1 00:00:00,173 --> 00:00:21,022 (Intro jingle) 2 00:00:21,022 --> 00:00:22,604 I'm Paul Levinson 3 00:00:22,604 --> 00:00:28,291 and welcome to Light On Light Through, episode 93: 4 00:00:28,791 --> 00:00:32,471 The Selfie and Marshall McLuhan. 5 00:00:33,534 --> 00:00:43,760 Well, you might ask how and what did Marshall McLuhan, who left this earth in 1980, 6 00:00:44,851 --> 00:00:47,537 what did he have to say about the selfie, 7 00:00:47,953 --> 00:00:52,935 which of course didn't even exist until just a few years ago. 8 00:00:54,163 --> 00:00:57,194 The answer, I think, is very interesting. 9 00:00:57,194 --> 00:01:01,701 One of the real joys about understanding McLuhan 10 00:01:02,167 --> 00:01:07,935 is how what he wrote in the 50's, the 60's and the 1970's 11 00:01:08,717 --> 00:01:11,860 so accurately predicted 12 00:01:12,503 --> 00:01:17,674 what our communications and media are doing today. 13 00:01:18,384 --> 00:01:26,312 And even better than that in some ways, is the way that some people who have read McLuhan 14 00:01:27,049 --> 00:01:35,459 compound insights, just in their everyday lives, when they realize that hey, this is something 15 00:01:35,459 --> 00:01:40,194 that McLuhan might have actually been talking about, 16 00:01:40,194 --> 00:01:48,045 and something that McLuhan's ideas can help us understand and explain 17 00:01:48,644 --> 00:01:53,606 in hopefully a unique and valuable way. 18 00:01:54,328 --> 00:01:58,416 So, here is one of my favorite examples: 19 00:01:58,416 --> 00:02:04,253 a true story, something that happened to me about 5 or 6 months ago. 20 00:02:04,744 --> 00:02:06,841 I actually wrote a blog post about it. 21 00:02:06,841 --> 00:02:12,531 Now I'm finally getting around to doing a podcast episode about this. 22 00:02:13,847 --> 00:02:19,137 I posted a photo on Twitter, of Marshall McLuhan, 23 00:02:19,596 --> 00:02:27,114 his son Eric McLuhan and me that was taken in the late 1970's, 24 00:02:27,447 --> 00:02:32,485 when I had organized a conference at Fairleigh Dickinson University, 25 00:02:32,485 --> 00:02:37,280 which is where I was teaching then: it's in Teaneck, New Jersey. 26 00:02:37,755 --> 00:02:43,918 The conference was about the Tetrad or the Laws of the Media. 27 00:02:44,381 --> 00:02:47,935 Now, I'll get back to that in a moment. 28 00:02:48,305 --> 00:02:52,382 But one of the first people to comment on the photo 29 00:02:53,105 --> 00:02:58,125 was a current media theorist, by the name of Ian Bogost, 30 00:02:58,716 --> 00:03:02,398 who said: 'Where is the fourth?' 31 00:03:03,504 --> 00:03:08,055 Now, in order to understand why Ian asked that question, 32 00:03:08,564 --> 00:03:15,300 now, I'll explain to you what the Tetrad or Laws of the Media are all about. 33 00:03:15,726 --> 00:03:20,489 And they go back to the mid to late 1970s 34 00:03:20,863 --> 00:03:27,142 when Marshall McLuhan began publishing some short articles and talking about 35 00:03:27,499 --> 00:03:32,692 what he was terming 'the laws of the media', or 'laws of media'. 36 00:03:33,363 --> 00:03:38,417 And in fact, there were four laws: hence the word 'tetrad' 37 00:03:38,417 --> 00:03:46,856 which is a way of saying 'four'; a triad is three, a tetrad is four. 38 00:03:47,757 --> 00:03:51,599 And to give you an example, you could do a tetrad 39 00:03:51,599 --> 00:04:00,509 or apply McLuhan's Laws of Media to radio and its impact, and how people used it. 40 00:04:01,331 --> 00:04:08,682 And you can begin by looking at the first consequence or effect of radio. 41 00:04:09,405 --> 00:04:14,360 McLuhan called this first law, this first law of the Tetrad, 42 00:04:14,693 --> 00:04:18,296 enhancement or amplification. 43 00:04:18,941 --> 00:04:25,707 And what the radio clearly does is it amplifies or enhances 44 00:04:26,580 --> 00:04:34,499 instant verbal, acoustic communication across long distances. 