0:00:06.279,0:00:09.985 (Applause) 0:00:11.326,0:00:14.546 I would like to start our talk, 0:00:14.546,0:00:16.361 our discussion, 0:00:16.361,0:00:19.029 with the film based [br]on Alberto Moravia's novel 0:00:19.029,0:00:21.697 “Il conformista” 1951 / “Conformist”. 0:00:21.697,0:00:24.365 Bernardo Bertolucci created[br]a wonderful, touching, 0:00:24.365,0:00:27.867 interesting story of the conflict,[br]personal conflict 0:00:27.867,0:00:31.675 between the main character[br]Marcello Clerici and the state. 0:00:31.675,0:00:34.166 As a result of this conflict,[br]the main character 0:00:34.167,0:00:36.939 lost his loved one. 0:00:36.939,0:00:39.603 Many of us in this room 0:00:39.603,0:00:44.774 are ready to confront the state,[br]the opinion of others or the crowd. 0:00:44.774,0:00:48.136 Actually, in our laboratory,[br]we are trying 0:00:48.136,0:00:52.925 to understand why we are strongly [br]inclined to be conformists, 0:00:52.925,0:00:57.017 how much we can understand the hidden[br]the cerebral mechanisms of conformism. 0:00:57.017,0:00:58.579 While preparing our talk, 0:00:58.579,0:01:03.181 I tried to find out where [br]my interest in this subject stemmed from. 0:01:03.181,0:01:05.854 I remembered a few interesting facts. 0:01:05.854,0:01:07.839 I have made my dissertation 0:01:07.839,0:01:09.982 under the supervision [br]of Natalia Behtereva -- 0:01:09.982,0:01:13.913 granddaughter of the great Russian[br]physiologist and psychiatrist 0:01:13.913,0:01:15.358 Vladimir Bekhterev. 0:01:15.358,0:01:17.820 Vladimir Bekhterev’s interest[br]was in social influence. 0:01:17.820,0:01:19.422 If you look at this book 0:01:19.422,0:01:25.647 “Suggestion and its role[br]in public life”, 0:01:25.659,0:01:28.000 you will find a number [br]of very interesting chapters. 0:01:28.000,0:01:30.896 For example, the chapter [br]on clonic effects, 0:01:30.896,0:01:33.792 epidemics of witchcraft and demonomania. 0:01:33.792,0:01:36.690 Incredibly interesting stories 0:01:36.690,0:01:40.802 about how epidemics[br]of religious ecstasies and convulsions 0:01:40.802,0:01:43.689 spread with incredible speed[br]in groups of people. 0:01:43.689,0:01:46.555 Actually, Behterev’s curiosity, 0:01:46.558,0:01:50.202 went on to his granddaughter,[br]and then to me as her student. 0:01:50.207,0:01:52.272 At that time I was studying brain 0:01:52.272,0:01:54.991 and we absolutely did not[br]understand how we can study 0:01:54.991,0:01:57.785 “Neurobiology of social influence”. 0:01:58.515,0:01:59.795 Many of you are familiar 0:01:59.795,0:02:02.312 with the excellent research[br]in social psychology. 0:02:02.312,0:02:04.608 As a post-graduate student,[br]I became increasingly interested 0:02:04.608,0:02:06.199 in social psychology. 0:02:06.199,0:02:08.836 With excitement, I read books[br]by social psychologists, 0:02:08.836,0:02:11.335 the books of Cialdini, Zimbardo, Arnsen. 0:02:11.335,0:02:14.007 I read all these[br]fantastic experiments which show 0:02:14.007,0:02:16.002 how people are influencing us. 0:02:16.002,0:02:18.605 I read and, frankly, realized that 0:02:18.605,0:02:22.712 as a neuroscientist,[br]I will never learn it, never... 0:02:22.712,0:02:25.933 Many of you might remember[br]wonderful experiments of Solomon Asch. 0:02:25.933,0:02:29.646 He asked his subjects[br]to do a very simple task. 0:02:29.646,0:02:31.808 They saw on a screen 0:02:31.808,0:02:33.771 three lines[br]“А”, “В” and “С”. 