1
00:00:04,796 --> 00:00:08,342
It's been a few years since I’ve checked in with The Bechdel Test For Women in Movies

2
00:00:08,342 --> 00:00:10,469
so I thought I’d be a good time to look in on Hollywood

3
00:00:10,469 --> 00:00:14,640
and see if there's been any substantial improvement in women's representations on the big screen.

4
00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:20,229
One way to do this is to apply the test to the films that have been nominated for best picture in the 2011 Academy Awards,

5
00:00:20,229 --> 00:00:23,398
since the Oscars are widely regarded as the “best of the best”

6
00:00:23,398 --> 00:00:25,817
at least as determined by the industry itself.

7
00:00:25,817 --> 00:00:30,155
But before I get to that, here’s a quick refresher on what the Bechdel Test is and how it works.

8
00:00:30,155 --> 00:00:34,064
The Bechdel Test is a very basic gauge to measure women's relevance to a film's plot

9
00:00:34,064 --> 00:00:36,850
and generally to assess female presence in Hollywood movies.

10
00:00:36,850 --> 00:00:41,517
It was popularized by Allison Bechdel in her comic Dykes to Watch Out For back in 1985.

11
00:00:41,517 --> 00:00:45,767
In order to pass the test a film just needs to fulfill these three, very simple, criteria:

12
00:00:45,767 --> 00:00:49,049
A movie has to have at least two women in it who have names,

13
00:00:49,049 --> 00:00:50,480
who talk to each other,

14
00:00:50,480 --> 00:00:52,431
about something besides a man.

15
00:00:52,431 --> 00:00:53,638
Pretty simple right?

16
00:00:53,638 --> 00:00:56,765
I mean this is really the absolute lowest that we could possibly set the bar

17
00:00:56,765 --> 00:00:59,268
for women’s meaningful presence in movies.

18
00:00:59,268 --> 00:01:01,228
Let’s remember that this was made as a bit of a joke

19
00:01:01,228 --> 00:01:05,649
to make fun of the fact that there are so few movies with significant female characters in them.

20
00:01:05,649 --> 00:01:08,068
The reason the test has become so important in recent years

21
00:01:08,068 --> 00:01:12,447
is because it actually does highlight a serious and ongoing problem within the entertainment industry.

22
00:01:12,447 --> 00:01:15,867
So with that in mind, let’s take a look at the Academy Award best picture nominees

23
00:01:15,867 --> 00:01:18,745
for 2011 and see how they measure up to the Bechdel Test.

24
00:01:18,745 --> 00:01:20,596
First up the Descendents.

25
00:01:20,596 --> 00:01:23,754
It’s a story of a father pulling his family through a crisis.

26
00:01:23,754 --> 00:01:27,129
The mother is basically fridged before the opening credits even finish rolling

27
00:01:27,129 --> 00:01:29,923
to provide the catalyst for the father figure’s growth.

28
00:01:29,923 --> 00:01:34,469
This film does pass the test because of a handful of brief interactions between female characters,

29
00:01:34,469 --> 00:01:37,556
including between the two daughters, Alex and Scotty.

30
00:01:37,556 --> 00:01:42,894
Moneyball is a story about an American League baseball team centered around their general manager Billy Beane.

31
00:01:42,894 --> 00:01:47,566
It fails the test badly, not even having two female characters speak to each other at all.

32
00:01:47,566 --> 00:01:51,153
Even so it’s a surprisingly funny and captivating movie.

33
00:01:51,153 --> 00:01:54,323
Tree of Life is a more experimental film about a boy and his family.

34
00:01:54,323 --> 00:01:57,563
It fails the test because the only brief scene where two women talk,

35
00:01:57,563 --> 00:02:00,329
the conversation is about the death of the family's son.

36
00:02:00,329 --> 00:02:03,165
While it's true there's very little dialogue in the film as a whole,

37
00:02:03,165 --> 00:02:06,340
the father and the son do speak to each other on multiple occasions.

