1 00:00:14,959 --> 00:00:17,543 Paul Levinson: So, how are you doing? (Audience) Good! 2 00:00:17,584 --> 00:00:19,454 PL: That was a a nice introduction. 3 00:00:19,455 --> 00:00:23,538 So I'm trying to decide should I talk about science fiction, time travel, 4 00:00:23,539 --> 00:00:26,009 the First Amendment, 5 00:00:26,010 --> 00:00:29,389 but I'll stick to what I'm supposed to talk about 6 00:00:29,390 --> 00:00:33,639 which is I think one of the most revolutionary developments 7 00:00:33,640 --> 00:00:36,959 in our history as a species. 8 00:00:36,960 --> 00:00:39,558 What I'm talking about is a development 9 00:00:39,559 --> 00:00:44,099 which for the first time has put the power 10 00:00:44,100 --> 00:00:48,329 not only to communicate to one another which we've always had 11 00:00:48,330 --> 00:00:52,692 but the power to communicate to the world at large 12 00:00:52,693 --> 00:00:55,559 in everyone's hands 13 00:00:55,560 --> 00:00:59,199 and not only through the written word 14 00:00:59,200 --> 00:01:05,449 but through speech and audiovisual content. 15 00:01:06,039 --> 00:01:11,079 That is a major path-breaking development 16 00:01:11,080 --> 00:01:14,819 and let me just start by giving you a couple of examples, 17 00:01:14,820 --> 00:01:18,779 and then we'll trace a little bit of the history of that 18 00:01:18,780 --> 00:01:21,188 to put it into a proper context. 19 00:01:21,189 --> 00:01:23,799 I'm sure most of you know 20 00:01:23,800 --> 00:01:30,533 that Barack Obama won his reelection campaign a few months ago, 21 00:01:30,534 --> 00:01:34,380 and I'm sure most of you also know, if you follow the news at all, 22 00:01:34,381 --> 00:01:39,666 that one of the key factors in Obama's victory 23 00:01:39,667 --> 00:01:43,459 was Mitt Romney's statement 24 00:01:43,563 --> 00:01:48,192 that 47% the American population 25 00:01:48,193 --> 00:01:54,382 were not of interest to him, his supporters, and the Republican Party. 26 00:01:54,383 --> 00:01:57,519 In a very contemptuous way, Romney said 27 00:01:57,520 --> 00:02:03,208 47% of Americans are only interested in a handout; 28 00:02:03,209 --> 00:02:07,119 we're never going to get their vote anyway. 29 00:02:07,120 --> 00:02:11,149 That was actually a statement 30 00:02:11,150 --> 00:02:15,687 that a political candidate might well have made 31 00:02:15,688 --> 00:02:20,267 to his or her rich supporters, 32 00:02:20,268 --> 00:02:24,419 and in fact, that is indeed the physical premise 33 00:02:24,420 --> 00:02:27,347 where Romney made that statement. 34 00:02:27,348 --> 00:02:30,875 But as I'm sure most of you also know, 35 00:02:30,876 --> 00:02:36,449 it was not just those people at that fundraising event 36 00:02:36,450 --> 00:02:40,706 who heard and saw Romney make that statement. 37 00:02:41,485 --> 00:02:47,030 In fact, eventually, most Americans saw that statement. 38 00:02:47,040 --> 00:02:48,518 Why was that? 39 00:02:48,519 --> 00:02:53,589 A bartender had brought in a little video camera 40 00:02:53,590 --> 00:02:58,169 not much bigger at all than a typical smartphone, 41 00:02:58,170 --> 00:03:02,899 had put it on the bar, had pointed it to Romney, 42 00:03:02,900 --> 00:03:09,279 had turned on the recording and just let the video recording run 43 00:03:09,280 --> 00:03:11,918 while Romney made that statement. 44 00:03:12,380 --> 00:03:16,239 We could talk about the ethics of doing that. 45 00:03:16,240 --> 00:03:18,279 Is it ethical to record someone 46 00:03:18,280 --> 00:03:21,179 when they don't know they're being recorded? 47 00:03:21,180 --> 00:03:23,811 I think those are very interesting issues there; 48 00:03:23,812 --> 00:03:25,259 I think by and large, 49 00:03:25,260 --> 00:03:28,052 it's not particularly the height of ethics 50 00:03:28,053 --> 00:03:31,769 to record someone when they don't know they're being recorded, 51 00:03:31,770 --> 00:03:33,450 but as in most things in life, 52 00:03:33,459 --> 00:03:36,293 sometimes we have a collision 53 00:03:36,419 --> 00:03:40,641 of ethical problems and ethical concerns. 