WEBVTT 00:00:12.940 --> 00:00:16.414 Hi, I'm Liz, and I'm an architect. 00:00:17.094 --> 00:00:19.484 Whenever I tell people I'm an architect, 00:00:19.593 --> 00:00:21.684 one of the first questions they often ask me 00:00:21.684 --> 00:00:25.724 is whether or not I have read or seen "The Fountainhead." 00:00:26.150 --> 00:00:27.880 And for those of you - 00:00:28.444 --> 00:00:29.879 Clearly, some of you have. 00:00:29.949 --> 00:00:31.897 For those of you who are familiar with it 00:00:31.897 --> 00:00:34.525 and have just now silently asked yourself this question, 00:00:34.525 --> 00:00:36.292 let me just get that out of the way. 00:00:36.292 --> 00:00:38.942 Yes, I have both read the book and seen the movie. 00:00:38.972 --> 00:00:41.382 No, I didn't really like either of them. 00:00:41.446 --> 00:00:43.886 (Laughter) (Applause) 00:00:45.150 --> 00:00:48.013 And yes, this probably should have been some indication to me 00:00:48.013 --> 00:00:50.957 that I was well on my way to an architectural identity crisis, 00:00:51.197 --> 00:00:54.203 which then leads into the second question that I often get, 00:00:54.203 --> 00:00:56.447 "What kind of buildings do you design?" 00:00:56.897 --> 00:00:58.698 And for me, for the longest time, 00:00:58.698 --> 00:01:01.479 this has been a hard question to answer. 00:01:01.479 --> 00:01:04.276 Usually, I hem and haw, and then I often say, 00:01:04.341 --> 00:01:06.121 "Oh, I design community centers." 00:01:06.161 --> 00:01:08.852 Partly because a lot of my work is with communities, 00:01:08.852 --> 00:01:10.320 so it's kind of true, 00:01:10.470 --> 00:01:13.438 and community centers is a typology that people can relate to. 00:01:13.440 --> 00:01:15.394 So they're like, "Oh yeah! Great! Cool!" 00:01:15.394 --> 00:01:17.425 And then we move on with the conversation. 00:01:17.595 --> 00:01:21.053 But the truth of the matter is I actually don't design community centers. 00:01:21.443 --> 00:01:23.543 And so what I wanted to try to do here today 00:01:23.583 --> 00:01:26.980 is to explain to you exactly what it is that I do. 00:01:27.517 --> 00:01:31.544 I'm an architect that doesn't design buildings. 00:01:32.264 --> 00:01:35.047 The things that I design, the things that I build 00:01:35.231 --> 00:01:38.353 are actually opportunities for impact. 00:01:39.163 --> 00:01:42.112 Right now, you're probably asking yourself one of two questions 00:01:42.112 --> 00:01:44.316 which I can safely say that my family, friends, 00:01:44.316 --> 00:01:47.934 and even architecture school professors have asked themselves more than once. 00:01:47.934 --> 00:01:51.386 The first is, "What the heck is designing opportunities for impact?" 00:01:51.507 --> 00:01:52.777 That's a good question. 00:01:53.147 --> 00:01:56.958 The second is, "What kind of architect doesn't design buildings?" 00:01:57.042 --> 00:01:58.273 Also a good question. 00:01:58.273 --> 00:02:00.669 By the way, that second question is often known as, 00:02:00.669 --> 00:02:04.837 "Wow, did she really go $75,000 into debt at a prestigious architecture school 00:02:04.837 --> 00:02:06.918 only to not practice architecture?" 00:02:07.268 --> 00:02:09.464 I'm still trying to work that one out. 00:02:09.884 --> 00:02:11.994 But let me see if I can explain to you 00:02:11.994 --> 00:02:14.659 what it means to design opportunities for impact. 00:02:14.899 --> 00:02:17.732 It often means that I'm wearing one of three hats: 00:02:17.833 --> 00:02:19.223 that of the expert citizen, 00:02:19.223 --> 00:02:20.530 that of the storyteller, 00:02:20.530 --> 00:02:22.516 that of the translator. 