0:00:00.602,0:00:04.160 The first patient to ever be [br]treated with an antibiotic 0:00:04.160,0:00:05.693 was a policeman in Oxford. 0:00:05.693,0:00:07.800 On his day off from work, 0:00:07.800,0:00:11.173 he was scratched by a rose thorn[br]while working in the garden. 0:00:11.173,0:00:14.848 That small scratch became infected. 0:00:14.848,0:00:17.163 Over the next few days, [br]his head was swollen 0:00:17.163,0:00:18.884 with abscesses, 0:00:18.884,0:00:21.167 and in fact his eye was so infected 0:00:21.167,0:00:23.070 that they had to take it out, 0:00:23.070,0:00:26.050 and by February of 1941, 0:00:26.050,0:00:28.487 this poor man was on the verge of dying. 0:00:28.487,0:00:31.685 He was at Radcliffe Infirmary in Oxford, 0:00:31.685,0:00:33.991 and fortunately for him, 0:00:33.991,0:00:35.041 a small team of doctors 0:00:35.041,0:00:36.930 led by a Dr. Howard Florey 0:00:36.930,0:00:38.997 had managed to synthesize 0:00:38.997,0:00:41.820 a very small amount of penicillin, 0:00:41.820,0:00:43.901 a drug that had been discovered 0:00:43.901,0:00:46.223 12 years before by Alexander Fleming 0:00:46.223,0:00:49.930 but had never actually been [br]used to treat a human, 0:00:49.930,0:00:52.340 and indeed no one even [br]knew if the drug would work, 0:00:52.340,0:00:55.980 if it was full of impurities [br]that would kill the patient, 0:00:55.980,0:00:57.894 but Florey and his team figured 0:00:57.894,0:00:59.616 if they had to use it, [br]they might as well use it 0:00:59.616,0:01:02.181 on someone who was going to die anyway. 0:01:02.181,0:01:05.836 So they gave Albert Alexander, 0:01:05.836,0:01:08.715 this Oxford policeman, the drug, 0:01:08.715,0:01:11.132 and within 24 hours, 0:01:11.132,0:01:13.394 he started getting better. 0:01:13.394,0:01:17.370 His fever went down, [br]his appetite came back. 0:01:17.370,0:01:19.683 Second day, he was doing much better. 0:01:19.683,0:01:21.921 They were starting to [br]run out of penicillin, 0:01:21.921,0:01:23.983 so what they would do [br]was run with his urine 0:01:23.983,0:01:26.833 across the road to re-synthesize [br]the penicillin from his urine 0:01:26.833,0:01:28.768 and give it back to him, 0:01:28.768,0:01:30.016 and that worked. 0:01:30.016,0:01:32.496 Day four, well on the way to recovery. 0:01:32.496,0:01:34.134 This was a miracle. 0:01:34.134,0:01:38.370 Day five, they ran out of penicillin, 0:01:38.370,0:01:40.637 and the poor man died. 0:01:40.637,0:01:43.350 So that story didn't end that well, 0:01:43.350,0:01:47.700 but fortunately for [br]millions of other people, 0:01:47.700,0:01:50.706 like this child who was treated [br]again in the early 1940s, 0:01:50.706,0:01:53.740 who was again dying of a sepsis, 0:01:53.740,0:01:56.890 and within just six days, you can see, 0:01:56.890,0:02:00.243 recovered thanks to this [br]wonder drug, penicillin. 0:02:00.243,0:02:02.201 Millions have lived, 0:02:02.201,0:02:05.785 and global health has been transformed. 0:02:05.785,0:02:08.578 Now, antibiotics have been used 0:02:08.578,0:02:11.705 for patients like this, 0:02:11.705,0:02:13.842 but they've also been [br]used rather frivolously 0:02:13.842,0:02:15.586 in some instances, 0:02:15.586,0:02:17.949 for treating someone [br]with just a cold or the flu, 0:02:17.949,0:02:20.423 which they might not have [br]responded to an antibiotic, 0:02:20.423,0:02:24.161 and they've also been [br]used in large quantities 0:02:24.161,0:02:27.803 sub-therapeutically, which[br]means in small concentrations, 0:02:27.803,0:02:30.986 to make chicken and hogs grow faster. 