WEBVTT 00:00:05.345 --> 00:00:08.357 It was an afternoon in the fall of 2005. 00:00:09.187 --> 00:00:12.891 I was working at the ACLU as the organization's science advisor. 00:00:13.272 --> 00:00:15.330 I really, really loved my job, 00:00:16.010 --> 00:00:18.428 but I was having one of those days 00:00:18.428 --> 00:00:21.400 where I was feeling just a little bit discouraged. 00:00:21.400 --> 00:00:25.713 So I wandered down the hallway to my colleague Chris Hansen's office. 00:00:26.504 --> 00:00:29.993 Chris had been at the ACLU for more than 30 years, 00:00:29.993 --> 00:00:33.273 so he had deep institutional knowledge and insights. 00:00:33.771 --> 00:00:36.864 I explained to Chris that I was feeling a little bit stuck. 00:00:37.646 --> 00:00:39.821 I had been investigating a number of issues 00:00:39.821 --> 00:00:44.256 at the intersection of science and civil liberties - super interesting, 00:00:45.003 --> 00:00:49.182 but I wanted the ACLU to engage these issues in a much bigger way, 00:00:49.182 --> 00:00:51.610 in a way that could really make a difference. 00:00:53.871 --> 00:00:55.987 So Chris cut right to the chase and he says, 00:00:55.987 --> 00:00:59.916 "Well, of all the issues you've been looking at, what are the top five?" 00:00:59.916 --> 00:01:02.486 "Well, there's genetic discrimination, 00:01:02.486 --> 00:01:04.863 and reproductive technologies, 00:01:04.863 --> 00:01:06.750 and biobanking, and ... 00:01:07.053 --> 00:01:08.939 Oh! -- there's this really cool issue, 00:01:08.939 --> 00:01:11.518 functional MRI and using it for lie detection, and ... 00:01:11.518 --> 00:01:13.550 Oh! and of course, there's gene patents." 00:01:13.550 --> 00:01:15.341 "Gene patents?" 00:01:15.884 --> 00:01:18.158 "Yes, you know, patents on human genes." 00:01:18.158 --> 00:01:19.504 "No! 00:01:19.814 --> 00:01:22.282 You're telling me that the US government 00:01:22.282 --> 00:01:25.526 has been issuing patents on part of the human body? 00:01:25.526 --> 00:01:27.312 That can't be right." 00:01:28.045 --> 00:01:31.677 I went back to my office and sent Chris three articles. 00:01:32.003 --> 00:01:35.452 And 20 minutes later, he came bursting in my office. 00:01:35.579 --> 00:01:39.348 "Oh my god! You're right! Who can we sue?" 00:01:39.508 --> 00:01:41.538 (Laughter) 00:01:41.679 --> 00:01:43.535 Now Chris is a really brilliant lawyer, 00:01:43.535 --> 00:01:46.715 but he knew almost nothing about patent law, 00:01:46.715 --> 00:01:49.331 and certainly nothing about genetics. 00:01:49.331 --> 00:01:52.149 I knew something about genetics, but I wasn't even a lawyer, 00:01:52.149 --> 00:01:53.995 let alone a patent lawyer. 00:01:53.995 --> 00:01:58.086 So clearly we had a lot to learn before we could file a lawsuit. 00:01:58.086 --> 00:02:01.150 First, we needed to understand exactly what was patented 00:02:01.150 --> 00:02:03.248 when someone patented a gene. 00:02:03.798 --> 00:02:07.149 Gene patents typically contain dozens of claims, 00:02:07.708 --> 00:02:12.758 but the most controversial of these are to so-called, "isolated DNA." 00:02:13.118 --> 00:02:17.495 Namely, a piece of DNA that has been removed from a cell. 00:02:18.432 --> 00:02:19.860 Gene patent proponents say, 00:02:19.860 --> 00:02:23.156 "See? We didn't patent the gene in your body, 00:02:23.156 --> 00:02:25.357 we patented an isolated gene." 00:02:25.592 --> 00:02:26.784 And that's true, 00:02:26.784 --> 00:02:33.448 but the problem is that any use of the gene requires that it be isolated. 00:02:34.931 --> 00:02:39.050 And the patents weren't just to a particular gene that they isolated, 00:02:39.050 --> 00:02:42.378 but on every possible version of that gene. 00:02:42.667 --> 00:02:44.211 So what does that mean? 00:02:44.369 --> 00:02:47.498 That means that you can't give your gene to your doctor 00:02:47.498 --> 00:02:49.537 and ask him or her to look at it, 00:02:49.537 --> 00:02:51.542 say, to see if it has any mutations, 00:02:51.542 --> 00:02:53.974 without permission of the patent holder. 