WEBVTT 00:00:10.779 --> 00:00:12.943 Hello, this is Howard Rheingold. 00:00:16.260 --> 00:00:19.360 We're talking with Robin Good about curation 00:00:19.360 --> 00:00:25.690 So Robin, I loved your series of articles, I highly recommend them 00:00:25.729 --> 00:00:30.520 I just wanted to get directly from you a few thoughts about curation online 00:00:30.520 --> 00:00:35.270 starting with what do you think the importance in the place of curation is 00:00:35.270 --> 00:00:38.230 today from for anybody who's online? 00:00:39.206 --> 00:00:42.300 (RG) I think I'll you could see it this way: 00:00:42.300 --> 00:00:45.980 we've reached somehow the limit 00:00:45.980 --> 00:00:49.100 of understanding and making sense of the information 00:00:49.100 --> 00:00:53.000 just by going out to Google, typing out a query 00:00:53.000 --> 00:00:57.958 and getting a listing of things that could be relevant to us. 00:00:58.130 --> 00:01:03.339 I think this is like, you know, having been hungry 00:01:03.339 --> 00:01:07.260 and going to McDonald's, you know: it's fast food information 00:01:07.260 --> 00:01:11.790 but I want something more like when I go to a restaurant 00:01:11.790 --> 00:01:15.600 I can choose to have a restaurant tjat has the foods, the quality, the level 00:01:15.600 --> 00:01:18.310 and the type of customer service, and so on. 00:01:18.310 --> 00:01:23.640 So I am looking for a new level of accessing information whereby 00:01:23.640 --> 00:01:26.919 I'm not just trying to list and rank information 00:01:26.919 --> 00:01:29.390 but I'm trying to make sense of the information 00:01:29.390 --> 00:01:31.869 this is what people want more and more 00:01:31.869 --> 00:01:36.470 because one article by itself or a link or a video 00:01:36.470 --> 00:01:41.316 sometimes is just a little opening hole to understanding that topic 00:01:41.316 --> 00:01:43.747 while if there was some kind of intermediate layer 00:01:44.030 --> 00:01:48.760 whether done by an algorithm or by people 00:01:48.775 --> 00:01:51.959 contributing and working with an algorithm to collect, 00:01:51.959 --> 00:01:58.900 things that make sense on a certain topic, I think we would be in a position 00:01:59.080 --> 00:02:03.649 to inform and learn much faster and much better than we can do now. 00:02:04.749 --> 00:02:08.682 (HR) What qualities do you think a curator ought to have? 00:02:10.078 --> 00:02:15.740 (RG) Well, he's got to be somewhat of a very curious person 00:02:15.740 --> 00:02:19.510 and a passionate person in the area where he wants to curate. 00:02:19.510 --> 00:02:24.020 I don't think you can just go about curating a topic 00:02:24.020 --> 00:02:27.569 because you wake up and that's something you want to do -- well, 00:02:27.569 --> 00:02:30.710 you certainly can and gain confidence with it with time 00:02:30.712 --> 00:02:33.391 but it would be best that you go and curate something 00:02:33.391 --> 00:02:36.640 that you're already very passionate about, that you'd be exposed to 00:02:36.640 --> 00:02:40.140 so that you have some sensitivity, some antennas 00:02:40.140 --> 00:02:44.610 that allow you to understand what is good, what is better, 00:02:44.610 --> 00:02:48.120 because then it becomes a point of who are you doing this for. 00:02:48.120 --> 00:02:50.890 Are you just an artis painting something for yourself 00:02:50.890 --> 00:02:54.480 or are you curating something for a specific audience, 00:02:54.480 --> 00:02:57.550 trying to intercept a specific need and resolve it 00:02:57.550 --> 00:03:00.809 with that channel of information? 00:03:00.809 --> 00:03:06.098 So I would think that knowing the audience and being an expert on the topic 00:03:06.159 --> 00:03:12.129 helps someone curate whatever type of information items he has at his disposal. 00:03:12.129 --> 00:03:14.740 That, I think, are the key elements. 