1 00:00:10,316 --> 00:00:14,474 Once there was a Stone Age, a Bronze Age 2 00:00:14,474 --> 00:00:18,070 and now we are in the middle of the Plastic Age. 3 00:00:18,070 --> 00:00:23,177 Because every year we produce about 300,000,000 tons of plastic 4 00:00:23,177 --> 00:00:29,530 and fraction of that enters rivers, water ways and eventually the oceans. 5 00:00:29,530 --> 00:00:33,216 If you want to eat a biscuit nowadays 6 00:00:33,216 --> 00:00:36,425 we have to buy a biscuit within a plastic wrapper, 7 00:00:36,425 --> 00:00:39,343 within a plastic tray, within a cardboard box, 8 00:00:39,343 --> 00:00:42,362 within a plastic foil, within a plastic bag. 9 00:00:42,362 --> 00:00:46,263 It's not hazardous nuclear waste -- it's a biscuit. 10 00:00:46,263 --> 00:00:53,337 And this is me. I love diving 11 00:00:53,337 --> 00:00:57,802 just taking you through my holiday slides here. 12 00:00:57,802 --> 00:01:04,709 This is at the pristine Azores Islands and this is how their beaches look. 13 00:01:04,709 --> 00:01:09,068 Covered with plastic fragments. 14 00:01:09,068 --> 00:01:12,385 Due to sun and waves over the years 15 00:01:12,385 --> 00:01:18,266 the garbage breaks down into ever smaller pieces, but remains plastic. 16 00:01:18,778 --> 00:01:28,037 And, well interestingly, you don't see a lot of red particles in here 17 00:01:28,410 --> 00:01:31,976 because those look like food 18 00:01:31,976 --> 00:01:35,548 to birds more than any other color. 19 00:01:35,548 --> 00:01:39,467 So this is the result. 20 00:01:39,467 --> 00:01:46,140 And well, the debris primarily collects at these 5 rotating currents 21 00:01:46,320 --> 00:01:50,785 called the gyres, where it doesn't only directly kills sea life, 22 00:01:50,785 --> 00:01:57,869 but due to the absorption of PCBs and DDTs, also poisons the food chain. 23 00:01:58,039 --> 00:02:01,828 A food chain that includes us -- humans. 24 00:02:02,982 --> 00:02:05,925 And while diving in Greece 25 00:02:06,109 --> 00:02:11,279 I came across more plastic bags than fish 26 00:02:11,279 --> 00:02:14,799 and astounded by the depressing sights 27 00:02:14,876 --> 00:02:19,334 my Scottish dive buddy turned to me and said, 28 00:02:19,334 --> 00:02:23,906 "A lot of jellyfish is here, dear. Seen about a thousand." 29 00:02:23,906 --> 00:02:26,710 There were no jellyfish. 30 00:02:26,710 --> 00:02:31,039 I won't talk about environmental issues in general. 31 00:02:31,060 --> 00:02:34,212 I think the common response is, well that's a long way off. 32 00:02:34,257 --> 00:02:36,356 That's for our children to worry about. 33 00:02:36,356 --> 00:02:39,387 So hello, here I am. 34 00:02:41,264 --> 00:02:44,306 Why don't we just clean it up? 35 00:02:44,306 --> 00:02:45,953 There are a multiple reasons why 36 00:02:45,953 --> 00:02:50,392 current plastic pollution researchers believe we should focus on prevention, 37 00:02:50,409 --> 00:02:55,794 for example through education, rather than attempting a cleanup operation. 38 00:02:55,921 --> 00:03:01,012 Because we would need to deal with 5 colossal areas -- each moving around. 39 00:03:01,123 --> 00:03:09,201 Plastic sizes ranging from these massive ghost nets to molecules -- bycatches and emissions. 40 00:03:09,336 --> 00:03:12,966 Furthermore we would need to get all the plastic back to land. 41 00:03:12,966 --> 00:03:16,228 It would need to be financially realistic and 42 00:03:16,228 --> 00:03:24,094 in fact the total amount of plastic within the gyres [is] unknown. 43 00:03:24,094 --> 00:03:28,736 But about a year ago, when I was on my way to the hairdresser's 44 00:03:28,846 --> 00:03:36,527 and I must admit I don't go there often but I had this little epiphany. 