38
00:02:06,340 --> 00:02:11,262
Hugo is a whimsical film about an orphan boy trying to solve a mystery left by his father.

39
00:02:11,262 --> 00:02:14,134
And while there are two named female characters who speak to each other,

40
00:02:14,134 --> 00:02:17,253
their conversation is always in relationship to a man

41
00:02:17,253 --> 00:02:21,391
except this one 5 second interaction that some might argue constitutes a pass.

42
00:02:21,391 --> 00:02:25,896
Isabelle: You were an actress? A real cinema actress, it’s impossibly romantic mama.

43
00:02:25,896 --> 00:02:30,609
Mama: It wasn’t like that, we weren’t movie stars like they have today.

44
00:02:30,609 --> 00:02:34,446
If while at the theater you drop your box of junior mints, and by the time you pick em up

45
00:02:34,446 --> 00:02:37,919
you’ve missed the one scene in the whole film where women actually talk to each other,

46
00:02:37,919 --> 00:02:40,009
there’s something clearly wrong.

47
00:02:40,009 --> 00:02:43,167
Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close also fails the test.

48
00:02:43,167 --> 00:02:47,376
It follows the story of a boy dealing with the trauma of losing his father on 9/11.

49
00:02:47,376 --> 00:02:51,340
Two women never talk to each other about anything other than the boy.

50
00:02:51,340 --> 00:02:55,752
In classic Woody Allan style, Midnight in Paris is about a man struggling to discover himself

51
00:02:55,752 --> 00:02:58,011
and while there’s a handful of women in the picture,

52
00:02:58,011 --> 00:03:01,848
they never really discuss anything other than men and men's influence on their lives.

53
00:03:01,848 --> 00:03:05,760
Some critics have argued that this scene between Inez and her mother constitutes a pass.

54
00:03:05,760 --> 00:03:10,102
Helen: Come look at these Inez. Wouldn’t these be charming in a Malibu beach house?

55
00:03:10,102 --> 00:03:11,286
Inez: oh

56
00:03:11,286 --> 00:03:12,493
Helen: Combien monsieur?

57
00:03:12,493 --> 00:03:14,119
Shop Owner: dix-huit mille

58
00:03:14,119 --> 00:03:15,280
Helen : Merci

59
00:03:15,280 --> 00:03:16,154
Inez : What is that?

60
00:03:16,154 --> 00:03:17,669
Helen: They’re a steal at 18,000 dollars.

61
00:03:17,669 --> 00:03:20,575
Gil: 18,000 dollars for this!?

62
00:03:20,575 --> 00:03:21,828
Helen: Oh wait it’s euros…

63
00:03:21,828 --> 00:03:26,123
But as you’ll notice Owen Wilson’s character and the shop keeper are also involved in the interaction.

64
00:03:26,123 --> 00:03:27,749
So I’d say it fails.

65
00:03:27,749 --> 00:03:30,794
But I'll come back to this one line question later in the video

66
00:03:30,794 --> 00:03:32,834
What’s even more embarrassing about this film

67
00:03:32,834 --> 00:03:37,092
is that one of the most important historical figures that Gil interacts with is Gertrude Stein.

68
00:03:37,092 --> 00:03:39,010
For those of you who aren’t familiar with her,

69
00:03:39,010 --> 00:03:42,772
Stein is one of the most famous writers and lesbians in American history,

70
00:03:42,772 --> 00:03:47,727
and Woody Allan has the nerve to not have her speak to another female character in the entire film.

71
00:03:47,727 --> 00:03:49,980
War Horse is a story about a boy and his horse.

72
00:03:49,980 --> 00:03:51,619
It fails.

73
00:03:51,619 --> 00:03:53,316
So moving on.

74
00:03:53,316 --> 00:03:56,903
The Help is a woman centered story with a large female cast,

75
00:03:56,903 --> 00:03:58,780
there’s no doubt that this film passes the test.