00:03:14.740 --> 00:03:19.760 Then you you gotta be very transparent and give full credit 00:03:19.763 --> 00:03:21.600 to whoever you are gathering in 00:03:21.600 --> 00:03:25.640 and expose actually the best qualities of these sources and people 00:03:25.640 --> 00:03:28.333 and add something of your own, that is, 00:03:28.793 --> 00:03:34.430 the ultimate quality of the curator is like the one for a DJ. 00:03:34.430 --> 00:03:38.940 I mean, what's the difference between putting a mixed tape and a live DJ? 00:03:38.960 --> 00:03:42.926 I think those same qualities apply somewhat to a content curator: //// 00:03:42.980 --> 00:03:47.430 that is the ability to listen closely to what I of volumes at the moment he's 00:03:47.430 --> 00:03:48.150 serving 00:03:48.150 --> 00:03:52.579 and and providing a context so that the type of information ease or she's 00:03:52.579 --> 00:03:53.329 collecting 00:03:53.329 --> 00:03:56.980 make sense to them so you may have to change titles may take 00:03:56.980 --> 00:04:01.129 change descriptions images order how he just oppose things 00:04:01.129 --> 00:04:05.959 but you have to customize the flow for that purpose the man 00:04:05.959 --> 00:04:10.829 public you're doing that for Jordan who who you are. should come 00:04:10.829 --> 00:04:13.859 come through just to some degree your 00:04:13.859 --> 00:04:17.810 your sensibility and your your point of view aren't you 00:04:17.810 --> 00:04:21.329 not be completely suppressed when you're your jury 00:04:21.329 --> 00:04:25.700 they may be different instances any 00:04:25.700 --> 00:04:28.700 situations business why is 00:04:28.700 --> 00:04:33.990 a a sure research and information activities 00:04:33.990 --> 00:04:38.539 how he may vary our I wouldn't be so sure that all the time you'd have to 00:04:38.539 --> 00:04:39.150 bring 00:04:39.150 --> 00:04:42.599 out your personality but that 00:04:42.599 --> 00:04:46.690 there is no way that you can not somehow stand in some position 00:04:46.690 --> 00:04:50.580 cell them would be a generic position it may be a bit more 00:04:50.580 --> 00:04:55.330 I def I'm positions for those who have had it all to take political stances or 00:04:55.330 --> 00:04:56.840 research things where their 00:04:56.840 --> 00:05:01.419 opal's Inc views but again there you may be a great reader by just sending out 00:05:01.419 --> 00:05:02.710 for your position 00:05:02.710 --> 00:05:06.030 or maybe even a better curator by creating 00:05:06.030 --> 00:05:10.220 all the positions that out there and allowing people to discover which ones 00:05:10.220 --> 00:05:13.729 it's best for their money both of them are valid to me 00:05:13.729 --> 00:05:18.289 are a woman what is your advice to do to people about how to go about this and be 00:05:18.289 --> 00:05:21.830 I know %um a very detailed workflow you just 00:05:21.830 --> 00:05:25.379 someone wants to go ahead and start curating in the butt 00:05:25.379 --> 00:05:28.520 a passion for subject in some knowledge about it would out 00:05:28.520 --> 00:05:31.960 how they go about 00:05:31.960 --> 00:05:35.099 the first thing you want to do is to 00:05:35.099 --> 00:05:38.160 collect your so say risk your 00:05:38.160 --> 00:05:41.970 the places where you're going to gather that information you wanna start from 00:05:41.970 --> 00:05:44.849 some basis at these may be some blogs 00:05:44.849 --> 00:05:47.879 I some video channels says some 00:05:47.879 --> 00:05:51.229 tweet their personalities fun pages 00:05:51.229 --> 00:05:54.460 anything especially that he's capable of producing 00:05:54.460 --> 00:05:58.069 on RSS feed in is very useful for 00:05:58.069 --> 00:06:01.240 cue Radian creating channels on the information dedicated to a specific 00:06:01.240 --> 00:06:02.930 topic 00:06:02.930 --> 00:06:07.129 you you want them to become familiar with something that the ski 00:06:07.129 --> 00:06:10.800 a and technically beat for it was difficult to understand is what I call a 00:06:10.800 --> 00:06:15.780 persistent search that is the ability to set out a search for a topic 00:06:15.780 --> 00:06:20.379 and be alerted any time something comes up so that you can discover 00:06:20.379 --> 00:06:24.379 new things but you can discover also news sources for information that you 00:06:24.379 --> 00:06:27.039 may not be aware of 00:06:27.039 --> 00:06:31.569 eddie Van Ness when you bring together different sources 00:06:31.569 --> 00:06:35.000 ones you know that once you're going to discover gradually 00:06:35.000 --> 00:06:38.509 it the core part of your job is 00:06:38.509 --> 00:06:44.009 to select to pick does that really count in again to customize them 00:06:44.009 --> 00:06:48.539 personalizing for your audience for this specific communication 00:06:48.539 --> 00:06:51.979 objective yes it out for yourself with that channel or stream of the 00:06:51.979 --> 00:06:54.009 information you're creating 00:06:54.009 --> 00:07:00.120 so in the job to describe is as simple as that you you may want and to 00:07:00.120 --> 00:07:04.479 share this information to package it happened distributed