45 00:04:35,618 --> 00:04:41,164 The second law has to do with what the new technology or media replaces 46 00:04:41,164 --> 00:04:44,140 and McLuhan called this obsolescence. 47 00:04:45,091 --> 00:04:50,925 So, you can clearly see that one of the things that radio obsolesced 48 00:04:50,925 --> 00:04:57,230 was the printed word, in a variety of ways: say, newspapers. 49 00:04:57,623 --> 00:05:01,781 They used to be the only way that people received news. 50 00:05:02,136 --> 00:05:08,758 Once radio came along, in the 1920's and really began expanding in the 1930's, 51 00:05:09,054 --> 00:05:14,816 people increasingly began to get their news, not just from newspapers, 52 00:05:14,816 --> 00:05:16,955 but from radio reports. 53 00:05:17,553 --> 00:05:21,170 Or consider something like a sporting event. 54 00:05:22,115 --> 00:05:26,714 That's something where, up until the introduction of radio, 55 00:05:26,714 --> 00:05:32,977 people had to read about what their favorite teams did, in the newspaper: 56 00:05:33,543 --> 00:05:36,100 either later in the day, or the next day. 57 00:05:37,037 --> 00:05:42,721 But what radio did is, it also allowed people to listen to games 58 00:05:42,721 --> 00:05:47,420 as they were actually occurring, in real time. 59 00:05:48,688 --> 00:05:53,103 The third law, or third part of the tetrad, gets even more interesting, 60 00:05:53,103 --> 00:05:57,608 because McLuhan said that every new medium or technology 61 00:05:57,900 --> 00:06:00,000 first of all enhances something, 62 00:06:00,432 --> 00:06:05,874 second of all obsolesces or eclipses something, something else, 63 00:06:06,123 --> 00:06:11,288 and third of all, retrieves some kind of communication 64 00:06:11,288 --> 00:06:15,232 which itself had been previously obsolesced. 65 00:06:15,679 --> 00:06:23,022 And so, again clearly, what radio does is it retrieves the spoken word. 66 00:06:23,625 --> 00:06:26,459 Now the spoken word, of course, never disappeared. 67 00:06:26,703 --> 00:06:31,855 So it's not as if this retrieval was digging something up 68 00:06:31,855 --> 00:06:33,492 which had been out of use. 69 00:06:33,492 --> 00:06:38,449 The spoken word continued to be important, and continues to be important right now. 70 00:06:38,744 --> 00:06:41,189 That's the way it has been throughout human history. 71 00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:46,239 But there's also no doubt that what the written word did 72 00:06:46,718 --> 00:06:54,157 is, to some extent in some cases, take emphasis away from the spoken word. 73 00:06:54,608 --> 00:06:59,316 For example, once upon a time, the spoken word was 74 00:06:59,316 --> 00:07:05,256 a more important commitment, in a contractual, legal sense, 75 00:07:05,506 --> 00:07:07,381 than the written word. 76 00:07:07,779 --> 00:07:11,351 But after the printing press, for a variety of reasons, 77 00:07:11,884 --> 00:07:18,851 the written word became legally much more binding than the spoken word. 78 00:07:19,232 --> 00:07:24,238 So radio obviously retrieves the spoken word. 79 00:07:24,899 --> 00:07:30,266 Now, in some ways, the fourth law of the Tetrad, 80 00:07:30,266 --> 00:07:35,086 or the fourth law in MacLuhan's Laws of Media 81 00:07:35,086 --> 00:07:38,972 I think is probably the most interesting and fascinating, 82 00:07:38,972 --> 00:07:45,881 because McLuhan said that eventually, when a medium is pushed to its limits, 83 00:07:46,638 --> 00:07:51,674 meaning that it can't do any more as that media, 84 00:07:52,589 --> 00:07:58,199 at that point, it flips into something else. 85 00:07:59,057 --> 00:08:01,436 And again, if you look at the history of radio, 86 00:08:01,436 --> 00:08:04,177 what happened with radio eventually? 