0:00:00.535,0:00:03.056
Let's see what else we can change[br]about the font.

0:00:03.440,0:00:06.269
What if we want[br]this first paragraph to be bold?

0:00:06.531,0:00:09.416
We could wrap the whole paragraph[br]in a `` tag.

0:00:09.532,0:00:12.480
But that would be kind of an abuse[br]of a `` tag.

0:00:12.579,0:00:14.112
We're not really trying to say

0:00:14.112,0:00:16.322
that the whole first paragraph[br]is a highlight.

0:00:16.337,0:00:18.628
We just think it might look better bolded.

0:00:18.641,0:00:21.862
So instead, we should use[br]a CSS property: `font-weight`.

0:00:22.245,0:00:27.562
Let's go up to the relevant CSS rule,[br]and say, `font-weight: bold`.

0:00:28.025,0:00:29.345
Ta-da! It's bold.

0:00:29.917,0:00:34.664
Now, what if we want to make[br]all of these lyrics italicized-- slanted?

0:00:34.782,0:00:37.869
Once again, we could wrap them all[br]in an `` tag,

0:00:37.869,0:00:42.372
because the browser always defaults[br]to giving `` italicized style.

0:00:42.555,0:00:44.085
But we shouldn't do that,

0:00:44.085,0:00:46.750
because that's kind of an abuse[br]of the `` tag.

0:00:46.842,0:00:49.248
We're not trying to emphasize[br]the whole song.

0:00:49.392,0:00:52.132
We just think [br]it might look better italicized.

0:00:52.335,0:00:55.983
So instead, we should use[br]a CSS property: `font-style`.

0:00:56.432,0:00:59.529
Let's go up to our relevant rule,[br]`song-lyrics`,

0:00:59.529,0:01:03.120
and say,[br]`font-style: italic`.

0:01:03.681,0:01:05.645
Okay, great.

0:01:05.889,0:01:08.926
Notice that we have a bunch[br]of font-related properties

0:01:08.926,0:01:10.454
in one rule for our lyrics.

0:01:10.630,0:01:13.870
We've got `font-family`, `font-size`,[br]and `font-style`.

0:01:13.954,0:01:19.305
If we want, we can actually bundle them up[br]into a single property: `font`

0:01:19.305,0:01:24.445
by just writing:[br]`font: italic 13px fantasy;`.

0:01:25.083,0:01:28.772
Okay, and we can delete[br]the three properties that we used to have

0:01:28.992,0:01:30.908
and everything looks the same.

0:01:31.092,0:01:35.891
This is called a "shorthand property",[br]since as you can see, it's a lot shorter.

0:01:36.091,0:01:37.667
But me, I don't like it.

0:01:37.667,0:01:41.038
Because I always forget what order[br]to write the properties in,

0:01:41.038,0:01:43.952
and it's just easier [br]if I write them out one at a time.

0:01:44.196,0:01:47.020
So I'm going to bring back[br]what I had before.

0:01:48.360,0:01:51.951
It's up to you-- if you're a [br]"shorthander" or a "longhander".

0:01:52.229,0:01:54.816
The important thing[br]is to stay stylish.