1 00:00:00,566 --> 00:00:02,900 In the last video we hopefully got the intuition 2 00:00:02,900 --> 00:00:05,816 between how real interest rates 3 00:00:05,816 --> 00:00:08,002 might impact planned investment. 4 00:00:08,002 --> 00:00:11,233 We saw that if real interest rates went up, 5 00:00:11,233 --> 00:00:15,484 then planned investment went down. 6 00:00:15,484 --> 00:00:17,204 If real interest rates went down, 7 00:00:17,204 --> 00:00:21,149 then planned investment went up. 8 00:00:21,149 --> 00:00:22,937 What we want to do in this video is 9 00:00:22,937 --> 00:00:25,067 take this conclusion right over here, 10 00:00:25,067 --> 00:00:28,150 this hopefully fairly intuitive conclusion right over here 11 00:00:28,150 --> 00:00:30,150 and apply it to our Keynesian Cross 12 00:00:30,150 --> 00:00:31,734 and think about how real interest rates 13 00:00:31,734 --> 00:00:34,270 would effect overall planned expenditure 14 00:00:34,270 --> 00:00:35,783 and what that would do in a model 15 00:00:35,783 --> 00:00:37,982 like the Keynesian Cross, 16 00:00:37,982 --> 00:00:42,934 what that would do to our equilibrium real GDPs. 17 00:00:42,934 --> 00:00:44,600 Just as a reminder, 18 00:00:44,600 --> 00:00:46,849 let's just draw our Keynesian Cross first, 19 00:00:46,849 --> 00:00:48,433 or parts of it. 20 00:00:48,433 --> 00:00:49,933 On this axis right over here, 21 00:00:49,933 --> 00:00:52,116 we have expenditures. 22 00:00:52,116 --> 00:00:55,267 This axis right over here, 23 00:00:55,267 --> 00:00:57,383 we have income. 24 00:00:57,383 --> 00:00:59,515 We know, from many videos now, 25 00:00:59,515 --> 00:01:01,515 that an economy is a equilibrium 26 00:01:01,515 --> 00:01:03,185 when income is equal, 27 00:01:03,185 --> 00:01:05,648 when aggregate real income 28 00:01:05,648 --> 00:01:07,868 is equal to aggregate real expenditures. 29 00:01:07,868 --> 00:01:10,357 Circular flow of GDP. 30 00:01:10,357 --> 00:01:11,273 Let's draw ⌠31 00:01:11,273 --> 00:01:13,450 Let me make a line that's all the points 32 00:01:13,450 --> 00:01:16,608 where Y is equal to expenditures. 33 00:01:16,608 --> 00:01:19,785 Along this 45 degree line right over here. 34 00:01:19,785 --> 00:01:21,358 This is our expenditures. 35 00:01:21,358 --> 00:01:22,608 At this point right over here, 36 00:01:22,608 --> 00:01:24,318 that should be the same value 37 00:01:24,318 --> 00:01:27,023 as what our aggregate income is. 38 00:01:27,023 --> 00:01:28,524 That's part of the Keynesian Cross. 39 00:01:28,524 --> 00:01:29,783 The other part is to actually 40 00:01:29,783 --> 00:01:32,607 plot planned expenditures relative to this 41 00:01:32,607 --> 00:01:33,941 and then see where they intersect. 42 00:01:33,941 --> 00:01:37,049 What the equilibrium for that planned expenditure line? 43 00:01:37,049 --> 00:01:38,848 I'll write it here as ... 44 00:01:38,848 --> 00:01:41,049 I've written it in the past as planned. 45 00:01:41,049 --> 00:01:42,384 I just wrote out the word. 46 00:01:42,384 --> 00:01:45,651 Planned expenditures. 47 00:01:45,651 --> 00:01:51,858 We could write it as expenditures planned, like that. 48 00:01:51,858 --> 00:01:55,784 It's equal to our aggregate consumption. 49 00:01:55,784 --> 00:01:57,117 Our aggregate consumption, 50 00:01:57,117 --> 00:02:01,116 we can write it as a function of disposable income. 51 00:02:01,116 --> 00:02:02,983 Y - T is disposable income. 52 00:02:02,983 --> 00:02:05,583 Aggregat income minus aggregate taxes. 