1
00:00:06,151 --> 00:00:08,290
Have you experienced déjà vu?

2
00:00:08,290 --> 00:00:10,640
It's that shadowy feeling you get

3
00:00:10,640 --> 00:00:12,564
when a situation seems familiar.

4
00:00:12,564 --> 00:00:14,069
A scene in a restaurant plays out

5
00:00:14,069 --> 00:00:15,551
exactly as you remember.

6
00:00:15,551 --> 00:00:17,011
The world moves like a ballet

7
00:00:17,011 --> 00:00:18,359
you've choreographed,

8
00:00:18,359 --> 00:00:20,670
but the sequence can't be based on a past experience

9
00:00:20,670 --> 00:00:23,400
because you've never eaten here before.

10
00:00:23,400 --> 00:00:24,755
This is the first time you've had clams,

11
00:00:24,755 --> 00:00:26,761
so what's going on?

12
00:00:26,761 --> 00:00:30,486
Unfortunately there isn't one single explanation for déjà vu.

13
00:00:30,486 --> 00:00:31,873
The experience is brief

14
00:00:31,873 --> 00:00:32,927
and occurs without notice,

15
00:00:32,927 --> 00:00:34,479
making it nearly impossible

16
00:00:34,479 --> 00:00:36,710
for scientists to record and study it.

17
00:00:36,710 --> 00:00:38,277
Scientists can't simply sit around

18
00:00:38,277 --> 00:00:39,984
and wait for it to happen to them --

19
00:00:39,984 --> 00:00:41,223
this could take years.

20
00:00:41,223 --> 00:00:43,365
It has no physical manifestations

21
00:00:43,365 --> 00:00:45,492
and in studies, it's described by the subject

22
00:00:45,492 --> 00:00:47,567
as a sensation or feeling.

23
00:00:47,567 --> 00:00:49,413
Because of this lack of hard evidence,

24
00:00:49,413 --> 00:00:52,406
there's been a surplus of speculation over the years.

25
00:00:52,406 --> 00:00:54,748
Since Emile Boirac introduced déjà vu

26
00:00:54,748 --> 00:00:57,083
as a French term meaning already seen,

27
00:00:57,083 --> 00:00:58,880
more than 40 theories attempt

28
00:00:58,880 --> 00:01:00,465
to explain this phenomenon.

29
00:01:00,465 --> 00:01:03,760
Still, recent advancements in neuroimaging

30
00:01:03,760 --> 00:01:05,042
and cognitive psychology narrow down

31
00:01:05,042 --> 00:01:06,665
the field of prospects.

32
00:01:06,665 --> 00:01:07,559
Let's walk through

33
00:01:07,559 --> 00:01:09,379
three of today's more prevalent theories,

34
00:01:09,379 --> 00:01:11,830
using the same restaurant setting for each.

35
00:01:11,830 --> 00:01:13,825
First up is dual processing.

36
00:01:13,825 --> 00:01:14,786
We'll need an action.

37
00:01:14,786 --> 00:01:17,395
Let's go with a waiter dropping a tray of dishes.

38
00:01:17,395 --> 00:01:18,611
As the scene unfolds,

39
00:01:18,611 --> 00:01:20,180
your brain's hemispheres process

40
00:01:20,180 --> 00:01:21,715
a flurry of information:

41
00:01:21,715 --> 00:01:23,231
the waiter's flailing arms,

42
00:01:23,231 --> 00:01:24,273
his cry for help,

43
00:01:24,273 --> 00:01:25,775
the smell of pasta.

44
00:01:25,775 --> 00:01:26,897
Within milliseconds,

45
00:01:26,897 --> 00:01:28,894
this information zips through pathways

46
00:01:28,894 --> 00:01:31,313
and is processed into a single moment.

47
00:01:31,313 --> 00:01:33,890
Most of the time, everything is recorded in-sync.

48
00:01:33,890 --> 00:01:35,225
However, this theory asserts

49
00:01:35,225 --> 00:01:38,020
that déjà vu occurs when there's a slight delay

50
00:01:38,020 --> 00:01:40,321
in information from one of these pathways.

51
00:01:40,321 --> 00:01:41,541
The difference in arrival times

52
00:01:41,541 --> 00:01:43,876
causes the brain to interpret the late information

53
00:01:43,876 --> 00:01:45,766
as a separate event.

54
00:01:45,766 --> 00:01:48,042
When it plays over the already-recorded moment,

55
00:01:48,042 --> 00:01:49,783
it feels as if it's happened before

56
00:01:49,783 --> 00:01:52,072
because, in a sense, it has.

57
00:01:52,670 --> 00:01:55,373
Our next theory deals with a confusion of the past

58
00:01:55,373 --> 00:01:57,427
rather than a mistake in the present.