54 00:03:41,200 --> 00:03:45,749 And so, against that questionable practice 55 00:03:45,750 --> 00:03:49,051 of recording someone without his or her knowledge, 56 00:03:49,052 --> 00:03:52,658 you have the other important point 57 00:03:52,659 --> 00:03:57,250 that don't the American people deserve to know 58 00:03:58,050 --> 00:04:01,059 who they are voting for? 59 00:04:01,060 --> 00:04:03,789 I think of those two issues 60 00:04:03,790 --> 00:04:06,579 the greater good resides with 61 00:04:06,580 --> 00:04:12,390 the American people knowing a little bit more about the candidates. 62 00:04:12,935 --> 00:04:14,549 As a matter of fact, 63 00:04:14,550 --> 00:04:19,968 what happened was this very hour of Romney making those remarks 64 00:04:19,969 --> 00:04:24,637 was not only recorded on this little video camera 65 00:04:24,638 --> 00:04:31,491 it was put up on YouTube, and it was eventually picked up by the mass media. 66 00:04:31,759 --> 00:04:35,269 And so, although the actual recording took place in May, 67 00:04:35,270 --> 00:04:40,070 it wasn't until September that everyone began talking about it. 68 00:04:40,083 --> 00:04:45,042 One of the words in my talk is transmedia. 69 00:04:45,050 --> 00:04:48,299 And it's important to recognize 70 00:04:48,300 --> 00:04:52,369 that social media, in and of themselves, 71 00:04:52,370 --> 00:04:57,771 don't have the power all the time to get information out to the world. 72 00:04:58,551 --> 00:05:03,244 In fact, what you often need are the traditional mass media 73 00:05:03,245 --> 00:05:07,423 to come into the system 74 00:05:07,424 --> 00:05:11,255 and amplify the message 75 00:05:11,256 --> 00:05:14,775 that the social medium has created 76 00:05:14,776 --> 00:05:17,990 and put up to the world in the first place. 77 00:05:17,991 --> 00:05:22,043 So that's a key component of this revolution. 78 00:05:22,047 --> 00:05:26,647 It's transmedia, meaning it rarely operates 79 00:05:26,648 --> 00:05:33,361 just from one medium going to other media 80 00:05:33,362 --> 00:05:39,479 or just one medium going to other inconsequential media; 81 00:05:39,480 --> 00:05:40,922 rather, it operates 82 00:05:40,923 --> 00:05:44,523 by going from one medium to other media 83 00:05:44,524 --> 00:05:50,229 and then hitting the jackpot of the more consequential mass media 84 00:05:50,230 --> 00:05:54,760 which still have an enormous amount of power in our society. 85 00:05:55,485 --> 00:06:01,720 Often, we hear people talking about television versus the Internet, 86 00:06:02,375 --> 00:06:05,956 cable television versus YouTube, 87 00:06:05,957 --> 00:06:09,579 the newspaper versus Twitter 88 00:06:09,580 --> 00:06:11,249 as a source of news. 89 00:06:11,250 --> 00:06:13,609 In fact that's not, I think, 90 00:06:13,610 --> 00:06:19,138 the most accurate way to look at this current media environment, 91 00:06:19,139 --> 00:06:24,717 because what you find on Twitter are links to news reporting 92 00:06:24,718 --> 00:06:29,229 in the New York Times, in newspapers, on television, and so forth. 93 00:06:29,230 --> 00:06:33,089 Conversely what you find in the New York Times, 94 00:06:33,090 --> 00:06:37,409 and on conventional, traditional news broadcasts 95 00:06:37,410 --> 00:06:43,368 are clips from YouTube and various events 96 00:06:43,369 --> 00:06:47,159 that otherwise you would not see covered in the mass media. 97 00:06:48,216 --> 00:06:53,762 So to use a fancy word, this is a synergistic 98 00:06:53,763 --> 00:06:55,599 - or another phrase - 99 00:06:55,600 --> 00:06:59,109 mutually catalytic development 100 00:06:59,110 --> 00:07:04,872 in which the social media contribute, and the mass media contribute. 101 00:07:05,970 --> 00:07:10,239 There's a transnational aspect to this as well, 102 00:07:10,240 --> 00:07:14,068 and obviously, whoever is elected President of the United States 103 00:07:14,069 --> 00:07:15,887 is by definition -- 104 00:07:15,888 --> 00:07:20,799 that event by definition is something that has international import. 