76
00:03:58,780 --> 00:04:03,285
While the film is deeply problematic when it comes to portraying issues of racism in America,

77
00:04:03,285 --> 00:04:07,831
both Viola Davis and Octavia Spencer give incredible and moving performances.

78
00:04:07,831 --> 00:04:11,426
Finally, we have the The Artist, which it’s true, is a silent film.

79
00:04:11,426 --> 00:04:16,418
So you might be asking how we do apply the Bechdel Test to a film without any spoken dialogue?

80
00:04:16,418 --> 00:04:20,510
Well in classic Silent movie style characters do communicate with each other

81
00:04:20,510 --> 00:04:22,177
via title cards,

82
00:04:22,177 --> 00:04:23,221
mouthing words,

83
00:04:23,221 --> 00:04:26,850
facial expressions, physical gestures and pantomime.

84
00:04:26,850 --> 00:04:30,896
So for this one I’ll accept any non-verbal communication between two women

85
00:04:30,896 --> 00:04:34,019
that has any significance to the plot that’s not about a man.

86
00:04:34,019 --> 00:04:36,898
And amazingly… it still fails.

87
00:04:36,898 --> 00:04:41,656
It looks like out of the 9 best picture nominees in 2011 only 2 clearly pass the bechdel test,

88
00:04:41,656 --> 00:04:44,451
while 2 others are questionable about one line.

89
00:04:44,451 --> 00:04:48,288
And notably only one film nominated is female centered.

90
00:04:48,288 --> 00:04:50,081
Coming back to Hugo and Midnight in Paris,

91
00:04:50,081 --> 00:04:54,917
unfortunately, discussions and debates surrounding the Bechdel test often descend into quibbling over whether

92
00:04:54,917 --> 00:04:59,514
one brief and questionable exchange makes a movie pass the test or not.

93
00:04:59,514 --> 00:05:02,254
It’s not really necessary to get bogged down in the minutia

94
00:05:02,254 --> 00:05:05,305
of whether one 10 second scene constitutes “talking to each other”.

95
00:05:05,305 --> 00:05:07,682
If there’s really that much of a debate about this point,

96
00:05:07,682 --> 00:05:12,169
then it’s a pretty good indicator that there’s a problem with women’s representation in the movie.

97
00:05:12,169 --> 00:05:13,772
So, in the spirit of the Bechdel test,

98
00:05:13,772 --> 00:05:16,836
I'd like to respectfully propose adding a small addendum:

99
00:05:16,836 --> 00:05:19,158
A film has to have two named women who speak to each other

100
00:05:19,158 --> 00:05:23,082
for longer than 60 seconds about something besides a man.

101
00:05:23,082 --> 00:05:25,335
This new 60 second rule would help to clarify the test

102
00:05:25,335 --> 00:05:28,539
and resolve some of the quibbles over one or two lines

103
00:05:28,539 --> 00:05:31,883
and if two women do speak to each other for more then 60 seconds

104
00:05:31,883 --> 00:05:35,544
there’s a slightly better chance that the dialogue will have some relevance to the plot,

105
00:05:35,544 --> 00:05:37,170
maybe.

106
00:05:37,170 --> 00:05:43,385
I mean, its only 1 minute out of a 90 or 120 minute film that we’re talking about here, it’s still a really low bar.

107
00:05:43,385 --> 00:05:47,430
Passing films still wouldn’t necessarily have substantial female roles

108
00:05:47,430 --> 00:05:50,976
it would make it harder for a movie to squeak by on a technicality.

109
00:05:50,976 --> 00:05:54,187
For example if we look at the Best Picture nominees from 2010,

110
00:05:54,187 --> 00:05:57,065
6 out of the 10 nominees might arguably get by

111
00:05:57,065 --> 00:06:01,047
but if we apply the new 60 second rule we find that half of them wouldn’t make the cut at all.