0:02:33.771,0:02:35.195 And the question was very simple: 0:02:35.195,0:02:39.109 which of these lines[br]has the same length as line “X”? 0:02:39.109,0:02:40.839 The answer is obvious: 0:02:40.839,0:02:42.711 line “B” is equal to line “X”. 0:02:42.711,0:02:44.932 But imagine for a minute[br]that in a room, 0:02:44.932,0:02:46.991 there are 6 decoy subjects besides you 0:02:46.991,0:02:49.148 and all of them are giving a wrong answer. 0:02:49.148,0:02:52.268 Solomon Asch showed[br]that in this situation, 0:02:52.268,0:02:55.148 less than a third of people[br]give the correct answer, 0:02:55.148,0:02:57.937 the rest will show conformism, 0:02:57.937,0:03:01.683 they'll give the wrong answer,[br]just not to be different from others. 0:03:01.683,0:03:05.682 Social psychology through hundreds [br]of great experiments showed 0:03:05.682,0:03:08.148 the power of the people around you,[br]the power of the crowd. 0:03:08.148,0:03:09.875 We are afraid to be different, 0:03:09.875,0:03:11.898 we change our opinion[br]to follow the crowd. 0:03:11.898,0:03:14.114 For example,[br]social psychology revealed that 0:03:14.114,0:03:17.426 it is the behavior of others,[br]not our own opinion, 0:03:17.426,0:03:20.778 that determines the amount[br]of adultery, crime, 0:03:20.778,0:03:24.808 amount of dishonest taxpayers. 0:03:24.808,0:03:29.341 Social influence and the behavior[br]of others determine our behavior. 0:03:29.341,0:03:33.060 But I was a neurophysiologist,[br]I knew that 0:03:33.060,0:03:36.275 I would never explore[br]all these interesting processes. 0:03:36.275,0:03:40.233 In my academic career,[br]along my academic path, 0:03:40.233,0:03:42.811 the change happened very unexpectedly. 0:03:42.811,0:03:45.258 I understood that I would have[br]no chance to study 0:03:45.258,0:03:46.736 all the processes of social influence, 0:03:46.736,0:03:48.306 when we realize with horror 0:03:48.306,0:03:50.602 how our opinion differs from[br]the opinion of the majority. 0:03:50.602,0:03:52.877 But one day, 0:03:52.877,0:03:56.556 when I was[br]on an internship in Helsinki, 0:03:56.556,0:03:58.675 in a university, I parked my car 0:03:58.675,0:04:01.208 near this building. 0:04:01.208,0:04:02.779 The building was created 0:04:02.779,0:04:05.061 by a magnificent Scandinavian architect 0:04:05.061,0:04:06.300 Alvar Aalto. 0:04:06.300,0:04:09.209 I stopped my car[br]and leaned towards the radio receiver. 0:04:09.209,0:04:11.952 Somebody was talking[br]about a new science, 0:04:11.952,0:04:13.666 about neuroeconomics. 0:04:13.666,0:04:17.108 The new discipline appeared[br]at that very moment 0:04:17.108,0:04:20.793 as economists and neuroscientists[br]discovered each other. 0:04:20.793,0:04:22.579 It turned out that [br]for hundreds of years, 0:04:22.579,0:04:26.359 economists and neuroscientists [br]had been studying the same thing. 0:04:26.359,0:04:28.600 They studied decision-making process. 