in different ways 00:07:04.479 --> 00:07:04.810 but 00:07:04.810 --> 00:07:08.849 the core elements are basically does once they're 00:07:08.849 --> 00:07:12.169 so many people then just worry about 00:07:12.169 --> 00:07:17.189 a what is the tool that can do all the stuff in a simple way without needing me 00:07:17.189 --> 00:07:20.330 to know HTML RSS tags at 00:07:20.330 --> 00:07:24.250 persistent searches and so on so let me get a right to that 00:07:24.250 --> 00:07:27.689 and dat is if I were to advise 00:07:27.689 --> 00:07:31.680 a tool that I am NOT associated with commercially they think helps anyone 00:07:31.680 --> 00:07:33.280 who's in all this 00:07:33.280 --> 00:07:36.479 to get good grapes all what 00:07:36.479 --> 00:07:39.710 curating information can do when I can be done 00:07:39.710 --> 00:07:43.129 is the one you're using yourself since a few days and that's cool beat 00:07:43.129 --> 00:07:47.280 as see okie .it 00:07:47.280 --> 00:07:50.560 that's just bury simple to use free tool 00:07:50.560 --> 00:07:54.970 that allows you to aggregate fielder's church put together information even 00:07:54.970 --> 00:07:56.599 layout and publish it 00:07:56.599 --> 00:07:59.789 within a workflow that is extremely easy 00:07:59.789 --> 00:08:02.949 an almost intuitive to pick up 00:08:02.949 --> 00:08:06.259 and %uh I also likes kinda the community feature a Scooby 00:08:06.259 --> 00:08:10.250 im at the am there are people can cook can 00:08:10.250 --> 00:08:13.800 recommend sources to you and then you have a stream sources 00:08:13.800 --> 00:08:17.080 besides the ones that you gone out and and found 00:08:17.080 --> 00:08:20.550 that you can go through and you can either I'm use them 00:08:20.550 --> 00:08:24.460 you can discard them or you can say and when used as source anymore so 00:08:24.460 --> 00:08:27.710 use dream become smarter as you as you you 00:08:27.710 --> 00:08:32.030 mercury did is a tool I like a lot too 00:08:32.030 --> 00:08:36.390 yes but there are actually very many tula in de- 00:08:36.390 --> 00:08:40.169 if you recall on 2005 ahead 00:08:40.169 --> 00:08:44.870 what was the did montel the ID March or April I was in San Francisco with you on 00:08:44.870 --> 00:08:49.130 mountain time of bias we were talking for the first time in that beautiful 00:08:49.130 --> 00:08:54.120 scenery aboul what we discussed in now that he's news Gration 00:08:54.120 --> 00:08:58.710 and you with leukemia me and wondering where their 00:08:58.710 --> 00:09:03.100 that made any sense at I'm so glad that that this time has passed and it's 00:09:03.100 --> 00:09:05.040 become a reality I was 00:09:05.040 --> 00:09:09.160 Solex I did last year and in the last few months where 00:09:09.160 --> 00:09:13.830 about sixty Diff'rent corporation content curation tools have come out 00:09:13.830 --> 00:09:15.090 that created that 00:09:15.090 --> 00:09:18.680 at map you've probably seen which update every weekend 00:09:18.680 --> 00:09:21.860 and what is surprising ease now all these different 00:09:21.860 --> 00:09:24.980 areas for content curation because we study 00:09:24.980 --> 00:09:30.720 RSS curating content in news creating news Raiders as they call them specific 00:09:30.720 --> 00:09:32.040 thematic channels but 00:09:32.040 --> 00:09:35.240 now there's a universe of other possibilities that is 00:09:35.240 --> 00:09:38.530 that is DVD a curation they resell 00:09:38.530 --> 00:09:42.360 product curation these fashion duration which is 00:09:42.360 --> 00:09:46.280 fantastic go in CT said it's called police for 00:09:46.280 --> 00:09:49.560 PE ow.ly voor E 00:09:49.560 --> 00:09:54.160 and see what people can do to a team together different fashion elements like 00:09:54.160 --> 00:09:56.070 shoes & jewelry 00:09:56.070 --> 00:09:59.810 and attic gadgets and create day who radiate 00:09:59.810 --> 00:10:05.640 sets said that it really a interesting and visually appealing 00:10:05.640 --> 00:10:11.030 you so I think the horizon easy and understanding that basically anything 00:10:11.030 --> 00:10:15.380 can be curated doesn't have to be on the news you can create stuff that 00:10:15.380 --> 00:10:18.420 doesn't be doesn't have to be connected tweet their 00:10:18.420 --> 00:10:21.580 or staff detachments right at this moment me 00:10:21.580 --> 00:10:25.410 even collecting and curating what he's out there for the past 00:10:25.410 --> 00:10:29.710 I we've got into the DL situation from the beginning