00:02:23.226 --> 00:02:25.324 Expert citizen is this great term 00:02:25.324 --> 00:02:28.865 that I came across a couple of years ago in a book called "Spatial Agency," 00:02:28.865 --> 00:02:32.034 and it so perfectly encapsulated part of what I do 00:02:32.162 --> 00:02:34.449 that I have used it religiously since. 00:02:34.819 --> 00:02:38.306 An expert citizen, I imagine, is many of us in this room here today. 00:02:38.340 --> 00:02:40.697 We've been trained in some type of expertise, 00:02:40.697 --> 00:02:42.287 in my case as a designer. 00:02:42.637 --> 00:02:45.266 What I love about this is the pairing with the citizen. 00:02:45.266 --> 00:02:48.458 The idea that we're still humans at the end of the day. 00:02:48.734 --> 00:02:50.934 We have emotions, we have assumptions, 00:02:50.934 --> 00:02:52.282 we have intuition. 00:02:52.352 --> 00:02:54.930 And the idea of expert often means 00:02:54.930 --> 00:02:57.535 people think of it as we're looking at things 00:02:57.535 --> 00:03:00.135 purely in this objective way, almost scientifically. 00:03:00.470 --> 00:03:04.373 But I think it's important to remember that when you combine that human element, 00:03:04.643 --> 00:03:07.045 it's actually a really rich combination. 00:03:07.682 --> 00:03:11.484 Many of the communities that I work with are considered to be citizen experts. 00:03:11.864 --> 00:03:14.504 Whether I'm working in a poor African-American community 00:03:14.504 --> 00:03:15.806 in San Francisco 00:03:15.926 --> 00:03:18.597 or a low-income Kenyan community in Nairobi, 00:03:18.767 --> 00:03:20.822 those people know more about what it is like 00:03:20.822 --> 00:03:23.362 to live in their communities than I ever will. 00:03:23.752 --> 00:03:25.803 They know about their needs and aspirations, 00:03:25.803 --> 00:03:27.925 their successes and their failures. 00:03:27.925 --> 00:03:29.924 And what I need to do as the expert citizen 00:03:29.924 --> 00:03:31.826 is to create space at the table for them 00:03:31.826 --> 00:03:33.907 to be able to come and share that knowledge. 00:03:33.927 --> 00:03:36.137 Because oftentimes they have not been empowered 00:03:36.137 --> 00:03:38.107 to see that knowledge as expertise. 00:03:38.197 --> 00:03:41.829 And so I try, as much as possible, to issue out an invitation 00:03:41.879 --> 00:03:44.074 in which they feel comfortable doing that. 00:03:44.420 --> 00:03:47.448 I can best describe this through the story of Mama Sama. 00:03:47.768 --> 00:03:50.370 Mama Sama and many women throughout the global South 00:03:50.370 --> 00:03:52.699 face a problem when it comes to cooking. 00:03:53.139 --> 00:03:56.715 The traditional technology is actually a three-stone fire. 00:03:56.715 --> 00:03:58.723 And it actually creates a lot of issues 00:03:58.723 --> 00:04:01.324 including health, from the smoke inhalation, 00:04:01.324 --> 00:04:02.341 and environment, 00:04:02.341 --> 00:04:05.063 from the deforestation and air pollution, 00:04:05.073 --> 00:04:08.251 and then also safety, when people go out to fetch wood. 00:04:09.087 --> 00:04:11.381 Cookstoves, particularly improved cookstoves, 00:04:11.381 --> 00:04:13.765 is something that has been around for over 30 years 00:04:13.765 --> 00:04:18.546 as an effort to try and alleviate the issues that come up with the fire. 00:04:18.933 --> 00:04:22.296 And there has been a huge push from many governments and NGOs 00:04:22.296 --> 00:04:25.293 to try and rapidly increase the adoption of the cookstoves 00:04:25.293 --> 00:04:27.208 by the year 2020. 