0:04:28.600,0:04:32.146 The economists were interested[br]in exploring complex solutions: 0:04:32.146,0:04:35.498 why we pay this amount of money[br]for these goods and not a different one, 0:04:35.498,0:04:38.361 why we invest money[br]or do not invest money, 0:04:38.361,0:04:42.340 why we save money 0:04:42.340,0:04:45.980 for pensions, or not. 0:04:45.980,0:04:48.282 Biologists were interested[br]in simpler questions: 0:04:48.282,0:04:50.569 why we pursue the fat rabbit,[br]or not 0:04:50.569,0:04:54.631 or why we run away from a scary lion,[br]or not. 0:04:54.631,0:04:59.126 In fact, for hundreds of years [br]the two disciplines had been studying 0:04:59.147,0:05:01.484 the same thing, the same question: 0:05:01.484,0:05:03.093 how do we make decisions? 0:05:03.093,0:05:05.512 And here the new discipline appeared:[br]neuroeconomics. 0:05:05.512,0:05:07.960 This discipline tries to find out 0:05:07.960,0:05:10.849 how our brain[br]is programming our decisions 0:05:10.849,0:05:14.211 in various complex[br]economic and social contexts. 0:05:14.211,0:05:16.126 For me it was a turning point! 0:05:16.126,0:05:18.444 We were able to formalize the hypothesis, 0:05:18.444,0:05:21.742 the hypothesis of brain mechanisms[br]of conformism. 0:05:21.742,0:05:24.727 For us, conformism --[br]or social influence -- 0:05:24.727,0:05:26.937 is a phenomenon of people nearby 0:05:26.937,0:05:29.931 manipulating our brain, 0:05:29.931,0:05:32.077 manipulating the activity[br]of certain brain areas 0:05:32.077,0:05:33.933 involved in the decision-making process. 0:05:33.933,0:05:36.625 Which areas of the brain[br]and which processes 0:05:36.625,0:05:38.879 are exploited by people around us, 0:05:38.879,0:05:42.070 forcing us to change our opinion? 0:05:42.070,0:05:43.929 To answer this question, 0:05:43.929,0:05:46.386 we can put our subjects in the scanner, 0:05:46.386,0:05:48.493 try to influence their opinion 0:05:48.493,0:05:50.527 and register that activity of the brain, 0:05:50.527,0:05:52.644 which is connected[br]to social influence. 0:05:52.644,0:05:55.131 But we need a hypothesis. 0:05:55.131,0:05:56.935 In fact, we are interested 0:05:56.935,0:05:58.942 in the following situation. 0:05:58.942,0:06:00.831 This is a famous German photo, 0:06:00.831,0:06:02.624 you see a man with crossed hands 0:06:02.624,0:06:05.580 amidst the crowd giving the Nazi salute. 0:06:05.580,0:06:06.966 Probably this person 0:06:06.966,0:06:09.329 has a different opinion. 0:06:09.329,0:06:12.228 What is going on[br]in this man's head? 0:06:12.228,0:06:13.578 We hypothesized 0:06:13.578,0:06:16.560 that our biology, our evolution 0:06:16.560,0:06:18.105 designed the brain in such a way 0:06:18.105,0:06:20.244 that the brain at this point tells him: 0:06:20.244,0:06:21.909 “You're wrong! 0:06:21.909,0:06:24.296 You should not be different[br]from others!” 0:06:24.296,0:06:26.876 Indeed, it is dangerous[br]to differ from the people around. 0:06:26.876,0:06:29.389 Let’s imagine[br]an FC “Spartak” Moscow t-shirt 0:06:29.389,0:06:32.095 at the fan sector of Petrovsky stadium[br][home stadium of a rival team] 0:06:32.095,0:06:35.545 in St. Petersburg. 0:06:35.546,0:06:39.404 It can be very dangerous[br]to differ from others! 0:06:39.404,0:06:40.595 Therefore we hypothesized 0:06:40.595,0:06:43.046 that the brain signals us danger: 0:06:43.046,0:06:44.550 “You are different, it is dangerous, 0:06:44.550,0:06:47.848 change your opinion[br]to agree with the majority!” 0:06:47.848,0:06:51.442 How to identify[br]this signal of danger? 0:06:51.442,0:06:53.873 Here we can refer 0:06:53.873,0:06:56.266 to a formal representation[br]of this mechanism, 0:06:56.266,0:07:00.269 formulated by a remarkable neuroeconomist,[br]mathematician Read Montague. 