1
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So you've heard of your IQ,

2
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
your general intelligence,

3
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but what's your Psy-Q?

4
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
How much do you know
about what makes you tick,

5
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and how good are you
at predicting other peoples' behavior

6
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
or even your own?

7
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And how much about what you think
you know about psychology is wrong?

8
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So let's find out by counting down
the top 10 myths of psychology.

9
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So you've probably heard it said
that when it comes to their psychology,

10
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
it's almost as if men are from Mars
and women are from Venus.

11
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But how different
are men and women really?

12
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So to find out, let's start by looking
at something on which men and women

13
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
really do differ

14
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and plotting some psychological
gender differences on the same scale.

15
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So one thing that men and women

16
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
do really differ on is how far
they can throw a ball.

17
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So if we look at the data for men here,

18
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
we see what is called
a normal distribution curve.

19
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
A few men can throw a ball really far,

20
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and a few men not far at all,

21
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but most a kind of average difference.

22
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And women share
the same distribution as well,

23
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but actually there's
quite a big difference.

24
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
In fact, the average man
can throw a ball further

25
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
than about 98 percent of all women.

26
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So now let's look at what
some psychological gender differences

27
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
look like on the same standardized scale.

28
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So any psychologist will tell you
that men are better

29
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
at spacial awareness than women,

30
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
so things like map-reading, for example,

31
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and it's true,

32
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but let's have a look
at the size of this difference.

33
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It's tiny: the lines are so close together
that they almost overlap.

34
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
In fact, the average woman is better
than 33 percent of all men,

35
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and of course, if that was 50 percent,

36
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
then the two genders
would be exactly equal.

37
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And it's worth bearing in mind
that this difference

38
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and the next one I'm going to show you

39
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
are pretty much the biggest
psychological gender differences

40
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
ever discovered in psychology.

41
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So here's the next one.

42
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Any psychologist will tell you
that women are better

43
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
with language and grammar than men.

44
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So here's performance
on the standardized grammar test.

45
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
There go the women. There go to the men.

46
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Again, yes, women are better on average,

47
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but the lines are so close

48
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that 33 percent of men

49
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
are better than the average woman,

50
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and again, if it was 50 percent,

51
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that would represent
complete gender equality.

52
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So it's not really
a case of Mars and Venus.

53
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It's more a case of, if anything,
Mars and Snickers:

54
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
basically the same, but, you know,

55
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
one's maybe slightly
nuttier than the other.

56
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I won't say which.

57
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Right. Now we've got you warmed up.

58
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Let's psychoanalyze you using
the famous Rorschach inkblot test.

59
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So you can probably see two, I dunno,
two bears or two people or something.

60
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But what do you think they're doing?

61
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Put your hand up if you think
they're saying hello.

62
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Not many people. Okay.

63
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Put your hands up if you think
they are high-fiving.

64
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Okay. What if you think they're fighting?

65
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Only a few people there.

66
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Okay, so if you think they're
saying hello or high-fiving,

67
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
then that means you're a friendly person.

68
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
If you think they're fighting,
that means you're a bit more

69
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
of a nasty, aggressive person.

70
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Are you a lover or a fighter, basically.

71
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
All right, what about this one?

72
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This isn't really a voting one,

73
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
so on three, everyone
shout out what you see.

74
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
One, two, three.

75
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I heard hamster. Who said hamster?

76
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
That was very worrying.

77
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
A guy there said hamster.

78
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Well, you should see
some kind of two-legged animal here,

79
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and then the mirror image of them there.

80
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
If you didn't, then this means
that you have difficulty

81
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
processing complex situations

82
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
where there's a lot going on.

83
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Except, of course,
it doesn't mean that at all.

84
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Rorschach inkblot tests
have basically no validity

85
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
when it comes to diagnosing
people's personality

86
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and are not used
by modern-day psychologists.

87
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
In fact, one recent study found

88
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that when you do try
to diagnose people's personality


89
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
using Rorschach inkblot tests,

90
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
schizophrenia was diagnosed

91
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in about one sixth of apparently
perfectly normal participants.

92
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So if you didn't do that well on this,

93
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
maybe you are not
a very visual type of person.