00:04:27.408 --> 00:04:30.829 Last year, when I was a fellow at ido.org, my colleagues and I were hired 00:04:30.829 --> 00:04:32.845 by the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves 00:04:32.845 --> 00:04:34.185 to try and investigate a way 00:04:34.185 --> 00:04:36.672 to close that gap between the adoption of the stove 00:04:36.752 --> 00:04:39.906 and the potential that it could still have. 00:04:40.068 --> 00:04:43.813 And so we spent three weeks in Tanzania, which was one of the target countries. 00:04:44.001 --> 00:04:45.163 We went into many homes, 00:04:45.163 --> 00:04:48.436 talked to many citizen experts, like Mama Sama. 00:04:48.976 --> 00:04:50.757 And we even cooked with them. 00:04:51.137 --> 00:04:53.135 And what we found is that many of the women 00:04:53.135 --> 00:04:55.669 actually were familiar with the idea of the cookstove. 00:04:55.669 --> 00:04:57.411 They even understood its benefits. 00:04:57.451 --> 00:05:00.169 The problem was that when it came time 00:05:00.169 --> 00:05:02.659 to cooking a lot of food for their extended family, 00:05:02.909 --> 00:05:05.064 a single cookstove was not enough. 00:05:05.382 --> 00:05:08.232 When they wanted to cook ugali, which is a traditional dish, 00:05:08.363 --> 00:05:11.461 it is just as hard to cook on a cookstove, if not harder, 00:05:11.561 --> 00:05:13.440 than cooking on a woodfire. 00:05:14.016 --> 00:05:17.826 And when it came to the cost of fuel, particularly if they were using charcoal, 00:05:18.396 --> 00:05:20.141 the cost of a month's supply of fuel 00:05:20.141 --> 00:05:22.941 was equal to 10 times the cost of a single stove. 00:05:23.199 --> 00:05:25.926 In that case, the benefits of a cookstove were not enough. 00:05:26.617 --> 00:05:29.300 So we were sent into the field to answer the question of 00:05:29.300 --> 00:05:32.667 "How could we use design to increase the adoption of the cookstove?" 00:05:32.767 --> 00:05:35.703 But what we found was that adoption really wasn't the problem. 00:05:35.731 --> 00:05:37.164 Many of them owned cookstoves, 00:05:37.164 --> 00:05:40.251 they just couldn't afford to be able to use it often. 00:05:40.251 --> 00:05:41.680 And if you don't use it often, 00:05:41.680 --> 00:05:43.769 you actually can't get the benefits from it. 00:05:43.769 --> 00:05:46.261 So by taking the time to listen to Mama Sama 00:05:46.261 --> 00:05:47.689 and the other citizen experts, 00:05:47.689 --> 00:05:51.518 and really understand their needs and aspirations of their daily life, 00:05:51.671 --> 00:05:54.441 what we found is that in order to generate design solutions 00:05:54.441 --> 00:05:55.900 that would be appropriate, 00:05:55.929 --> 00:05:58.261 we had to actually design from this question, 00:05:58.501 --> 00:06:01.392 "How might we design for the cook and not the cookstove?" 00:06:01.930 --> 00:06:05.956 It wasn't about improving the actual technology of the stove, 00:06:06.280 --> 00:06:08.474 it wasn't about increasing access to markets. 00:06:08.594 --> 00:06:10.052 It was about designing things 00:06:10.052 --> 00:06:12.333 that actually responded to the women themselves. 00:06:12.963 --> 00:06:15.822 And so we came up with a bunch of different design solutions, 00:06:15.822 --> 00:06:18.595 everything from implements that could be added to the stove 00:06:18.595 --> 00:06:19.866 to make it easier to cook 00:06:19.866 --> 00:06:22.027 to actually creating fuel-saving initiatives, 00:06:22.027 --> 00:06:25.248 something the Global Alliance had not previously looked at. 00:06:26.098 --> 00:06:28.749 Next, I want to talk to you about being a storyteller. 00:06:29.492 --> 00:06:33.097 And through that, I'm going to tell a little bit about the story of Roberto. 00:06:33.521 --> 00:06:35.600 Roberto and his colleagues are many things: 00:06:35.600 --> 00:06:38.576 they are artisans, they are craftsmen, they are tradesmen. 00:06:39.376 --> 00:06:41.201 They're also day laborers. 