53 00:02:05,583 --> 00:02:07,117 I want to be very clear here. 54 00:02:07,117 --> 00:02:09,521 This is not saying C x Y - T. 55 00:02:09,521 --> 00:02:11,856 This is saying C is a function of Y - T. 56 00:02:11,856 --> 00:02:15,116 Give my a Y - T and I will give you a C. 57 00:02:15,116 --> 00:02:17,439 For the sake of our Keynesian Cross analysis, 58 00:02:17,439 --> 00:02:18,715 and this is kind of kind of what you would see 59 00:02:18,715 --> 00:02:20,359 in a traditional intro class, 60 00:02:20,359 --> 00:02:23,651 we assume that we have a linear consumption function. 61 00:02:23,651 --> 00:02:25,716 We assume that our consumption functions. 62 00:02:25,716 --> 00:02:28,649 C as a function of disposable income. 63 00:02:28,649 --> 00:02:31,783 It might be something like our autonomous consumption 64 00:02:31,783 --> 00:02:33,939 plus our marginal propensity to consume 65 00:02:33,939 --> 00:02:37,783 times our aggregate income, minus taxes. 66 00:02:37,783 --> 00:02:39,916 This right over here really is multiplication. 67 00:02:39,916 --> 00:02:42,250 We could distribute this C 1. 68 00:02:42,250 --> 00:02:46,985 This is just saying C as a function of Y - T. 69 00:02:46,985 --> 00:02:49,856 That's only one part of planned expenditures. 70 00:02:49,856 --> 00:02:51,049 Above and beyond that, 71 00:02:51,049 --> 00:02:53,690 we have planned investment. 72 00:02:53,690 --> 00:02:55,607 We're talking about the planned side of things. 73 00:02:55,607 --> 00:02:57,382 Now we know that planned investment ... 74 00:02:57,382 --> 00:03:00,450 In the past we viewed it as a constant, 75 00:03:00,450 --> 00:03:01,859 but now we know it can actually be 76 00:03:01,859 --> 00:03:05,381 a function of real interest rates. 77 00:03:05,381 --> 00:03:06,941 Above and beyond that, 78 00:03:06,941 --> 00:03:09,450 we have government expenditures 79 00:03:09,450 --> 00:03:11,522 and then net exports. 80 00:03:11,522 --> 00:03:14,117 For some given real interest rate, 81 00:03:14,117 --> 00:03:15,584 we can plot this line. 82 00:03:15,584 --> 00:03:17,190 The consumption function right over here 83 00:03:17,190 --> 00:03:20,984 is just a line with a positive slope that intersects 84 00:03:20,984 --> 00:03:24,857 the vertical axis at some place up here. 85 00:03:24,857 --> 00:03:26,383 It has a positive intersect. 86 00:03:26,383 --> 00:03:28,316 All of these, for given interest rate, 87 00:03:28,316 --> 00:03:29,941 these are all going to be constant. 88 00:03:29,941 --> 00:03:34,050 Our planned expenditures would look something like this. 89 00:03:34,050 --> 00:03:37,318 It might look something like that. 90 00:03:37,318 --> 00:03:40,608 This is YP. 91 00:03:40,608 --> 00:03:43,182 Let's call this YP_1. 92 00:03:43,182 --> 00:03:46,247 This is the YP we get when we pick ⌠93 00:03:46,247 --> 00:03:47,450 I'll just write ... 94 00:03:47,450 --> 00:03:49,190 I'll just rewrite the whole thing over again. 95 00:03:49,190 --> 00:03:50,916 We have our consumption, 96 00:03:50,916 --> 00:03:53,716 which is a function of Y - T, 97 00:03:53,716 --> 00:03:56,858 plus the level of planned investment at ... 98 00:03:56,858 --> 00:04:00,048 Let's say interest rate R1, 99 00:04:00,048 --> 00:04:01,856 so at some given interest rate, 100 00:04:01,856 --> 00:04:03,857 plus government spending, 101 00:04:03,857 --> 00:04:07,524 plus net exports. 102 00:04:07,524 --> 00:04:08,650 We see ... 