0:02:30.986,0:02:34.552 Just to save a few pennies[br]on the price of meat, 0:02:34.552,0:02:37.252 we've spent a lot of [br]antibiotics on animals, 0:02:37.252,0:02:39.614 not for treatment, not for sick animals, 0:02:39.614,0:02:42.730 but primarily for growth promotion. 0:02:42.730,0:02:45.587 Now, what did that lead us to? 0:02:45.587,0:02:48.298 Basically, the massive use of antibiotics 0:02:48.298,0:02:49.783 around the world 0:02:49.783,0:02:53.587 has imposed such large[br]selection pressure on bacteria 0:02:53.587,0:02:56.240 that resistance is now a problem, 0:02:56.240,0:02:58.010 because we've now selected for just 0:02:58.010,0:02:59.985 the resistant bacteria. 0:02:59.985,0:03:02.825 And I'm sure you've all read[br]about this in the newspapers, 0:03:02.825,0:03:04.629 you've seen this in every magazine 0:03:04.629,0:03:06.528 that you come across, 0:03:06.528,0:03:08.328 but I really want you to appreciate 0:03:08.328,0:03:10.499 the significance of this problem. 0:03:10.499,0:03:11.950 This is serious. 0:03:11.950,0:03:16.766 The next slide I'm about to show you is [br]of carbapenem resistance in acinetobacter. 0:03:16.766,0:03:19.154 Acinetobacter is a nasty hospital bug, 0:03:19.154,0:03:20.487 and carbapenem is pretty much 0:03:20.487,0:03:22.265 the strongest class of antibiotics 0:03:22.265,0:03:24.721 that we can throw at this bug. 0:03:24.721,0:03:27.990 And you can see in 1999 0:03:27.990,0:03:30.185 this is the pattern of resistance, 0:03:30.185,0:03:33.218 mostly under about 10 percent[br]across the United States. 0:03:33.218,0:03:37.215 Now watch what happens [br]when we play the video. 0:03:46.461,0:03:48.516 So I don't know where you live, 0:03:48.516,0:03:51.418 but wherever it is, it certainly is a lot worse now 0:03:51.418,0:03:53.915 than it was in 1999, 0:03:53.915,0:03:57.886 and that is the problem of antibiotic resistance. 0:03:57.886,0:03:59.573 It's a global issue 0:03:59.573,0:04:02.001 affecting both rich and poor countries, 0:04:02.001,0:04:04.242 and at the heart of it, [br]you might say, well, 0:04:04.242,0:04:06.170 isn't this really just a medical issue? 0:04:06.170,0:04:08.731 If we taught doctors how not [br]to use antibiotics as much, 0:04:08.731,0:04:11.676 if we taught patients how [br]not to demand antibiotics, 0:04:11.676,0:04:13.131 perhaps this really wouldn't be an issue, 0:04:13.131,0:04:15.120 and maybe the pharmaceutical companies 0:04:15.120,0:04:16.875 should be working harder to develop 0:04:16.875,0:04:18.511 more antibiotics. 0:04:18.511,0:04:21.890 Now, it turns out that there's something [br]fundamental about antibiotics 0:04:21.890,0:04:23.673 which makes it different from other drugs, 0:04:23.673,0:04:25.694 which is that if I misuse antibiotics 0:04:25.694,0:04:27.431 or I use antibiotics, 0:04:27.431,0:04:31.291 not only am I affected but [br]others are affected as well, 0:04:31.291,0:04:33.629 in the same way as if I [br]choose to drive to work 0:04:33.629,0:04:36.268 or take a plane to go somewhere, 0:04:36.268,0:04:38.242 that the costs I impose on others 0:04:38.242,0:04:40.682 through global climate change go everywhere, 0:04:40.682,0:04:43.455 and I don't necessarily take[br]these costs into consideration. 0:04:43.455,0:04:46.334 This is what economists might [br]call a problem of the commons, 0:04:46.334,0:04:48.314 and the problem of the commons is exactly 0:04:48.314,0:04:50.739 what we face in the case [br]of antibiotics as well: 0:04:50.739,0:04:52.889 that we don't consider — 0:04:52.889,0:04:55.891 and we, including individuals, patients, 0:04:55.891,0:04:59.050 hospitals, entire health systems — 0:04:59.050,0:05:01.198 do not consider the costs [br]that they impose on others 0:05:01.198,0:05:03.554 by the way antibiotics are actually used. 0:05:03.554,0:05:05.959 Now, that's a problem that's similar 0:05:05.959,0:05:07.941 to another area that we all know about, 0:05:07.941,0:05:09.870 which is of fuel use and energy, 0:05:09.870,0:05:11.369 and of course energy use 0:05:11.369,0:05:14.451 both depletes energy as well as 0:05:14.451,0:05:17.713 leads to local pollution [br]and climate change. 