08.109 --> 00:12:09.899 When you take him out. 00:12:09.900 --> 00:12:13.912 We are born in language, live in language, language all around, language everywhere. 00:12:13.913 --> 00:12:16.465 Part of what I want to do today is create a space 00:12:16.466 --> 00:12:20.541 where we can begin to look at language instead of living through it, 00:12:20.542 --> 00:12:24.251 so we can be more aware of what we're up to in language 00:12:24.252 --> 00:12:26.639 and more conscious and more purposeful 00:12:26.640 --> 00:12:31.295 about how we wield this creative, generative energy we call language. 00:12:32.027 --> 00:12:36.061 We are swimming, each of us, in an ocean of stories, 00:12:36.062 --> 00:12:39.086 interpretations, explanations and beliefs, 00:12:39.087 --> 00:12:40.929 all of which live in language 00:12:40.930 --> 00:12:45.232 and a great majority of which we have long since forgotten that we authored. 00:12:46.112 --> 00:12:50.027 Some of these stories, interpretations, explanations, and beliefs 00:12:50.028 --> 00:12:54.081 absolutely do not take us today and will not take us tomorrow 00:12:54.082 --> 00:12:56.551 where we say we want to go. 00:12:57.211 --> 00:12:59.763 But because we have forgotten that we are the author, 00:13:00.803 --> 00:13:04.604 we have also forgotten that we have the authority and the ability 00:13:04.605 --> 00:13:08.342 to change them, update them, transcend them or let them go. 00:13:09.480 --> 00:13:12.688 So number one: language creates and generates. 00:13:12.689 --> 00:13:15.424 Plus, number two: we live in language equals, 00:13:15.425 --> 00:13:18.470 we are always creating or generating something, 00:13:19.640 --> 00:13:22.679 it just may or may not be what we say we want. 00:13:23.959 --> 00:13:29.059 What do you most seek in to be, do, or have in your life? 00:13:30.729 --> 00:13:34.654 Because regardless of how you answer that question, these questions, 00:13:34.655 --> 00:13:39.579 I'm here today to remind you you speak yourself into the world. 00:13:40.501 --> 00:13:43.918 We are not human beings, we are human becomings. 00:13:44.942 --> 00:13:46.062 We are. 00:13:46.063 --> 00:13:51.242 And in this neverending dance of learning, growing, evolving, and becoming, 00:13:51.243 --> 00:13:54.755 this ideal, this way of understanding language, 00:13:54.756 --> 00:13:57.159 this way of understanding ourselves, 00:13:57.160 --> 00:13:58.677 is the key. 00:14:00.107 --> 00:14:04.659 I invite you, I challenge you as you leave here today, 00:14:04.660 --> 00:14:10.111 to be a more powerful observer of yourself and what you're up to in language 00:14:10.112 --> 00:14:13.952 and live with ongoing awareness and acceptance of your role 00:14:13.953 --> 00:14:16.802 as the author of your life. 00:14:16.803 --> 00:14:18.193 (Applause) 00:14:19.293 --> 00:14:20.692 Thank you. 00:14:20.693 --> 00:14:22.053 (Applause)