45 00:03:36,639 --> 00:03:39,076 I saw even old people throwing rubbish in the water 46 00:03:39,076 --> 00:03:44,551 and I thought, well some people will just never learn, will they? 47 00:03:44,551 --> 00:03:48,474 We'll need the combination of both roads 48 00:03:48,474 --> 00:03:51,236 and we'll need them soon. 49 00:03:51,236 --> 00:03:53,611 So then I simply used this list of concerns 50 00:03:53,611 --> 00:03:58,694 as challenges, and in fact a week later as a school assignment, 51 00:03:58,694 --> 00:04:01,244 I had a chance to spend a lot of time 52 00:04:01,244 --> 00:04:05,441 on a subject of choice together with a friend of mine. 53 00:04:05,441 --> 00:04:07,616 And this gave me the perfect opportunity 54 00:04:07,616 --> 00:04:12,408 to do new and fundamental research regarding plastic pollution. 55 00:04:12,408 --> 00:04:16,912 I then went on a holiday to Greece taking this manta trawl with me, 56 00:04:16,912 --> 00:04:20,099 which is the common device for sampling plastic, 57 00:04:20,099 --> 00:04:24,047 and so I had to leave home all my clothes 58 00:04:24,047 --> 00:04:27,309 due to low cost airlines weight limit policies. 59 00:04:27,309 --> 00:04:32,803 Well, the trawl we built, however, is 15 times finer 60 00:04:32,803 --> 00:04:36,535 than the regular one. And what we discovered was 61 00:04:36,535 --> 00:04:42,010 that the count of those minute particles is in fact 40 times higher 62 00:04:42,010 --> 00:04:46,710 than the larger particles. So we have to take these small plastics out, 63 00:04:46,710 --> 00:04:52,175 but then we wouldn't want to take the important plankton out as well. 64 00:04:52,175 --> 00:04:57,978 Luckily these could simply be separated using centrifugal forces. 65 00:04:57,978 --> 00:05:02,753 However, nobody knew how much G forces common zoo-plankton could survive. 66 00:05:02,753 --> 00:05:11,052 So we took the trawl out again, and we didn't have a boat, 67 00:05:11,052 --> 00:05:16,467 so and we tested it, and in fact they can survive over 50 Gs, which is more than enough 68 00:05:16,467 --> 00:05:20,470 for successful separation. 69 00:05:20,470 --> 00:05:24,544 And then in order to know up to which depth the ocean surface should be cleaned, 70 00:05:24,544 --> 00:05:28,329 we designed and built something that I call the multilevel trawl. 71 00:05:28,329 --> 00:05:33,291 We basically stuck ten trawls on top of each other. 72 00:05:33,291 --> 00:05:36,148 Here you can see us testing that on the North Sea, 73 00:05:36,148 --> 00:05:39,972 I thought it was a great day -- I was the only one who didn't get sick 74 00:05:39,972 --> 00:05:47,547 but then the so perfectly working trawl broke and 75 00:05:47,547 --> 00:05:52,733 of course we didn't quit there, because I believe you can't clean up something 76 00:05:52,733 --> 00:05:55,782 you don't know the size of. 77 00:05:55,782 --> 00:06:00,809 I've heard the estimations ranging from several hundred thousand tons 78 00:06:00,809 --> 00:06:05,429 all the way to a hundred million tons. 79 00:06:05,890 --> 00:06:11,068 I knew we really need a better estimate -- some scientific data. 80 00:06:11,068 --> 00:06:15,511 So then I simply contacted some professors from the universities 81 00:06:15,511 --> 00:06:20,907 Delft, Utrecht and Hawaii -- who then actually helped us in determining 82 00:06:20,907 --> 00:06:24,677 how much plastic there is in the top layers of the gyres. 83 00:06:24,677 --> 00:06:35,717 The result -- a whopping 7.25 million tons of extractable plastic in 2020. 84 00:06:35,717 --> 00:06:42,924 That's the weight of 1,000 Eiffel towers floating in the gyres. 85 00:06:42,924 --> 00:06:47,888 Now, researcher and effect discoverer of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, Charles Moore 86 00:06:47,888 --> 00:06:55,237 estimates it would take 79,000 years to remediate that. 87 00:06:55,237 --> 00:07:00,320 However, I believe the Great Pacific Garbage Patch 88 00:07:00,320 --> 00:07:05,991 can completely clean itself in just 5 years. 89 00:07:05,991 --> 00:07:12,262 And that is a difference of 78,995 years. 90 00:07:14,592 --> 00:07:18,734 Well, of course, this is the conventional idea of extracting litter, 91 00:07:18,734 --> 00:07:23,089 so you have a vessel and a net fishing for plastic. 