103 00:04:08,650 --> 00:04:10,051 We've done this Keynesian Cross analysis 104 00:04:10,051 --> 00:04:11,916 several times now, already. 105 00:04:11,916 --> 00:04:14,783 This is our equilibrium level of GDP. 106 00:04:14,783 --> 00:04:17,250 This is where along our planned expenditure line, 107 00:04:17,250 --> 00:04:20,784 where income is equal to expenditures, 108 00:04:20,784 --> 00:04:22,450 or output is equal to expenditures. 109 00:04:22,450 --> 00:04:25,191 We are equilibrium right over here. 110 00:04:25,191 --> 00:04:28,999 We're not eating into inventories in an unplanned way 111 00:04:28,999 --> 00:04:31,398 and we're not building excessive inventory 112 00:04:31,398 --> 00:04:34,597 above and beyond what we had planned. 113 00:04:34,597 --> 00:04:35,998 Now, what I want to think about, 114 00:04:35,998 --> 00:04:43,731 what happens if interest rates go from R1 to R2? 115 00:04:43,731 --> 00:04:47,315 What happens if interest rates go from R1 to R2 116 00:04:47,315 --> 00:04:50,665 and in particular let's assume that R2? 117 00:04:50,665 --> 00:04:54,796 Now, we're going have planned investment at R2 118 00:04:54,796 --> 00:04:58,316 and we're going to assume that R2 is less than R1. 119 00:04:58,316 --> 00:04:59,265 We're essentially saying, 120 00:04:59,265 --> 00:05:01,731 what happens when interest rates go down. 121 00:05:01,731 --> 00:05:02,597 We already know. 122 00:05:02,597 --> 00:05:04,856 When interest rates go down, 123 00:05:04,856 --> 00:05:08,798 planned investment goes up. 124 00:05:08,798 --> 00:05:09,932 Everything else equal, 125 00:05:09,932 --> 00:05:11,933 if this thing shifts up, 126 00:05:11,933 --> 00:05:14,999 if this term right over here goes from R ... 127 00:05:14,999 --> 00:05:18,149 if the input into it, if the real interest rate goes down, 128 00:05:18,149 --> 00:05:21,332 then this whole expression is going to go up 129 00:05:21,332 --> 00:05:23,423 and so you're going to have an increase. 130 00:05:23,423 --> 00:05:25,080 You're going to have a shifting up 131 00:05:25,080 --> 00:05:26,465 of your planned expenditure 132 00:05:26,465 --> 00:05:28,996 for any level of income. 133 00:05:28,996 --> 00:05:31,198 It might look something like this. 134 00:05:31,198 --> 00:05:34,079 It would look something like this. 135 00:05:34,079 --> 00:05:37,196 This delta right over here, this ... 136 00:05:37,196 --> 00:05:38,665 Let me do it right over here. 137 00:05:38,665 --> 00:05:40,398 This distance right over here 138 00:05:40,398 --> 00:05:44,263 is going to be your change in planned investment. 139 00:05:44,263 --> 00:05:46,996 It went up because interest rates went down. 140 00:05:46,996 --> 00:05:49,329 We saw that in the last video. 141 00:05:49,329 --> 00:05:51,931 We saw that we got to a new level, 142 00:05:51,931 --> 00:05:53,369 or we see now that 143 00:05:53,369 --> 00:05:54,743 when you shift that up, 144 00:05:54,743 --> 00:05:55,600 that investment goes up. 145 00:05:55,600 --> 00:05:57,200 Because real interest rate went down, 146 00:05:57,200 --> 00:05:59,684 you get to a new equilibrium point. 147 00:05:59,684 --> 00:06:02,768 That equilibrium point is a higher level ... 148 00:06:02,768 --> 00:06:06,184 it's a higher level of GDP or income. 149 00:06:06,184 --> 00:06:08,101 We know from previous videos as well, 150 00:06:08,101 --> 00:06:10,133 that this distance right over here 151 00:06:10,133 --> 00:06:12,768 is the same as our multiplier 152 00:06:12,768 --> 00:06:15,599 times the amount that things got bumped up. 153 00:06:15,599 --> 00:06:17,408 The amount that things got bumped up 154 00:06:17,408 --> 00:06:20,099 was the change in planned investment. 