94
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So let's do another
quick quiz to find out.

95
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
When making a cake, do you prefer to

96
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
-- so hands up for each one again --

97
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
do you prefer to use
a recipe book with pictures?

98
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Yeah, a few people.

99
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Have a friend talk you through?

100
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Or have a go, making it up
as you go along?

101
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Quite a few people there.

102
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Okay, so if you said a,

103
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
then this means that you
are a visual learner

104
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and you learn best when information

105
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is presented in a visual style.

106
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
If you said b, it means
you're an auditory learner,

107
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that you learn best when information
is presented to you in an auditory format,

108
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and if you said c,

109
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
it means that you're
a kinesthetic learner,

110
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that you learn best when you get stuck in

111
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and do things with your hands.

112
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Except, of course,
as you've probably guessed,

113
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that it doesn't, because
the whole thing is a complete myth.

114
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Learning styles are made up

115
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and are not supported
by scientific evidence.

116
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So we know this because in
tightly controlled experimental studies,

117
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
when learners are given material to learn

118
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
either in their preferred style
or an opposite style,

119
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
it makes no difference at all

120
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to the amount of information
that they retain.

121
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And if you think about it
for just a second,

122
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
it's just obvious
that this has to be true.

123
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It's obvious that
the best presentation format

124
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
depends not on you,

125
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but on what you're trying to learn.

126
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Could you learn to drive a car,
for example,

127
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
just by listening to someone
telling you what to do

128
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
with no kinesthetic experience?

129
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Could you solve simultaneous equations

130
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
by talking them through in your head
and without writing them down?

131
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Could you ?? for your architecture exams

132
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
using interpretive dance
if you're a kinesthetic learner?

133
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
No. What you need to do is match

134
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the material to be learned
to the presentation format,

135
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
not you.

136
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So, I know many of you
are A-level students

137
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that will have recently gotten
your ???? results.

138
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And if you didn't quite get
what you were hoping for,

139
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
then you can't really blame
your learning style,

140
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but one thing that you might want
to think about blaming is your genes.

141
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So what this is all about

142
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is a recent study
at University College London

143
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
found that 58 percent of the variation

144
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
between different students
and their ??? results

145
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
was down to genetic factors.

146
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So that sounds a very precise figure,

147
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
so how can we tell?

148
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Well, when we want to unpack
the relative contributions

149
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
of genes and the environment,

150
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
what we can do is do a twin study.

151
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So identical twins share
100 percent of their environment

152
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and 100 percent of their genes,

153
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
whereas non-identical twins
share 100 percent of their environment,

154
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but just like any brother and sister,

155
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
share only 50 percent of their genes.

156
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So by comparing how similar
??? results are in identical twins

157
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
versus non-identical twins,

158
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and doing some clever math,

159
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
we can an idea of how much variation
and performance is due to the environment

160
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and how much is due to genes.

161
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And it turns out that it's
about 58 percent due to genes.

162
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So this isn't to undermine the hard work
that you and your teachers here put in.

163
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
If you didn't quite get the ??? results
that you were hoping for,

164
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
then you can always try blaming
your parents, or at least their genes.

165
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
One thing that you shouldn't blame

166
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is being a left brained
or right brained learner,

167
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
because again, this is a myth.

168
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So the myth here is that
the left brain is logical,

169
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
it's good with equations like this,

170
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and the right brain is more creative,

171
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
so the right brain is better at music.

172
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But again, this is a myth
because nearly everything that you do

173
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
involves nearly all parts
of your brain talking together,

174
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
even just the most mundane thing
like having a normal conversation.

175
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
However, perhaps one reason
why this myth has survived

176
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is that there is
a slight grain of truth to it.

177
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So a related version of the myth

178
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is that left-handed people are
more creative than right-handed people,

179
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which kind of makes sense because
your brain controls the opposite hands,

180
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
so left-handed people,

181
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the right side of the brain
is slightly more active

182
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
than the left hand side of the brain,

183
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and the idea is the right-hand side
is more creative.

184
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Now, it isn't true per se

185
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that left-handed people are more creative
than right-handed people.