105 00:07:20,800 --> 00:07:25,779 So in fact Romney's 47% remark 106 00:07:25,780 --> 00:07:30,109 was not only seen by Americans who voted in the election, 107 00:07:30,110 --> 00:07:33,968 but was seen by people all over the world. 108 00:07:34,730 --> 00:07:38,208 Marshall McLuhan, back in 1962, 109 00:07:38,209 --> 00:07:42,209 observed that new electronic media 110 00:07:42,224 --> 00:07:46,682 were turning the world into a global village, 111 00:07:46,683 --> 00:07:51,124 and I'm sure many of you have heard that term "global village," 112 00:07:51,125 --> 00:07:55,291 but back in 1962, 113 00:07:55,292 --> 00:07:58,751 the environment was really 114 00:07:58,859 --> 00:08:02,850 neither global nor a village, 115 00:08:02,879 --> 00:08:05,918 because back in 1962 116 00:08:05,919 --> 00:08:09,649 and what got McLuhan to make that point in the first place, 117 00:08:09,650 --> 00:08:14,799 what you had were national audiences watching television programs 118 00:08:14,800 --> 00:08:18,708 there was no international communication really. 119 00:08:18,709 --> 00:08:25,335 The first international satellite Telstar was launched in that period of time, 120 00:08:25,335 --> 00:08:30,709 but it didn't really have any programming that was conveying to the world. 121 00:08:31,300 --> 00:08:35,687 So it was not yet global nor was it a village, 122 00:08:35,688 --> 00:08:38,518 because in a normal village 123 00:08:38,519 --> 00:08:42,707 the citizens of that village can talk to one another 124 00:08:42,707 --> 00:08:46,292 - just like you can talk to each other - 125 00:08:46,293 --> 00:08:50,223 and can move a conversation along, 126 00:08:50,224 --> 00:08:55,001 can question information not just receive information. 127 00:08:55,699 --> 00:08:58,072 On traditional television, 128 00:08:58,073 --> 00:09:03,269 there is a one-way communication 129 00:09:03,270 --> 00:09:06,458 in which we are receivers of information, 130 00:09:06,459 --> 00:09:11,153 but we have no way to really question or even comment upon the information. 131 00:09:11,167 --> 00:09:15,501 All that changes when we get into social media. 132 00:09:16,250 --> 00:09:19,584 So if you look at videos on YouTube, 133 00:09:19,698 --> 00:09:23,579 some of them have thousands of comments, 134 00:09:24,334 --> 00:09:28,459 and I always think, when I see that, 135 00:09:28,586 --> 00:09:33,060 that, "Ah, here is democracy at work," 136 00:09:33,079 --> 00:09:36,599 because here in these comments, you see people 137 00:09:36,600 --> 00:09:41,348 not only receiving news but sending back information, 138 00:09:41,349 --> 00:09:43,359 sending back commentary. 139 00:09:43,699 --> 00:09:48,388 So the global village that McLuhan talked about in 1962 140 00:09:48,389 --> 00:09:54,031 was really a metaphor back then or a sign pointing to the future. 141 00:09:54,709 --> 00:09:59,679 I often like to say that McLuhan was not writing about his time, 142 00:09:59,680 --> 00:10:02,170 he was writing about our time: 143 00:10:03,009 --> 00:10:07,539 not because he was clairvoyant, but because he understood 144 00:10:07,540 --> 00:10:11,968 with such depth how human beings wanted to communicate 145 00:10:11,969 --> 00:10:16,049 that he realized we would be moving in a direction 146 00:10:16,050 --> 00:10:19,398 in which we did have a village. 147 00:10:19,918 --> 00:10:23,918 And so, Romney's remarks were indeed 148 00:10:24,033 --> 00:10:27,819 truly seen by a global audience. 149 00:10:28,751 --> 00:10:32,960 Let me just give you another example, a very different example. 150 00:10:34,209 --> 00:10:37,251 Occupy Wall Street -- 151 00:10:37,359 --> 00:10:41,710 which was a a global movement 152 00:10:41,728 --> 00:10:46,112 that coincided to some extent with the Arab Spring 153 00:10:46,113 --> 00:10:49,729 and let me tell you about one person in particular 154 00:10:49,730 --> 00:10:52,568 who in my view did one of the best jobs 155 00:10:52,569 --> 00:10:58,590 reporting what was happening in Occupy Wall Street. 