155 00:06:20,099 --> 00:06:22,532 Then, we multiply that times our multiplier. 156 00:06:22,532 --> 00:06:24,684 Our multiplier is 1 over 157 00:06:24,684 --> 00:06:27,017 the marginal propensity to save, 158 00:06:27,017 --> 00:06:31,132 or 1 over 1- the marginal propensity to consume. 159 00:06:31,132 --> 00:06:33,102 The marginal propensity to consume ... 160 00:06:33,102 --> 00:06:35,398 We assume it's going to be constant 161 00:06:35,398 --> 00:06:37,199 in order to even be able to do this map. 162 00:06:37,199 --> 00:06:39,266 That's this piece right over there. 163 00:06:39,266 --> 00:06:42,531 That is equal to our C1. 164 00:06:42,531 --> 00:06:44,266 The main theme here, 165 00:06:44,266 --> 00:06:48,017 the real big picture here as we go on our way 166 00:06:48,017 --> 00:06:50,532 to constructing our ISLM model, 167 00:06:50,532 --> 00:06:52,266 is really that all we're seeing ... 168 00:06:52,266 --> 00:06:54,665 when real interest rates go up, 169 00:06:54,665 --> 00:06:56,278 planned investment goes down. 170 00:06:56,278 --> 00:06:57,696 When interest rates go down ... 171 00:06:57,696 --> 00:07:00,126 which is what we saw in this example right over here. 172 00:07:00,126 --> 00:07:01,662 Actually, let me write this down. 173 00:07:01,662 --> 00:07:08,198 Y, planned expenditures 2 at C as a function of Y - D +. 174 00:07:08,198 --> 00:07:11,778 Our new planned investment, at this lower interest rate, 175 00:07:11,778 --> 00:07:13,817 + G + net exports. 176 00:07:13,817 --> 00:07:17,454 This is our Y2 right over here, our planned expenditures. 177 00:07:17,454 --> 00:07:18,788 We saw in this example, 178 00:07:18,788 --> 00:07:20,721 when real interest rates went down, 179 00:07:20,721 --> 00:07:23,192 planned expenditures ... 180 00:07:23,192 --> 00:07:24,691 When real interest rates went down, 181 00:07:24,691 --> 00:07:26,120 planned investment went up. 182 00:07:26,120 --> 00:07:29,387 That made total planned expenditures go up. 183 00:07:29,387 --> 00:07:31,985 That made total GDP go up. 184 00:07:31,985 --> 00:07:34,054 Now we can have another relationship, 185 00:07:34,054 --> 00:07:36,190 which is really very analogous to this. 186 00:07:36,190 --> 00:07:38,941 Really, by changing this, we're just shifting this curve. 187 00:07:38,941 --> 00:07:42,587 Then, you have the multiplier effect on our equilibrium output. 188 00:07:42,587 --> 00:07:43,720 The big takeaway from here is, 189 00:07:43,720 --> 00:07:46,024 if real interest rates go up, 190 00:07:46,024 --> 00:07:49,121 not only does planned investment go down, 191 00:07:49,121 --> 00:07:51,690 that would shift this entire curve down. 192 00:07:51,690 --> 00:07:53,525 Then, that would also cause 193 00:07:53,525 --> 00:07:57,191 our equilibrium real GDP to go down. 194 00:07:57,191 --> 00:07:59,078 It would go down by some multiplier, 195 00:07:59,078 --> 00:08:01,501 by the multiplier of how much this goes down. 196 00:08:01,501 --> 00:08:03,500 If real interest rates go down, 197 00:08:03,500 --> 00:08:04,999 then planned investment, 198 00:08:04,999 --> 00:08:06,388 because of what we saw in the last video, 199 00:08:06,388 --> 00:08:07,417 goes up. 200 00:08:07,417 --> 00:08:09,001 Then, that would cause ... 