112
00:06:01,047 --> 00:06:06,620
The three 2010 films that DO pass the test with women who speak to each other for more then 60 seconds

113
00:06:06,620 --> 00:06:10,799
about something other then a man are all actually female centered films.

114
00:06:10,799 --> 00:06:13,957
And if you haven’t seen Winter’s Bone yet, put it at the top of your list.

115
00:06:13,957 --> 00:06:16,585
In addition to being beautifully shot and well acted,

116
00:06:16,585 --> 00:06:21,590
I highly recommend it for its complex portrayal of gender and poverty in rural America.

117
00:06:21,590 --> 00:06:25,135
Interestingly, even though True Grit is a female centered story,

118
00:06:25,135 --> 00:06:28,865
following the adventures of Mattie Ross struggling to get by in a man’s world,

119
00:06:28,865 --> 00:06:32,115
when we apply the 60 second rule the film doesn’t pass.

120
00:06:32,115 --> 00:06:36,527
In fact the only exchange she has with any other woman is with Mrs. Floyd the innkeeper

121
00:06:36,527 --> 00:06:39,778
and those incidental interactions total less than a minute.

122
00:06:39,778 --> 00:06:43,528
This style of film where the female lead inhabits an almost entirely male world,

123
00:06:43,528 --> 00:06:48,491
brings to mind the Smurfette Principle which I’ve discussed in my Tropes vs Women video series.

124
00:06:48,491 --> 00:06:51,953
Again, to be clear this test does not gauge the quality of a film,

125
00:06:51,953 --> 00:06:57,208
it doesn’t determine whether a film is feminist or not, and it doesn’t even determine whether a film is woman centered.

126
00:06:57,208 --> 00:06:59,085
Some pretty awful movies including ones that have

127
00:06:59,085 --> 00:07:03,840
stereotypical and/or sexist representations of women might pass the test with flying colours

128
00:07:03,840 --> 00:07:08,316
Where really well made films that I would highly recommend might not.

129
00:07:08,316 --> 00:07:12,286
The Bechdel test is best when used as a tool to evaluate Hollywood as an institution,

130
00:07:12,286 --> 00:07:15,444
it can be applied to pretty much any grouping of mainstream movies

131
00:07:15,444 --> 00:07:21,109
such as the Golden Globes nominees or the top grossing films of any given year, all with similar results.

132
00:07:21,109 --> 00:07:24,945
The test helps us identify the lack of relevant and meaningful female roles

133
00:07:24,945 --> 00:07:28,308
as a larger pattern in the film industry as a whole.

134
00:07:28,308 --> 00:07:32,255
The problem isn’t restricted to any individual movie, director or genre.

135
00:07:32,255 --> 00:07:34,788
Every once and awhile we get a film like Bridesmaids

136
00:07:34,788 --> 00:07:40,336
that depict women and women’s relationships with one another in a more genuine and less "chick flicky way”

137
00:07:40,336 --> 00:07:44,923
but this happens about as often as women are nominated for best director by the Academy.

138
00:07:44,923 --> 00:07:48,593
In response to the Bechdel Test, I’m often asked, well, what about the reverse?

139
00:07:48,593 --> 00:07:53,098
“Why isn’t there also a test to determine if two men talk to each other about something other then a woman”.

140
00:07:53,098 --> 00:07:56,434
The answer to that is simple, the test is meant to indicate a problem,

141
00:07:56,434 --> 00:08:00,438
and there isn’t a problem with a lack of men interacting with one another.

142
00:08:00,438 --> 00:08:04,159
The Bechdel test is useful because it can point out an institutional pattern

143
00:08:04,159 --> 00:08:08,153
and since there’s no problem with men and men’s stories being underrepresented in films,

144
00:08:08,153 --> 00:08:11,032
the reverse test is useless and irrelevant.