00:06:41.541 --> 00:06:44.609 They're some of the over 115,000 men and women 00:06:44.609 --> 00:06:45.869 who look for a day’s work 00:06:45.869 --> 00:06:49.066 for a day’s wages in cities across the US every day. 00:06:49.486 --> 00:06:51.966 And the vast majority of the sites that they do it at 00:06:51.966 --> 00:06:53.354 are informal sites, 00:06:53.354 --> 00:06:55.610 meaning that they were designed for other uses. 00:06:55.820 --> 00:06:58.328 They are the street corners, the gas stations, 00:06:58.328 --> 00:07:00.232 the Home Depot parking lot. 00:07:00.532 --> 00:07:05.003 And usually at those sites, they lack even the most basic of human necessities. 00:07:05.177 --> 00:07:06.505 There's no shelter, 00:07:06.685 --> 00:07:09.225 there's no water, there's no toilets. 00:07:09.825 --> 00:07:10.845 A few years ago, 00:07:10.845 --> 00:07:14.166 I was the design director at a non-profit called Public Architecture, 00:07:14.166 --> 00:07:16.665 and my colleagues and I felt that there was something 00:07:16.665 --> 00:07:17.999 that we could do about this. 00:07:17.999 --> 00:07:21.338 But it wasn't like a day laborer was ever going to walk into our office NOTE Paragraph 00:07:21.338 --> 00:07:24.545 and say, "Hi, I'm Roberto, and I'm having a problem at the corner. 00:07:24.545 --> 00:07:26.265 I could really use your help." 00:07:26.570 --> 00:07:29.413 So we actually, had to go out into the streets to them. 00:07:29.503 --> 00:07:32.752 And we treated them both as our clients and our co-designers. 00:07:32.832 --> 00:07:36.262 And the product of those conversations, several years of conversations, 00:07:36.490 --> 00:07:37.817 resulted in this - 00:07:38.007 --> 00:07:39.527 the Day Labour Station. 00:07:39.647 --> 00:07:41.971 This is a prototype, a semi-permanent structure 00:07:41.971 --> 00:07:44.312 that can be deployed at informal hiring sites. 00:07:44.382 --> 00:07:46.299 It's based on an idea of a kit of parts 00:07:46.299 --> 00:07:49.122 so you can reconfigure it to meet the needs of a given site. 00:07:49.212 --> 00:07:52.382 In this case, what you see is a rather large station 00:07:52.391 --> 00:07:55.499 because it was supposed to be a proposal for a site in Los Angeles 00:07:55.499 --> 00:07:57.806 that was going to house over 150 workers. 00:07:58.056 --> 00:08:00.214 But the central elements were always the same: 00:08:00.244 --> 00:08:03.707 a seating area and pods that could house a bathroom, 00:08:03.825 --> 00:08:06.042 an office for a work site coordinator, 00:08:06.072 --> 00:08:09.588 or even a kitchen so that you could have an income-generating food business 00:08:09.588 --> 00:08:11.484 that could help to sustain the station. 00:08:11.484 --> 00:08:12.912 It's flexible in use, 00:08:12.912 --> 00:08:15.302 everything from an employment center to a classroom 00:08:15.302 --> 00:08:18.308 so you could teach additional skills to the workers. 00:08:18.826 --> 00:08:22.223 I often get asked if by building this, was I not making it worse 00:08:22.223 --> 00:08:24.724 for Roberto and others like him. 00:08:25.264 --> 00:08:28.124 But the fact of the matter is that many of these hiring sites 00:08:28.124 --> 00:08:30.319 have been around for years if not decades. 00:08:30.379 --> 00:08:31.759 If you think of most cities 00:08:31.839 --> 00:08:35.202 when you go around and you're looking, there are no giant signs saying, 00:08:35.202 --> 00:08:36.472 "Day laborers here!" 00:08:36.742 --> 00:08:39.642 But if you were to ask anyone, they would be able to tell you, 00:08:39.642 --> 00:08:42.896 "Oh, yeah. You go to that corner, and that's where you pick them up." 00:08:42.896 --> 00:08:44.864 The fact that there is nothing there 00:08:44.864 --> 00:08:47.565 belies the fact that they're actually rather permanent. 