186
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
What is true that ambidextrous people,

187
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
or people who use both hands
for different tasks,

188
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
are more creative thinkers
than one-handed people,

189
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
because being ambidextrous involves

190
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
having both sides of the brain
talk to each other a lot,

191
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which seems to be involved
in creating flexible thinking.

192
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The myth of the creative left-hander

193
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
arises from the fact
that being ambidextrous

194
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is more common amongst left-handers

195
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
than right handers,

196
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
so a grain of truth in the idea
of the creative left-hander,

197
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but not much.

198
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
A related myth that you've
probably heard of

199
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is that we only use
10 percent of our brains.

200
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This is, again, a complete myth.

201
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Nearly everything that we do,
even the most mundane thing,

202
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
uses nearly all of our brains.

203
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
That said, it is of course true

204
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that most of us don't use our brainpower

205
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
quite as well as we could.

206
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So what could we do
to boost our brain power?

207
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Maybe we could listen
to a nice bit of Mozart.

208
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So have you heard of the idea
of the Mozart effect?

209
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So the idea is that listening to Mozart

210
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
makes you smarter and improves
your performance on IQ tests.

211
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Now again, what's interesting
about this myth

212
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is that although it's basically a myth,

213
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
there is a grain of truth to it.

214
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So the original study found that

215
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
participants who were played
Mozart music for a few minutes

216
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
did better on a subsequent IQ test

217
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
than participants who simply
sat in silence.

218
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But a follow-up study recruited
some people who like Mozart music

219
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and then another group of people

220
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
who were fans of the horror stories
of Stephen King.

221
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And they played the people
the music or the stories.

222
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The people who preferred
Mozart music to the stories

223
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
got a bigger IQ boost
from the Mozart than the stories,

224
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but the people who preferred
the stories to the Mozart music

225
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
got a bigger IQ boost

226
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
from listening to the Stephen King stories
than the Mozart music.

227
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So the truth is that listening
to something that you enjoy

228
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
perks you up a bit
and gives you a temporary IQ boost

229
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
on a narrow range of tasks.

230
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
There's no suggestion that
listening to Mozart

231
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
or indeed Stephen King stories

232
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is going to make you any smarter
in the long run.

233
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So another version of the Mozart myth

234
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is that listening to Mozart can make you
not only cleverer but healthier, too.

235
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Unfortunately, this doesn't
seem to be true

236
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
of someone who listened
to the music of Mozart almost every day,

237
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Mozart himself,

238
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
who suffered from gonorrhea,
smallpox, arthritis,

239
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and what most people think
eventually killed him in the end,

240
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
syphilis.

241
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This suggests that Mozart
should have bit more careful, perhaps,

242
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
when choosing his sexual partners.

243
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But how do we choose a partner?

244
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So a myth, but I have to say
is sometimes spread a bit by sociologists

245
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is that our preferences
in a romantic partner

246
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
are a product of our culture,

247
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that they're very culturally specific,

248
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but in fact, the data don't back this up.

249
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So a famous study surveyed people from
32 different cultures across the globe,

250
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
from Americans to Zulus,

251
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
on what they look for in a partner.

252
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And in every single culture
across the globe,

253
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
men placed more value
on physical attractiveness in a partner

254
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
than did women,

255
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and in every single culture, too,

256
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
women placed more importance than did men

257
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
on ambition and high earning power.

258
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
In every culture, too,

259
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
men preferred women
who were younger than themselves,

260
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
an average of I think it was 2.66 years,

261
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and in every culture, too,

262
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
women preferred men
who were older than them,

263
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
so an average of 3.42 years,

264
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which is why we've got here
"Everybody Needs A Sugar Daddy."

265
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So moving on from trying
to score with a partner

266
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to trying to score in basketball
or football or whatever your sport is.

267
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So the myth here is that sportsmen

268
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
go through hot hand streaks,
Americans call them,

269
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
or purple patches,
we sometimes say in England,

270
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
where they just can't miss,

271
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
like this guy here.

272
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But in fact, what happens is that
if you analyze the pattern

273
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
of hits and misses statistically,

274
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
it turns out that it's
nearly always at random.

275
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Your brain creates patterns
from the randomness.