0:05:17.713,0:05:19.523 And typically, in the case of energy, 0:05:19.523,0:05:21.831 there are two ways in which[br]you can deal with the problem. 0:05:21.831,0:05:25.576 One is, we can make better[br]use of the oil that we have, 0:05:25.576,0:05:27.691 and that's analogous to making better use 0:05:27.691,0:05:29.239 of existing antibiotics, 0:05:29.239,0:05:30.930 and we can do this in a number of ways 0:05:30.930,0:05:33.160 that we'll talk about in a second, 0:05:33.160,0:05:36.847 but the other option is the [br]"drill, baby, drill" option, 0:05:36.847,0:05:41.038 which in the case of antibiotics [br]is to go find new antibiotics. 0:05:41.050,0:05:43.100 Now, these are not separate. 0:05:43.100,0:05:46.522 They're related, because if we invest heavily 0:05:46.522,0:05:48.806 in new oil wells, 0:05:48.806,0:05:51.760 we reduce the incentives [br]for conservation of oil 0:05:51.760,0:05:54.286 in the same way that's going [br]to happen for antibiotics. 0:05:54.286,0:05:56.454 The reverse is also going [br]to happen, which is that 0:05:56.454,0:05:58.792 if we use our antibiotics appropriately, 0:05:58.792,0:06:01.573 we don't necessarily have [br]to make the investments 0:06:01.573,0:06:03.750 in new drug development. 0:06:03.750,0:06:06.466 And if you thought that these two were entirely, 0:06:06.466,0:06:08.288 fully balanced between these two options, 0:06:08.288,0:06:10.471 you might consider the fact that 0:06:10.471,0:06:12.743 this is really a game that we're playing. 0:06:12.743,0:06:15.184 The game is really one of coevolution, 0:06:15.184,0:06:18.116 and coevolution is, in [br]this particular picture, 0:06:18.116,0:06:20.472 between cheetahs and gazelles. 0:06:20.472,0:06:22.090 Cheetahs have evolved to run faster, 0:06:22.090,0:06:23.667 because if they didn't run faster, 0:06:23.667,0:06:25.613 they wouldn't get any lunch. 0:06:25.613,0:06:28.300 Gazelles have evolved to run faster because 0:06:28.300,0:06:31.509 if they don't run faster, they would be lunch. 0:06:31.509,0:06:34.395 Now, this is the game we're[br]playing against the bacteria, 0:06:34.395,0:06:36.452 except we're not the cheetahs, 0:06:36.452,0:06:37.929 we're the gazelles, 0:06:37.929,0:06:40.716 and the bacteria would, 0:06:40.716,0:06:42.549 just in the course of this little talk, 0:06:42.549,0:06:43.975 would have had kids and grandkids 0:06:43.975,0:06:46.360 and figured out how to be resistant 0:06:46.360,0:06:48.834 just by selection and trial and error, 0:06:48.834,0:06:50.746 trying it over and over again. 0:06:50.746,0:06:54.518 Whereas how do we stay [br]ahead of the bacteria? 0:06:54.518,0:06:56.572 We have drug discovery processes, 0:06:56.572,0:06:58.202 screening molecules, 0:06:58.202,0:06:59.930 we have clinical trials, 0:06:59.930,0:07:02.078 and then, when we think we have a drug, 0:07:02.078,0:07:05.823 then we have the FDA regulatory process. 0:07:05.823,0:07:08.001 And once we go through all of that, 0:07:08.001,0:07:10.266 then we try to stay one step ahead 0:07:10.266,0:07:12.562 of the bacteria. 0:07:12.562,0:07:15.339 Now, this is clearly not a [br]game that can be sustained, 0:07:15.339,0:07:16.476 or one that we can win 0:07:16.476,0:07:18.313 by simply innovating to stay ahead. 