00:02:54.684 --> 00:02:58.849 It also means that the patent holder has the right to stop anyone 00:02:58.849 --> 00:03:02.432 from using that gene in research or clinical testing. 00:03:03.718 --> 00:03:05.569 Allowing patent holders, 00:03:05.593 --> 00:03:06.877 often private companies, 00:03:06.901 --> 00:03:11.387 to lock up stretches of the human genome was harming patients. 00:03:11.958 --> 00:03:13.110 Consider Abigail, 00:03:13.134 --> 00:03:15.527 a 10-year-old with Long QT Syndrome, 00:03:15.551 --> 00:03:18.975 a serious heart condition that, if left untreated, 00:03:18.999 --> 00:03:20.777 can result in sudden death. 00:03:21.911 --> 00:03:25.833 The company that obtained a patent on two genes associated with this condition 00:03:25.857 --> 00:03:28.339 developed a test to diagnose the syndrome. 00:03:28.363 --> 00:03:31.187 But then they went bankrupt and they never offered it. 00:03:32.060 --> 00:03:33.988 So another lab tried to offer the test, 00:03:34.012 --> 00:03:37.000 but the company that held the patents threatened to sue the lab 00:03:37.024 --> 00:03:38.206 for patent infringement. 00:03:38.230 --> 00:03:39.389 So as a result, 00:03:39.413 --> 00:03:42.275 for 2 years, no test was a available. 00:03:43.291 --> 00:03:44.441 During that time, 00:03:44.465 --> 00:03:47.715 Abigail died of undiagnosed Long QT. 00:03:48.776 --> 00:03:52.013 Gene patents clearly were a problem and were harming patients. 00:03:52.467 --> 00:03:54.873 But was there a way we could challenge them? 00:03:56.864 --> 00:03:58.585 Turns out that the Supreme Court 00:03:58.585 --> 00:04:01.460 has made clear through a long line of cases, 00:04:01.460 --> 00:04:04.774 that certain things are not patent eligible. 00:04:05.534 --> 00:04:07.988 You can't patent products of nature - 00:04:07.988 --> 00:04:12.170 the air, the water, minerals, elements of the periodic table. 00:04:13.081 --> 00:04:15.783 And you can't patent laws of nature - 00:04:16.296 --> 00:04:18.839 the law of gravity, E = mc2. 00:04:18.943 --> 00:04:22.715 These things are just too fundamental and must remain free to all, 00:04:23.825 --> 00:04:26.028 and reserved exclusively to none. 00:04:26.028 --> 00:04:28.485 It seemed to us that DNA, 00:04:28.485 --> 00:04:31.545 the most fundamental structure of life, 00:04:31.545 --> 00:04:34.185 that codes for the production of all of our proteins, 00:04:34.185 --> 00:04:37.165 is both a product of nature and a law of nature, 00:04:37.165 --> 00:04:40.205 regardless of whether it's in our bodies 00:04:40.205 --> 00:04:42.610 or sitting in the bottom of a test tube. 00:04:43.045 --> 00:04:44.577 As we delved into this issue, 00:04:44.577 --> 00:04:48.398 we traveled all over the country to speak with many different experts - 00:04:48.973 --> 00:04:52.453 scientists, medical professionals, lawyers, patent lawyers. 00:04:53.210 --> 00:04:56.503 Most of them agreed that we were right as a matter of policy, 00:04:56.528 --> 00:05:00.023 and, at least in theory, as a matter of law. 00:05:00.541 --> 00:05:02.191 All of them thought 00:05:02.191 --> 00:05:04.761 our chances of winning a gene-patent challenge 00:05:04.761 --> 00:05:06.628 were about zero. 00:05:07.864 --> 00:05:09.378 Why is that? 00:05:09.968 --> 00:05:12.849 Well, the patent office had been issuing these patents 00:05:12.849 --> 00:05:14.963 for more than 20 years. 00:05:15.750 --> 00:05:18.609 There were literally thousands of patents on human genes. 