0:00:00.380,0:00:03.200 As I said a lot of new technology is being[br]built. 0:00:03.200,0:00:05.490 But it's very easy to be distracted by[br]this technology. 0:00:05.490,0:00:09.290 It's easy to forget what to focus on[br]because of all the shiny visuals. 0:00:10.420,0:00:13.290 Simultaneously technology can open new[br]doors or 0:00:13.290,0:00:15.850 put in new constraints on our pedagrophy. 0:00:15.850,0:00:17.510 So let's think again, let's refocus. 0:00:18.550,0:00:20.630 When we teach what should we care about[br]the most? 0:00:22.080,0:00:24.024 Well I have some practical experience as[br]an 0:00:24.024,0:00:26.220 instructor but i am not an expert in[br]education. 0:00:26.220,0:00:29.940 So i rely on a influential study by John[br]Hand. 0:00:29.940,0:00:35.127 He looked at 800 hundred meta-analysis and[br]synthesized them. 0:00:35.127,0:00:37.280 He was looking for what influences[br]learning. 0:00:37.280,0:00:40.400 Which circumstances, tools and techniques[br]or which had 0:00:40.400,0:00:43.320 the best effects or which just had average[br]effects. 0:00:44.390,0:00:47.640 So let's pick and choose a few of those[br]factors in no order at the moment. 0:00:47.640,0:00:50.420 The first is physical attributes. 0:00:51.420,0:00:52.040 The class size, for 0:00:54.080,0:00:54.510 instance. 0:00:54.510,0:00:57.960 It's clear that this is relevant to the[br]setting. 0:00:57.960,0:01:00.442 The second factor is computer-assisted[br]instruction. 0:01:00.442,0:01:02.459 It's also clear that this is crucial in[br][UNKNOWN]. 0:01:03.940,0:01:06.910 There are other factors that will affect[br]teaching, 0:01:06.910,0:01:08.760 things that are mainly more intrinsic to[br]the student. 0:01:08.760,0:01:12.600 Course we would like to think that we can[br]teach anyone, but we expect the 0:01:12.600,0:01:15.864 students disposition to garn their[br]intrinsic motivation to 0:01:15.864,0:01:17.800 have to be a factor in the outcome. 0:01:19.070,0:01:22.990 In some way mooks have a self-selected[br]audience for now so this is mitigated. 0:01:24.600,0:01:27.410 There's also the factor of the student's[br]prior cognitive ability. 0:01:27.410,0:01:30.550 Think of something like their IQ, for[br]instance. 0:01:30.550,0:01:32.720 We have little control there. 0:01:34.390,0:01:36.500 Fortunately, there are part we can[br]actually change. 0:01:36.500,0:01:41.430 The instructional quality of the course,[br]for instance. 0:01:41.430,0:01:45.630 That is, the student's perception of the[br]quality of the instruction they get. 0:01:45.630,0:01:46.840 According to Hadley's definition. 0:01:48.220,0:01:49.530 What about individualization? 0:01:49.530,0:01:52.220 The design of a learning program[br]specifically the student. 0:01:54.030,0:01:55.590 Or maybe mastery learning. 0:01:55.590,0:01:57.480 This is when student are giving test 0:01:57.480,0:02:01.170 on relatively easy material soon after[br]instruction. 0:02:01.170,0:02:04.710 And if it seems necessary there given more[br]work again. 0:02:04.710,0:02:06.480 They're retested until they get it. 0:02:08.340,0:02:11.070 Maybe a teacher could challenge students[br]by applying goals, but 0:02:12.550,0:02:16.460 there is also feedback which in Hadi's[br]mind which includes 0:02:16.460,0:02:21.808 positive reinforcement for what has been[br]done well, information about 0:02:21.808,0:02:25.790 needs to improve but also includes merely[br]clarifying the goals. 0:02:26.880,0:02:27.770 As part of the feedback. 0:02:29.770,0:02:31.580 There's also peer tutoring, where the 0:02:31.580,0:02:33.610 students explain, check, and assess each[br]other. 0:02:34.800,0:02:35.610 How about a good old test? 0:02:35.610,0:02:41.330 How about external factors, such as the[br]presence of a television at home? 0:02:41.330,0:02:43.410 Hattie identified 130 different such[br]factors. 0:02:43.410,0:02:46.530 I only picked a few here. 0:02:46.530,0:02:48.590 But it's already a lot of influencers on[br]the student's achievements. 0:02:51.100,0:02:52.956 But how do you rank them so we could make 0:02:52.956,0:02:56.210 sense of the potential thug of that large[br]number of influences. 0:02:56.210,0:02:56.710 So 0:02:58.440,0:03:00.060 what do you think ranked the best? 0:03:00.060,0:03:00.680 What ranked the worst? 0:03:02.200,0:03:04.850 You can maybe guess that television is the[br]worst. 0:03:04.850,0:03:07.502 That seems kind of an obvious candidate in 0:03:07.502,0:03:10.900 fact television slowed down a students[br]progress. 0:03:12.230,0:03:16.650 Next up and very controversially was class[br]size. 0:03:16.650,0:03:20.498 This is still very much at the bottom in[br]fact the data indicates 0:03:20.498,0:03:23.310 inconclusively that small class sizes have[br]a 0:03:23.310,0:03:26.430 tiny positive effect on the students[br]learning. 