0:07:18.313,0:07:21.618 We've got to slow the pace of coevolution down, 0:07:21.618,0:07:25.300 and there are ideas that we [br]can borrow from energy 0:07:25.300,0:07:27.070 that are helpful in thinking about 0:07:27.070,0:07:28.607 how we might want to do this in the case 0:07:28.607,0:07:30.153 of antibiotics as well. 0:07:30.153,0:07:32.393 Now, if you think about how we deal with 0:07:32.393,0:07:33.816 energy pricing, for instance, 0:07:33.816,0:07:35.665 we consider emissions taxes, 0:07:35.665,0:07:38.249 which means we're imposing [br]the costs of pollution 0:07:38.249,0:07:41.080 on people who actually use that energy. 0:07:41.080,0:07:44.060 We might consider doing that for antibiotics as well, 0:07:44.060,0:07:46.771 and perhaps that would make sure that antibiotics 0:07:46.771,0:07:49.172 actually get used appropriately. 0:07:49.172,0:07:51.200 There are clean energy subsidies, 0:07:51.200,0:07:54.255 which are to switch to fuels[br]which don't pollute as much 0:07:54.255,0:07:57.100 or perhaps don't need fossil fuels. 0:07:57.100,0:07:59.960 Now, the analogy here is, perhaps we need 0:07:59.960,0:08:02.220 to move away from using antibiotics, 0:08:02.220,0:08:05.936 and if you think about it, what are [br]good substitutes for antibiotics? 0:08:05.936,0:08:08.100 Well, turns out that anything that reduces 0:08:08.100,0:08:10.343 the need for the antibiotic would really work, 0:08:10.343,0:08:13.485 so that could include improving[br]hospital infection control 0:08:13.485,0:08:16.380 or vaccinating people, 0:08:16.380,0:08:18.677 particularly against [br]the seasonal influenza. 0:08:18.677,0:08:21.208 And the seasonal flu is probably 0:08:21.208,0:08:24.212 the biggest driver of antibiotic use, 0:08:24.212,0:08:27.131 both in this country as well[br]as in many other countries, 0:08:27.131,0:08:29.151 and that could really help. 0:08:29.151,0:08:33.254 A third option might include[br]something like tradeable permits. 0:08:33.254,0:08:37.500 And these seem like faraway scenarios, 0:08:37.500,0:08:39.927 but if you consider the [br]fact that we might not 0:08:39.927,0:08:43.310 have antibiotics for many [br]people who have infections, 0:08:43.310,0:08:45.547 we might consider the fact that we might 0:08:45.547,0:08:47.858 want to allocate who actually gets to use 0:08:47.858,0:08:50.572 some of these antibiotics over others, 0:08:50.572,0:08:53.898 and some of these might have to[br]be on the basis of clinical need, 0:08:53.898,0:08:55.833 but also on the basis of pricing. 0:08:55.833,0:08:57.743 And certainly consumer education works. 0:08:57.743,0:09:00.344 Very often, people overuse antibiotics 0:09:00.344,0:09:02.621 or prescribe too much without necessarily 0:09:02.621,0:09:04.227 knowing that they do so, 0:09:04.227,0:09:05.658 and feedback mechanisms 0:09:05.658,0:09:07.560 have been found to be useful, 0:09:07.560,0:09:09.489 both on energy — 0:09:09.489,0:09:11.029 When you tell someone that they're using 0:09:11.029,0:09:12.946 a lot of energy during peak hour, 0:09:12.946,0:09:14.416 they tend to cut back, 0:09:14.416,0:09:16.183 and the same sort of example has been performed 0:09:16.183,0:09:17.993 even in the case of antibiotics. 0:09:17.993,0:09:19.974 A hospital in St. Louis basically would put up 0:09:19.974,0:09:24.166 on a chart the names of surgeons 0:09:24.166,0:09:26.385 in the ordering of how much antibiotics they'd used 0:09:26.385,0:09:28.329 in the previous month, 0:09:28.329,0:09:30.671 and this was purely an [br]informational feedback, 0:09:30.671,0:09:31.854 there was no shaming, 0:09:31.854,0:09:33.989 but essentially that provided [br]some information back 0:09:33.989,0:09:35.943 to surgeons that maybe they could rethink 0:09:35.943,0:09:38.172 how they were using antibiotics. 