87 00:08:04,607 --> 00:08:09,332 Well, by the end of the 1940's, radio flipped into television, 88 00:08:10,086 --> 00:08:12,429 which has a lot of similarities to radio: 89 00:08:12,429 --> 00:08:14,835 it's broadcast, it could be live, 90 00:08:16,216 --> 00:08:21,267 but it's very different from radio, because you have a visual component. 91 00:08:21,516 --> 00:08:28,764 And in a way, what television does is, it retrieves the visual component 92 00:08:28,764 --> 00:08:32,349 that radio had formerly obsolesced. 93 00:08:32,771 --> 00:08:35,929 Now, one of the nice things of the Tetrad is, you can apply it 94 00:08:35,929 --> 00:08:40,505 to many different threads of media evolution. 95 00:08:40,505 --> 00:08:45,317 And that's something that I've been doing ever since I first wrote the preface 96 00:08:45,594 --> 00:08:49,992 to the publication of McLuhan's 'Laws of the Media' 97 00:08:49,992 --> 00:08:54,511 back in 1977, in Etcetera magazine, 98 00:08:54,511 --> 00:08:59,551 and I did that when I was actually a Ph.D. student at New York University. 99 00:09:00,413 --> 00:09:03,257 But one of the things that didn't exist back then 100 00:09:03,863 --> 00:09:07,945 was what you're listening to right now: the podcast. 101 00:09:08,236 --> 00:09:12,845 And so, one of the things that radio verses into is the podcast. 102 00:09:13,155 --> 00:09:17,024 Like television, the podcast has similarities with radio. 103 00:09:17,593 --> 00:09:20,124 It's the spoken word, it's sound. 104 00:09:20,451 --> 00:09:24,187 But unlike radio, anybody can do a podcast. 105 00:09:24,840 --> 00:09:26,939 I'm a professor, I'm an author, 106 00:09:26,939 --> 00:09:32,691 but I certainly have no radio professional experience. 107 00:09:32,691 --> 00:09:36,889 I've been on a few radio shows: actually, probably dozens over the years, 108 00:09:36,889 --> 00:09:39,392 but I've never had my own radio show. 109 00:09:40,309 --> 00:09:45,638 I'm not a professional, I'm not considered a professional in the radio business. 110 00:09:45,910 --> 00:09:50,422 But that doesn't matter, because anybody can do a podcast. 111 00:09:50,759 --> 00:09:58,618 So, one of the things that radio has recently flipped into is the podcast. 112 00:09:59,171 --> 00:10:03,679 So, now let's go back to what Ian Bogost was asking 113 00:10:03,679 --> 00:10:09,683 when I posted this photo of Marshall McLuhan, Eric McLuhan and me, 114 00:10:10,013 --> 00:10:14,546 taken at the conference at Fairleigh Dickinson University 115 00:10:14,546 --> 00:10:23,673 where we were considering the Tetrad and the Laws of Media, back in 1977. 116 00:10:25,585 --> 00:10:30,563 Well, why was Ian Bogost saying "Where is the fourth?"? 117 00:10:30,563 --> 00:10:36,314 He was talking about the Tetrad having four parts 118 00:10:36,314 --> 00:10:39,607 and he only saw three people in the photograph. 119 00:10:39,992 --> 00:10:42,277 So that was a pretty clever question. 120 00:10:43,015 --> 00:10:46,306 But as soon as I read that question on Twitter, 121 00:10:46,885 --> 00:10:49,965 the answer popped into my head immediately. 122 00:10:50,820 --> 00:10:54,864 The fourth in that photograph is the selfie. 123 00:10:55,501 --> 00:11:00,138 Now, actually, somebody else, Mary-Lou Bale, one of my students 124 00:11:00,138 --> 00:11:01,502 took that photograph. 125 00:11:02,274 --> 00:11:10,651 But nowadays, you can clearly see that the photograph has flipped into the selfie. 126 00:11:10,651 --> 00:11:13,286 So let's do a Tetrad for the photograph. 127 00:11:14,000 --> 00:11:16,967 What does it enhance or amplify? 