0:07:00.269,0:07:02.856 He expressed this hypothesis[br]quite abstractly. 0:07:02.856,0:07:06.037 Imagine that the brain[br]perceives the behavior of others -- 0:07:06.037,0:07:09.065 this is a green line,[br]green curve, 0:07:09.065,0:07:11.778 this is how our brain[br]perceives the norm. 0:07:11.778,0:07:13.356 The red line indicates 0:07:13.356,0:07:15.874 how our brain perceives[br]our own behavior. 0:07:15.874,0:07:17.688 This is an abstract curve. 0:07:17.688,0:07:21.202 The difference between them[br]is a mathematical error. 0:07:21.202,0:07:22.813 This mathematical error 0:07:22.813,0:07:24.368 forces us to change our opinion 0:07:24.368,0:07:26.103 to agree with the opinions[br]of people nearby. 0:07:26.103,0:07:27.614 Many will say: “What a strange 0:07:27.614,0:07:29.810 simplified mechanism, 0:07:29.810,0:07:31.068 which is not clear enough.” 0:07:31.068,0:07:33.337 Why do they say that[br]about this mathematical error? 0:07:33.337,0:07:34.782 It is because we then translate 0:07:34.782,0:07:36.888 the whole problem of social influence 0:07:36.888,0:07:39.308 into the language of neuroeconomics. 0:07:39.308,0:07:41.858 For neuroeconomics, for biology, 0:07:41.858,0:07:44.179 error is the key point. 0:07:44.179,0:07:45.507 For neurobiology 0:07:45.507,0:07:47.013 error -- or the awareness of error -- 0:07:47.013,0:07:48.586 is the moment when we change. 0:07:48.586,0:07:50.939 If we do not realize it, 0:07:50.939,0:07:53.958 and make a mistake,[br]we learn almost nothing, 0:07:53.958,0:07:57.052 we stick to the same opinion,[br]the same behavior. 0:07:57.052,0:07:59.554 If we are wrong and notice the mistake, 0:07:59.554,0:08:01.864 we change, we learn. 0:08:01.864,0:08:03.836 Therefore, we hypothesized[br]that at the moment 0:08:03.836,0:08:06.165 when our opinion differs[br]from the opinion of others, 0:08:06.165,0:08:08.718 our brain screams: “You're wrong!” 0:08:08.718,0:08:10.559 The brain signals us an error 0:08:10.559,0:08:12.193 and this signal forces us 0:08:12.218,0:08:15.683 to automatically change our opinion[br]to agree with the opinion of others. 0:08:15.683,0:08:18.762 How to find this error signal[br]in a human brain? 0:08:18.762,0:08:21.490 A huge body of neurobiological research 0:08:21.490,0:08:23.439 shows that there is 0:08:23.439,0:08:26.389 a distributed network in our brain 0:08:26.389,0:08:28.561 which monitors our mistakes. 0:08:28.561,0:08:30.510 It warns us about our mistakes and, 0:08:30.510,0:08:32.202 first of all,[br]it is the cingulate cortex, 0:08:32.202,0:08:35.155 marked here by a yellow circle. 0:08:35.155,0:08:38.625 If you mentally cut our brain[br]like apple, between the hemispheres, 0:08:38.625,0:08:40.705 then the cingulate cortex[br]will be located 0:08:40.705,0:08:43.491 on the inner surface[br]of the cerebral hemispheres. 0:08:43.491,0:08:46.251 This area signals us our mistakes, 0:08:46.251,0:08:48.701 this area triggers internal changes. 0:08:48.701,0:08:51.080 Therefore, if our hypothesis is correct, 0:08:51.080,0:08:52.773 if for our brain 0:08:52.773,0:08:55.331 differing from others is an error, 0:08:55.331,0:08:57.214 we should detect this activity, 0:08:57.214,0:09:00.458 when our opinion[br]differs from the opinion of others. 