0:09:38.172,0:09:40.186 Now, there's a lot that can be done 0:09:40.186,0:09:42.335 on the supply side as well. 0:09:42.335,0:09:44.112 If you look at the price of penicillin, 0:09:44.112,0:09:45.763 the cost per day is about 10 cents. 0:09:45.763,0:09:47.521 It's a fairly cheap drug. 0:09:47.521,0:09:49.658 If you take drugs that have[br]been introduced since then — 0:09:49.658,0:09:52.302 linezolid or daptomycin — 0:09:52.302,0:09:54.180 those are significantly more expensive, 0:09:54.180,0:09:59.631 so to a world that has been used to[br]paying 10 cents a day for antibiotics, 0:09:59.633,0:10:02.163 the idea of paying 180 dollars per day 0:10:02.163,0:10:03.730 seems like a lot. 0:10:03.730,0:10:05.717 But what is that really telling us? 0:10:05.717,0:10:07.682 That price is telling us 0:10:07.682,0:10:09.580 that we should no longer 0:10:09.580,0:10:13.697 take cheap, effective [br]antibiotics as a given 0:10:13.697,0:10:15.464 into the foreseeable future, 0:10:15.464,0:10:17.994 and that price is a signal to us 0:10:17.994,0:10:19.603 that perhaps we need to be paying 0:10:19.603,0:10:22.156 much more attention to conservation. 0:10:22.156,0:10:24.860 That price is also a signal 0:10:24.860,0:10:27.735 that maybe we need to start[br]looking at other technologies, 0:10:27.735,0:10:30.387 in the same way that [br]gasoline prices are a signal 0:10:30.387,0:10:32.977 and an impetus, to, say, 0:10:32.977,0:10:34.845 the development of electric cars. 0:10:34.845,0:10:36.622 Prices are important signals 0:10:36.622,0:10:38.208 and we need to pay attention, 0:10:38.208,0:10:40.660 but we also need to consider the fact that 0:10:40.660,0:10:44.912 although these high prices[br]seem unusual for antibiotics, 0:10:44.912,0:10:47.151 they're nothing compared to the price per day 0:10:47.151,0:10:48.535 of some cancer drugs, 0:10:48.535,0:10:51.905 which might save a patient's life only[br]for a few months or perhaps a year, 0:10:51.905,0:10:53.675 whereas antibiotics would potentially 0:10:53.675,0:10:55.501 save a patient's life forever. 0:10:55.501,0:10:56.820 So this is going to involve 0:10:56.820,0:10:58.782 a whole new paradigm shift, 0:10:58.782,0:11:00.638 and it's also a scary shift because 0:11:00.638,0:11:02.967 in many parts of this country, 0:11:02.967,0:11:04.711 in many parts of the world, 0:11:04.711,0:11:06.780 the idea of paying 200 dollars 0:11:06.780,0:11:09.671 for a day of antibiotic treatment 0:11:09.671,0:11:12.213 is simply unimaginable. 0:11:12.213,0:11:13.947 So we need to think about that. 0:11:13.947,0:11:15.760 Now, there are backstop options, 0:11:15.760,0:11:18.436 which is other alternative technologies 0:11:18.436,0:11:19.630 that people are working on. 0:11:19.630,0:11:22.282 It includes bacteriophages, probiotics, 0:11:22.282,0:11:26.330 quorum sensing, synbiotics. 0:11:26.330,0:11:29.369 Now, all of these are useful avenues to pursue, 0:11:29.369,0:11:31.979 and they will become even more lucrative 0:11:31.979,0:11:35.060 when the price of new [br]antibiotics starts going higher, 0:11:35.060,0:11:37.957 and we've seen that the[br]market does actually respond, 0:11:37.957,0:11:39.965 and the government is now considering 0:11:39.965,0:11:43.732 ways of subsidizing new [br]antibiotics and development. 0:11:43.732,0:11:45.455 But there are challenges here. 0:11:45.455,0:11:47.030 We don't want to just throw money at a problem. 0:11:47.030,0:11:48.549 What we want to be able to do 0:11:48.549,0:11:50.828 is invest in new antibiotics 0:11:50.828,0:11:53.804 in ways that actually encourage 0:11:53.804,0:11:56.824 appropriate use and sales of those antibiotics, 0:11:56.824,0:11:59.287 and that really is the challenge here. 0:11:59.287,0:12:01.616 Now, going back to these technologies, 0:12:01.616,0:12:03.979 you all remember the line from that famous 0:12:03.979,0:12:06.205 dinosaur film, "Nature will find a way." 0:12:06.205,0:12:09.524 So it's not as if these are [br]permanent solutions. 