0:00:06.151,0:00:08.290 Have you experienced déjà vu? 0:00:08.290,0:00:10.640 It's that shadowy feeling you get 0:00:10.640,0:00:12.564 when a situation seems familiar. 0:00:12.564,0:00:14.069 A scene in a restaurant plays out 0:00:14.069,0:00:15.551 exactly as you remember. 0:00:15.551,0:00:17.011 The world moves like a ballet 0:00:17.011,0:00:18.359 you've choreographed, 0:00:18.359,0:00:20.670 but the sequence can't be based on a past experience 0:00:20.670,0:00:23.400 because you've never eaten here before. 0:00:23.400,0:00:24.755 This is the first time you've had clams, 0:00:24.755,0:00:26.761 so what's going on? 0:00:26.761,0:00:30.486 Unfortunately there isn't one single explanation for déjà vu. 0:00:30.486,0:00:31.873 The experience is brief 0:00:31.873,0:00:32.927 and occurs without notice, 0:00:32.927,0:00:34.479 making it nearly impossible 0:00:34.479,0:00:36.710 for scientists to record and study it. 0:00:36.710,0:00:38.277 Scientists can't simply sit around 0:00:38.277,0:00:39.984 and wait for it to happen to them -- 0:00:39.984,0:00:41.223 this could take years. 0:00:41.223,0:00:43.365 It has no physical manifestations 0:00:43.365,0:00:45.492 and in studies, it's described by the subject 0:00:45.492,0:00:47.567 as a sensation or feeling. 0:00:47.567,0:00:49.413 Because of this lack of hard evidence, 0:00:49.413,0:00:52.406 there's been a surplus of speculation over the years. 0:00:52.406,0:00:54.748 Since Emile Boirac introduced déjà vu 0:00:54.748,0:00:57.083 as a French term meaning already seen, 0:00:57.083,0:00:58.880 more than 40 theories attempt 0:00:58.880,0:01:00.465 to explain this phenomenon. 0:01:00.465,0:01:03.760 Still, recent advancements in neuroimaging 0:01:03.760,0:01:05.042 and cognitive psychology narrow down 0:01:05.042,0:01:06.665 the field of prospects. 0:01:06.665,0:01:07.559 Let's walk through 0:01:07.559,0:01:09.379 three of today's more prevalent theories, 0:01:09.379,0:01:11.830 using the same restaurant setting for each. 0:01:11.830,0:01:13.825 First up is dual processing. 0:01:13.825,0:01:14.786 We'll need an action. 0:01:14.786,0:01:17.395 Let's go with a waiter dropping a tray of dishes. 0:01:17.395,0:01:18.611 As the scene unfolds, 0:01:18.611,0:01:20.180 your brain's hemispheres process 0:01:20.180,0:01:21.715 a flurry of information: 0:01:21.715,0:01:23.231 the waiter's flailing arms, 0:01:23.231,0:01:24.273 his cry for help, 0:01:24.273,0:01:25.775 the smell of pasta. 0:01:25.775,0:01:26.897 Within milliseconds, 0:01:26.897,0:01:28.894 this information zips through pathways 0:01:28.894,0:01:31.313 and is processed into a single moment. 0:01:31.313,0:01:33.890 Most of the time, everything is recorded in-sync. 0:01:33.890,0:01:35.225 However, this theory asserts 0:01:35.225,0:01:38.020 that déjà vu occurs when there's a slight delay 0:01:38.020,0:01:40.321 in information from one of these pathways. 0:01:40.321,0:01:41.541 The difference in arrival times 0:01:41.541,0:01:43.876 causes the brain to interpret the late information 0:01:43.876,0:01:45.766 as a separate event. 0:01:45.766,0:01:48.042 When it plays over the already-recorded moment, 0:01:48.042,0:01:49.783 it feels as if it's happened before 0:01:49.783,0:01:52.072 because, in a sense, it has. 0:01:52.670,0:01:55.373 Our next theory deals with a confusion of the past 0:01:55.373,0:01:57.427 rather than a mistake in the present. 