59
00:01:57,427 --> 00:01:59,261
This is the hologram theory,

60
00:01:59,261 --> 00:02:01,706
and we'll use that tablecloth to examine it.

61
00:02:01,706 --> 00:02:03,372
As you scan its squares,

62
00:02:03,372 --> 00:02:04,758
a distant memory swims up

63
00:02:04,758 --> 00:02:06,292
from deep within your brain.

64
00:02:06,292 --> 00:02:07,511
According to the theory,

65
00:02:07,511 --> 00:02:09,226
this is because memories are stored

66
00:02:09,226 --> 00:02:10,629
in the form of holograms,

67
00:02:10,629 --> 00:02:11,459
and in holograms,

68
00:02:11,459 --> 00:02:12,681
you only need one fragment

69
00:02:12,681 --> 00:02:14,077
to see the whole picture.

70
00:02:14,077 --> 00:02:16,017
Your brain has identified the tablecloth

71
00:02:16,017 --> 00:02:17,276
with one from the past,

72
00:02:17,276 --> 00:02:18,958
maybe from your grandmother's house.

73
00:02:18,958 --> 00:02:20,772
However, instead of remembering

74
00:02:20,772 --> 00:02:22,705
that you've seen this pattern at your grandmother's,

75
00:02:22,705 --> 00:02:24,745
your brain has summoned up the old memory

76
00:02:24,745 --> 00:02:26,362
without identifying it.

77
00:02:26,362 --> 00:02:28,319
This leaves you stuck with familiarity

78
00:02:28,319 --> 00:02:29,820
but no recollection.

79
00:02:29,820 --> 00:02:31,707
Although you've never been in this restaurant,

80
00:02:31,707 --> 00:02:33,033
you've seen that tablecloth

81
00:02:33,033 --> 00:02:35,330
but are just failing to identify it.

82
00:02:35,330 --> 00:02:36,625
Now, look at this fork.

83
00:02:36,625 --> 00:02:38,039
Are you paying attention?

84
00:02:38,039 --> 00:02:40,168
Our last theory is divided attention,

85
00:02:40,168 --> 00:02:42,012
and it states that déjà vu occurs

86
00:02:42,012 --> 00:02:44,454
when our brain subliminally takes in an environment

87
00:02:44,454 --> 00:02:47,204
while we're distracted by one particular object.

88
00:02:47,204 --> 00:02:48,287
When our attention returns,

89
00:02:48,287 --> 00:02:50,348
we feel as if we've been here before.

90
00:02:50,348 --> 00:02:52,561
For example, just now you focused on the fork

91
00:02:52,561 --> 00:02:53,960
and didn't observe the tablecloth

92
00:02:53,960 --> 00:02:55,136
or the falling waiter.

93
00:02:55,136 --> 00:02:57,013
Although your brain has been recording everything

94
00:02:57,013 --> 00:02:58,235
in your peripheral vision,

95
00:02:58,235 --> 00:03:01,170
it's been doing so below conscious awareness.

96
00:03:01,170 --> 00:03:01,984
When you finally pull yourself

97
00:03:01,984 --> 00:03:03,129
away from the fork,

98
00:03:03,129 --> 00:03:04,264
you think you've been here before

99
00:03:04,264 --> 00:03:05,409
because you have,

100
00:03:05,409 --> 00:03:07,276
you just weren't paying attention.

101
00:03:07,276 --> 00:03:08,481
While all three of these theories

102
00:03:08,481 --> 00:03:10,569
share the common features of déjà vu,

103
00:03:10,569 --> 00:03:12,863
none of them propose to be the conclusive source

104
00:03:12,863 --> 00:03:14,166
of the phenomenon.

105
00:03:14,166 --> 00:03:16,409
Still, while we wait for researchers and inventers

106
00:03:16,409 --> 00:03:17,664
to come up with new ways

107
00:03:17,664 --> 00:03:19,372
to capture this fleeting moment,

108
00:03:19,372 --> 00:03:21,427
we can study the moment ourselves.

109
00:03:21,427 --> 00:03:23,791
After all, most studies of déjà vu

110
00:03:23,791 --> 00:03:25,504
are based on first-hand accounts,

111
00:03:25,504 --> 00:03:27,343
so why can't one be yours?

112
00:03:27,343 --> 00:03:28,673
The next time you get déjà vu,

113
00:03:28,673 --> 00:03:30,427
take a moment to think about it.

114
00:03:30,427 --> 00:03:31,771
Have you been distracted?

115
00:03:31,771 --> 00:03:33,819
Is there a familiar object somewhere?

116
00:03:33,819 --> 00:03:36,021
Is your brain just acting slow?

117
00:03:36,021 --> 00:03:38,849
Or is it something else?