92 00:07:23,089 --> 00:07:27,174 Of course multiple vessels could be used to cover a larger area, 93 00:07:27,174 --> 00:07:30,900 but by spanning booms between those vessels, 94 00:07:30,900 --> 00:07:33,511 suddenly a much larger area would be covered, 95 00:07:33,511 --> 00:07:37,540 because the essence is not to catch the debris, but divert it. 96 00:07:37,540 --> 00:07:43,702 Because there is no mesh size, we can even get out the smallest particles, 97 00:07:43,702 --> 00:07:47,739 and since all organisms can simply move under the booms, 98 00:07:47,739 --> 00:07:54,954 we'll be able to eliminate bycatches by 99.98%. 99 00:07:55,185 --> 00:08:00,042 But, if we want to do something different 100 00:08:00,042 --> 00:08:03,871 shouldn't we also have to think differently. 101 00:08:03,871 --> 00:08:11,142 For example then: the absorption of PCBs by plastic is not such a bad thing, 102 00:08:11,773 --> 00:08:14,303 it's a good thing. 103 00:08:14,471 --> 00:08:19,228 Get all the plastic out and simultaneously remove tons and tons 104 00:08:19,228 --> 00:08:24,290 of persistent organic pollutants from the marine environment. 105 00:08:24,290 --> 00:08:31,694 But how would we minimize environmental, financial and transportation cost then? 106 00:08:31,694 --> 00:08:34,948 Let's use our enemy to our advantage, OK? 107 00:08:34,948 --> 00:08:41,187 The oceanic currents moving around is not an obstacle -- it's a solution. 108 00:08:41,187 --> 00:08:49,526 Why move through the oceans if the oceans can move through you? 109 00:08:49,526 --> 00:08:54,057 By fixing the "ships" to the seabed and letting the rotating currents 110 00:08:54,057 --> 00:09:01,337 do their work -- vast amounts of funds, manpower and emissions will be saved. 111 00:09:01,337 --> 00:09:05,332 The platforms will, of course, be completely self-supportive 112 00:09:05,332 --> 00:09:09,024 receiving their energy from sun, currents and waves. 113 00:09:09,024 --> 00:09:14,372 And inspired by my diving at the Azores, It now actually seems 114 00:09:14,372 --> 00:09:18,859 that the best shape for these platforms is that of a Manta Ray, 115 00:09:18,859 --> 00:09:22,861 by letting its wings sway like a real manta, 116 00:09:22,861 --> 00:09:26,529 we can assure contact of the inlet with the surface 117 00:09:26,529 --> 00:09:30,187 even in the roughest weather. 118 00:09:30,803 --> 00:09:41,526 Well, imagine a zigzag array of just 24 of these platforms cleaning an entire ocean. 119 00:09:41,526 --> 00:09:45,278 Let's make a comparison, OK? 120 00:09:45,355 --> 00:09:48,034 These are the beaches of Hong Kong, earlier this year. 121 00:09:48,034 --> 00:09:53,558 The largest plastic spill in history. And this is their source, 122 00:09:53,558 --> 00:09:56,599 just 6 containers. 123 00:09:56,599 --> 00:09:59,506 How much could we get out? 124 00:09:59,506 --> 00:10:05,173 Over 55 of these containers per day. 125 00:10:05,173 --> 00:10:16,083 Not only is plastic directly responsible for over a billion USD in vessel damages a year, 126 00:10:16,083 --> 00:10:19,545 no, the awesome surprise for me was that 127 00:10:19,607 --> 00:10:28,307 if we sell the plastics retrieved from the 5 gyres we'd make over $500,000,000 128 00:10:28,307 --> 00:10:33,104 and this is in fact more than the plan would cost to execute. 129 00:10:33,104 --> 00:10:36,820 In other words -- it's profitable. 130 00:10:36,820 --> 00:10:41,792 But I believe that the key thing is that 131 00:10:41,792 --> 00:10:48,490 only if we realize change is more important than money, money will come. 132 00:10:48,490 --> 00:10:58,444 And yes, it will be one of the largest environmental rescue operations yet, but we created this mess. 133 00:10:58,444 --> 00:11:05,647 Heck, we even invented this new material first before we made this mess, 134 00:11:05,647 --> 00:11:12,407 so please don't tell me we can't clean this up together. 135 00:11:12,407 --> 00:11:14,752 Thank you very much. 136 00:11:14,860 --> 00:11:17,598 (Applause)