until now 00:10:29.710 --> 00:10:33.820 it's something useful and I think that direction of the future 00:10:33.820 --> 00:10:37.320 ease if not for Google for us to create 00:10:37.320 --> 00:10:42.160 an alternative titles Google where we can cooperatively 00:10:42.160 --> 00:10:45.840 curating information that is out there think for a moment 00:10:45.840 --> 00:10:52.740 if instead of depending of secret algorithms to decide for us 00:10:52.740 --> 00:10:57.820 what is relevant we could choose individually each one of us 00:10:57.820 --> 00:11:00.960 we charge a ranking elements we want to use 00:11:00.960 --> 00:11:04.750 or tap into your lines and the one of my friend and the other friend 00:11:04.750 --> 00:11:08.230 and create our own eco-system I'll 00:11:08.230 --> 00:11:13.230 but she rated algorithm sir curated collections have information on how to 00:11:13.230 --> 00:11:14.640 make sense of reality 00:11:14.640 --> 00:11:19.990 instead of depending of somebody or depends on profits and as clues 00:11:19.990 --> 00:11:24.170 is clue simply on its own earnings to decide what's best for us and that's 00:11:24.170 --> 00:11:29.880 absurd for me because the world s now lives in an economy the information we 00:11:29.880 --> 00:11:31.660 depend so much I needed 00:11:31.660 --> 00:11:34.900 it is not just a matter of doing a business online it's a matter 00:11:34.900 --> 00:11:39.740 of allow each I each one of us like to breathe get water 00:11:39.740 --> 00:11:43.720 to be able to access information and make some good use of it 00:11:43.720 --> 00:11:48.570 I don't know it and it and agree with these are not but to me it's a planetary 00:11:48.570 --> 00:11:52.200 question that two people should start to addressing 00:11:52.200 --> 00:11:56.760 yes that's why I think it a a fundamental literacy about duration is 00:11:56.760 --> 00:11:58.930 something that everybody ought to know about it min 00:11:58.930 --> 00:12:02.240 not just for specialists just like there are 00:12:02.240 --> 00:12:07.060 our web sites did get a lot of traffic there are too many many many web sites 00:12:07.060 --> 00:12:10.990 that may not get the huge amount of traffic but we wouldn't have the really 00:12:10.990 --> 00:12:12.120 rich 00:12:12.120 --> 00:12:15.360 eco-system online if we didn't have so many 00:12:15.360 --> 00:12:19.910 contributors so I I really like your division which YouTube resent to 00:12:19.910 --> 00:12:23.980 so enthusiastically in passionately I'm I really population of 00:12:23.980 --> 00:12:27.990 a few readers that its it's not just for the individuals is further 00:12:27.990 --> 00:12:31.680 the whole system I'm make it much much richer 00:12:31.680 --> 00:12:36.630 then than it is already yeah we want to have different points of view all week 00:12:36.630 --> 00:12:37.820 dust that mean 00:12:37.820 --> 00:12:41.120 as should you formation ranking be 00:12:41.120 --> 00:12:45.470 I on-demand fundamentalist religion because 00:12:45.470 --> 00:12:50.050 what is that I mean if there is one entity that secretly knows what is true 00:12:50.050 --> 00:12:50.940 or not 00:12:50.940 --> 00:12:55.130 isn't that religion so I don't want to depend on some religious organization to 00:12:55.130 --> 00:12:55.780 the sale 00:12:55.780 --> 00:13:00.100 what's out there and I want to be able to tap on different points of views that 00:13:00.100 --> 00:13:02.010 want to be able to contribute 00:13:02.010 --> 00:13:06.480 12 other people understand what I have discovered and the system we have now 00:13:06.480 --> 00:13:11.180 does not allow me to do this so more and more i'm looking for people can be 00:13:11.180 --> 00:13:15.940 gateways to the information they need India's must be trusted people 00:13:15.940 --> 00:13:19.470 so we need out a Google love the people for the people 00:13:19.470 --> 00:13:24.580 I'm not me %uh individual curator's doing this for ourselves that's what we 00:13:24.580 --> 00:13:26.260 need yes 00:13:26.260 --> 00:13:29.420 this is wonderful thank you so much and and thank you for your wonderful 00:13:29.420 --> 00:13:32.030 hospitality in Rome I will never forget it 00:13:32.030 --> 00:13:35.360 and and hope to see you there again soon 00:13:35.360 --> 00:13:38.760 all right thank you I had my share my mind get it 00:13:38.760 --> 00:13:45.760 by do 00:13:46.490 --> 00:13:51.290 do 00:13:51.290 --> 00:13:54.600 do 00:13:54.600 --> 00:14:01.600 do 00:14:02.680 --> 00:14:09.680 do the