0:09:00.458,0:09:03.405 We thought a lot about[br]how to explore conformism, 0:09:03.405,0:09:06.293 how to trigger conformism many times,[br]and at the same time 0:09:06.293,0:09:08.402 not stress our subjects too much. 0:09:08.402,0:09:10.333 At that time, I was working[br]in the Netherlands. 0:09:10.358,0:09:11.952 My professor, Hyenas Fernandez[br]suggested: 0:09:11.977,0:09:13.355 “Let’s study conformism 0:09:13.355,0:09:16.045 as a change of opinion[br]about the attractiveness of faces.” 0:09:16.045,0:09:18.842 I like this 0:09:18.842,0:09:20.249 digital masterpiece, 0:09:20.249,0:09:22.864 you see beautiful faces[br]of different races 0:09:22.864,0:09:26.086 and carefully crafted[br]transient versions. 0:09:26.086,0:09:28.253 All these people are beautiful. 0:09:28.253,0:09:30.923 Indeed, there is something[br]universal in beauty 0:09:30.923,0:09:32.679 and psychology says[br]that beauty is universal. 0:09:32.679,0:09:35.031 But at the same time[br]there is something special 0:09:35.031,0:09:37.144 in the faces of people[br]of different cultures, 0:09:37.144,0:09:39.249 that we do not fully understand. 0:09:39.249,0:09:41.261 These faces are beautiful[br]for a given culture, 0:09:41.261,0:09:43.804 but we cannot grasp this beauty. 0:09:43.804,0:09:46.730 We decided to study how our opinion 0:09:46.730,0:09:49.311 changes 0:09:49.311,0:09:51.351 under the influence[br]of the opinion of others. 0:09:51.351,0:09:52.602 We created a very simple test. 0:09:52.602,0:09:55.799 We put our subjects into a scanner[br]and asked them 0:09:55.799,0:09:57.853 to assess the attractiveness[br]of people's faces. 0:09:57.853,0:09:59.672 They saw a face on the screen 0:09:59.672,0:10:01.721 and had to assess it 0:10:01.721,0:10:03.074 from not attractive -- 1, 0:10:03.074,0:10:05.903 to very attractive -- 8 0:10:05.903,0:10:07.456 The subject evaluates the face, 0:10:07.456,0:10:09.749 see their assessment on the screen, 0:10:09.749,0:10:10.922 but every time they did so, 0:10:10.922,0:10:14.158 every time they assessed the face, 0:10:14.158,0:10:16.196 we presented them the opinion 0:10:16.196,0:10:19.644 of more than one hundred students[br]from the same university. 0:10:19.644,0:10:22.941 Sometimes this opinion differed[br]from the subject's opinion, 0:10:22.941,0:10:24.399 sometimes it matched. 0:10:24.399,0:10:26.190 We were interested in[br]what is happening at the moment, 0:10:26.190,0:10:27.874 when our opinion differs 0:10:27.874,0:10:29.872 from the opinion of others. 0:10:29.872,0:10:31.466 Whether the cingulate cortex activates, 0:10:31.466,0:10:34.224 whether it tells us about the error... 0:10:34.224,0:10:36.179 Our research has shown that indeed, 0:10:36.179,0:10:38.628 you see it in yellow,[br]the cingulate cortex activates, 0:10:38.628,0:10:40.988 as soon as our opinion differs[br]from the opinion of others. 0:10:40.988,0:10:43.407 For our brain, the difference 0:10:43.407,0:10:46.051 from others in our behavior, [br]in our opinion -- 0:10:46.051,0:10:47.885 is an error! 0:10:47.885,0:10:50.971 How quickly does the brain[br]tell us about this error? 0:10:50.971,0:10:52.258 To investigate this, 0:10:52.258,0:10:53.738 we used a different method -- 0:10:53.738,0:10:55.713 magnetic encephalography. 0:10:55.713,0:10:57.819 With this method,[br]we can surround your head 0:10:57.819,0:11:00.560 with lots of hypersensitive sensors 0:11:00.560,0:11:02.229 which are able to catch a small signal 0:11:02.229,0:11:04.343 produced by the cingulate cortex. 