00:05:20.062 --> 00:05:22.911 The patent bar was deeply entrenched in the status quo, 00:05:23.672 --> 00:05:26.891 the biotech industry had grown up around this practice, 00:05:27.202 --> 00:05:30.506 and legislation to ban gene patents had been introduced 00:05:30.506 --> 00:05:32.102 year after year in Congress, 00:05:32.102 --> 00:05:33.767 and had gone absolutely nowhere. 00:05:34.398 --> 00:05:35.911 So the bottom line: 00:05:35.911 --> 00:05:39.156 courts just weren't going to be willing to overturn these patents. 00:05:40.174 --> 00:05:44.406 Now, neither Chris nor I were the type to shy away from a challenge, 00:05:44.406 --> 00:05:47.610 and hearing, "Being right just isn't enough," 00:05:48.029 --> 00:05:50.559 seemed all the more reason to take on this fight. 00:05:51.643 --> 00:05:53.593 So we set out to build our case. 00:05:54.832 --> 00:05:58.644 Now, patent cases tend to be: Company A sues Company B 00:05:58.656 --> 00:06:01.592 over some really narrow, obscure technical issue. 00:06:02.502 --> 00:06:04.892 We weren't really interested in that kind of case, 00:06:04.892 --> 00:06:07.550 and we thought this case was much bigger than that. 00:06:07.550 --> 00:06:10.202 This was about scientific freedom, medical progress, 00:06:10.202 --> 00:06:11.720 the rights of patients. 00:06:11.720 --> 00:06:14.200 So we decided we were going to develop a case 00:06:14.200 --> 00:06:16.334 that was not like your typical patent case. 00:06:17.192 --> 00:06:19.816 More like a civil rights case. 00:06:20.130 --> 00:06:22.958 We set out to identify a gene-patent holder 00:06:22.958 --> 00:06:25.627 that was vigorously enforcing its patents, 00:06:26.095 --> 00:06:29.545 and then to organize a broad coalition of plaintiffs and experts 00:06:29.545 --> 00:06:31.119 that could tell the court 00:06:31.119 --> 00:06:35.043 about all the ways that these patents were harming patients and innovation. 00:06:37.156 --> 00:06:39.953 We found the prime candidate to sue in Myriad Genetics, 00:06:39.953 --> 00:06:43.146 a company that's based in Salt Lake City, Utah. 00:06:44.571 --> 00:06:46.729 Myriad held patents on two genes, 00:06:46.729 --> 00:06:50.130 the BRCA1 and the BRCA2 genes. 00:06:50.887 --> 00:06:53.643 Women with certain mutations along these genes 00:06:53.643 --> 00:06:56.219 are considered to be at a significantly increased risk 00:06:56.219 --> 00:06:58.344 of developing breast and ovarian cancer. 00:06:59.881 --> 00:07:01.874 Myriad had used its patents to maintain 00:07:01.874 --> 00:07:06.197 a complete monopoly on BRCA testing in the United States. 00:07:07.426 --> 00:07:11.402 It had forced multiple labs that were offering BRCA testing, to stop. 00:07:11.459 --> 00:07:13.657 It charged a lot of money for its test - 00:07:13.657 --> 00:07:15.130 over 3,000 dollars. 00:07:15.747 --> 00:07:18.285 It had stopped sharing its clinical data 00:07:18.285 --> 00:07:20.562 with the international scientific community. 00:07:21.276 --> 00:07:23.323 And perhaps worst of all, 00:07:23.323 --> 00:07:25.451 for a period of several years, 00:07:25.548 --> 00:07:29.162 Myriad refused to update its test to include additional mutations 00:07:29.171 --> 00:07:33.374 that had been identified by a team of researchers in France. 00:07:33.914 --> 00:07:36.212 It has been estimated that during that period, 00:07:36.212 --> 00:07:37.569 for several years, 00:07:37.569 --> 00:07:41.715 as many as 12 percent of women undergoing testing 00:07:41.715 --> 00:07:44.906 received the wrong answer - 00:07:44.906 --> 00:07:48.812 a negative test result that should have been positive. 00:07:50.325 --> 00:07:51.925 This is Kathleen Maxian. 00:07:52.899 --> 00:07:56.552 Kathleen's sister Eileen developed breast cancer at age 40 00:07:56.552 --> 00:07:58.382 and she was tested by Myriad. 