276
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So if you toss a coin, you know,

277
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
a streak of heads or tails is going
to come out somewhere in randomness,

278
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and becomes the brain likes
to see patterns where there are none,

279
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
we look at these streaks
and attribute meanings to them

280
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and say, "Yeah he's really on form today,"

281
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
whereas actually you would
get the same pattern

282
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
if you were just getting
hits and misses at random.

283
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So an exception to this, however,
is penalty shootouts.

284
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
A recent study looking
at penalty shootouts in football

285
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
shows that players who represent countries

286
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
with a very bad record
in penalty shootouts,

287
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
like, for example, England,

288
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
tend to be quicker to take their shots
than countries with a better record,

289
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and presumably as a result,
they're more likely to miss.

290
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Which raises the question

291
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
of if there's any way that we
could improve people's performance,

292
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and one thing you might think about doing

293
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is punishing people for their misses

294
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and seeing if that improves things.

295
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This idea, the effect that punishment
can improve performance,

296
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is what participants
thought they were testing

297
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in Milgram's famous learning
and punishment experiment

298
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that you've probably heard about
if you're a psychology student.

299
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The story goes that participants
were prepared to give

300
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
what they believed to be fatal
electric shocks to a fellow participant

301
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
when they got a question wrong,

302
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
just because someone
in a white coat told them too.

303
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But this story is a myth
for three reasons.

304
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Firstly and most crucially,
the lab coat wasn't white.

305
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It was, in fact, grey.

306
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Secondly, the participants
were told before the study

307
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and reminded any time
they raised a concern,

308
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that although the shocks were painful,
they were not fatal

309
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and indeed caused
no permanent damage whatsoever.

310
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And thirdly, participants
didn't give the shocks

311
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
just because someone
in the coat told them to.

312
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
When they were interviewed
after the study,

313
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
all the participants said
that they firmly believed

314
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that the learning and punishment study
served a worthy scientific purpose

315
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which would have
enduring gains for science

316
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
as opposed to the momentary
non-fatal discomfort

317
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
caused to the participants.

318
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Okay, so I've been talking
for about 12 minutes now,

319
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and you've probably been sitting there

320
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
listening to me, analyzing
my speech patterns and body language

321
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and trying to work out if you should
take any notice of what I'm saying,

322
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
whether I'm telling the truth
or whether I'm lying,

323
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but if so you've
probably completely failed,

324
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
because although we all think
we can catch a liar

325
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
from their body language
and speech patterns,

326
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
hundreds of psychological tests
over the years have shown

327
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that all of us, including
police officers and detectives,

328
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
are basically at chance when it comes
to detecting lies from body language

329
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and verbal patterns.

330
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Interestingly, there is one exception:

331
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
TV appeals for missing relatives.

332
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It's quite easy to predict
when the relatives are missing

333
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and when the appealers have in fact
murdered the relatives themselves.

334
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So hoax appealers are more likely
to shake their heads, to look away,

335
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and to make errors in their speech,

336
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
whereas genuine appealers are more likely

337
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to express hope that the person
will return safely

338
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and to avoid brutal language.

339
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So, for example, they might say
"taken from us" rather than "killed."

340
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Speaking of which,

341
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
it's about time I killed this talk,

342
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but before I do, I just want to give you

343
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in 30 seconds

344
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the overarching myth of psychology.

345
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So the myth is that psychology

346
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is just a collection
of interesting theories,

347
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
all of which say something useful

348
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and all of which have something to offer.

349
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
What I hope to have shown you
in the past few minutes

350
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is that this isn't true.

351
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
What we need to do is assess
psychological theories

352
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
by seeing what predictions they make,

353
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
whether that is that listening to Mozart
makes you smarter,

354
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that you learn better when information

355
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is presented in your
preferred learning style,

356
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
or whatever it is, all of these
are testable empirical predictions,

357
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and the only way we can make progress

358
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is to test these predictions
against the data

359
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in tightly controlled
experimental studies,

360
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and it's only by doing so
that we can hope to discover

361
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which of these theories
are well-supported,

362
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and which, like all the ones
I've told you about today, are myths.

363
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Thank you.

364
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
(Applause)