0:11:04.343,0:11:06.075 And by using this method, 0:11:06.075,0:11:08.605 we saw this peak of activity[br]240 milliseconds later, 0:11:08.605,0:11:11.058 a quarter of a second later 0:11:11.058,0:11:14.735 our brain tells us:[br]“You differ from others! 0:11:14.735,0:11:16.503 Change your opinion!” 0:11:16.503,0:11:19.156 If such a signal[br]really exists in the brain, 0:11:19.156,0:11:21.410 can we suppress it by modern methods? 0:11:21.410,0:11:22.739 Yes, we can! 0:11:22.739,0:11:26.229 We can use[br]transcranial magnetic stimulation. 0:11:26.229,0:11:28.588 Using a focused magnetic field, 0:11:28.588,0:11:31.421 we can temporarily suppress, 0:11:31.421,0:11:33.442 reduce the activity[br]of the cingulate cortex, 0:11:33.442,0:11:35.822 which tells us about this error. 0:11:35.822,0:11:38.916 We can expose our subject 0:11:38.916,0:11:40.268 to a transcranial magnetic stimulation. 0:11:40.268,0:11:43.108 For 20-30 minutes, their cingulate cortex 0:11:43.108,0:11:46.072 will produce much fewer signals. 0:11:46.072,0:11:48.504 We did this with our subjects, 0:11:48.504,0:11:50.776 asked them to do the same task. 0:11:50.776,0:11:52.943 The results show that our subjects 0:11:52.943,0:11:55.714 change their opinion only half as much 0:11:55.714,0:11:57.477 after their cingulate cortex 0:11:57.477,0:11:59.700 was temporarily blocked 0:11:59.700,0:12:01.689 with magnetic field. 0:12:01.689,0:12:04.809 That is, the brain[br]automatically informs us: 0:12:04.809,0:12:07.046 “We differ from others.” 0:12:07.046,0:12:10.605 This signal appears[br]in a quarter of a second. 0:12:10.605,0:12:12.145 Modern methods allow us 0:12:12.145,0:12:13.283 to suppress this signal 0:12:13.283,0:12:15.019 and make people less conformists. 0:12:15.019,0:12:17.726 My colleagues in various laboratories 0:12:17.726,0:12:19.613 studied how the cingulate cortex responds 0:12:19.613,0:12:21.630 to the opinion of the group of people[br]that we love, 0:12:21.630,0:12:24.058 and to the opinion of the group[br]that we hate, 0:12:24.058,0:12:27.427 how it reacts when our opinion differs[br]from the opinion of experts. 0:12:27.427,0:12:28.629 My colleagues in Denmark 0:12:28.629,0:12:30.575 used chemical substances 0:12:30.575,0:12:32.307 that change a certain amount 0:12:32.307,0:12:34.360 of neurotransmitters[br]in the cingulate cortex 0:12:34.360,0:12:37.061 and temporarily made people[br]more conformists. 0:12:37.061,0:12:39.205 That is, we are increasingly aware 0:12:39.205,0:12:41.742 of what happens[br]in the brain of a conformist. 0:12:41.742,0:12:43.140 We all seem to be prone 0:12:43.140,0:12:45.467 to automatically change our opinion 0:12:45.467,0:12:49.151 to agree with the opinion of others. 0:12:49.151,0:12:51.908 All this research has shown[br]that for our brain, 0:12:51.908,0:12:55.187 our difference from others is an error 0:12:55.187,0:12:57.154 and it showed that the brain tends 0:12:57.155,0:13:00.557 to automatically change our opinion[br]to agree with the opinion of others. 0:13:00.557,0:13:03.440 Why did we become such conformists? 0:13:03.453,0:13:05.591 Why are we inclined to conformism? 0:13:05.591,0:13:08.229 We can cite here[br]a few theories. 0:13:08.229,0:13:11.466 One theory -- “wisdom of the crowds” --[br]says that the crowd 0:13:11.466,0:13:15.536 is a more accurate device[br]to evaluate the reality. 