00:07:59.191 --> 00:08:01.108 The test was negative. 00:08:01.108 --> 00:08:02.505 The family was relieved. 00:08:02.505 --> 00:08:05.839 That meant that Eileen's cancer most likely didn't run in the family, 00:08:05.839 --> 00:08:08.855 and that other members of her family didn't need to be tested. 00:08:09.637 --> 00:08:11.417 But two years later, 00:08:11.417 --> 00:08:15.117 Kathleen was diagnosed with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. 00:08:16.052 --> 00:08:19.888 It turned out that Kathleen's sister was among the 12 percent 00:08:19.888 --> 00:08:22.899 who received a false-negative test result. 00:08:23.395 --> 00:08:26.692 Had Eileen received the proper result, 00:08:26.692 --> 00:08:28.795 Kathleen would have then been tested, 00:08:28.795 --> 00:08:31.388 and her ovarian cancer could have been prevented. 00:08:33.950 --> 00:08:35.375 Once we settled on Myriad, 00:08:35.375 --> 00:08:39.156 we then had to form a coalition of plaintiffs and experts 00:08:39.156 --> 00:08:41.259 that could illuminate these problems. 00:08:41.561 --> 00:08:43.957 We ended up with 20 highly committed plaintiffs, 00:08:45.091 --> 00:08:46.606 genetic counselors, 00:08:46.606 --> 00:08:49.821 geneticists who had received cease and desist letters, 00:08:50.119 --> 00:08:52.262 advocacy organizations, 00:08:52.557 --> 00:08:56.263 four major scientific organizations that collectively represented 00:08:56.263 --> 00:08:59.514 more than 150,000 scientists and medical professionals 00:09:00.314 --> 00:09:03.520 and individual women who either couldn't afford Myriad's test, 00:09:03.520 --> 00:09:06.878 or who wanted to obtain a second opinion but could not, 00:09:06.878 --> 00:09:08.652 as a result of the patents. 00:09:10.114 --> 00:09:13.026 One of the major challenges we had in preparing the case 00:09:13.026 --> 00:09:16.406 was figuring out how best to communicate the science. 00:09:16.406 --> 00:09:21.187 So in order to argue that what Myriad did was not an invention, 00:09:21.187 --> 00:09:24.339 and that isolated BRCA genes were products of nature, 00:09:24.859 --> 00:09:28.118 we had to explain a couple of basic concepts, like: 00:09:28.118 --> 00:09:30.470 What's a gene? What's DNA? 00:09:30.470 --> 00:09:34.564 How is DNA isolated, and why isn't that an invention? 00:09:35.016 --> 00:09:38.685 We spent hours and hours with our plaintiffs and experts, 00:09:38.685 --> 00:09:42.188 trying to come up with ways of explaining these concepts 00:09:42.188 --> 00:09:43.972 simply yet accurately. 00:09:43.972 --> 00:09:47.447 And we ended up relying heavily on the use of metaphors, 00:09:47.826 --> 00:09:49.239 like gold. 00:09:50.016 --> 00:09:52.388 So isolating DNA - 00:09:52.388 --> 00:09:54.819 it's like extracting gold from a mountain, 00:09:54.819 --> 00:09:57.344 or taking it out of a stream bed. 00:09:59.502 --> 00:10:03.135 You might be able to patent the process for mining the gold, 00:10:03.135 --> 00:10:05.137 but you can't patent the gold itself. 00:10:06.258 --> 00:10:08.550 It might've taken a lot of hard work and effort 00:10:08.550 --> 00:10:10.734 to dig the gold out of the mountain; 00:10:10.734 --> 00:10:13.479 you still can't patent it, it's still gold. 00:10:13.797 --> 00:10:15.515 And the gold, once it's extracted, 00:10:15.515 --> 00:10:17.747 can clearly be used for all sorts of things 00:10:17.747 --> 00:10:20.463 that it couldn't be used for when it was in the mountain; 00:10:20.463 --> 00:10:22.720 you can make jewelry out of it for example - 00:10:22.720 --> 00:10:25.244 still can't patent the gold, it's still gold. 00:10:26.568 --> 00:10:30.977 So now it's 2009, and we're ready to file our case. 00:10:31.536 --> 00:10:34.950 We filed in federal court in the southern district of New York, 00:10:36.032 --> 00:10:39.601 and the case was randomly assigned to Judge Robert Sweet. 