00:08:47.565 --> 00:08:50.753 I recall Juan, who was a day laborer that I met in Houston 00:08:50.753 --> 00:08:53.451 when we were looking at building one of these there, 00:08:53.451 --> 00:08:56.609 and he said to me, "I've been coming to this site for many years. 00:08:56.733 --> 00:08:58.714 It is a place in which I earn my living. 00:08:58.714 --> 00:09:00.282 It is sacred to me. 00:09:00.612 --> 00:09:03.878 But because there is nothing here, no one else sees that." 00:09:04.801 --> 00:09:06.802 And so for Juan and others like him, 00:09:06.802 --> 00:09:09.312 building this wasn't about trying to create something 00:09:09.312 --> 00:09:11.504 that would bring unwanted attention to them. 00:09:11.504 --> 00:09:13.362 It was about trying to create something 00:09:13.362 --> 00:09:16.184 that is actually emblematic of the permanence of their site 00:09:16.184 --> 00:09:18.742 and that could help actually bring dignity to them. 00:09:19.488 --> 00:09:23.011 In terms of an architectural project, this was actually a bit of a failure. 00:09:23.011 --> 00:09:25.361 We launched it right before the economic collapse, 00:09:25.361 --> 00:09:28.648 and although I flew all around the country at the invitation of cities 00:09:28.648 --> 00:09:31.221 who were really interested as this is a novel solution, 00:09:31.221 --> 00:09:32.541 when the collapse hit, 00:09:32.541 --> 00:09:34.891 as you're closing schools and cutting services, 00:09:34.891 --> 00:09:38.382 it simply was politically untenable to spend money on illegals. 00:09:39.216 --> 00:09:40.944 But that actually forced us to think 00:09:40.944 --> 00:09:43.995 about what were some of the other outcomes that came out of this. 00:09:43.995 --> 00:09:46.339 We treated this project not as a design exercise 00:09:46.669 --> 00:09:49.106 but as an opportunity to create transformation 00:09:49.106 --> 00:09:52.007 of the way in which people saw a particular type of space 00:09:52.137 --> 00:09:53.886 and saw a particular type of people. 00:09:54.416 --> 00:09:55.689 And to that end, 00:09:55.714 --> 00:10:00.766 we tried to tell the stories of Roberto, Juan, Gabrielle, Leobardo 00:10:00.766 --> 00:10:02.130 and others like them. 00:10:02.130 --> 00:10:05.052 We tried to tell the stories of them and their American dream, 00:10:05.052 --> 00:10:07.774 their desire to come here for a better life for themselves 00:10:07.774 --> 00:10:08.984 and for their families. 00:10:08.984 --> 00:10:11.606 And we tried to tell the stories of their sacred spaces, 00:10:11.646 --> 00:10:15.063 the places in which they earned a living which would support that dream. NOTE Paragraph 00:10:15.223 --> 00:10:17.129 And we took that story far and wide. 00:10:17.129 --> 00:10:19.399 We took it to The Los Angeles Times, 00:10:19.399 --> 00:10:21.527 the Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum, 00:10:21.527 --> 00:10:22.943 the Venice Bienalle. 00:10:22.943 --> 00:10:26.505 And what you see here is actually a poster from a big international award 00:10:26.505 --> 00:10:28.180 that we won for this project. 00:10:28.360 --> 00:10:30.925 And on this poster are actually quotes from emails 00:10:30.925 --> 00:10:33.495 that I received over the years from doing this project, 00:10:33.495 --> 00:10:35.363 both good and, actually, a lot bad. 00:10:35.363 --> 00:10:37.844 And the thing that we felt really important 00:10:37.844 --> 00:10:40.191 was that this was a catalyst for a conversation. 