0:01:57.427,0:01:59.261 This is the hologram theory, 0:01:59.261,0:02:01.706 and we'll use that tablecloth to examine it. 0:02:01.706,0:02:03.372 As you scan its squares, 0:02:03.372,0:02:04.758 a distant memory swims up 0:02:04.758,0:02:06.292 from deep within your brain. 0:02:06.292,0:02:07.511 According to the theory, 0:02:07.511,0:02:09.226 this is because memories are stored 0:02:09.226,0:02:10.629 in the form of holograms, 0:02:10.629,0:02:11.459 and in holograms, 0:02:11.459,0:02:12.681 you only need one fragment 0:02:12.681,0:02:14.077 to see the whole picture. 0:02:14.077,0:02:16.017 Your brain has identified the tablecloth 0:02:16.017,0:02:17.276 with one from the past, 0:02:17.276,0:02:18.958 maybe from your grandmother's house. 0:02:18.958,0:02:20.772 However, instead of remembering 0:02:20.772,0:02:22.705 that you've seen this pattern at your grandmother's, 0:02:22.705,0:02:24.745 your brain has summoned up the old memory 0:02:24.745,0:02:26.362 without identifying it. 0:02:26.362,0:02:28.319 This leaves you stuck with familiarity 0:02:28.319,0:02:29.820 but no recollection. 0:02:29.820,0:02:31.707 Although you've never been in this restaurant, 0:02:31.707,0:02:33.033 you've seen that tablecloth 0:02:33.033,0:02:35.330 but are just failing to identify it. 0:02:35.330,0:02:36.625 Now, look at this fork. 0:02:36.625,0:02:38.039 Are you paying attention? 0:02:38.039,0:02:40.168 Our last theory is divided attention, 0:02:40.168,0:02:42.012 and it states that déjà vu occurs 0:02:42.012,0:02:44.454 when our brain subliminally takes in an environment 0:02:44.454,0:02:47.204 while we're distracted by one particular object. 0:02:47.204,0:02:48.287 When our attention returns, 0:02:48.287,0:02:50.348 we feel as if we've been here before. 0:02:50.348,0:02:52.561 For example, just now you focused on the fork 0:02:52.561,0:02:53.960 and didn't observe the tablecloth 0:02:53.960,0:02:55.136 or the falling waiter. 0:02:55.136,0:02:57.013 Although your brain has been recording everything 0:02:57.013,0:02:58.235 in your peripheral vision, 0:02:58.235,0:03:01.170 it's been doing so below conscious awareness. 0:03:01.170,0:03:01.984 When you finally pull yourself 0:03:01.984,0:03:03.129 away from the fork, 0:03:03.129,0:03:04.264 you think you've been here before 0:03:04.264,0:03:05.409 because you have, 0:03:05.409,0:03:07.276 you just weren't paying attention. 0:03:07.276,0:03:08.481 While all three of these theories 0:03:08.481,0:03:10.569 share the common features of déjà vu, 0:03:10.569,0:03:12.863 none of them propose to be the conclusive source 0:03:12.863,0:03:14.166 of the phenomenon. 0:03:14.166,0:03:16.409 Still, while we wait for researchers and inventers 0:03:16.409,0:03:17.664 to come up with new ways 0:03:17.664,0:03:19.372 to capture this fleeting moment, 0:03:19.372,0:03:21.427 we can study the moment ourselves. 0:03:21.427,0:03:23.791 After all, most studies of déjà vu 0:03:23.791,0:03:25.504 are based on first-hand accounts, 0:03:25.504,0:03:27.343 so why can't one be yours? 0:03:27.343,0:03:28.673 The next time you get déjà vu, 0:03:28.673,0:03:30.427 take a moment to think about it. 0:03:30.427,0:03:31.771 Have you been distracted? 0:03:31.771,0:03:33.819 Is there a familiar object somewhere? 0:03:33.819,0:03:36.021 Is your brain just acting slow? 0:03:36.021,0:03:38.849 Or is it something else?