00:10:39.895 --> 00:10:43.201 In March 2010, Judge Sweet issued his opinion - 00:10:44.019 --> 00:10:46.048 152 pages - 00:10:46.048 --> 00:10:48.864 and a complete victory for our side. 00:10:49.647 --> 00:10:51.306 In reading the opinion, 00:10:51.306 --> 00:10:56.940 we could not get over how eloquently he described the science in the case. 00:10:57.571 --> 00:10:59.709 I mean, our brief - it was pretty good, 00:10:59.709 --> 00:11:01.535 but not this good. 00:11:02.797 --> 00:11:06.890 How did he develop such a deep understanding of this issue 00:11:06.890 --> 00:11:08.423 in such a short time? 00:11:08.423 --> 00:11:11.115 We just could not comprehend how this had happened. 00:11:11.729 --> 00:11:13.105 So it turned out, 00:11:13.105 --> 00:11:16.326 Judge Sweet's clerk working for him at the time, 00:11:16.326 --> 00:11:18.210 was not just a lawyer - 00:11:18.210 --> 00:11:19.809 he was a scientist. 00:11:19.809 --> 00:11:21.426 He was not just a scientist - 00:11:21.426 --> 00:11:23.988 he had a PhD in molecular biology. 00:11:24.753 --> 00:11:26.411 (Laughter) 00:11:26.411 --> 00:11:28.734 What an incredible stroke of luck! 00:11:29.948 --> 00:11:30.977 Myriad then appealed 00:11:30.977 --> 00:11:34.413 to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. 00:11:34.413 --> 00:11:36.844 And here things got really interesting. 00:11:37.253 --> 00:11:40.412 First, in a pivotal moment of this case, 00:11:41.024 --> 00:11:44.031 the US government switched sides. 00:11:44.716 --> 00:11:48.344 So in the district court the government submitted a brief on Myriad's side. 00:11:48.344 --> 00:11:53.229 But now in direct opposition to its own patent office, 00:11:53.229 --> 00:11:56.475 the US government files a brief that states that is has 00:11:56.475 --> 00:11:59.959 "reconsidered this issue in light of the district court's opinion, 00:11:59.959 --> 00:12:03.181 and has concluded that isolated DNA is not patent eligible." 00:12:03.628 --> 00:12:05.547 This was a really big deal, 00:12:05.547 --> 00:12:07.090 totally unexpected. 00:12:08.313 --> 00:12:10.561 The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 00:12:10.561 --> 00:12:12.261 hears all patent cases, 00:12:12.261 --> 00:12:15.699 and it has a reputation for being very, very pro-patent. 00:12:15.699 --> 00:12:18.510 So even with this remarkable development, 00:12:18.510 --> 00:12:20.106 we expected to lose. 00:12:20.326 --> 00:12:21.595 And we did. 00:12:22.323 --> 00:12:23.707 Sort of. 00:12:24.736 --> 00:12:27.283 Ends up split decision, 2 to 1. 00:12:28.140 --> 00:12:30.666 But the two judges who ruled against us, 00:12:30.666 --> 00:12:33.242 did so for completely different reasons. 00:12:33.529 --> 00:12:35.386 The first one, Judge Lourie, 00:12:35.386 --> 00:12:38.097 made up his own novel, biological theory - 00:12:38.097 --> 00:12:39.511 totally wrong. 00:12:39.750 --> 00:12:40.958 (Laughter) 00:12:40.958 --> 00:12:43.191 Decided Myriad had created a new chemical - 00:12:43.191 --> 00:12:45.111 made absolutely no sense. 00:12:45.207 --> 00:12:48.941 Myriad didn't even argue this, so it came out of the blue. 00:12:49.516 --> 00:12:51.493 The other, Judge Moore, 00:12:51.493 --> 00:12:55.583 said she basically agreed with us that isolated DNA is a product of nature. 00:12:56.671 --> 00:13:00.460 But she's like, "I don't want to shake up the biotech industry." 00:13:02.233 --> 00:13:04.095 I can think of a lot of things 00:13:04.095 --> 00:13:08.481 that if judges had said that, we'd be in a very different society right now. 00:13:08.702 --> 00:13:11.292 The third, Judge Bryson, 00:13:11.292 --> 00:13:12.857 agreed with us. 00:13:13.848 --> 00:13:16.666 So now we sought review by the Supreme Court. 