0:12:09.524,0:12:13.610 We really have to remember that,[br]whatever the technology might be, 0:12:13.610,0:12:16.486 that nature will find some [br]way to work around it. 0:12:16.486,0:12:18.557 You might think, well, [br]this is just a problem 0:12:18.557,0:12:21.301 just with antibiotics and with bacteria, 0:12:21.301,0:12:23.247 but it turns out that we [br]have the exact same 0:12:23.247,0:12:25.981 identical problem in [br]many other fields as well, 0:12:25.981,0:12:28.933 with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, 0:12:28.933,0:12:32.495 which is a serious problem [br]in India and South Africa. 0:12:32.495,0:12:34.282 Thousands of patients are dying because 0:12:34.282,0:12:36.116 the second-line drugs are so expensive, 0:12:36.116,0:12:38.343 and in some instances, even those don't work 0:12:38.343,0:12:40.413 and you have XDR TB. 0:12:40.413,0:12:42.224 Viruses are becoming resistant. 0:12:42.224,0:12:45.390 Agricultural pests. Malaria parasites. 0:12:45.390,0:12:47.173 Right now, much of the world depends on 0:12:47.173,0:12:50.870 one drug, artemisinin drugs, 0:12:50.870,0:12:52.826 essentially to treat malaria. 0:12:52.826,0:12:55.413 Resistance to artemisinin has already emerged, 0:12:55.413,0:12:57.767 and if this were to become widespread, 0:12:57.767,0:12:59.115 that puts at risk 0:12:59.115,0:13:02.006 the single drug that we have to [br]treat malaria around the world 0:13:02.006,0:13:05.220 in a way that's currently [br]safe and efficacious. 0:13:05.220,0:13:07.018 Mosquitos develop resistance. 0:13:07.018,0:13:09.255 If you have kids, you probably [br]know about head lice, 0:13:09.255,0:13:10.968 and if you're from New York City, 0:13:10.968,0:13:13.701 I understand that the [br]specialty there is bedbugs. 0:13:13.701,0:13:15.956 So those are also resistant. 0:13:15.956,0:13:18.835 And we have to bring an[br]example from across the pond. 0:13:18.835,0:13:21.190 Turns out that rats are [br]also resistant to poisons. 0:13:21.190,0:13:23.891 Now, what's common [br]to all of these things is 0:13:23.891,0:13:26.597 the idea that we've had these technologies 0:13:26.597,0:13:31.218 to control nature only for [br]the last 70, 80 or 100 years 0:13:31.218,0:13:34.246 and essentially in a blink, 0:13:34.246,0:13:36.797 we have squandered our ability to control, 0:13:36.797,0:13:39.288 because we have not recognized 0:13:39.288,0:13:42.100 that natural selection and [br]evolution was going to find 0:13:42.100,0:13:43.274 a way to get back, 0:13:43.274,0:13:45.323 and we need to completely rethink 0:13:45.323,0:13:47.666 how we're going to use 0:13:47.666,0:13:50.760 measures to control biological organisms, 0:13:50.760,0:13:54.224 and rethink how we incentivize 0:13:54.224,0:13:56.450 the development, introduction, 0:13:56.450,0:13:59.118 in the case of antibiotics prescription, 0:13:59.118,0:14:02.890 and use of these valuable resources. 0:14:02.890,0:14:05.270 And we really now need to [br]start thinking about them 0:14:05.270,0:14:07.228 as natural resources. 0:14:07.228,0:14:09.466 And so we stand at a crossroads. 0:14:09.466,0:14:12.625 An option is to go through that rethinking 0:14:12.625,0:14:14.438 and carefully consider incentives 0:14:14.438,0:14:16.992 to change how we do business. 0:14:16.992,0:14:19.253 The alternative is 0:14:19.253,0:14:22.336 a world in which even a blade of grass 0:14:22.336,0:14:24.765 is a potentially lethal weapon. 0:14:24.765,0:14:26.565 Thank you. 0:14:26.565,0:14:29.300 (Applause)