156 00:10:58,603 --> 00:11:02,008 We're talking about something that happened 157 00:11:02,009 --> 00:11:04,377 a year or two ago. 158 00:11:05,264 --> 00:11:08,139 I was teaching a class 159 00:11:08,140 --> 00:11:13,659 at Fordham University in the Fall of 2011 160 00:11:13,660 --> 00:11:17,218 when Occupy Wall Street was going strong in New York City, 161 00:11:17,219 --> 00:11:19,038 around the country, around the world 162 00:11:19,369 --> 00:11:23,908 I went back to my office, and I looked at my email. 163 00:11:23,909 --> 00:11:30,063 And right before I was about to sign off and shut down my computer and drive home, 164 00:11:30,249 --> 00:11:33,119 I looked one more time at my Twitter. 165 00:11:34,119 --> 00:11:37,835 I saw her just a little tweet which said 166 00:11:38,420 --> 00:11:43,278 Tim Pool giving live coverage 167 00:11:43,279 --> 00:11:48,668 to an Occupy Wall Street protest that was going on at Baruch College. 168 00:11:48,669 --> 00:11:53,510 Baruch College, if you don't know, is part of the City University of New York System 169 00:11:54,329 --> 00:11:59,208 down in the a East Twenties in Manhattan. 170 00:11:59,209 --> 00:12:06,040 I clicked on the link on YouTube and pretty quickly I was brought to a page 171 00:12:06,054 --> 00:12:12,199 where there was live streaming coverage, literally, of that demonstration. 172 00:12:13,160 --> 00:12:16,455 And I was able to see that in real time. 173 00:12:17,119 --> 00:12:20,815 It would be hours before any of the mass media picked that up. 174 00:12:21,970 --> 00:12:23,953 And, as was the case with YouTube, 175 00:12:23,954 --> 00:12:27,528 there were people who were commenting on what they were seeing: 176 00:12:27,529 --> 00:12:33,092 literally, the police moving in, pushing demonstrators out of the way, 177 00:12:33,093 --> 00:12:38,569 in my view, illegally, because it was violating their First Amendment rights. 178 00:12:38,584 --> 00:12:41,502 But all that was actually shown 179 00:12:41,595 --> 00:12:45,717 in real time through Tim Pool's reporting. 180 00:12:46,040 --> 00:12:52,164 And it was seen internationally, literally in real time, through his reporting. 181 00:12:53,279 --> 00:12:55,768 And by the way Tim Pool continued to do that, 182 00:12:55,769 --> 00:13:01,599 he had a New Year's Eve live feed 183 00:13:01,600 --> 00:13:05,366 of another series of Occupy Wall Street events. 184 00:13:05,367 --> 00:13:09,097 It shows you what a great party person I am. 185 00:13:10,357 --> 00:13:12,418 It's amazing my wife puts up with me, 186 00:13:12,419 --> 00:13:16,749 because that's what I was doing at least for an hour or two on New Year's Eve, 187 00:13:16,750 --> 00:13:20,239 looking at Tim Pool's live coverage. 188 00:13:20,240 --> 00:13:22,112 But that's extremely significant, 189 00:13:22,113 --> 00:13:25,907 and by the way, it has legal import as well, 190 00:13:26,477 --> 00:13:31,436 because the New York City police arrested many people 191 00:13:31,437 --> 00:13:35,717 that they said were violating this or that law. 192 00:13:37,237 --> 00:13:40,156 In most cases, on no evidence, 193 00:13:40,157 --> 00:13:43,338 and in one case, I was very happy to see, 194 00:13:43,339 --> 00:13:46,518 the case was thrown out of court, 195 00:13:46,519 --> 00:13:51,147 the person who had been arrested by the NYPD was found not guilty 196 00:13:51,783 --> 00:13:58,638 and the reason was Tim Pool had been there with his little phone 197 00:13:58,639 --> 00:14:00,498 -- he just uses a smartphone 198 00:14:00,499 --> 00:14:04,178 hooked up to an internet connection to report what happened 199 00:14:04,179 --> 00:14:07,726 at another event in which someone had been arrested 200 00:14:07,727 --> 00:14:13,158 for breaking through a police line which in fact never happened. 201 00:14:13,159 --> 00:14:18,600 So this has profound legal consequences as well. 202 00:14:19,370 --> 00:14:22,819 But let me put some of this in historical context, 203 00:14:22,820 --> 00:14:26,189 and end with a little trip through history, 204 00:14:26,209 --> 00:14:29,751 just so you have an idea of why I think 205 00:14:29,859 --> 00:14:33,558 this is such a path-breaking development 206 00:14:33,559 --> 00:14:36,149 in our communication history. 