00:13:16.666 --> 00:13:19.120 And when you petition the Supreme Court, 00:13:19.120 --> 00:13:22.622 you have to present a question that you want the court to answer. 00:13:22.622 --> 00:13:26.811 Usually these questions take the form of a super-long paragraph, 00:13:26.811 --> 00:13:29.693 like a whole page long with lots and lots of clauses, 00:13:29.693 --> 00:13:31.790 "wherein this" and "therefore that." 00:13:32.443 --> 00:13:36.466 We submitted perhaps the shortest question presented ever. 00:13:37.541 --> 00:13:39.020 Four words: 00:13:40.723 --> 00:13:43.143 Are human genes patentable? 00:13:43.143 --> 00:13:46.006 Now when Chris first asked me what I thought of these words, 00:13:46.006 --> 00:13:47.523 I said, "Well, I don't know. 00:13:47.523 --> 00:13:50.795 I think you have to say, 'Is isolated DNA patentable?'" 00:13:51.136 --> 00:13:52.397 "Nope. 00:13:52.397 --> 00:13:57.158 I want the justices to have the very same reaction that I had 00:13:57.158 --> 00:14:00.652 when you brought this issue to me seven years ago." 00:14:00.990 --> 00:14:03.299 Well, I certainly couldn't argue with that. 00:14:03.925 --> 00:14:07.593 The Supreme Court only hears about one percent 00:14:07.593 --> 00:14:09.350 of the cases that it receives, 00:14:09.350 --> 00:14:11.091 and it agreed to hear ours. 00:14:12.132 --> 00:14:16.131 The day of the oral argument arrives and it was really, really exciting - 00:14:16.131 --> 00:14:18.033 long line of people outside, 00:14:18.033 --> 00:14:20.931 people had been standing in line since 2:30 in the morning 00:14:20.931 --> 00:14:22.755 to try to get into the courthouse. 00:14:22.755 --> 00:14:24.759 Two breast cancer organizations, 00:14:24.759 --> 00:14:27.174 Breast Cancer Action and FORCE, 00:14:27.174 --> 00:14:29.883 had organized a demonstration on the courthouse steps. 00:14:29.883 --> 00:14:32.482 Chris and I sat quietly in the hallway, 00:14:33.633 --> 00:14:36.606 moments before he was to walk in and argue 00:14:36.606 --> 00:14:38.671 the most important case of his career. 00:14:39.409 --> 00:14:41.829 I was clearly more nervous than he was. 00:14:42.214 --> 00:14:45.214 It's a good thing he was arguing, and not me. 00:14:45.346 --> 00:14:48.891 And I sat there, sort of thinking, "Oh, God, is he ready? 00:14:49.721 --> 00:14:53.431 Did I do everything I could have done to help prepare him for this day?" 00:14:53.467 --> 00:14:58.599 But any remaining panic subsided as I walked into the courtroom 00:14:58.599 --> 00:15:01.337 and looked around at a sea of friendly faces: 00:15:01.337 --> 00:15:03.375 our individual women clients, 00:15:03.375 --> 00:15:06.492 who had shared their deeply personal stories; 00:15:06.492 --> 00:15:10.671 the geneticists who had taken huge chunks of time out of their busy careers 00:15:10.671 --> 00:15:12.654 to dedicate themselves to this fight; 00:15:12.654 --> 00:15:15.182 and representatives from a diverse array 00:15:15.182 --> 00:15:17.474 of medical, patient advocacy, 00:15:17.474 --> 00:15:19.652 environmental and religious organizations, 00:15:19.652 --> 00:15:23.036 who had submitted friend of the court briefs in the case. 00:15:24.297 --> 00:15:27.364 Also in the room were three leaders of the Human Genome Project, 00:15:27.364 --> 00:15:30.036 including the co-discoverer of DNA himself, 00:15:30.041 --> 00:15:31.300 James Watson, 00:15:31.300 --> 00:15:33.343 who had submitted a brief to the court, 00:15:33.343 --> 00:15:36.816 where he referred to gene patenting as "lunacy." 00:15:37.761 --> 00:15:39.248 (Laughter) 00:15:39.248 --> 00:15:42.215 The diversity of the communities represented in this room 00:15:42.215 --> 00:15:45.897 and the contributions each had made to make this day a reality 00:15:45.897 --> 00:15:48.063 spoke volumes to what was at stake. 