201 00:08:09,001 --> 00:08:09,986 That would cause this whole ... 202 00:08:09,986 --> 00:08:11,119 That's what we did in this video. 203 00:08:11,119 --> 00:08:12,720 This curve would shift up. 204 00:08:12,720 --> 00:08:13,916 If this curve shifts up, 205 00:08:13,916 --> 00:08:16,520 our equilibrium GDP is going to be 206 00:08:16,520 --> 00:08:20,084 however much this shifted, times the multiplier, 207 00:08:20,084 --> 00:08:23,916 so your equilibrium GDP is going to go up. 208 00:08:23,916 --> 00:08:26,627 You really have a very similar relationship 209 00:08:26,627 --> 00:08:28,916 in terms of just how things move. 210 00:08:28,916 --> 00:08:31,083 We can plot this. 211 00:08:31,083 --> 00:08:33,119 Economist are famous for 212 00:08:33,119 --> 00:08:35,707 not always plotting the independent variable 213 00:08:35,707 --> 00:08:37,499 the way you would want to. 214 00:08:37,499 --> 00:08:38,787 As we construct our ... 215 00:08:38,787 --> 00:08:40,217 What we're going to see is our IS curve. 216 00:08:40,217 --> 00:08:42,467 It stands for investment savings. 217 00:08:42,467 --> 00:08:43,301 What we're going to do 218 00:08:43,301 --> 00:08:44,719 and we'll talk more about that in the future. 219 00:08:44,719 --> 00:08:46,317 We plot the convention is to put 220 00:08:46,317 --> 00:08:48,986 real interest rates on the vertical axis 221 00:08:48,986 --> 00:08:53,217 and to put real GDP right over here. 222 00:08:53,217 --> 00:08:54,717 If you want to look at this relationship, 223 00:08:54,717 --> 00:08:56,918 when we have a high real interest rate, 224 00:08:56,918 --> 00:09:00,253 we're going to have a low real GDP. 225 00:09:00,253 --> 00:09:02,885 When we have a low real interest rate, 226 00:09:02,885 --> 00:09:04,253 we're going to have a high GDP. 227 00:09:04,253 --> 00:09:06,253 It's going to make spending go up. 228 00:09:06,253 --> 00:09:07,051 If spending goes up, 229 00:09:07,051 --> 00:09:08,156 you have a multiplier effect. 230 00:09:08,156 --> 00:09:10,127 It makes our equilibrium output go up. 231 00:09:10,127 --> 00:09:12,460 Low interest rate, high real GDP, 232 00:09:12,460 --> 00:09:15,125 so you have a curve that relates. 233 00:09:15,125 --> 00:09:18,031 If you want to relate real GDP to real interest rates 234 00:09:18,031 --> 00:09:19,726 you get a curve like this, 235 00:09:19,726 --> 00:09:21,697 and it's called the IS curve. 236 00:09:21,697 --> 00:09:24,526 IS comes for investment savings. 237 00:09:24,526 --> 00:09:26,531 We're really more focused on the I part of it, 238 00:09:26,531 --> 00:09:27,927 the way we analyzed here. 239 00:09:27,927 --> 00:09:30,364 The whole reason, based on the logic in this video 240 00:09:30,364 --> 00:09:31,865 and the last one as well, 241 00:09:31,865 --> 00:09:33,994 the whole reason why we have this relationship 242 00:09:33,994 --> 00:09:37,793 is due to real interest rates impact on investment. 243 00:09:37,793 --> 00:09:39,326 When you have high real interest rates, 244 00:09:39,326 --> 00:09:41,031 you don't have much investment. 245 00:09:41,031 --> 00:09:45,531 Also, you'll be sapping out of GDP. 246 00:09:45,531 --> 00:09:47,125 If you lower interest rates, 247 00:09:47,125 --> 00:09:50,260 then that makes you end up having a lot more investment, 248 00:09:50,260 --> 00:09:51,260 like we saw in the last video. 249 00:09:51,260 --> 00:09:53,793 That will expand GDP by the multiplier 250 00:09:53,793 --> 00:09:57,000 that we see right over there.