00:10:40.591 --> 00:10:42.966 No one was talking about these sites before, 00:10:42.966 --> 00:10:44.693 and by opening up the conversation 00:10:44.693 --> 00:10:46.823 we were talking both about what they are now 00:10:46.823 --> 00:10:48.698 and what they have the potential to be. 00:10:48.898 --> 00:10:52.684 It was also really important to tell the story not only to the wider public 00:10:52.684 --> 00:10:55.394 but also to the workers themselves. 00:10:56.134 --> 00:10:58.230 One of my favorite moments from this project 00:10:58.230 --> 00:10:59.668 was that I had the opportunity 00:10:59.668 --> 00:11:01.880 to present it to a convention of day laborers - 00:11:01.880 --> 00:11:03.487 and yes, there is such a thing. 00:11:03.487 --> 00:11:05.700 And I only spoke for a short period of time, 00:11:05.700 --> 00:11:08.389 but after I did, many people came up to me, 00:11:08.644 --> 00:11:11.485 and I was truly touched by how touched they were 00:11:11.739 --> 00:11:14.298 at being able to see up there on that big screen 00:11:14.298 --> 00:11:17.310 something that acknowledged that they had been seen, 00:11:17.476 --> 00:11:20.223 that they had been heard, and that they had been valued. 00:11:20.753 --> 00:11:23.031 And that's the power of being a storyteller. 00:11:23.551 --> 00:11:26.145 As for the translator hat, you have actually seen that 00:11:26.145 --> 00:11:28.685 over the ten plus minutes that I've been talking. 00:11:28.725 --> 00:11:32.172 It's basically taking the things I hear when I listen at the table 00:11:32.372 --> 00:11:35.566 and the stories that I know that I need to tell to create impact 00:11:35.566 --> 00:11:38.705 and combining them into something that is tangible - 00:11:38.925 --> 00:11:40.801 a reflection of all of that. 00:11:40.911 --> 00:11:44.028 And that allows us to move forward on whatever the social issue is 00:11:44.028 --> 00:11:45.542 that I'm trying to address. 00:11:45.652 --> 00:11:49.537 And so, that is what it means to design opportunities for impact. 00:11:49.927 --> 00:11:51.723 It means that I'm an expert citizen 00:11:51.723 --> 00:11:54.262 who creates space at the table for citizen experts. 00:11:54.682 --> 00:11:57.477 That I'm a storyteller that tries to tell authentic stories 00:11:57.477 --> 00:11:59.610 of the people I meet and design with. 00:11:59.840 --> 00:12:01.561 And that I'm a translator 00:12:01.571 --> 00:12:04.951 who tries to bring tangibility to a vision of places and services 00:12:04.951 --> 00:12:08.463 that speak to the needs and aspirations of the human experience. 00:12:09.263 --> 00:12:12.309 And so I hope that if you take anything away today from my talk, 00:12:12.309 --> 00:12:14.028 well, there is sort of three things. 00:12:14.028 --> 00:12:17.451 The first is never really ask that Fountainhead question to an architect. 00:12:17.451 --> 00:12:18.739 We don't like it. 00:12:19.459 --> 00:12:20.890 The other thing is that I hope 00:12:20.890 --> 00:12:24.172 that you think about architecture and design a little bit differently: 00:12:24.172 --> 00:12:26.897 about what it is and what it has the potential to impact. 00:12:26.897 --> 00:12:29.568 And the third is that the things that I have shown you 00:12:29.568 --> 00:12:32.418 are about the combination of both the hard skills of design 00:12:32.418 --> 00:12:34.394 and the soft skills of humanity. 00:12:34.744 --> 00:12:39.104 But those soft skills are not the domain, the exclusive domain of design. 00:12:39.234 --> 00:12:41.060 They can be used by all of you 00:12:41.060 --> 00:12:44.827 in anything that you are trying to do in your own lives and in your own crafts. 00:12:44.827 --> 00:12:46.988 And so I hope that you move on today 00:12:46.988 --> 00:12:49.173 trying to figure out exactly how to do that. 00:12:49.303 --> 00:12:50.344 Thank you. 00:12:50.344 --> 00:12:53.340 (Applause)