00:15:49.151 --> 00:15:51.317 The argument itself was riveting. 00:15:51.669 --> 00:15:53.471 Chris argued brilliantly. 00:15:53.471 --> 00:15:54.919 But for me, 00:15:54.919 --> 00:15:58.890 the most thrilling aspect was watching the Supreme Court Justices grapple 00:15:58.890 --> 00:16:00.508 with isolated DNA, 00:16:00.508 --> 00:16:05.289 through a series of colorful analogies and feisty exchanges, 00:16:05.289 --> 00:16:09.027 very much the same way as our legal team had done 00:16:09.027 --> 00:16:10.746 for the past seven years. 00:16:11.573 --> 00:16:13.947 Justice Kagan likened isolating DNA 00:16:13.947 --> 00:16:17.546 to extracting a medicinal plant from the Amazon. 00:16:18.686 --> 00:16:23.048 Justice Roberts distinguished it from carving a baseball bat from a tree. 00:16:24.731 --> 00:16:27.355 And in one of my absolutely favorite moments, 00:16:27.355 --> 00:16:32.285 Justice Sotomayor proclaimed isolated DNA to be "just nature sitting there." 00:16:32.672 --> 00:16:34.346 (Laughter) 00:16:34.346 --> 00:16:37.010 We felt pretty confident leaving the courtroom that day, 00:16:37.010 --> 00:16:40.327 but I could never have anticipated the outcome: 00:16:41.141 --> 00:16:42.755 Nine to zero. 00:16:44.929 --> 00:16:48.615 "A naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature, 00:16:48.615 --> 00:16:51.452 and not patent-eligible merely because it has been isolated. 00:16:52.001 --> 00:16:53.235 And furthermore, 00:16:53.235 --> 00:16:55.812 Myriad did not create anything." 00:16:58.054 --> 00:16:59.630 Within 24 hours of the decision, 00:16:59.630 --> 00:17:01.358 five labs had announced 00:17:01.358 --> 00:17:04.423 that they would begin to offer testing for the BRCA genes. 00:17:04.988 --> 00:17:08.947 Some of them promised to offer the tests at a lower price than Myriad's. 00:17:08.947 --> 00:17:11.898 Some promised to provide a more comprehensive test 00:17:11.898 --> 00:17:13.781 than the one Myriad was offering. 00:17:14.365 --> 00:17:16.862 But of course the decision goes far beyond Myriad. 00:17:16.862 --> 00:17:21.334 It ends a 25-year practice of allowing patents on human genes 00:17:21.334 --> 00:17:22.876 in the United States. 00:17:22.876 --> 00:17:27.272 It clears a significant barrier to biomedical discovery and innovation. 00:17:28.089 --> 00:17:32.872 And it helps to ensure that patients like Abigail, Kathleen and Eileen 00:17:32.872 --> 00:17:35.326 have access to the tests that they need. 00:17:37.229 --> 00:17:39.871 A few weeks after the court issued its decision, 00:17:39.871 --> 00:17:42.307 I received a small package in the mail. 00:17:43.322 --> 00:17:45.104 It was from Bob Cook-Deegan, 00:17:45.104 --> 00:17:47.169 a professor at Duke University, 00:17:47.169 --> 00:17:50.412 and one the very first people Chris and I went to visit 00:17:50.412 --> 00:17:54.562 when we started to consider whether to bring this case. 00:17:55.739 --> 00:17:58.661 I opened it up to find a small stuffed animal. 00:17:59.368 --> 00:18:02.895 (Laughter) 00:18:05.270 --> 00:18:07.757 We took a big risk in taking this case. 00:18:08.066 --> 00:18:11.053 Part of what gave us the courage to take that risk 00:18:11.053 --> 00:18:13.606 was knowing that we were doing the right thing. 00:18:13.606 --> 00:18:17.142 The process took nearly eight years from the start to finish, 00:18:17.142 --> 00:18:19.480 with many twists and turns along the way. 00:18:20.222 --> 00:18:22.336 A little luck certainly helped, 00:18:22.336 --> 00:18:25.393 but it was the communities that we bridged, 00:18:25.393 --> 00:18:27.196 the alliances that we created, 00:18:27.196 --> 00:18:29.122 that made pigs fly. 00:18:29.122 --> 00:18:30.515 Thank you. 00:18:30.515 --> 00:18:32.568 (Applause)