0:03:27.980,0:03:29.230 The best way to make sense of 0:03:29.230,0:03:31.850 this is probably to better understand[br]Hattie's methodology. 0:03:33.100,0:03:36.180 This result comes after accounting for all 0:03:36.180,0:03:40.680 the other effects, if all else remains[br]equal. 0:03:40.680,0:03:44.050 So if a politician somewhere bases a[br]decision on this study, and 0:03:44.050,0:03:47.614 blindly doubles the class size of all the[br]classrooms in their country. 0:03:47.614,0:03:51.130 Presumably formed by firing half of the[br]teachers. 0:03:51.130,0:03:55.010 Well the teacher that remain will be[br]suddenly swamped with work. 0:03:55.010,0:03:57.332 And enable to do some of the other 0:03:57.332,0:04:01.444 techniques that actually have a very[br]positive effect. 0:04:01.444,0:04:02.980 So this would be bad. 0:04:02.980,0:04:03.820 On to the positive effects. 0:04:05.320,0:04:07.576 When Haddie performed this study he very[br]well understood 0:04:07.576,0:04:10.170 that most of those techniques had a[br]positive effect. 0:04:10.170,0:04:14.230 The point was to identify those that were[br]most effective. 0:04:14.230,0:04:17.250 So we set the bar at the average effect[br]size. 0:04:17.250,0:04:21.779 Obviously we're interested in the top[br]effects, those way above the bar. 0:04:21.779,0:04:24.140 But we should proceed methodalically. 0:04:24.140,0:04:26.180 Below that bar still with a positive[br]effect 0:04:26.180,0:04:29.168 but not so great are computer assisted[br]instruction. 0:04:29.168,0:04:33.590 Individualization and testing. 0:04:33.590,0:04:36.143 Above that and in a position that starts[br]to be 0:04:36.143,0:04:41.610 very useful are challenging students with[br]goal, peer tutoring, mastery learning. 0:04:41.610,0:04:44.890 And slightly above all those three the[br]student's disposition to learn. 0:04:46.720,0:04:47.730 But the three stellar effects 0:04:47.730,0:04:51.760 are feedback, student's prior cognitive[br]ability. 0:04:51.760,0:04:52.830 And instruction quality. 0:04:54.520,0:04:57.810 Each is at a level where you expect 50%[br]increase in the pace of learning. 0:04:57.810,0:05:01.360 Of course feedback is a bit of an umbrella[br]term here. 0:05:01.360,0:05:05.160 It covers pure feedback or mastery[br]learning for instance. 0:05:07.660,0:05:11.250 Also computer assistant goes up as more. 0:05:11.250,0:05:15.459 Yes, the course becomes more interactive[br]and more engaging and also that smaller 0:05:15.459,0:05:17.411 effects can be combined to accumulate 0:05:17.411,0:05:20.050 traction, so nothing should be fully[br]dismissed. 0:05:20.050,0:05:24.640 So, we now have Haddies final ranking for[br]the effects I've selected. 0:05:26.610,0:05:28.300 Why am I talking about this? 0:05:28.300,0:05:30.700 Well, because in mooks some of it is[br]especially relevant. 0:05:31.750,0:05:34.690 Mastery learning has been trumpeted again[br]and again for months. 0:05:34.690,0:05:38.590 We can offer a quiz sampling questions and[br]answers until the student gets it. 0:05:39.790,0:05:43.502 Interaction as well more and more mooks[br]have interactive components 0:05:43.502,0:05:46.930 that students can use to visually see what[br]they are learning. 0:05:46.930,0:05:48.850 So this is all a success story for mooks 0:05:48.850,0:05:51.800 integrating fully those effects in the[br]format you want. 0:05:53.310,0:05:56.840 Pure effects are also important and also[br]present in mooks. 0:05:56.840,0:05:57.930 But they're not full mastered yet. 0:05:57.930,0:06:00.880 There are some structured peer grading[br]components in mooks 0:06:00.880,0:06:03.690 but they're still in early stages and can[br]be improved. 0:06:04.890,0:06:08.080 Also, few people know for sure how to get[br]a forum started. 0:06:08.080,0:06:12.350 One that encourages students from all[br]backgrounds to engage with their peers. 0:06:12.350,0:06:14.570 I'm certainly no, not one of those[br]experts. 0:06:14.570,0:06:16.800 It's a skill, something that needs to be[br]learned and practiced. 0:06:18.050,0:06:20.890 Some of those experts, on the other hand,[br]might be lurking in this class. 0:06:20.890,0:06:25.320 So please help the discussion get started[br]on the forums if you feel you can help. 0:06:26.920,0:06:28.700 I would love to engage with all of you. 0:06:28.700,0:06:30.580 Share your opinion, don't be afraid. 0:06:30.580,0:06:32.530 There's definitely no right or wrong. 0:06:32.530,0:06:35.280 Even Hattie's study is open to criticism. 0:06:35.280,0:06:37.910 And especially my retelling of it. 0:06:37.910,0:06:38.720 This is education. 0:06:38.720,0:06:40.290 There is no one answer. 0:06:40.290,0:06:43.720 So, I would love to have a discussion on[br]the forums about all that. 0:06:43.720,0:06:46.480 The last effect I want to discuss that[br]will be the 0:06:46.480,0:06:50.789 next video is the most important according[br]to Hattie, that is feedback. 0:06:50.789,0:06:56.889 [BLANK_AUDIO]