128 00:11:17,244 --> 00:11:22,900 Well, capturing the visual world as it actually is. 129 00:11:23,909 --> 00:11:29,378 And that clearly points at what the photograph obsolesces: the painting, 130 00:11:30,017 --> 00:11:35,993 in which what is on the painting is dependent on the talent of the painter, 131 00:11:36,429 --> 00:11:41,322 in contrast to the photograph, where the photographer has to have some talent 132 00:11:41,790 --> 00:11:45,942 but the essence of the photograph is just the purely 133 00:11:45,942 --> 00:11:50,522 -- originally, photo-chemical process -- now digital process 134 00:11:50,522 --> 00:11:56,482 in which the light bounces off the real world or whatever you are taking a photograph of, 135 00:11:56,727 --> 00:11:59,234 and you then have a photograph. 136 00:11:59,729 --> 00:12:07,680 So the painter, the pen-and-ink sketcher, is obsolesced by the photograph 137 00:12:07,680 --> 00:12:09,227 and by the photographer. 138 00:12:10,128 --> 00:12:14,171 Well, what does the photograph and the photographer retrieve, 139 00:12:14,171 --> 00:12:16,077 which had been previously lost? 140 00:12:16,462 --> 00:12:19,131 Well, you can look into a pool of water. 141 00:12:19,566 --> 00:12:26,178 And in fact, McLuhan talked about this when he talked about the Greek myth of Narcisus 142 00:12:26,568 --> 00:12:32,279 who stared at his reflection in a crystal-clear pool of water. 143 00:12:32,689 --> 00:12:36,994 That's in effect what a photograph is retrieving, 144 00:12:36,994 --> 00:12:43,653 because that's not an artist's interpretation, that's an actual reflection of the world. 145 00:12:44,191 --> 00:12:45,784 And so, we get to the end: 146 00:12:45,784 --> 00:12:51,226 What does the photograph, let's even say, the still photograph, 147 00:12:51,226 --> 00:12:53,006 what does it flip into? 148 00:12:53,006 --> 00:12:55,949 Well, over the years, it has flipped into many things. 149 00:12:56,508 --> 00:12:58,859 It's flipped into motion pictures, 150 00:12:59,545 --> 00:13:05,202 it's flipped into the Kodak photograph which could be taken by anyone: 151 00:13:05,405 --> 00:13:09,274 the first photographs were only taken by professional photographers. 152 00:13:10,265 --> 00:13:14,545 It's flipped into the polaroid, which is an instant photograph. 153 00:13:15,259 --> 00:13:18,749 And of course, it's flipped very recently into the photographs 154 00:13:18,749 --> 00:13:21,368 that we all take with our phones. 155 00:13:21,681 --> 00:13:28,670 But I think the selfie most epitomizes what the photograph has currently flipped into. 156 00:13:29,362 --> 00:13:34,603 Because as we all know, millions of photographs are now taken by simply pointing 157 00:13:34,936 --> 00:13:40,512 the camera in our smart phone at ourselves. 158 00:13:41,293 --> 00:13:47,734 And so, that's what the photographer, I think, has flipped into. 159 00:13:48,625 --> 00:13:57,189 Anyway, you can read more about McLuhan and the Tetrad in many places. 160 00:13:57,189 --> 00:13:59,077 I'll recommend one of my books, 161 00:13:59,077 --> 00:14:04,231 "Digital McLuhan - a Guide to the Information Millennium" 162 00:14:04,231 --> 00:14:08,204 which I wrote back in 1999. 163 00:14:08,837 --> 00:14:12,581 You'll find a link to that on the podcast page, 164 00:14:13,991 --> 00:14:24,307 which is lightonlightthrough.com. 165 00:14:25,432 --> 00:14:30,959 And by the way, Light On Light Through is a term I also got from McLuhan. 166 00:14:32,563 --> 00:14:39,771 So, if you ever have a chance, read not only my books and other books about McLuhan 167 00:14:39,771 --> 00:14:43,595 but read some of McLuhan's original works themselves. 168 00:14:44,433 --> 00:14:46,859 Some people find them a little hard to get into, 169 00:14:46,859 --> 00:14:54,613 but if you give them some time, you'll be rewarded by a cornucopia of insights 170 00:14:55,077 --> 00:15:04,500 and tools that we can use to help make sense of our rapidly evolving media age. 171 00:15:05,066 --> 00:15:07,216 (Female voice) The Light On Light Through podcast 172 00:15:07,535 --> 00:16:18,745 (Music and announcements) 173 00:16:18,746 --> 00:16:44,704 (Outro jingle)