0:13:15.550,0:13:17.118 There are many opinions in the crowd. 0:13:17.118,0:13:19.296 It leads to the crowd more accurately 0:13:19.296,0:13:22.390 assessing the situation,[br]evaluating information, 0:13:22.390,0:13:24.119 so you should follow the crowd. 0:13:24.119,0:13:26.138 Another theory is --[br]evolutionary theory -- 0:13:26.138,0:13:28.717 tells us about evolutionarily stable[br]strategies of behavior. 0:13:28.717,0:13:30.790 It says that for millions of years 0:13:30.790,0:13:33.115 evolution has been testing us. 0:13:33.115,0:13:36.812 All wrong decisions,[br]suboptimal solutions, 0:13:36.812,0:13:39.265 are immediately punished[br]by natural selection. 0:13:39.265,0:13:42.033 We become somebody's food,[br]we do not leave posterity, 0:13:42.033,0:13:43.570 we die from hunger. 0:13:43.570,0:13:46.520 Therefore, if a group, a flock, 0:13:46.520,0:13:50.099 learns the same behavior,[br]the same opinion... 0:13:50.099,0:13:51.907 It can happen only 0:13:51.907,0:13:55.141 if this opinion, this behavior,[br]is better than the alternative. 0:13:55.141,0:13:57.948 Because the alternative was punished[br]for millions of years. 0:13:57.948,0:14:00.665 From the point of view of evolution,[br]we must follow the flock. 0:14:00.665,0:14:04.136 Their opinion is checked[br]by natural selection. 0:14:04.136,0:14:07.499 But we are living[br]in a rapidly changing world, 0:14:07.499,0:14:09.318 where the opinion of the majority 0:14:09.318,0:14:11.332 may slow down progress, for example. 0:14:11.332,0:14:16.288 The majority can suppress[br]the creative minority opinion, 0:14:16.288,0:14:18.018 it can suppress changes. 0:14:18.018,0:14:19.340 Therefore we have to remember 0:14:19.340,0:14:21.783 about this internal[br]tendency to conformism, 0:14:21.783,0:14:25.490 we tend to change our opinion[br]to agree with the opinion of others. 0:14:25.490,0:14:28.345 We should remember this when we see[br]the number of likes on the Internet, 0:14:28.345,0:14:30.655 when we read surveys, 0:14:30.655,0:14:35.332 when we listen to TED talks. 0:14:35.332,0:14:38.900 If we go back to the main question[br]of our conversation: 0:14:38.900,0:14:41.713 what was going on[br]in the head of Marcello Clerici 0:14:41.713,0:14:45.135 during his conflict with the state? 0:14:45.135,0:14:48.430 Probably his brain signaled him 0:14:48.430,0:14:50.641 about, possibly,[br]the most important mistake: 0:14:50.641,0:14:52.752 his opinion differs[br]from the opinion of the state, 0:14:52.752,0:14:55.875 his opinion differs[br]from the opinion of others. 0:14:55.875,0:14:59.562 And we should remember that. 0:14:59.562,0:15:02.105 Perhaps not everyone in this room[br]will be able to overcome... 0:15:02.105,0:15:03.554 Because when we go 0:15:03.554,0:15:07.260 against the state, against others,[br]against the opinion of the crowd, 0:15:07.260,0:15:11.072 we go, in some sense,[br]against our own brain. 0:15:11.072,0:15:12.663 Perhaps at this point, [br]I should conclude my presentation. 0:15:12.663,0:15:15.301 And finally,[br]I want to thank all my colleagues, 0:15:15.301,0:15:16.631 who helped me carry out 0:15:16.631,0:15:18.055 all these quite difficult experiments 0:15:18.055,0:15:19.653 and you for your patience and attention. 0:15:19.653,0:15:21.421 Thank You![br](Applause)