207 00:14:36,150 --> 00:14:41,215 Once upon a time, a long long time ago, 208 00:14:41,216 --> 00:14:45,099 we're talking about thousands and thousands and thousands of years ago, 209 00:14:45,100 --> 00:14:48,608 the only way we communicated was by talking, 210 00:14:48,609 --> 00:14:51,636 and in that environment as limited as it was, 211 00:14:51,637 --> 00:14:55,333 because you couldn't communicate beyond your physical surroundings, 212 00:14:55,334 --> 00:14:58,962 anybody could talk, and anyone could respond. 213 00:14:58,963 --> 00:15:03,572 And then, we moved into a written environment, 214 00:15:03,573 --> 00:15:09,229 in which the information was saved, preserved 215 00:15:09,230 --> 00:15:14,259 in scrolls, in parchment, papyrus, and eventually paper; 216 00:15:14,260 --> 00:15:18,338 and it was the same thing: anyone could write, anyone could read, 217 00:15:18,339 --> 00:15:20,707 but very limited distribution. 218 00:15:21,889 --> 00:15:24,979 In the Renaissance, in the 1450s, 219 00:15:24,980 --> 00:15:28,049 Gutenberg, as we all know, introduced the printing press. 220 00:15:28,050 --> 00:15:31,298 Suddenly, millions and millions of people could read 221 00:15:31,299 --> 00:15:34,438 what anyone had written. 222 00:15:34,439 --> 00:15:37,098 But now, a problem was introduced: 223 00:15:37,099 --> 00:15:43,260 who was to decide who would do that dissemination? 224 00:15:43,780 --> 00:15:47,108 An editor or a publisher had to decide. 225 00:15:47,109 --> 00:15:51,488 And so, what was set up was this profound asymmetry 226 00:15:51,489 --> 00:15:57,288 of who knows how many ideas, how many written works were out there, 227 00:15:57,289 --> 00:15:59,477 could have been out there? 228 00:15:59,478 --> 00:16:03,889 But only a small fraction of them ever made it into print. 229 00:16:04,529 --> 00:16:06,506 In the 20th century, 230 00:16:06,507 --> 00:16:10,508 we had the introduction of electronic broadcasting media: 231 00:16:10,509 --> 00:16:13,756 this improved greatly the dissemination. 232 00:16:13,759 --> 00:16:18,249 Millions of people could hear the news, see the news instantly. 233 00:16:18,250 --> 00:16:19,940 Extraordinary! 234 00:16:19,941 --> 00:16:25,280 But once again, who decided what would be in that news? 235 00:16:25,281 --> 00:16:29,028 The answer was again: a producer, 236 00:16:29,029 --> 00:16:33,648 a television production crew, an editor. 237 00:16:33,649 --> 00:16:38,406 And who knows how many stories were left uncovered? 238 00:16:39,417 --> 00:16:45,178 It was not until the Internet that this began to change. 239 00:16:45,179 --> 00:16:49,618 There actually was one little important development before the Internet: 240 00:16:49,619 --> 00:16:51,619 the rise of photocopying. 241 00:16:51,620 --> 00:16:55,848 McLuhan again said the Xerox turns every author into a publisher. 242 00:16:55,849 --> 00:16:59,998 Unfortunately, Xerox manuscripts don't look like books, 243 00:16:59,999 --> 00:17:02,819 but again McLuhan was onto something 244 00:17:02,820 --> 00:17:07,617 because you didn't need anyone's permission to Xerox your manuscript. 245 00:17:08,358 --> 00:17:10,490 But that is really small potatoes, 246 00:17:10,491 --> 00:17:14,402 compared to the power that's now in all of your hands; 247 00:17:14,403 --> 00:17:17,363 each and every one of you, you have an idea, 248 00:17:17,364 --> 00:17:21,150 you have an opinion about something, you see something that's happening, 249 00:17:21,151 --> 00:17:24,928 you don't need anyone's permission, 250 00:17:24,929 --> 00:17:29,386 you can upload it to your YouTube channel, you can put it on your blog, 251 00:17:29,387 --> 00:17:33,542 and you, like this bartender in Florida 252 00:17:33,674 --> 00:17:37,932 who reported Mitt Romney's 47% comment, 253 00:17:37,933 --> 00:17:41,728 you can change the world. 254 00:17:41,729 --> 00:17:43,026 Thank you. 255 00:17:43,027 --> 00:17:44,656 (Applause)