145
00:08:11,032 --> 00:08:13,865
Women aren’t the only ones marginalized in Hollywood movies,

146
00:08:13,865 --> 00:08:16,791
so one variation on the Bechdel Test that is actually useful

147
00:08:16,791 --> 00:08:20,645
is applying the test to the development and presence of characters of colour.

148
00:08:20,645 --> 00:08:25,498
Alaya Dawn Johnson adapted the test to ask if a movie has two or more people of colour in it,

149
00:08:25,498 --> 00:08:28,967
who talk to each other about something other than a white person.

150
00:08:28,967 --> 00:08:31,884
The percentage of films that pass this test is extremely small,

151
00:08:31,884 --> 00:08:36,272
even a movie like the Help which stars multiple named women of colour in prominent roles,

152
00:08:36,272 --> 00:08:42,313
passes by the narrowest of margins because characters are almost always talking to or about white people.

153
00:08:42,313 --> 00:08:46,609
This variation of the test exposes the fact that Hollywood still basically refuses

154
00:08:46,609 --> 00:08:50,989
to make movies for a general audience that focuses on the lives of people of colour,

155
00:08:50,989 --> 00:08:54,159
unless it also stars a sympathetic white character.

156
00:08:54,159 --> 00:08:56,126
As Martha Southgate pointed out,

157
00:08:56,126 --> 00:09:00,537
“Implicit in The Help and a number of other popular works that deal with the civil rights era

158
00:09:00,537 --> 00:09:06,621
is the notion that a white character is somehow crucial or even necessary to this particular tale of black liberation.”

159
00:09:06,621 --> 00:09:10,216
So with that in mind, and as I saw on George Takei’s facebook page,

160
00:09:10,216 --> 00:09:14,632
this may be a slightly more appropriate title for the movie.

161
00:09:14,632 --> 00:09:20,310
So while it might be comforting to think that the number of important roles for women in Hollywood movies are slowly growing,

162
00:09:20,310 --> 00:09:22,937
the truth is they’re really not.

163
00:09:22,937 --> 00:09:28,860
Men are still primarily the studio executives, the writers, the directors and the major decision makers in the industry

164
00:09:28,860 --> 00:09:31,321
and they tell stories that they can relate to.

165
00:09:31,321 --> 00:09:36,041
Not surprisingly this results in most movies focusing on men and men's stories.

166
00:09:36,041 --> 00:09:41,126
So while it might make sense that one specific film like Moneyball is male dominated and male centered

167
00:09:41,126 --> 00:09:44,417
and they wouldn’t or couldn’t incorporate women as major characters,

168
00:09:44,417 --> 00:09:49,589
the problem is that the vast majority of movies made in Hollywood are also male centered and male dominated.

169
00:09:49,589 --> 00:09:52,967
It’s depressingly clear that Hollywood doesn’t prioritize roles for women

170
00:09:52,967 --> 00:09:55,428
and isn’t interested in telling women’s stories.

171
00:09:55,428 --> 00:10:01,101
The real solution here is for filmmakers and screen writers to focus more movies on women and women’s lives,

172
00:10:01,101 --> 00:10:03,440
that’s how we really solve this problem.

173
00:10:03,440 --> 00:10:06,784
There are literally thousands of compelling, important and courageous

174
00:10:06,784 --> 00:10:09,710
women’s stories just waiting to be told on the big screen.

175
00:10:09,710 --> 00:10:12,987
When there are as many stories that center on women, as there are on men,

176
00:10:12,987 --> 00:10:15,700
then we won’t be have much use for the Bechdel Test anymore,

177
00:10:15,700 --> 00:10:20,721
but sadly it seems, that’s still a long ways away.

178
00:10:20,721 --> 00:10:25,453
Feminist Frequency videos are always advertisement free, so I need your help to keep going.

179
00:10:25,453 --> 00:10:29,784
Please visit feministfrequency.com/donate